Existem evidências sobre a diferenciação entre empresas pré-operacionais e empresas operacionais em aspectos relacionados com a estrutura de ativos, a estrutura de capital, a rentabilidade de ativos, oportunidades de crescimento e a reação do mercado à divulgação financeira. Essas diferenças apontam que projetos de investimento afetam diversos aspectos da empresa e geram expectativas no mercado quanto à geração futura de resultados. A pesquisa foi realizada analisando-se empresas do mercado de capitais brasileiro divididas em duas amostras ou grupos de empresas: pré-operacionais e operacionais. Foram realizados dois testes. O primeiro, a partir de informações financeiras divulgadas trimestralmente com o cálculo de indicadores econômico-financeiros, em que se verificaram diferenças de médias. O segundo, a partir das datas de divulgação dos relatórios financeiros, em que se verificou, com o auxílio da técnica de estudo de eventos, que há diferença estatística significativa dos retornos anormais acumulados entre essas duas amostras em razão da reação do mercado à divulgação financeira, denotando sua importância como componente informativo para ajustes dos preços das ações. Adicionalmente, foi estendido o teste de estudo de evento para analisar a reação do mercado à divulgação das menores e maiores variações dos ativos não circulantes. Esta variável é utilizada no estudo como proxy dos esforços da empresa na formação de capital produtivo, verificando-se que o mercado não reagiu às baixas variações desse ativo. No entanto, o mercado reage de forma limitada à informação quando a variação desse ativo está entre as maiores variações. Embora os resultados dos testes estejam limitados às amostras utilizadas, fornecem uma direção no sentido de entender as mudanças nos fundamentos de valor dessas empresas. / There is evidence about the differentiation between pre-operational and operational companies on aspects related to the structure of assets, capital structure, asset profitability, growth opportunities and market reaction to financial disclosure. These differences indicate that investment projects affect many aspects of the company and generate market expectations about the future generation of results. The survey was conducted by analyzing companies in the Brazilian capital market divided into two samples or groups of companies: preoperational and operational. Two tests were performed. The first, from the quarterly financial information disclosure with the calculation of economic-financial indicators. Differences of means were observed. The second, from the disclosure date of the financial reports. It was observed with the help of the technique of event studies, significant statistical difference of abnormal cumulative returns between these two samples as a result to the market reaction on the financial disclosure, denoting its importance as an informational component for adjustment of stock prices. Additionally, the event study test was extended to analyze the market reaction to the disclosure of minor and major changes in non-current assets. This variable is used in the study as proxy of the company\'s efforts in the formation of capital efficiency. It was observed that the market did not react to the low variations of this asset. However, the market limitedly reacted to the information when the variance of this asset is among the largest variations. Although the test results are limited to the samples used, provides a direction in order to understand the changes in the fundamentals of value of these companies.

