Masters of Science / Radon (222Rn) has been identified as an important factor that could result in a health hazard by studies all around the world. The health risks can be minimised by preventive measures where radon is highly concentrated as in some mines and homes. A study in the diffusion of the inert gas, will give us a better understanding of its possible pathways through soil into the air surrounding mine dumps where the radon releases can become hazardous. Measuring and modelling the radon concentrations in the mine dump soil, can help to deduce the radon flux to identify the problem areas for rehabilitation especially in the cases of gold and uranium mine tailings.

Over the course of normal oil well operations, pipes used downhole in the oil and petroleum industry tend to accumulate a mineral deposit on their interior, which restricts the flow of oil. This deposit, termed scale, will eventually occlude the interior diameter of the pipe making removal from service and descaling a cost effective option. The pipes are sent to cleaning yards where they remain until descaling can be performed. This storage period can potentially create a health concern not only because of the external radiation exposure but also because of the radon gas emissions, both of which are due to the radioactive minerals contained in the scale. It was believed that the structure of the scale is formed tightly enough to prevent much of the radon from becoming airborne. The goal of this research was to determine the emanation fractions for the rattled scale samples from three formations. A high purity germanium detector was used to measure the activities of the parents and progeny of radon, and electret ion chambers were used to measure the concentration of radon emanated from the scale. The emanation fractions of between 4.9x10-5 and 1.08x10-3 for radon were a factor of approximately 100 smaller than previous research results. For thoron, the fractions were and 5.72x10-8 and 4.92x10-7 for thoron with no previous research to compare. However, information that pertains to the temperature dependence of emanation was included in this research and was not available for previous, similar research. Therefore, differences in the environment (e.g., temperature, humidity, etc.) in which the previous experiments were conducted, as well as differences in the scale formation types used, could account for the discrepancy. In addition, measuring the emanation fractions of the rattled scale was a method of determining whether surface to volume ratio dependence existed. After acquiring the emanation fractions, insufficient evidence of any surface to volume ratio dependence could be found.

Over the course of normal oil well operations, pipes used downhole in the oil and petroleum industry tend to accumulate a mineral deposit on their interior, which restricts the flow of oil. This deposit, termed scale, will eventually occlude the interior diameter of the pipe making removal from service and descaling a cost effective option. The pipes are sent to cleaning yards where they remain until descaling can be performed. This storage period can potentially create a health concern not only because of the external radiation exposure but also because of the radon gas emissions, both of which are due to the radioactive minerals contained in the scale. It was believed that the structure of the scale is formed tightly enough to prevent much of the radon from becoming airborne. The goal of this research was to determine the emanation fractions for the rattled scale samples from three formations. A high purity germanium detector was used to measure the activities of the parents and progeny of radon, and electret ion chambers were used to measure the concentration of radon emanated from the scale. The emanation fractions of between 4.9x10-5 and 1.08x10-3 for radon were a factor of approximately 100 smaller than previous research results. For thoron, the fractions were and 5.72x10-8 and 4.92x10-7 for thoron with no previous research to compare. However, information that pertains to the temperature dependence of emanation was included in this research and was not available for previous, similar research. Therefore, differences in the environment (e.g., temperature, humidity, etc.) in which the previous experiments were conducted, as well as differences in the scale formation types used, could account for the discrepancy. In addition, measuring the emanation fractions of the rattled scale was a method of determining whether surface to volume ratio dependence existed. After acquiring the emanation fractions, insufficient evidence of any surface to volume ratio dependence could be found.

There are no public records that give an idea of how much emanation monitoring is actually taking place. However, there are a few data points that lead us to believe there is a real threat. One of these is that TEMPEST industry is over a billion dollars a year business. Reports like the ”Redefining Security” by Joint Security Commission stated that electronic equipment such as computers, printers, and electronic typewriters give off electromagnetic emanations and that this has long been a concern for various industries. An attacker using the latest and most efficient equipment can monitor and retrieve classified or sensitive information as it is being processed without the user being aware that a loss is occurring. But new information states that the attacker doesn’t need to have access to the latest equipment. This master thesis is based on the three statements below:  It exists a cheap and simple TEMPEST technique that is a security risk.  A downloadable TEMPEST virus is a powerful tool when conducting TEMPEST attacks.  It does not exist a cheap and simple solution that protects common users from TEMPEST attacks. In the experiment I use a program called Tempest_for_eliza and a simple Philips radio receiver. In this thesis I prove that it exist a TEMPEST technique, that is cheap and relatively simple and still is a security risk. I prove this with facts from literature studies and an experiment. Today there is only one way to protect yourself against TEMPEST attacks and that is by metal shielding. This is expensive and home users have the option but not often the resources to finance this type of protection.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-10-09T12:29:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 / Made available in DSpace on 2014-10-09T14:00:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 00374.pdf: 1851667 bytes, checksum: eb55ab298cfe6ea72073a36c84226d72 (MD5) / Dissertacao (Mestrado) / IEA/D / Instituto de Energia Atomica - IEA

