No description available.

Nitrogen is the most frequently limiting nutrient in southern pine plantations.  Previous studies found that only 10 to 25% of applied urea fertilizer N is taken up by trees.  Enhanced efficiency fertilizers could increase tree uptake efficiency by controlling the release of N and/or stabilize N.  Three enhanced efficiency fertilizers were selected as a representation of fertilizers that could be used in forestry: 1) NBPT treated urea (NBPT urea), 2) polymer coated urea (PC urea), and 3) monoammonium phosphate coated NBPT treated urea (MC NBPT urea). Urea, MC NBPT urea, and NBPT urea fertilizer treatments showed an extractable NH4+ spike 14 days after fertilization while the polymer coated urea showed a spike in NH4+ 49 days after fertilization. Total ecosystem recovery of fertilizer in each treatment was; MC NBPT urea, 51.29 g N; NBPT urea, 48.87 g N; urea, 45.09 g N; and PC urea, 31.30 g N which represents 78.7%, 74.7%, 72.1%, and 47.6% respectively of the total N applied.  For the MC NBPT urea, NBPT urea, and PC urea treatments the largest sinks for N were the forest floor and mineral soil.  The largest sink for fertilizer applied N in the urea treatment was in the tree.  The 2011 foliage cohort was the largest sinks for fertilizer N recovered by the tree.  N volatilization was around 20% for all fertilizer treatments except polymer coated fertilizer, which was 1.1%.  Urea preformed the same as the soluble enhanced efficiency fertilizers and better than the PC urea fertilizer.  The results emphasize the importance of climatic conditions on fertilizer release and effectiveness. / Master of Science

Nitrogen (N) fertilizer application constitutes a major portion of farmers' cost of production since N is the most applied nutrient in U.S. cotton production. Despite this, N uptake and use efficiency (NUE) in cotton remains below 50%, which presents challenges of environmental quality. Studies were conducted across 4 states in the US Cotton Belt with the overall objective of evaluating strategies to reduce loss of N to the environment, increase N uptake and NUE. The first study had two objectives: 1) compare NH3 volatilization from surface versus subsurface application/placement of granular (urea) and fluid N source (urea ammonium nitrate; UAN32); and 2) compare NH3 volatilization from urea and UAN treated with enhanced-efficiency fertilizer products. For this study, four A horizon soils of different types were collected from four sites in Virginia (VA), Georgia (GA), Tennessee (TN), and Texas (TX). The EEF products were N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), nitrapyrin, and ESN. In the first set of experiments (N placement experiments), it was found that across soil types, subsurface placement of granular N source reduced NH3 volatilization by 58 – 81% and subsurface placement of UAN reduced NH3 volatilization by 56 – 98%. In the second set of experiments (EEF experiments), it was found that NBPT reduced NH3 volatilization by 5 – 77% across soil types, and the highest reduction in losses by NBPT was observed on sandier and low CEC soils. Treating urea with both nitrapyrin and NBPT was more effective at reducing NH3 volatilization compared to treating urea with nitrapyrin alone. Based on our findings, subsurface application of granular and fluid N sources is recommended as strategy to reduce NH3 volatilization. Where subsurface placement is not possible, EEF products should be considered. The objectives of the second study were: 1) determine the effects of small grain and legume cover crops on N cycling; 2) evaluate the effects of cover crops and N fertilization on N uptake; and 3) evaluate the effects of cover crops on lint yield. Cover crops were winter fallow (winter weeds), small grain [cereal rye (Secale cereale)], legume mix [(50% crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum): 50% hairy vetch (Vicia villosa)], and legume mix + rye [(67% legume mix:33% hairy vetch)]. Fertilizer N application rates were 0, 45, 90, and 135 kg ha-1. Soil inorganic N in the top 30 cm depths of the legume mix and legume mix + rye plots was consistently higher than in the rye lone or fallow plots. Cotton lint yield following legume mix with 45 kg ha-1 fertilizer N application was comparable to following fallow plots with 135 kg N ha-1. Thus, fertilizer N rate could considerably be reduced when cotton follows legume cover crops. The objectives of the third study were: 1) evaluate urea and UAN placement (broadcast, dribbling, and injection) on lint yield and fiber quality of three cotton maturity groups (early-, mid-, and full-maturity); (2) assess N use and agronomic efficiencies as influenced by N source, rate, and placement; (3) evaluate the impact of N source and placement on fiber quality. A study including 9 site-years studies was conducted in VA, GA, and TX. It was found that placement had no effect on yield in VA, had effect in all 3 years in TX, and had effect in 1 year in GA. Yield responded to N application in 8 out of 9 site-years in this study. Nitrogen use efficiency was highest among the early- and mid-season varieties. Overall, N rate and variety, rather than application/placement strategy, had the most pronounced effects on lint yield. / Doctor of Philosophy / Nitrogen (N) is usually the major limiting nutrient in cotton production and represents a significant cost of production. On average, the current proportion of applied N recovered in the aboveground crop biomass, (i.e., nitrogen use efficiency, or NUE) ranges from 33 – 50%, meaning that up to two-thirds of applied N is not recovered by crops. This unrecovered N not only represents economic loss to growers, but acts as a potential pollutant in the environment. There is a need for practices which increase N uptake in cotton production, agronomic efficiency, and environmental sustainability. Previous studies conducted outside the U.S. Cotton Belt reported that NUE is influenced by N source and rate of application. Data on NUE of contemporary cotton varieties utilized in the humid and semi-arid regions of the U.S. Cotton Belt would prove useful in efficient N management in the region. First study evaluated gaseous N loss from fertilizer application. It was found that subsurface placement of granular urea reduced NH3 loss as much as 58 – 81% compared to surface broadcast granular urea and subsurface placement of fluid N source reduced NH3 loss by 56 – 98%. In a second study, N rate and method of application/placement were evaluated. Here, it was found that N rate and cotton variety, rather than application/placement strategy had a more pronounced effect on cotton yield. Lastly, the potential of cover crops as alternate N source in cotton production was investigated. It was found that cotton yield following legume mix and fertilized with 45 kg of N per hectare was comparable with cotton yield following no cover crop and fertilized with 135 kg of N per hectare. The results of these studies indicate that subsurface placement of granular and fluid N sources can reduce NH3 loss. In addition, all other things being equal, choosing the right cotton variety as well as applying the right N rate are critical for yield. Furthermore, by growing cotton after legume cover crops, N fertilizer application rates can be significantly reduced.