A governança corporativa é composta por diferentes mecanismos que visam minimizar os problemas advindos da relação de agência, estabelecida a partir da separação entre a propriedade e o controle das empresas. Nessa relação, os proprietários, ou principais, passaram a delegar a autoridade para a tomada de decisão aos gestores, ou agentes. No entanto, à medida que os interesses próprios dos gestores entram em conflito com os interesses dos proprietários das empresas, se faz necessária a implementação de mecanismos para monitorar tais agentes, a fim de garantir a tomada de decisão adequada para os negócios. No caso das empresas de controle estatal, além dos conflitos de agência, existem os problemas advindos da pressão política exercida sobre a administração, além dos conflitos no estabelecimento dos objetivos de tais empresas. Nesse sentido, as incertezas que cercam as estatais poderiam ser minimizadas através das boas práticas de governança corporativa, que promoveriam maior monitoramento e transparência. Portanto, a governança corporativa promove a tomada de melhores decisões, o uso de controles mais adequados, além da diminuição do custo de capital. Sendo assim, tais fatores poderiam impactar positivamente o desempenho das empresas que adotarem boas práticas de governança corporativa. Em face das especificidades das empresas estatais, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo verificar se existe relação significativa entre o nível de governança corporativa das sociedades de economia mista brasileiras e o desempenho e valor, durante o período de 2002 a 2017. Foi utilizado o índice de governança corporativa (IGOV) proposto por Silveira (2004) como base para mensurar o nível de governança corporativa das estatais. O desempenho foi mensurado pelos indicadores retorno sobre o patrimônio líquido (ROE) e retorno sobre o ativo (ROA), enquanto o valor foi aproximado pelo q de Tobin. Os dados foram analisados por meio de análise descritiva e análise de regressão múltipla pelo procedimento de Efeitos Fixos e Aleatórios, além de um método mais robusto - Método dos Momentos Generalizado (GMM) - para minimizar potenciais problemas de endogeneidade neste tipo de estudo. A estimação de um modelo mais robusto indica que há relação positiva, embora não significativa, entre o nível de governança corporativa e o valor das empresas; e relação negativa, porém não significativa, entre o nível de governança corporativa e o desempenho das sociedades de economia mista. / Corporate governance considers different mechanisms that aim to minimize the problems derived from the agency relationship. The separation between ownership and control has made the owners - or principal - delegate the authority for decision-making to managers - the agents - establishing an agency relationship. However, as managers\' own interests begin to conflict with the owner\'s interests, it is necessary to implement mechanisms to monitor these agents, in order to assure a proper decision-making system for the firm. For state-owned enterprises, in addition to agency conflicts, there are problems arising from both the political pressure over the management and the process of establishing the firm\'s objectives. In this sense, the uncertainties surrounding state-owned enterprises could be minimized with good corporate governance practices, which would promote greater monitoring and transparency. Therefore, corporate governance offers better decisions, more appropriate controls and a reduced cost of capital. Such factors could impact positively the performance of firms that adopt good corporate governance practices. Considering the specificities of state-owned enterprises, this study has investigated if there is a significant relationship between the level of corporate governance of listed Brazilian state-owned firms and its performance and firm value, from 2002 to 2017. The corporate governance index (IGOV) proposed by Silveira (2004) was be used as the basis for measuring the level of corporate governance. Performance was measured by Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA) indicators while firm value was measured by Tobin\'s q. The data was analyzed through descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis by the Fixed and Random Effects procedures. The Generalized Method of Moments was also considered in a dynamic model, since it provides a more robust estimation to minimize bias of endogeneity in this type of study. The results from the GMM estimator indicate a positive and not significant relation between the level of corporate governance and firm value, and a negative and not significant relation between the level of corporate governance and performance for Brazilian state-owned enterprises.

This thesis addresses existing shortcomings in the co-creation literature by proposing organisational capabilities that support co-creation in financial service firms. A developing country perspective is taken and the context is Nigeria, a West African Country. In this thesis, the Resource-based view and Knowledge-based view are integrated with the Dynamic Capability perspective to identify capabilities required to manage the dyadic interactions during co-creation. First, a conceptual model is developed through an in-depth literature review, before testing, refining and validating the model through a mixed-method research approach, involving both qualitative and quantitative research steps. The conceptual model identified a set of capabilities - namely the firm's innovation, knowledge management and relational capability and their effect on co-creation practice. The aim of the qualitative research step was to improve the conceptual model through exploratory research. This step involved in-depth interviews (n=9) with key informants and a focus group discussion with users (n=7). In the quantitative step, empirical data was collected via a questionnaire (n=261) using a drop-off-pick-up (DOPU) technique. The data is analysed using structural path analysis, hypotheses testing and model re-specification. The results of the qualitative phase indicate that co-creation in financial services is dependent on regulation, user need and the structure of financial services in Nigeria. The results also confirm the influence of innovation, knowledge management and relational capabilities on co-creation practice. Nevertheless, qualitative findings also show that knowledge management capability emerged as a vital capability upon which other value creation activities in financial service firms depend. These findings were further tested and validated in the quantitative phase. In line with the resource-based view (RBV) and the knowledge-based view (KBV), empirical findings confirm that the firm`s resource endowments explain, in part, value co-creation in firms. Principally, the findings of this study show that the capacity of financial service organisations to provide sustainable value creation for its clients and itself depend on the degree to which they possess specific dynamic capabilities. The findings also show the relative importance of co-creation practices and how they are effective only in certain conditions and specific environments.

This study examines the relationship between R&D intensity (R&D/sales) and firm value. Additionally, both the moderating effect of endogenous firm characteristics (i.e. firm size, leverage and the interaction between size and leverage) and institutional quality are considered. By employing a sample of 1,833 firms throughout 49 countries, this study finds evidence supporting a positive association between R&D and firm value in its cross-national sample. Moreover, the results support the positive moderating effect of leverage on the relationship between R&D and firm value, in favour of the disciplining role of debt. Furthermore, a negative moderating effect of firm size is found, suggesting that smaller firms possess a superior ability to appropriate value from their R&D investments. Lastly, the size-leverage interaction reveals that small firms with high leverage reap the greatest firm value from their R&D investments.

