1 Legal Status of Judges in the Czech Republic - Disciplinary Liability Summary This diploma thesis focuses on the disciplinary liability of judges in the Czech Republic. The introduction of the thesis describes judiciary legislation and the individual responsibilities of a judge in performing judicial duties. The next part defines disciplinary liability and its legal nature and it also mentions the relationship of liability for damages and disciplinary liability. The third part focuses on the course of disciplinary proceedings and the structure of the disciplinary court that deals with disciplinary offences. Next, the fourth part offers a practical view on the individual disciplinary offences. The final part describes disciplinary measures and concentrates on one of them in particular - the concept of complaints of minor imperfection. The conclusion summarizes the findings and provides a comprehensive overview of the disciplinary liability of judges in the Czech Republic. The whole issue is examined mainly in terms of current legislation. Keywords Disciplinary liability of a judge. Judge. Disciplinary proceedings.

Lorsque le sportif professionnel exerce son activité en tant que salarié, il devrait disposer d’un contrat de travail classique soumis au droit commun. Toutefois, la spécificité du monde sportif complexifie les rapports contractuels que peut entretenir un sportif. En effet, la discontinuité des rapports contractuels, conséquence des transferts et prêts dont peuvent faire l’objet des joueurs, ou encore la règlementation sportive mise en place par les autorités sportives font que le législateur a dû s’adapter pour répondre correctement à l’originalité du monde sportif. Il a ainsi introduit, par le biais de la loi du 27 novembre 2015, le contrat à durée déterminée spécifique pour les sportifs et entraîneurs professionnels qui a permis de mettre fin à une incertitude juridique. Mais la spécificité du sport est également liée au rapport délicat qui existe entre les règles purement sportives et la législation étatique. La règlementation antidopage illustre parfaitement ce propos car il n’a vocation à s’appliquer que dans le monde du sport. Ainsi, pour préserver l’équité des manifestations sportives, il a été nécessaire de définir la notion de dopage mais surtout de rendre la lutte internationale en obligeant les différents États à intégrer les règlements en la matière au sein de leurs législations. La rencontre de ces différentes autorités permet d’expliquer la complexité du traitement juridique d’un fait de dopage d’un sportif. En effet, le sportif professionnel va faire face à plusieurs procédures qui peuvent entrer en conflit les uns avec les autres. La première est celle qui se tiendra devant la justice fédérale qui peuvent prononcer une sanction sportive. Les co-contractants du sportif peuvent également introduire une action afin d’obtenir réparation de leurs préjudices. Finalement, il est nécessaire de prendre en compte la possibilité que des poursuites pénales puissent être engagé à l’encontre du sportif qui se rend responsable d’un fait de dopage. / When the professionnal sportsman carry out his activity as an employee, he should have a classic work contract subject to the ordinary law. However, the specificity of the sports world further complicate the contractual relationship that the sportsman can have. Indeed, the discontinuity of the contractual relations, resulting of the players’ transfers and loans, or the rules governing sport implimented by the sports authorithies have forced the legislator to adapt himself and to take in account the uniqueness of the sports world. He thus incorporated, through the law of 27th november 2015, a specific fixed-term contract for the professionnal sportsmen and trainers which has put an end to the legal uncertainty. But the specificity of sport is also linked to the delicate balance existing between the purely sporting rules and the state legislation. The anti-doping regulation is a good example of this because it is intended to apply only in the sports world. Therefore, to preserve the fairness during the sport events, is was necessary to define the notion of doping but especially to make the fight international by forcing the different states to adopt the regulations into their legislations. The meeting between these different autorities can explain the complexity of the legal treatment of a doping case. Indeed, the professionnal sportsman will face different procedures who can be in conflict with each other. The first one is the procedure held before the federal justice who can pronounce a sporting sanction. The other contracting partners of the sportsman can also introduce an action to obtain redress for the injury caused. Finally, it is necessary to take in account the possibility that criminal proceedings are taken against the sportsman who is guilty of a doping case.

The aim of this thesis called "Disciplinary liability of health care professionals, relationship to criminal liability" is to analyse and compare criminal and disciplinary liability in medicine and outline their relationship. Considering its topicality and interdisciplinary character, I found this matter to be very inspiring. Although the medical liability issue seems to be very popular and frequently discussed subject, there are some aspects and problems that need to be sorted out in order to provide the doctors with a minimal standard of legal certainity. The thesis is composed of five chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of any kind of liability rising out of medical profession. First chapter is subdivided into four parts briefly describing civil, labour, administrative and contractual liability relating to medicine. Chapter two focuses on criminal liability of doctors and composes of eight parts. First two parts reffer to the risk of fault, that any doctor can cause, and the ultima ratio principle. Part three illustrates the conditions of criminal liability. Part four adressess the issue of circumstances excluding illegality in medicine. Part five and six present the nature of medical intervention and define the term of health care professionals. Part seven and eight deals...

In the paper Legal Liability from the Point of View of Normativist and Democratic Law Concepts concept of liability is briefly described. Social liability and its kinds are analysed. Legal liability is distinguished like a separate kind from the social liability, featuring a unique obligatory legal definition sign. Its application is assured by the state. Kinds of legal liability analysed: positive and tortious (negative) legal liability. Basis for occurrence of legal liability are described. Dependence of the legal liability upon the legal system of a state is described in the paper. In the non-democratic states, where the laws become a tool for the rulers to give law to the masses, other kinds of social liability, e.g. moral liability, contradict with the legal liability. All kinds of the social liability, except the legal liability, feature no forced measures applicable upon the violator. It is stressed that the non-democratic legal systems fail to accept the positive legal liability. Unsuccessful efforts of the Soviet law theoreticians to introduce the concept of positive legal liability into the law science are mentioned. Tortious legal liability is a sequel and guarantee of the positive liability. Therefore it is the secondary and the positive liability is the primary (main) form of the legal liability. It becomes especially vivid in the democratic society, when its right ceases being repressive and implementation of the positive law is first of all assured by the... [to full text]