Blends of controlled release and stabilized nitrogen (N) fertilizer represent an alternative to provide N at all corn growth stages, and is an option to reduce costs compared to the use of solely controlled release N. In this context, field experiments were conducted in Southeast Brazil with the use of a blend of polymer-sulfur coated urea (PSCU) and NBPT-treated urea (NBPTU) at a 70:30 ratio, applied at corn planting and incorporated into the soil. The objectives of the study were: i) to quantify and measure each fertilizer-derived N fate in the plants, and determine the nitrogen recovery efficiency of each N source in the blend; ii) to evaluate corn grain yield response to N rates (blend) in contrasting cropping systems, and to assess the posibility of reducing N rate when applying a blend of two enhanced efficiency N fertilizers compared to the application of regular urea; iii) understand and monitor changes in plant biomass and N uptake during the growing season. Fertilizer N contributed with less than 50% of the total plant N uptake at all evaluated corn growth stages (V4, V12, R2, and R6). At V4 growth stage, most of the N in the plant derived from fertilizer (NPDF) was provided by NBPTU, while later in the season, most of the NPDF was provided by PSCU. At harvest, most of the plant N was allocated in the grains (59%). Of the total plant N, 64% was supplied by the native soil N pool, 26% was provided by PSCU, and 10% by NBPTU. Therefore, NBPTU provided N to corn early in the season, while PSCU played a crucial role supplying N later in the season, as plants demand for N increased. Soil N was the main N source at all GS and this fraction decreased as N rate increased. At harvest, 64% of the total plant N was derived from the soil native N pool, 26% derived from PSCU, and 10% from urea. The measured fertilizer NRE of urea was in average 36%, and the estimated NUE from PSCU was 51%. In the second study, corn grain yield varied between sites, probably due to soil and climate characteristics of each site. Corn grain yield, N uptake, and biomass production were greatly impacted by fertilizer N. Grain yield and N uptake showed a quadratic response to N rates (blend). The blend of PSCU and NBPTU, applied at corn planting and incorporated into the soil proved to be a great strategy to attain yields at N rates below those needed when using regular urea. The third chapter focused on corn biomass and N uptake and partitioning throughout the growing season, and it was demonstrated that the amount of N uptake after flowering can reach up to 50% of the total plant N, thus, N availability must be guaranteed in late vegetative corn growth stages, and especially in the reproductive stages, which can be achieved by adopting enhanced efficiency N fertilizers such as the blend of PSCU and NBPTU used in this study. / A mistura de fertilizantes nitrogenados de liberação controlada e estabilizados representa uma alternativa para fornecer nitrogênio (N) em todos os estádios da cultura do milho, além de ser uma opção válida para reduzir custos em comparação ao uso exclusivo de produtos de liberação controlada. Neste sentido, conduziram-se experimentos de campo na região Sudeste do Brasil com a aplicação de um blend de ureia revestida com enxofre e polímeros (UREP) e ureia tratada com NBPT (U-NBPT), na proporção 70:30, aplicada na semeadura do milho, de forma incorporada. Os objetivos do trabalho foram: i) avaliar o destino do N dentro das plantas de milho proveniente dos fertilizantes misturados e determinar a eficiência de recuperação de cada um; ii) avaliar a resposta do rendimento de grãos de milho a doses de N (blend) em sistemas de produção contrastantes e avaliar a possibilidade de reduzir as doses de N quando aplicado o blend em comparação à ureia convencional; iii) entender e monitorar as mudanças da biomassa e o nitrogênio dentro das plantas de milho ao longo do ciclo da cultura. No primeiro estudo, o N na planta proveniente da UREP, da U-NBPT, e do solo (N-Solo) variaram ao longo do ciclo do milho. Contudo os fertilizantes nitrogenados contribuiram com menos de 50% do N total da planta em todos os estadios avaliados (V4, V12, R2 e R6). No estádio V4, a maior parte do N na planta proveniente de fertilizante (NPPF) foi fornecido pela U-NBPT, enquanto que nos estadios seguintes, a maior parte do NPPF foi fornecido pela UREP. O N-Solo foi o maior fornecedor de N para a planta, mas a contribuição diminuiu com o aumento das doses de N. Na colheita, 59% do total do N da planta foi alocado nos grãos. Do total de N da planta, 64% foi proveniente do N-Solo, 26% foi fornecido pela UREP, e 10% pela U-NBPT. A eficiência de recuperação da UREP e U-NBPT foram, respectivamente, 51 e 36%. No segundo estudo, o rendimento de grãos de milho variou entre locais, provavelmente devido às condições edafo-climáticas de cada área experimental. A aplicação do fertilizante nitrogenado influenciou o rendimento de grãos de milho, a produção de biomassa e acúmulo de N em todos os locais. O rendimento de grãos e acúmulo de N mostraram uma resposta quadrática às doses de N (blend). A incorporação do blend de UREP e U-NBPT na semeadura do milho mostrou-se como uma ótima estratégia para evitar perdas massivas de N e mostrou que pode atingir produtividade similar a ureia convencional com doses de N menores. O terceiro capítulo, com foco no acúmulo e particionamento da biomassa e N nas plantas de milho ao longo do ciclo, desmonstrou que a quantidade de N absorvido após o florescimento pode chegar a 50% do total de N acumulado nas plantas, pelo que adequada disponibilidade de N deve ser garantida nos estádios vegetativos finais e nos estádios reprodutivos da cultura do milho, o que pode ser conseguido com o uso de misturas de UREP e U-NBPT.