Yes / This paper examines how deviation from firms’ target leverage influences their decisions on undertaking foreign acquisitions. Using a sample of 5746 completed bids by UK acquirers from 1987 to 2012, we observe that over-deviated firms are more likely to acquire foreign targets. Consistent with co-insurance theory, we find that over-deviated firms engage in foreign acquisition deals to relieve their financial constraints and to mitigate their financial distress risk. We also note that foreign acquisitions enhance over-deviated firms’ value and performance, measured by Tobin’s q and return on assets (ROA) respectively. These findings support the view that over-deviated firms pursue the most value-enhancing acquisitions. Overall, this paper suggests that co-insurance effects, value creation and performance improvements are the main incentives for over-deviated firms’ involvement in foreign acquisitions. / Financial support of Zagazig University in Egypt / The full-text of this article will be released for public view at the end of the publisher embargo on 02 Mar 2019.

This paper examines the relationship between female participation in top management and firm performance and capital structure. Additionally, we assess whether this relationship differs at Female Friendly versus Non-Female Friendly firms. Today, women account for nearly half of the total labor force, but constitute less than one tenth of Fortune 500 Top Earners. This warrants further exploration, and thus, we hope to understand the impact gender has on firm value. After controlling for industry, size, age, leverage, and other firm specific measures, we find that female participation in top management is associated with a higher interest coverage ratio. We then investigate the difference between firm classifications and find that Female Friendly firms tend to outperform their Non-Female Friendly counterparts on the basis of operating profit margin and tend to carry a more levered capital structure. This exploration offers foundational evidence to fuel a new direction for this conversation—enacting corporate policies that better accommodate the female talent pool may allow firms to access a source of competitive advantage.

<p>In Chapter 1, I document a negative (positive) relationship between changes in large (small) blockholders' ownership and abnormal returns. The evidence in this paper suggests that an increase in the relatively large blockholders' ownership raises the consumption of private benefits while an increase in the relatively small blockholders' ownership constrains large blockholders from expropriating minority shareholders. Moreover, I find an inversely U-shaped relationship between changes in the largest blockholders' ownership and firm value. As large blockholders' ownership and control increase, the negative effect of firm value driven by expropriating minority shareholders starts to exceed the incentive benefits of monitoring by the largest blockholder. I also show that the negative relationship between changes in institutional investors' control and abnormal returns declines as analysts' following increases.</p><p>In Chapter 2, I study the role of trading as a governance mechanism. I hypothesize that governance through trading plays a significant monitoring role in practice and that engaging in "voice" and "exit" can be substitutes. I show that abnormal turnover following earnings announcements is significantly higher for firms with large institutional blockholders than for those with small individual</p><p>shareholders. For firms with majority institutional ownership, I demonstrate that abnormal trading is higher for firms with multiple blockholders than for those with a single large blockholder and that abnormal trading increases with the number of institutional investors and declines with the percent of stocks owned by the</p><p>largest institutional investor. Moreover, this excess trading is driven by mutual fund investors, which are non-interventionist and thus are more likely to engage in "exit" than "voice". I also show that for firms with large institutional blockholders, abnormal trading following public announcements increases with liquidity.</p> / Dissertation

I examined how politics affects corporate policies and value in two dissertation essays. In my first essay, we investigate whether diversity in points of view within corporate boards, as captured by the diversity in political ideology of board members, can affect a firm's performance. We employ personal political contributions' data to measure political ideology distance among groups of inside, outside directors and the CEO. Our empirical evidence strongly supports the notion that outside directors' monitoring effectiveness is more likely to be enhanced when their viewpoints are distinct from those of management. We find that ideologically diverse boards are associated with better firm performance, lower agency costs and less insiders' discretionary power over the firm's Political Action Committee (PAC) spending. Taken together, our results lead us to conclude that multiplicity of standpoints in corporate boardrooms is imperative for board effectiveness. In my second essay, we document that firms surrounded by high degrees of policy risk generated by local politicians' legislative activities present significantly high stock returns, indicating investors' perception of policy risk. We find that the diverse political strategies firms implement 1) successfully mitigate such policy risk, 2) help firms to acquire more lucrative procurement contracts, and 3) even get firms in trouble with legal issues. Additional results reveal that poor stock performance related to litigation is significantly recovered by political connections. Overall, our results reflect that investors view corporate political activities as effective hedging strategies against policy risk. Collectively, politics plays a critical role in determining corporate policies and/or value.