The objective of my diploma thesis was to determine the ecological impact of zinc and copper on the dairy and beef cattle breeding in the South-West Bohemia region at the farms located in the Šumava Protected Landscape Area, at the elevation from 750 m to 1070 m. The research included 4 cattle breeding farms, Posobice and Nemilkov {--} dairy cattle, and Hartmanice, Keple {--} beef cattle. In my thesis, I first evaluate the importance of zinc and copper as important mineral matters and their overall influence of the cattle organism. Furthermore, I evaluate their manifestations when these matters are lacking or in surplus in the organism. The final part of the thesis comprises two areas of findings. The first part focuses on the total intake in feed and mineral additives, the level of their content in blood plasma and their quantity excreted by cattle in the individual dairy and beef cattle breeding farms specified above. The second part researches the release of zinc and copper to the environment.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-10-09T12:29:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 / Made available in DSpace on 2014-10-09T14:00:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 00374.pdf: 1851667 bytes, checksum: eb55ab298cfe6ea72073a36c84226d72 (MD5) / Dissertacao (Mestrado) / IEA/D / Instituto de Energia Atomica - IEA

Avicenna argues that the celestial spheres each have a soul, termed the motive soul, which is emanated by the first celestial intellect––a body of knowledge which knows itself. Despite outlining the powers of the motive soul, Avicenna does not formally investigate the psychology of the spheres nor their volition. Rather, he presents their volition as a mystery and leaves it to posterity to solve. In an attempt to resolve this mystery, I will argue that it is a direct result of Avicenna having purposefully written a repeated gap into his account of emanation such that there is no clear account of the generation of the material which composes the sphere of the heavens; after clarifying the account of emanation by demonstrating that the sphere has a direct connection to the emanating intellect, I will make the plausible argument that estimation has an intellectual volition insofar as it as it possesses a shared similarity with the practical intellect such that its volition is of the same species of volition: intellectual rather than psychological.

Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā, 980–1037) entwickelt vornehmlich in Kapitel I.5 und ergänzend in den Kapiteln V.1 und 2 seiner Metaphysik (al-Ilāhiyyāt) – dem vierten Teil seiner philosophischen Summe Buch der Heilung (Kitāb al-Šifāʾ) – den Grundgedanken seiner Ontologie: die Distinktion von Sein und Wesen. Diese Lehre hat er als erster Denker zu einer eigenständigen ontologischen Theorie ausgearbeitet und auf ihrer Basis eine Modalontologie entwickelt. Sie sollte zu einem seiner bekanntesten und einflussreichsten Lehrstücke werden – nicht nur in der arabischen und hebräischen Tradition, sondern auch in der lateinischen. Für Gelehrte, die von einer monotheistischen Weltanschauung geprägt sind, liegt die enorme Attraktivität der avicennischen Ontologie darin, dass sich aus der Sein-Wesen-Distinktion rein rational die wichtigsten Aspekte der Beziehung ableiten lassen, in der Gott und Welt zueinander stehen, wenn man diese Beziehung im Hinblick auf das Sein betrachtet. Mit der Übernahme der Ontologie Avicennas vermag man als christlicher Denker das eigene Modell der Wirklichkeit rational-argumentativ zu begründen, ohne in Autoritätsargumenten auf die Offenbarung zurückgreifen zu müssen. Dies kommt dem Modell insofern zugute, als die rationale Fundierung dazu dient, es zu stärken und den Glauben mittels der Vernunft besser zu begreifen – freilich ohne ihn dadurch zu rechtfertigen. Angesichts der Tatsache, dass Avicennas Ontologie bei den lateinischen Denkern stark rezipiert wurde, stellt sich für mich die zentrale Frage, die ich in dieser Arbeit verfolge: Wie weit kann man als christlicher Denker mit Avicenna gehen, wenn man dessen Ontologie her-anzieht, um das Verhältnis von Gott und Welt zu erklären? Mich interessiert vor allem, an welchen Stellen und aus welchen Motiven ein Denker Modifikationen an der avicennischen Theorie vornimmt, sie anders als andere interpretiert oder gänzlich mit ihr bricht. Was be-deuten diese Änderungen inhaltlich? Und insbesondere: Wie werden sie rational gerechtfertigt? Da Ontologie, Theologie und Kosmogonie miteinander verschränkt sind, wirken sich grundlegende Annahmen der Ontologie auch auf die beiden anderen Bereiche aus. Diese Auswirkungen nehme ich ebenfalls in den Blick. Meine Fragen trage ich an die Theorien dreier ausgewählter Denker der lateinisch-christlichen Tradition heran: Dominicus Gundisalvi († ca. 1190), Wilhelm von Auvergne (†1249) und Heinrich von Gent (†1293). Alle drei Denker sind in unterschiedliche Phasen der Rezeption von Avicennas Metaphysik im lateinischen Westen zu verorten. Für jeden Autor untersuche ich zunächst, inwiefern seine Ontologie von Avicennas Lehre beeinflusst ist und in welchem Verhältnis Gott und Welt zueinander stehen. Ausgehend davon verfolge ich anschließend, in wie weit der jeweilige Denker das in der Ontologie entwickelte Konzept eines durch sich selbst notwendig Seienden für Gott von Avicenna übernimmt und wie er die Spannungen zwischen avicennischer und christlicher Lehre zu lösen versucht, die sich beispielsweise hinsichtlich der Trinitätstheologie ergeben. Sodann lege ich dar, wie sich die einzelnen Autoren im Unterschied zu Avicenna Gottes Wirken ad extra vorstellen, auf welche Weise sie ihr eigenes Modell rechtfertigen und damit verbunden Avicenna kritisieren. Umgekehrt werde ich ausgehend von Avicennas Standpunkt die Lehren der christlichen Denker kritisch befragen. Die Kapitel meiner Arbeit widmen sich jeweils einem Autor und sind meiner Fragestellung entsprechend parallel zueinander in einen Abschnitt zur Ontologie, Theologie und Kosmogonie unterteilt. / Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā, 980–1037) is famous for his ontology, in which he introduces the distinction of essence and existence and combines it with a modal theory. Based on this theory, he develops the following model of reality in a purely rational way, without relying on religious authority: On the one hand, there is a first principle that serves as both the efficient and final cause of the universe and can be identified with God. It is a necessary existent through itself (wāǧib al-wuǧūd bi-ḏātihī; necesse esse per se) that is able to exist out of itself alone, since essence and existence coincide in it. This characterization applies exclusively to the first principle. All other beings – the world as a whole as well as every single entity in it – are only possible existents through themselves (mumkin al-wuǧūd bi-ḏātihī, possibile esse per se), since their essences do not include existence. They are contingent beings, which means that their existence (and non-existence) is completely dependent on a cause. However, a cause that is only responsible for their coming into existence is not enough. Rather, during the whole duration of their actual existence, they need an external metaphysical efficient cause that coexists with them and permanently bestows existence upon them, since they never lose their essential disposition as possible existents in themselves. The chain of metaphysical efficient causes ends in the necessary existent through itself, God. Therefore, one can conclude that the world, with respect to its existence, is totally dependent on God. In addition to permanently bestowing being upon all worldly entities, he is responsible for the order of the cosmos, i.e., the formal structure of the world. Avicenna provides a detailed ontological and cosmological analysis in the Metaphysics (al-Ilāhiyyāt) of his philosophical summa Kitāb al-Šifāʾ (Book of the Healing). The Metaphysics was translated into Latin in the twelfth century as Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina. From then on, Latin Christian thinkers had access to Avicenna’s doctrines. They were attracted to his ontology, since in the model of reality described above, which can be developed based on this ontology, the relationship between God and the world corresponds to Christian faith. Taking over Avicenna’s ontology allows Christian thinkers to explain and demonstrate their own model of reality in a purely rational manner. In this way, they strengthen their own theory and show that reason does not contradict faith. Therefore, it is not surprising that Avicenna’s ontology became highly successful among Latin Christian thinkers. Since ontology provides the basic view of reality, it is not a theory that stands alone. Rather, it has an impact on other areas, such as theology and cosmogony. For example, Avicenna’s view of God and the way in which God causes the world’s existence are directly dependent on the ontological dispositions developed for the necessary existent through itself. Concerning the reception of Avicenna’s teachings among Latin thinkers, the main question of my dissertation is as follows: How far can a Christian thinker follow Avicenna when taking over the latter’s ontology to explain the relationship between God and the world? I am mainly interested in analysing where and why a given thinker modifies Avicenna’s theory or interprets it differently from other thinkers, and especially in finding out which rational justifications are provided for the modifications and interpretations. My analysis is based on the works of three Medieval Christian thinkers: Dominicus Gundisalvi (†ca. 1190), William of Auvergne (†1249), and Henry of Ghent (†1293). Each of them represents a different phase in the reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics and deals with Avicenna in a different way. A separate chapter is dedicated to each author, with each chapter divided into sections on ontology, theology, and cosmogony. / Wie weit kann ein christlicher Denker Avicenna folgen, wenn er dessen Ontologie zur Erklärung des Verhältnisses von Gott und Welt heranzieht? Dieser zentralen Frage der Avicenna-Rezeption widmet sich die vorliegende Arbeit. Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā, 980–1037) entwickelt in der Metaphysik (al-Ilāhiyyāt) – dem vierten Teil seiner philosophischen Summe Buch der Heilung (Kitāb al-Šifāʾ) – den Grundgedanken seiner Ontologie: die Distinktion von Sein und Wesen, die zu einem seiner bekanntesten und einflussreichsten Lehrstücke wurde. Nach der lateinischen Übersetzung von Avicennas Metaphysik im zwölften Jahrhundert fand die darin entworfene Ontologie rasche Verbreitung unter den lateinisch-christlichen Gelehrten. Für deren monotheistische Weltanschauung war diese Lehre insofern attraktiv, als sich aus der Sein-Wesen-Distinktion die wichtigsten ontologischen Aspekte der Beziehung von Gott und Welt rein rational ableiten lassen. Vor diesem Hintergrund stellt sich die genannte Frage, wie weit ein christlicher Denker mit Avicenna gehen kann, wenn er dessen Ontologie heranzieht, um das Verhältnis von Gott und Welt zu erklären. Diese Frage untersucht die Autorin für die drei Gelehrten Dominicus Gundisalvi († nach 1190), Wilhelm von Auvergne († 1249) und Heinrich von Gent († 1293). Die Verschränkung von Ontologie, Theologie und Kosmogonie gibt der Autorin die Möglichkeit, für diese drei Bereiche jeweils herauszuarbeiten, an welchen Stellen und aus welchen Motiven Modifikationen an der avicennischen Theorie vorgenommen wurden, um sie eigenen Zwecken oder neuen Kontexten wie der Trinitätstheologie anzupassen. Zugleich zeigt sie auf, an welchen Punkten mit Avicennas Theorie gänzlich gebrochen wurde. Was bedeuten diese Änderungen und Brüche inhaltlich? Und insbesondere: Wie werden sie rational gerechtfertigt?