Blends of controlled release and stabilized nitrogen (N) fertilizer represent an alternative to provide N at all corn growth stages, and is an option to reduce costs compared to the use of solely controlled release N. In this context, field experiments were conducted in Southeast Brazil with the use of a blend of polymer-sulfur coated urea (PSCU) and NBPT-treated urea (NBPTU) at a 70:30 ratio, applied at corn planting and incorporated into the soil. The objectives of the study were: i) to quantify and measure each fertilizer-derived N fate in the plants, and determine the nitrogen recovery efficiency of each N source in the blend; ii) to evaluate corn grain yield response to N rates (blend) in contrasting cropping systems, and to assess the posibility of reducing N rate when applying a blend of two enhanced efficiency N fertilizers compared to the application of regular urea; iii) understand and monitor changes in plant biomass and N uptake during the growing season. Fertilizer N contributed with less than 50% of the total plant N uptake at all evaluated corn growth stages (V4, V12, R2, and R6). At V4 growth stage, most of the N in the plant derived from fertilizer (NPDF) was provided by NBPTU, while later in the season, most of the NPDF was provided by PSCU. At harvest, most of the plant N was allocated in the grains (59%). Of the total plant N, 64% was supplied by the native soil N pool, 26% was provided by PSCU, and 10% by NBPTU. Therefore, NBPTU provided N to corn early in the season, while PSCU played a crucial role supplying N later in the season, as plants demand for N increased. Soil N was the main N source at all GS and this fraction decreased as N rate increased. At harvest, 64% of the total plant N was derived from the soil native N pool, 26% derived from PSCU, and 10% from urea. The measured fertilizer NRE of urea was in average 36%, and the estimated NUE from PSCU was 51%. In the second study, corn grain yield varied between sites, probably due to soil and climate characteristics of each site. Corn grain yield, N uptake, and biomass production were greatly impacted by fertilizer N. Grain yield and N uptake showed a quadratic response to N rates (blend). The blend of PSCU and NBPTU, applied at corn planting and incorporated into the soil proved to be a great strategy to attain yields at N rates below those needed when using regular urea. The third chapter focused on corn biomass and N uptake and partitioning throughout the growing season, and it was demonstrated that the amount of N uptake after flowering can reach up to 50% of the total plant N, thus, N availability must be guaranteed in late vegetative corn growth stages, and especially in the reproductive stages, which can be achieved by adopting enhanced efficiency N fertilizers such as the blend of PSCU and NBPTU used in this study. / A mistura de fertilizantes nitrogenados de liberação controlada e estabilizados representa uma alternativa para fornecer nitrogênio (N) em todos os estádios da cultura do milho, além de ser uma opção válida para reduzir custos em comparação ao uso exclusivo de produtos de liberação controlada. Neste sentido, conduziram-se experimentos de campo na região Sudeste do Brasil com a aplicação de um blend de ureia revestida com enxofre e polímeros (UREP) e ureia tratada com NBPT (U-NBPT), na proporção 70:30, aplicada na semeadura do milho, de forma incorporada. Os objetivos do trabalho foram: i) avaliar o destino do N dentro das plantas de milho proveniente dos fertilizantes misturados e determinar a eficiência de recuperação de cada um; ii) avaliar a resposta do rendimento de grãos de milho a doses de N (blend) em sistemas de produção contrastantes e avaliar a possibilidade de reduzir as doses de N quando aplicado o blend em comparação à ureia convencional; iii) entender e monitorar as mudanças da biomassa e o nitrogênio dentro das plantas de milho ao longo do ciclo da cultura. No primeiro estudo, o N na planta proveniente da UREP, da U-NBPT, e do solo (N-Solo) variaram ao longo do ciclo do milho. Contudo os fertilizantes nitrogenados contribuiram com menos de 50% do N total da planta em todos os estadios avaliados (V4, V12, R2 e R6). No estádio V4, a maior parte do N na planta proveniente de fertilizante (NPPF) foi fornecido pela U-NBPT, enquanto que nos estadios seguintes, a maior parte do NPPF foi fornecido pela UREP. O N-Solo foi o maior fornecedor de N para a planta, mas a contribuição diminuiu com o aumento das doses de N. Na colheita, 59% do total do N da planta foi alocado nos grãos. Do total de N da planta, 64% foi proveniente do N-Solo, 26% foi fornecido pela UREP, e 10% pela U-NBPT. A eficiência de recuperação da UREP e U-NBPT foram, respectivamente, 51 e 36%. No segundo estudo, o rendimento de grãos de milho variou entre locais, provavelmente devido às condições edafo-climáticas de cada área experimental. A aplicação do fertilizante nitrogenado influenciou o rendimento de grãos de milho, a produção de biomassa e acúmulo de N em todos os locais. O rendimento de grãos e acúmulo de N mostraram uma resposta quadrática às doses de N (blend). A incorporação do blend de UREP e U-NBPT na semeadura do milho mostrou-se como uma ótima estratégia para evitar perdas massivas de N e mostrou que pode atingir produtividade similar a ureia convencional com doses de N menores. O terceiro capítulo, com foco no acúmulo e particionamento da biomassa e N nas plantas de milho ao longo do ciclo, desmonstrou que a quantidade de N absorvido após o florescimento pode chegar a 50% do total de N acumulado nas plantas, pelo que adequada disponibilidade de N deve ser garantida nos estádios vegetativos finais e nos estádios reprodutivos da cultura do milho, o que pode ser conseguido com o uso de misturas de UREP e U-NBPT.