Family firms play a significant role in the U.S. economy, making up about 35 percent of S&P 500 or Fortune 500 companies and contributing about 65 percent to the U.S. GDP. This research explores differences in strategic behavior and firm performance between family firms and non-family firms, and further explores whether family firms such as Dell Inc. that use their founding family’s name as part of their firm name (termed family-named firms, or FN firms) behave and perform any differently versus family firms such as Gap Inc. whose firm name does not include their family’s name (termed non-family-named firms, or NFN firms). The first study which is based on a multi-industry sample of 130 publicly listed U.S. family firms over a five-year period (2002–2006), reveals that compared to NFN firms, FN firms have significantly higher levels of corporate citizenship and representation of their customers' voice (i.e., presence of a chief marketing officer) in the top management team. FN firms also have a higher strategic emphasis (i.e., a greater emphasis on value appropriation relative to value creation) compared to NFN firms. Furthermore, FN firms perform better (i.e., have a higher ROA) than NFN firms, and their superior performance is partially mediated by their higher corporate citizenship levels and strategic emphasis. In the second study — an event study of 1294 product introduction announcements of 107 publicly listed U.S. family firms from 2005-2007 — I find that relative to NFN firms, FN firms are rewarded more by the stock market for introducing new products. Superior returns to FN firms’ new product introductions are partially mediated by these firms’ history of trustworthy product-related behavior: FN firms, particularly those with corporate branding, and those wherein a founding family member holds the CEO or Chairman position, are more likely to exhibit a history of avoiding such product-related controversies as product safety issues, and deceptive advertising. The third study explores differences in strategic behavior and firm performance between family firms and non-family firms in the context of 7 U.S. economic recessions between the years 1970 and 2008. Findings based on a sample of 428 U.S. publicly listed firms reveal that family firms consistently outperform non-family firms during economic recessions. This superior performance is partially driven by family firms’ unique strategic behavior: during recessions, family firms maintain higher levels of advertising intensity, exhibit lower financial leverage, and get involved in fewer social and employee-related unethical actions than non-family firms. The three studies taken together have important implications for family firm, branding, CSR, firm valuation, and innovation-related theory and practice. I highlight these implications in my dissertation. / text

In today's marketplace, firms' exposure to business uncertainties and risks are continuously increasing as they strive to meet dynamically changing customer needs under intensifying competitive pressures. Consequently, modern supply chains are continuously evolving to effectively manage these uncertainties and the allied risks through both operational and financial hedging strategies. In practice, firms extensively use operational hedging strategies such as operational flexibility, capacity flexibility, postponement, multi-sourcing, supplier diversification, component commonality, substitutability, transshipments and holding excess stocks as operational means for risk management. On the other hand, financial hedging which involves buying and selling financial instruments, carrying large cash reserves or adopting conservative financial policies, changes the cash flow stream of the firms and may help to reduce the firms exposure to business risks and uncertainties. Overall, in this dissertation we explore how risk management can be integrated with operating decisions so as to improve the firm value creating more wealth for the shareholders. In the first essay, we focus on capacity flexibility as a means of operational hedging for risk management in an MTO production environment under demand uncertainty. We demonstrate that capacity flexibility may not only be used to hedge against the demand uncertainty, but may also be employed to effectively protect against possible suboptimal operating decisions in the future. In the second essay, we focus on operational hedging in financially constrained startup firms when making short-term production and long-term investment decisions. We provide an analytical characterization of the optimal investment and operating decisions and analyze the impact of market parameters on the operations of the firm. Our findings highlight an interesting operational hedging behavior between the process investment decisions and the short-term production commitments of the firm when they are faced with financial constraints. Our third essay focuses on the value of integrated financial risk management activities by publicly traded established firms under the risk of incurring financial distress cost. Different from the existing operations management literature, we study the risk management by a public corporation within the value framework of finance; hence our findings do not require any specific assumptions about the investors' utility functions. Moreover, we contribute to the operations management research by examining the impact of the costs of financial distress on hedging and operating plans of the firm. Overall, in this dissertation, we examine the effective integration of operational and financial risk management so as to improve the firm value creating more wealth for the shareholders. / text