The aim of this study has been to clarify how the radiumdistribution in soils affects the radon emanation. Thedistribution of radium, uranium and thorium has been determinedusing sequential extractions. In the study, soils from twodifferent locations were investigated. In the first part the applicability of the sequentialextraction method for determining Ra distribution in differentsoil types was investigated, using a simple sequentialextraction method. Sampled soils were clay, sand and till fromthe vicinity of the Stockholm Esker. The main part of Rnemanating Ra was associated with Fe oxides in the soil. Themethods applied provided information about the radon risk ofthe soil, but, inorder to gain more information on theprocesses governing Ra distribution and radon emanation insoils, a more detailed sequential extraction procedure would bedesirable. The second part consisted of a detailed study of theradionuclide distribution and the geochemistry in a podzolisedglacial till from Kloten in northern Västmanland. A moredetailed sequential extraction procedure was used, and thespecific surface area of samples was measured. Samples weretaken from E, B, and C horizons; radium and thorium wereenriched in the B horizon, whereas uranium had its maximumconcentration in the C horizon. Extractable radium primarilyoccurred in the exchangeable pool, possibly organicallycomplexed, whereas extractable uranium and thorium were mainlyFe oxide bound. Oxide-bound Ra was important only in the Bhorizon. The radon emanation was not correlated with the amountof exchangeable Ra, but instead with the oxide bound Ra.However, the amount of oxide-bound Ra was too small to accountfor all the emanated Rn, thus, exchangeable Ra was interpretedas the main source of emanated Rn. This exchangeable Ra wasmore emanative in the B horizon than in the C horizon. Theexplanation is the larger surface area of the B horizonsamples; the specific surface area appears to be the maingoverning parameter for Rn emanation in this soil. The surfacearea is largely created by the precipitation of amorphous Feoxides, thus, Fe oxides has a significant effect on Rnemanation. Comparing the two studies, the Stockholm samples had thesame amounts of oxide-bound Fe and surface-bound Ra. Still theradon emanation was much smaller for these samples than in theKloten soil. The amount of organic matter in the B horizon ofthe Kloten soil is however, much larger than the organic mattercontent in the Stockholm samples. It is suggested that thelarge Rn emanation in the B horizon of Kloten is caused by thecombined effect of Fe oxides and organic matter. The variability of226Ra distribution in soils was also investigated.The226Ra distribution was determined for samples from60-70 cm and 80-90 cm depth, from three adjacent soil profilesin a podzolic glacial till. Ra distributions, and estimationsof Rn risk based on the Ra distributions, of a single soilprofile, are likely to be representative for a similar area,provided that the samples are taken from a sufficientdepth. KEYWORDS: distribution, emanation, extraction, glacial till,podzol, Ra, radium, radon, Rn, sequential soil, spodosol, Th,thorium, U, uranium, variability