O N é um nutriente empregado em grandes quantidades nos sistemas de produção agrícola e o mais limitante para a produção de gramíneas. A ureia é o fertilizante nitrogenado (N-fertilizante) mais usado no mundo e o principal foco da indústria mundial de fertilizantes tecnologicamente aperfeiçoados, sendo altamente suscetível à perdas por volatilização de amônia (NH3), quando aplicada sobre superfície do solo. Com intuito de minimizar o impacto ambiental e aumentar a eficiência de N, o uso de inibidores de urease é uma das tecnologias mais promissoras e menos onerosas. Adicionalmente, inibidores de urease inorgânicos constituídos por elementos essenciais às plantas, como ácido bórico (H3BO3) e sulfato de cobre (CuSO4), podem suplementar nutricionalmente os sistemas agrícolas de produção. Neste contexto, foram desenvolvidos dois experimentos, em condições controladas de laboratório e casa de vegetação, com os seguintes objetivos: i) quantificar as perdas por volatilização de NH3 a partir da aplicação superficial da ureia tratada com doses variadas de H3BO3 e CuSO4, em câmara fechada; ii) avaliar a eficiência de uso de N e B em dois estádios vegetativos do milho a partir da aplicação em superfície da 15N-ureia tratada com H3BO3 e CuSO4, em condições controladas de casa de vegetação. No experimento de laboratório, não houve interação entre as doses de B e Cu ou qualquer efeito do Cu sobre as perdas de NH3 por volatilização. O aumento de H3BO3 no tratamento da U atrasou as perdas diárias de NH3 e reduziu (P<0,001) as perdas cumulativas de volatilização de NH3. As doses de B apresentaram ajuste quadrático e, com base na análise de regressão, a dose estimada de máxima eficiência é atingida com 0,88% B no recobrimento da U. Em condições de casa de vegetação, os inibidores de urease atrasaram e reduziram as perdas de NH3 por volatilização. Ao longo de 15 dias após a fertilização, o tratamento com H3BO3 promoveu reduções na volatilização de NH3 que variaram de 6 a 17% em relação à ureia não tratada, ocorrendo diferenciação entre doses de B. Os tratamentos com maiores doses de B não diferiram do tratamento com N-(n-butil) tiofosfórico triamida (NBPT) em produção de biomassa de milho. A altura de plantas, diâmetro de colmo e índice de área foliar não apresentaram diferenças entre N-fertilizantes. A morfologia do sistema radicular do milho foi afetada pelo uso de inibidores no estádio V8. O aumento de H3BO3 no revestimento da ureia aumentou em média 10% a eficiência de uso do N-fertilizante (EUN-F), em relação à ureia não tratada. Em VT, não houve diferença para EUN-F entre os tratamentos NBPT e maior dose de H3BO3 (0,88% B). O tratamento da ureia com H3BO3 aumentou proporcionalmente o acúmulo de B na planta. A adição de CuSO4 não afetou a volatilização de NH3 e a EUN-F. O recobrimento da ureia com H3BO3 foi uma estratégia eficiente em reduzir as perdas de N, aumentar a EUN-F e fornecer B às plantas. / N is a nutrient used in large quantities in agricultural production systems and it is the most limiting element for production of grasses. Urea is the most widely used nitrogen fertilizer (N fertilizer) in the world and the main focus of the worldwide industry of fertilizers technologically improved, being highly susceptible to losses by volatilization of ammonia (NH3) when applied on soil surface. In order to minimize environmental impact and increase N efficiency, the use of urease inhibitors is one of the most promising and least expensive technologies. In addition, inorganic urease composed for essential elements for plants, such as boric acid (H3BO3) and copper sulfate (CuSO4), can nutritionally supplement agricultural production systems. In this context, two experiments were carried out under controlled conditions (laboratory and greenhouse) with the following objectives: i) laboratory: to quantify NH3 volatilization losses from the surface application of urea treated with different rates of H3BO3 and CuSO4, using closed chamber; (ii) greenhouse: to evaluate the N and B use efficiency from surface application of 15N urea treated with H3BO3 and CuSO4 in two vegetative stages of maize. In the laboratory experiment, there was no interaction between B and Cu rates or any Cu effect on NH3 losses by volatilization. The increase of H3BO3 in the treatment of urea delayed the daily losses of NH3 and reduced (P<0.001) the cumulative volatilization losses of NH3. The rates of B showed a quadratic adjustment and, based on the regression analysis, the estimated rate of maximum efficiency was 0.88% B. Under greenhouse conditions, urease inhibitors delayed and decresed the losses of NH3 by volatilization. Over 15 days after fertilization, treatment with H3BO3 promoted reductions in NH3 volatilization ranging from 6 to 17% compared to untreated urea, and occur differentiation between B rates. The treatments with higher rates of B did not differ from the treatment with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) in maize biomass production. The plant height, stem diameter and leaf area index did not show differences between N fertilizers. The morphology of the maize root system was affected by the use of urease inhibitors only in stage V8. The increase of H3BO3 in the urea coating increased on average 10% the efficiency of use of N fertilizer (NUE-F) in relation to untreated urea. In VT growth stage, there was no difference for NUE-F between treatments NBPT and higher rate of H3BO3 (0.88% B). Treatment of U with H3BO3 increased proportionally the accumulation of B in the plant. The addition of CuSO4 did not affect volatilization of NH3 and NUE-F. Urea coating with H3BO3 was an efficient strategy to reduce N losses, to increase the NUE-F and to supply B for plants.

