Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2017-04-07T19:36:02Z No. of bitstreams: 1 rozaniadefatimasantos.pdf: 1204449 bytes, checksum: 049555efb24808d04a04295b47d50161 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-04-11T11:34:14Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 rozaniadefatimasantos.pdf: 1204449 bytes, checksum: 049555efb24808d04a04295b47d50161 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-11T11:34:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 rozaniadefatimasantos.pdf: 1204449 bytes, checksum: 049555efb24808d04a04295b47d50161 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-18 / O presente trabalho tem como objetivo descrever as fases de implementação, monitoramento e avaliação do Programa de Intervenção Pedagógica (PIP) na Superintendência Regional de Ensino de Diamantina/MG, com o foco na Escola Estadual Professora Júlia Kubitschek, da mesma cidade, e em como esta se apropriou do Programa para alcançar bons resultados na aprendizagem dos alunos e melhorar os resultados de suas avaliações internas e externas. A metodologia de pesquisa utilizada foi a análise de documentos relativos ao referido programa, levantamento de dados feito por meio de questionários aplicados aos analistas que trabalham com o Programa na SRE, entrevistas semiestruturadas com a analista que atende a escola pesquisada, com a diretora, professoras alfabetizadoras e especialistas em Educação Básica envolvidos no desenvolvimento do PIP desta escola e, ainda, observação do cotidiano escolar por meio de visitas in loco, em que foram levantados dados e informações sobre a relação do analista com a diretora escolar, professores e especialista para o desenvolvimento do PIP. A partir dos dados levantados, construiu-se um panorama do Programa, dos atores envolvidos e do ambiente de trabalho na escola pesquisada. Com base, principalmente, na literatura sobre intervenção pedagógica, gestão eficaz e avaliação externa, constatou-se fatores de várias dimensões que definem o sucesso ou insucesso do programa na SRE-Diamantina/MG. Os dados encontrados demonstram que há relevância na implementação do Programa, no monitoramento eficaz e eficiente de uma política pública e nos bons resultados da aprendizagem dos alunos. Sendo assim, apresenta-se os resultados positivos traduzidos em “boas práticas” identificadas nesta pesquisa para divulgação, por meio de um Plano de Ação Educacional (PAE), às escolas estaduais de anos iniciais pertencentes à Superintendência Regional de Diamantina/MG, com o intuito de aprimorar, adaptar e disseminar as ações bem sucedidas. / This paper aims to describe the implementation, monitoring and evaluation phases of the Programa de Intervenção Pedagógica/PIP (Pedagogical Intervention Program/PIP) in Diamantina´s Superintendência Regional de Ensino/SRE (Regional Superintendence of Education/SRE) in Minas Gerais state, on the Escola Estadual Professora Júlia Kubitschek in the same city, as it has appropriated of the Program to achieve good results in learning skills and thus improve the results of its internal and external evaluation tests. The research methodology used was the analysis of documents related to that program, data collection done through questionnaires applied for pedagogical analyst who work for the Program on SRE Diamantina, semistructured interviews with this pedagogical analyst who supports the school, with the school Director, literacy teachers and the Basic Education Specialists involved in the development of this school Pedagogical Program, and, finally, daily observations through local visits, in which were raised data and information about their relationship in the school. Through the data collected, it will be possible to construct an overview about this program, the actors involved, and the work environment as well. Grounded primarily in the literature about pedagogical intervention, effective management and external evaluations, you can find the several dimensions factors that define the success or failure of the program in the SRE Diamantina MG. Our data show that efficient and effective implementation besides monitoring public policy is relevant for good learning outcomes of the students. Thus, we present the positive results in terms of "best practices" identified in this research for dissemination through a Plano de Ação Educacional/PAE (Plan of Educational Action/PEA), to the public first years schools that belong to the Superintendência Regional de Diamantina/MG (Regional Superintendence of Education) in Diamantina/MG, in order to enhance, adapt and disseminate successful actions.

