L’œuvre d’Annie Ernaux, bien que l’écriture soit « plate », est un bel exemple de l’écriture polyphonique où différentes voix interviennent. Afin de mettre à jour ces différentes voix qui s’opèrent dans son œuvre, nous avons mené notre analyse en deux parties. Dans un premier temps, nous avons fait une analyse énonciative des instances énonciatrices en essayant de distinguer les différents actants de l’énonciation selon diverses analyses qui ont été développées jusqu’à présent : les instances émettrices d’une part (l’énonciateur, le locuteur et le narrateur) et les instances réceptrices d’autre part (le lecteur, l’interlocuteur et le narrataire). Dans un second temps, nous avons tenté de mettre au jour les différentes voix qui s’y font entendre à travers les diverses formes de la représentation de la parole d’autrui dans le discours telles que les formes monologales / monologiques, dialogales / dialogiques et polyphoniques, ainsi que les diverses formes de discours rapportés, de modalisation et d’utilisation des marques typographiques dans le but de retrouver les voix socio-culturelles dans son œuvre. / Despite her “flat” writing, the work of Annie Ernaux is an appropriate example of polyphonic writing in which different voices intervene. In order to reveal these different voices operating in her work we have undertaken a two-step analysis. First, we have analysed the enunciative instances in an attempt to make a distinction between the different actants of enunciation: senders (the enunciator, the locutor and the narrator) on the one hand and the receptors (the reader, the interlocutor and the narratee) on the other. Second, we have tried to put forth the different voices which can be heard by means of various forms of representation of the other’s parole in discourse in order to find the socio-cultural voices in her work. Such forms include the monological, dialogical and polyphonic forms, as well as various forms of reported speech, modalisation and the use of typographical icons.

This study seeks to understand the principal elements of the autosociobiography, a term which is not widely recognized in the literary world. This term is usually associated with the author Annie Ernaux and her book La place (1983). The main search question is to try identifying the criteria to determine if a given literally work can be classified as an autosociobiography. The study is drawn upon the theory of the autobiobiographical pact of Phillipe Leujeune and Pierre Bourdieu’s social theory The Distinction (1979). To identify the elements of the autosociobiography, this work explores the recent dialogues of Frédéric-Yves Jeannet around the works of Annie Ernaux in 2003 and it will involve several studies on the same subject. The result shows five different elements; the first one is the flat writing characterized by its simplicity and avoids the subjectivity and feelings. The second one is the class defector or the class mobility. The third one promotes the total reject of the fiction or autofiction. The fourth is the impersonal “I” which is a technique that uses an individual narrative way with an intention to reach the collective audience. The last one is the unique style of writing the life and living the writing. Moreover, the study confirms the results mentioned above with a projection of the identified elements on the work La place (1983) to deepen the understanding of the subject.