O N é um nutriente empregado em grandes quantidades nos sistemas de produção agrícola e o mais limitante para a produção de gramíneas. A ureia é o fertilizante nitrogenado (N-fertilizante) mais usado no mundo e o principal foco da indústria mundial de fertilizantes tecnologicamente aperfeiçoados, sendo altamente suscetível à perdas por volatilização de amônia (NH3), quando aplicada sobre superfície do solo. Com intuito de minimizar o impacto ambiental e aumentar a eficiência de N, o uso de inibidores de urease é uma das tecnologias mais promissoras e menos onerosas. Adicionalmente, inibidores de urease inorgânicos constituídos por elementos essenciais às plantas, como ácido bórico (H3BO3) e sulfato de cobre (CuSO4), podem suplementar nutricionalmente os sistemas agrícolas de produção. Neste contexto, foram desenvolvidos dois experimentos, em condições controladas de laboratório e casa de vegetação, com os seguintes objetivos: i) quantificar as perdas por volatilização de NH3 a partir da aplicação superficial da ureia tratada com doses variadas de H3BO3 e CuSO4, em câmara fechada; ii) avaliar a eficiência de uso de N e B em dois estádios vegetativos do milho a partir da aplicação em superfície da 15N-ureia tratada com H3BO3 e CuSO4, em condições controladas de casa de vegetação. No experimento de laboratório, não houve interação entre as doses de B e Cu ou qualquer efeito do Cu sobre as perdas de NH3 por volatilização. O aumento de H3BO3 no tratamento da U atrasou as perdas diárias de NH3 e reduziu (P<0,001) as perdas cumulativas de volatilização de NH3. As doses de B apresentaram ajuste quadrático e, com base na análise de regressão, a dose estimada de máxima eficiência é atingida com 0,88% B no recobrimento da U. Em condições de casa de vegetação, os inibidores de urease atrasaram e reduziram as perdas de NH3 por volatilização. Ao longo de 15 dias após a fertilização, o tratamento com H3BO3 promoveu reduções na volatilização de NH3 que variaram de 6 a 17% em relação à ureia não tratada, ocorrendo diferenciação entre doses de B. Os tratamentos com maiores doses de B não diferiram do tratamento com N-(n-butil) tiofosfórico triamida (NBPT) em produção de biomassa de milho. A altura de plantas, diâmetro de colmo e índice de área foliar não apresentaram diferenças entre N-fertilizantes. A morfologia do sistema radicular do milho foi afetada pelo uso de inibidores no estádio V8. O aumento de H3BO3 no revestimento da ureia aumentou em média 10% a eficiência de uso do N-fertilizante (EUN-F), em relação à ureia não tratada. Em VT, não houve diferença para EUN-F entre os tratamentos NBPT e maior dose de H3BO3 (0,88% B). O tratamento da ureia com H3BO3 aumentou proporcionalmente o acúmulo de B na planta. A adição de CuSO4 não afetou a volatilização de NH3 e a EUN-F. O recobrimento da ureia com H3BO3 foi uma estratégia eficiente em reduzir as perdas de N, aumentar a EUN-F e fornecer B às plantas. / N is a nutrient used in large quantities in agricultural production systems and it is the most limiting element for production of grasses. Urea is the most widely used nitrogen fertilizer (N fertilizer) in the world and the main focus of the worldwide industry of fertilizers technologically improved, being highly susceptible to losses by volatilization of ammonia (NH3) when applied on soil surface. In order to minimize environmental impact and increase N efficiency, the use of urease inhibitors is one of the most promising and least expensive technologies. In addition, inorganic urease composed for essential elements for plants, such as boric acid (H3BO3) and copper sulfate (CuSO4), can nutritionally supplement agricultural production systems. In this context, two experiments were carried out under controlled conditions (laboratory and greenhouse) with the following objectives: i) laboratory: to quantify NH3 volatilization losses from the surface application of urea treated with different rates of H3BO3 and CuSO4, using closed chamber; (ii) greenhouse: to evaluate the N and B use efficiency from surface application of 15N urea treated with H3BO3 and CuSO4 in two vegetative stages of maize. In the laboratory experiment, there was no interaction between B and Cu rates or any Cu effect on NH3 losses by volatilization. The increase of H3BO3 in the treatment of urea delayed the daily losses of NH3 and reduced (P<0.001) the cumulative volatilization losses of NH3. The rates of B showed a quadratic adjustment and, based on the regression analysis, the estimated rate of maximum efficiency was 0.88% B. Under greenhouse conditions, urease inhibitors delayed and decresed the losses of NH3 by volatilization. Over 15 days after fertilization, treatment with H3BO3 promoted reductions in NH3 volatilization ranging from 6 to 17% compared to untreated urea, and occur differentiation between B rates. The treatments with higher rates of B did not differ from the treatment with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) in maize biomass production. The plant height, stem diameter and leaf area index did not show differences between N fertilizers. The morphology of the maize root system was affected by the use of urease inhibitors only in stage V8. The increase of H3BO3 in the urea coating increased on average 10% the efficiency of use of N fertilizer (NUE-F) in relation to untreated urea. In VT growth stage, there was no difference for NUE-F between treatments NBPT and higher rate of H3BO3 (0.88% B). Treatment of U with H3BO3 increased proportionally the accumulation of B in the plant. The addition of CuSO4 did not affect volatilization of NH3 and NUE-F. Urea coating with H3BO3 was an efficient strategy to reduce N losses, to increase the NUE-F and to supply B for plants.