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the development of the psychiatric health care services, the views about what things can be regarded as good results in psychiatric health care and the factors affecting on them in Finland and in Greece. The study can be used as a point of reference when developing and comparing mental health indicators in and between the European countries. The psychiatric health care services in both the countries appeared to have gone through similar phases of development: isolation, psychopharmacal treatment, work and other activities, psychotherapies and finally, patient-oriented combination of all the methods. The number of psychiatric in-patient beds has decreased in mental hospitals and increased in general hospitals, and the number of rehabilitation and service homes has also increased. The data sets were collected by interviews and from written documents and statistical data sets concerning Finland and Greece (OECD health care data set 2000, European Commission 1997, 1999a, 1999b, 2000, 2001, World Health Organization 1996a, 1996b, 2001a, 2001b). In Finland 44 workers and decision-makers were interviewed within the area of one hospital district, and in Greece, 35 workers were interviewed in two psychiatric hospitals. The qualitative data sets were analyzed with methods of content analysis. The international and national quantitative data were analyzed for similarities and differences. The frame for the comparison was outlined based on the literature and the results of the interviews. In both countries, good results in psychiatric health care included well-being, functional abilities, service capacity and economy. Well-being in both the countries meant alleviation of the symptoms of the illness and satisfaction of the basic physical, psychic and social needs. In Finland patients' positive feelings were emphasized, while in Greece, the value of of equal rights for sick and healthy people was underlined. Functional abilities included the ability to take care of one's everyday life. In Greece the long-term mental patients needed to relearn the skills of daily living, while the Finnish system emphasized patients' ability to use the skills they had but did not use because of their illness. Adequate service capacity in Greece meant the accessibility of the services close to each person's place of residence, while in Finland possibilities to get information and guidance about matters concerning oneself and one's relatives were considered especially important. Economy meant the relationship between the costs and the results. In Greece patients needed sufficient pensions to be able to live outside the hospital. In Finland the challenge was to produce sufficiently high-quality services with the available resources. The factors affecting good results were related to the patient/client and his/her relatives, the health care staff, the methods of treatment, the organization of the system of care and the society in question. The importance of the patient's family, the professional skills of the staff, and the availability of both outpatient and inpatient treatment and medication were emphasized. / Tiivistelmä Tutkimuksessa vertaillaan psykiatrisen terveydenhoidon kehitystä sekä käsityksiä hoidon tuloksellisuudesta ja siihen vaikuttavista tekijöistä Suomessa ja Kreikassa. Tutkimusta voidaan käyttää yhtenä esimerkkinä kehitettäessä psykiatrisen hoidon indikaattoreita ja maiden välisiä vertailuja Euroopassa. Tulosten perusteella psykiatrisessa terveydenhoidossa on havaittavissa molemmissa maissa tietyt kehitysvaiheet: eristäminen, lääkitys, työ ja toiminta, psykoterapiat, ja viimeisimpänä edellä mainittujen potilaslähtöinen yhdistäminen. Sairaalapaikkojen määrä psykiatrisissa sairaaloissa on vähentynyt ja yleissairaaloissa lisääntynyt molemmissa maissa ja kuntoutus- ja hoitokotien määrä on lisääntynyt. Aineisto koottiin haastatteluilla, kirjoitetuista asiakirjoista sekä tilastotiedoista psykiatrisesta terveydenhoidosta Suomessa ja Kreikassa (OECD health care data set 2000, European Commission 1997, 1999a, 1999b, 2000, 2001, World Health Organization 1996a, 1996b, 2001a, 2001b). Suomessa haastateltiin 44 työntekijää ja päättäjää yhden sairaanhoitopiirin alueella, Kreikassa 35 kahdessa sairaalassa. Laadullinen aineisto analysoitiin sisällönanalyysimenetelmällä. Kvantitatiivisesta, kansallisista ja kansainvälisistä lähteistä kootusta aineistosta etsittiin samankaltaisuuksia ja eroavuuksia. Vertailun viitekehys muodostettiin kirjallisuuden ja haastattelujen tulosten perusteella. Psykiatrisen terveydenhoidon tuloksellisuus on molempien maiden tiedonantajien mukaan hyvää oloa, toimintakykyä, palvelukykyä ja taloudellisuutta. Hyvä olo tarkoittaa sairauden oireiden lieventymistä ja psyykkisten, fyysisten ja sosiaalisten perustarpeiden tyydyttymistä. Suomessa korostettiin potilaan myönteisiä tunteita, kreikassa ihmisarvoa samanlaisin oikeuksin kuin muillakin ihmisillä. Toimintakyky sisältää kyvyn huolehtia jokapäiväisen elämän vaatimista tehtävistä. Kreikassa pitkään sairastaneilla oli tarve opetella uudelleen alusta jokapäiväisen elämisen taitoja, Suomessa korostettiin sairauden vuoksi käyttämättömänä olevan osaamisen elvyttämistä. Palvelukyky tarkoitti Kreikassa palvelujen saatavuutta läheltä asuinpaikkaa, Suomessa tiedon ja ohjauksen saamista itseä ja läheisiä koskevissa asioissa. Taloudellisuus tarkoittaa kustannusten ja tulosten välistä suhdetta. Kreikassa potilaiden tulee saada parempia eläkkeitä kyetäkseen asumaan sairaalan ulkopuolella, Suomessa haasteeksi koettiin hyvän hoidon mahdollistaminen olevilla voimavaroilla. Tuloksellisuuteen vaikuttavat tekijät liittyivät potilaaseen/asiakkaaseen ja hänen läheisiinsä, hoitavaan henkilökuntaan ja hoitomenetelmiin, hoidon organisointiin sekä yhteiskuntaan, jossa eletään. Molemmissa maissa korostettiin potilaan läheisten merkitystä, henkilökunnan ammattitaitoa, hoitopaikkoina sekä avo- että sairaanhoitoa ja lääkehoitoa.