A ureia (UR) é atualmente o fertilizante nitrogenado mais utilizado na agricultura brasileira. No entanto, quando aplicada na superfície do solo está sujeita a perdas de nitrogênio (N) por volatilização de NH3. Uma das formas de minimizar as perdas de N-NH3 é o tratamento do fertilizante com inibidores de urease. A associação desses compostos com substâncias húmicas (SH), no tratamento da UR poderia aumentar a eficiência de uso dos nutrientes pelas plantas. O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar a eficiência de inibidores de urease, associados ou não com SH no revestimento da UR como fonte de N em cobertura para o milho. O experimento foi conduzido em casa de vegetação durante 62 dias em delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com três repetições, no esquema fatorial completo, com UR recoberta três inibidores de urease (0,40% B + 0,15% Cu; 0,64% B; NBPT) e um tratamento adicional sem inibidor (Ausente), três doses de SH (0, 0,6, e 1,2%) e um controle. Os tratamentos com N constaram da aplicação de fonte única do nutriente [CO(15NH2)2] aplicada em faixa e em superfície na dose de 180 mg kg-1 de N no estádio fisiológico V4 das plantas de milho. As plantas foram amostradas nos estádios V8 e VT do milho, respectivamente, aos 52 e 62 dias após a semeadura, quando foram avaliados: biometria de parte aérea, área foliar, biomassa seca de raízes e da parte aérea, caracterização morfológica do sistema radicular, e a eficiência de uso do N-fertilizante (EUN) pelo método do balanço isotópico (15N). Também se quantificou as perdas de N por volatilização de NH3 por meio de coletores semi-estáticos com espuma embebida em H3PO4- para avaliação comparativa entre tratamentos. Embora a concentração mais elevada de ácido bórico na UR (0,64% B) tenha reduzido mais as perdas de NH3 por volatilização em comparação ao 0,40 % B + 0,15 % Cu, isso não resultou em maior eficiência de uso do N-fertilizante pelo milho em VT, que ocorreu somente em V8. Em ambos os estádios, o NBPT apresentou-se como melhor inibidor de urease na ausência de SH. A aplicação de SH não aumentou a EUN pelo milho em V8 ou VT quando associados com 0,40% B + 0,15% Cu, 0,64% B, ou mesmo na UR convencional. Entretanto, quando associado com o NBPT, ocorreu aumento das perdas de NH3 por volatilização e redução na EUN em VT, o que pode ter ocorrido devido ao elevado pH das SH (8,5-9) e ao seu baixo poder tampão. A aplicação da UR convencional ou revestida com inibidores de urease não aumentou a taxa de crescimento ou biomassa seca de raízes e parte aérea do milho em nenhum dos períodos avaliados quando comparado ao controle. Da mesma forma, não foram observadas diferenças expressivas entre tratamentos na caracterização morfológica do sistema radicular em V8 ou VT. A ausência de diferença entre tratamentos pode ser explicada pelo curto período de tempo entre a adubação de cobertura e as avaliações das plantas, à aplicação superficial das fontes recobertas com SH e ao método de irrigação adotado, que impediu que as SH entrassem totalmente em contato com as raízes da planta. Além disso, é possível, também, que a dose de SH empregada tenha sido muito baixa para ser efetiva. / Urea (UR) is the most widely applied nitrogen (N) fertilizer in Brazilian agriculture. However, UR is more prone to ammonia (NH3) volatilization losses than other N sources when surface-applied. One alternative to improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of surface-applied UR is through application of urease inhibitors as coating materials of UR. The association of these composts with humic substances (HS) as UR coating materials may also improve nutrient recovery by plants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of urease inhibitors, associated or not with HS, as coating materials of UR as new top-dress N sources for maize. A greenhouse pot trial was carried out over 62 days with maize (Zea mays L.), in a completely randomized block design, with three replicates in a full factorial design, with UR coated with three urease inhibitors (0,40% B + 0,15% Cu; 0,64% B; NBPT) and one additional treatment without inhibitor, three doses of HS (0, 0.6, and 1.2%), and one control treatment. All treatments imposed had CO(15NH2)2 as N source, application rate of 180 mg kg-1of N, and side-dressing application at the V4 maize growth stage. Maize plants were assessed at V8 and VT growth stages, at 52 and 62 days after sowing, respectively, when it was evaluated: above and below-ground plant dry matter weight; leaf area; root morphological traits (length, surface area, and volume); and fertilizer use efficiency by the 15N balance method. In addition, semi-open static collectors with foam discs previously soaked in H3PO4- were used to quantify comparatively the NH3 volatilized from all treatments. Although the addition of a higher dose of boric acid on UR (0,64% B) promoted lower ammonia losses by volatilization in comparison to 0,40 % B + 0,15 % Cu, it did not result in higher NUE by maize in VT, which occurred at V8. In both growth stages, NBPT presented the best performance as urease inhibitor in the absence of HS. The application of HS did not increase NUE by maize in V8 and VT when associated with 0,40% B + 0,15% Cu, 0,64% B or even conventional UR. However, when added in conjunction with NBPT, it increased ammonia volatilization and reduced NUE in VT which may have occurred due to the high pH of the HS (8.5-9) and low buffering capacity. Moreover, the application of conventional UR or UR treated with HS and urease inhibitors did not increase maize growth rate or shoot/root dry matter weight in comparison to the control treatment at both growth stages. Likewise, there was no major significant differences between treatments on root morphological traits (length, surface area, and volume) at both growth stages assessed. The lack of sizable outcome differences between treatments could be explained by the application of a single N dose, the short period of time between the side-dressing application and assessment of maize plants, and to the surface-application of the HS and method of irrigation which prevented HS to have full contact with maize roots. Furthermore, HS application rate may have been too low to be effective.

A ureia (UR) é atualmente o fertilizante nitrogenado mais utilizado na agricultura brasileira. No entanto, quando aplicada na superfície do solo está sujeita a perdas de nitrogênio (N) por volatilização de NH3. Uma das formas de minimizar as perdas de N-NH3 é o tratamento do fertilizante com inibidores de urease. A associação desses compostos com substâncias húmicas (SH), no tratamento da UR poderia aumentar a eficiência de uso dos nutrientes pelas plantas. O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar a eficiência de inibidores de urease, associados ou não com SH no revestimento da UR como fonte de N em cobertura para o milho. O experimento foi conduzido em casa de vegetação durante 62 dias em delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com três repetições, no esquema fatorial completo, com UR recoberta três inibidores de urease (0,40% B + 0,15% Cu; 0,64% B; NBPT) e um tratamento adicional sem inibidor (Ausente), três doses de SH (0, 0,6, e 1,2%) e um controle. Os tratamentos com N constaram da aplicação de fonte única do nutriente [CO(15NH2)2] aplicada em faixa e em superfície na dose de 180 mg kg-1 de N no estádio fisiológico V4 das plantas de milho. As plantas foram amostradas nos estádios V8 e VT do milho, respectivamente, aos 52 e 62 dias após a semeadura, quando foram avaliados: biometria de parte aérea, área foliar, biomassa seca de raízes e da parte aérea, caracterização morfológica do sistema radicular, e a eficiência de uso do N-fertilizante (EUN) pelo método do balanço isotópico (15N). Também se quantificou as perdas de N por volatilização de NH3 por meio de coletores semi-estáticos com espuma embebida em H3PO4- para avaliação comparativa entre tratamentos. Embora a concentração mais elevada de ácido bórico na UR (0,64% B) tenha reduzido mais as perdas de NH3 por volatilização em comparação ao 0,40 % B + 0,15 % Cu, isso não resultou em maior eficiência de uso do N-fertilizante pelo milho em VT, que ocorreu somente em V8. Em ambos os estádios, o NBPT apresentou-se como melhor inibidor de urease na ausência de SH. A aplicação de SH não aumentou a EUN pelo milho em V8 ou VT quando associados com 0,40% B + 0,15% Cu, 0,64% B, ou mesmo na UR convencional. Entretanto, quando associado com o NBPT, ocorreu aumento das perdas de NH3 por volatilização e redução na EUN em VT, o que pode ter ocorrido devido ao elevado pH das SH (8,5-9) e ao seu baixo poder tampão. A aplicação da UR convencional ou revestida com inibidores de urease não aumentou a taxa de crescimento ou biomassa seca de raízes e parte aérea do milho em nenhum dos períodos avaliados quando comparado ao controle. Da mesma forma, não foram observadas diferenças expressivas entre tratamentos na caracterização morfológica do sistema radicular em V8 ou VT. A ausência de diferença entre tratamentos pode ser explicada pelo curto período de tempo entre a adubação de cobertura e as avaliações das plantas, à aplicação superficial das fontes recobertas com SH e ao método de irrigação adotado, que impediu que as SH entrassem totalmente em contato com as raízes da planta. Além disso, é possível, também, que a dose de SH empregada tenha sido muito baixa para ser efetiva. / Urea (UR) is the most widely applied nitrogen (N) fertilizer in Brazilian agriculture. However, UR is more prone to ammonia (NH3) volatilization losses than other N sources when surface-applied. One alternative to improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of surface-applied UR is through application of urease inhibitors as coating materials of UR. The association of these composts with humic substances (HS) as UR coating materials may also improve nutrient recovery by plants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of urease inhibitors, associated or not with HS, as coating materials of UR as new top-dress N sources for maize. A greenhouse pot trial was carried out over 62 days with maize (Zea mays L.), in a completely randomized block design, with three replicates in a full factorial design, with UR coated with three urease inhibitors (0,40% B + 0,15% Cu; 0,64% B; NBPT) and one additional treatment without inhibitor, three doses of HS (0, 0.6, and 1.2%), and one control treatment. All treatments imposed had CO(15NH2)2 as N source, application rate of 180 mg kg-1of N, and side-dressing application at the V4 maize growth stage. Maize plants were assessed at V8 and VT growth stages, at 52 and 62 days after sowing, respectively, when it was evaluated: above and below-ground plant dry matter weight; leaf area; root morphological traits (length, surface area, and volume); and fertilizer use efficiency by the 15N balance method. In addition, semi-open static collectors with foam discs previously soaked in H3PO4- were used to quantify comparatively the NH3 volatilized from all treatments. Although the addition of a higher dose of boric acid on UR (0,64% B) promoted lower ammonia losses by volatilization in comparison to 0,40 % B + 0,15 % Cu, it did not result in higher NUE by maize in VT, which occurred at V8. In both growth stages, NBPT presented the best performance as urease inhibitor in the absence of HS. The application of HS did not increase NUE by maize in V8 and VT when associated with 0,40% B + 0,15% Cu, 0,64% B or even conventional UR. However, when added in conjunction with NBPT, it increased ammonia volatilization and reduced NUE in VT which may have occurred due to the high pH of the HS (8.5-9) and low buffering capacity. Moreover, the application of conventional UR or UR treated with HS and urease inhibitors did not increase maize growth rate or shoot/root dry matter weight in comparison to the control treatment at both growth stages. Likewise, there was no major significant differences between treatments on root morphological traits (length, surface area, and volume) at both growth stages assessed. The lack of sizable outcome differences between treatments could be explained by the application of a single N dose, the short period of time between the side-dressing application and assessment of maize plants, and to the surface-application of the HS and method of irrigation which prevented HS to have full contact with maize roots. Furthermore, HS application rate may have been too low to be effective.

Stickstoffdüngung und Bodenbewirtschaftung sind die Hauptquellen für Treibhausgase aus Anbausystemen. Dennoch sind diese Maßnahmen in Ackerbaubetrieben unerlässlich. In Anbetracht der Notwendigkeit, rasch Maßnahmen gegen den Klimawandel zu ergreifen, ist es notwendig Minderungspotentiale und Kosten in diesen Betrieben zu ermitteln und vergleichen. Es wurden Fallstudien in den USA, in Brasilien und in Deutschland durchgeführt, wobei jeweils eine Kultur in jeder Region untersucht wurde. Wissenschaftliche Literatur und Fokusgruppen mit lokalen Experten wurden genutzt, um realistische Ergebnisse zu generieren, die den lokalen Kontext abbilden. Diese Arbeit zeigt, dass die Wirtschaftlichkeit der Minderungsstrategien von dem betrachteten Zeithorizont abhängt, der sich aus der Kohlenstoffdynamik im Boden ergibt. Kurzfristig bieten Strategien, die die Kohlenstoffbindung fördern, ein größeres Minderungspotenzial, was jedoch langfristig nicht zutrifft. Kurzfristig wurden in Brasilien und den USA die geringsten Minderungskosten durch die Optimierung der Stickstoffdüngung erreicht. Diese Kosten sind negativ, was bedeutet, dass die Anwendung dieser Strategien, nicht nur ihre Emissionen, sondern auch ihre Kosten senken würden. Weitere kosteneffiziente Strategien waren die Verringerung der Bodenbearbeitungsintensität und Zwischenfrüchte, die in allen Fällen mit vergleichbaren Minderungskosten durchführbar waren und die Kohlenstoffbindung fördern. Der Einsatz von Hemmstoffen schließlich, der in den USA und in Brasilien möglich war, hatte die höchsten Minderungskosten. Langfristig betrachtet stiegen die Minderungskosten von Strategien mit Kohlenstoffbindung an und waren ähnlich hoch oder höher als bei Strategien ohne Kohlenstoffbindung. Da in allen Fällen dieselbe Methodik angewandt wurde, sind die Ergebnisse vergleichbar. Darüber hinaus sind die Ergebnisse zwar spezifisch für den Kontext, in dem sie berechnet wurden, sie liefern jedoch Erkenntnisse für ähnliche Regionen. / Nitrogen fertilization and soil management are the main sources of greenhouse gases from cropping systems. Yet these operations are essential on arable farms. Considering the need to take quick action against climate change, it is necessary to understand which mitigation potentials and cost can be attained in these farms and how they compare. Case studies in the USA, Brazil and in Germany were conducted, assessing one crop in each region. Scientific literature and focus groups with local experts were used to generate realistic results which depict the local context. This thesis identified that the economics of the mitigation strategies depended on the time horizon considered, which results from the carbon dynamics in the soil. In the short term, strategies promoting carbon sequestration offer a larger mitigation potential, yet this is not valid in the long term. In the short term, the lowest mitigation costs were attained by optimizing the nitrogen rate, feasible in the USA and Brazil. These costs are indicated to be negative, implying that adopting the strategy would not only lower emissions, but also reduce their costs. The next most cost efficient strategies were the reduction of the tillage intensity and cover crops, which were feasible in all cases with comparable mitigation costs and promote carbon sequestration. Lastly, the adoption of inhibitors, feasible in the USA and in Brazil, had among the highest mitigation costs. Assuming the long term, the mitigation costs of strategies with carbon sequestration increased, becoming similar to or higher than strategies without carbon sequestration. By applying the same methodology in each case, the results are comparable. Moreover, while the findings are specific to the context in which they were calculated, they provide insights for similar regions.