Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:28:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Thiago Jurado.pdf: 1551172 bytes, checksum: 5676c40f70a0bbf3ea2091d44f8b2a75 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-02-20 / Profound changes have occurred in the familiar composition, forming then, new family configurations, but none of these news models is so controversial like the homoparental model. In our country this new model has caused prejudices and questions about the ability to provide a family beyond the traditional standards and be able to develop healthy people. This work aims to investigate the collective imagination of the Psychology students about the gay parenting, since Homoparenthood challenges the psychologist whose theoretical and methodological assumptions has proved inadequate to meet the demands of contemporary parenting. We emphasize the relevance of research about the imaginary, because it guides social and professional behaviors, creation of the public policies and laws for the society in general. The use of Interactive Narratives, inserted in a psychoanalytic and qualitative research proposal, aims to restore the dialogue on research, inviting participants to complete a short fictional story previously prepared by researcher. This proceeding is intended to facilitate the associative movement of these participants and identifies the fields of affective-emotional meaning that are the laws governing the production of them. The four fields of meaning fund communicate affective-emocional prejudice against homosexuals and their supposed healing through love, the issue of normalization of the conduct and your perverse effect on clinical, the desire to have children in contemporary times and the role of psychologists meet the demands of happiness and rapid relief of suffering. We hope that this study contributes to a social debate about the Homoparenthood and also the homosexual issue which is implicit and resumes the problem of prejudice in our society. / Profundas transforma??es ocorreram na composi??o familiar, dando origem a novas configura??es familiares, por?m nenhum dos novos modelos ? t?o controverso quanto o modelo homoparental. Em nosso pa?s esse novo arranjo tem suscitado preconceito e questionamentos sobre a capacidade de uma fam?lia se constituir fora dos padr?es tradicionais e ainda assim ser capaz de criar indiv?duos saud?veis. Este trabalho tem como objetivo investigar o imagin?rio coletivo de estudantes de Psicologia a respeito da parentalidade homossexual, uma vez que a homoparentalidade desafia o psic?logo cujos pressupostos te?rico-metodol?gicos tem se mostrado inadequados para atender as demandas da parentalidade contempor?nea. Enfatizamos a relev?ncia das pesquisas sobre o imagin?rio, uma vez que este orienta condutas sociais, profissionais, pol?ticas p?blicas e leis para a sociedade em geral. O uso das Narrativas Interativas pretende dentro desta proposta de pesquisa qualitativa de orienta??o psicanal?tica restaurar o di?logo na pesquisa, convidando os participantes para que completem uma pequena hist?ria fict?cia previamente preparada pelo pesquisador. Esse procedimento visa facilitar o movimento associativo dos participantes, a partir do qual s?o identificados campos de sentido afetivo-emocional que organizam as produ??es narrativas, a partir da interlocu??o entre o pesquisador, seu grupo de pesquisa e a literatura cient?fica consultada. Os quatro campos de sentido afetivo-emocional encontrados comunicam o preconceito contra o homossexual e sua suposta cura pelo amor, a quest?o da normatiza??o das condutas e seu efeito perverso na cl?nica, o desejo de ter filhos em tempos que pouco tempo temos para eles, al?m do papel do psic?logo frente ?s demandas de felicidade e al?vio r?pido do sofrimento. Esperamos ainda que este estudo contribua para o debate social sobre a homoparentalidade, al?m da quest?o homossexual que lhe ? impl?cita e retoma o problema do preconceito em nossa sociedade.

L’objectif de cette thèse est de chercher à savoir ce qui, dans la société occidentale actuelle et notamment en France, caractérise nos choix en termes de sexualité aussi bien dans nos comportements intimes que dans notre représentation sociale identitaire. La bisexualité nous semble incarner une nouvelle forme de sexualité qui pose le problème du lien qui existerait entre le sexe – et tous les dispositifs qui le sous-tendent, comme, par exemple l’identité bisexuelle, le militantisme bisexuel ou plus encore la simple pratique de la bisexualité – et les institutions sociales en place actuellement. Notre thèse a pris pour point départ la question de notre liberté sexuelle pour aboutir à l’hypothèse selon laquelle nous nous révélons être les acteurs autant que les victimes d’un pouvoir de la sexualité qui mêle action institutionnelle sur notre sphère privée et résistance de chacun d’entre nous dans l’espace public. Ainsi, la sexualité est prise ici comme un objet où des enjeux politiques se jouent et participent à un mécanisme complexe dont les rouages font interagir des notions multiples : le corps, le désir, la procréation, la parentalité, mais encore le genre, comme jonction de cet ensemble. Si nous avons prioritairement étudié la bisexualité, nous n’avons, dans ce travail, jamais quitté l’analyse critique de l’hétérosexualité et de l’homosexualité – et de l’homoparentalité – dans une société française que nous interrogeons par rapport à la pratique de la sexualité de ses membres. Une enquête de terrain a donc été nécessaire pour comprendre comment les Français considèrent ce lien tout en les interrogeant sur les notions qui sont chères à l’ensemble de notre problématique. Après avoir préalablement travaillé sur les théories psychanalytiques qui concernent la sexualité et les sexualités – notamment les théories freudiennes – notre étude de terrain nous a permis d’aboutir à la thèse selon laquelle l’existence réelle d’une sexualité politique démontre que nous entrons dans une nouvelle ère sexuelle, de nouvelles frontières entre ce qui est privé et ce qui est public naissant. En ce sens, nous sommes peut-être en droit de parler d’une nouvelle révolution sexuelle faisant suite à celle qu’a connu l’Occident dans les années 70, révolution sexuelle où, comme Michel Foucault l’affirmait déjà, la sexualité s’avère aisément démontrer sa puissance socio-politique, jusqu’à pouvoir parler de « monarchie du sexe ». A travers une analyse qui s’appuie sur une étude théorique et une enquête de terrain, cette thèse tente de mieux comprendre ce qui guide nos choix sexuels et affectifs et la façon dont nous gérons nos sentiments amoureux dans une société où les liens qui unissent le discours sexuel et les représentations politiques de cette même sexualité, semblent ambigus. Qu’en est-il, alors, de notre liberté sexuelle ? Plus encore, comment considérer la place nouvelle que les sexualités minoritaires prennent aujourd’hui en France ? La bisexualité est-elle l’incarnation d’une nouvelle révolution de la façon de vivre la sexualité et d’aimer ? / The aim of this thesis is to find out what guides our choices in terms of sexuality, private behaviour, in our social identity representation in western society and more precisely in France. Bisexuality embodies a new form of sexuality that questions the link that may exist between sex (and all the devices that go along with such as bisexual identity, bisexual militancy and the actual practice of bisexuality) and social institutions. Our thesis goes from the question of our sexual freedom all the way up to the hypotheses that we are the stakeholders and the victims at the same time of a power of sexuality that mingles institutional actions in our private sphere and opposition in our public sphere. Therefore sexuality becomes the object of political stakes and the object of a complex mechanism, a kind of machinery that intermingles with a variety of notions : body, desire, procreation, parenthood and gender as a link-up of the whole. While bisexuality being a priority in this study, the critical analysis of heterosexuality, homosexuality and homoparenthood in the french society is transversal, being questioned in relation to the actual practice of sexuality in the french society. A first survey helped us understand how french people look at this link and question the key-ideas wich are essential to our thesis. The psychanalytic theories on sexuality – and sexualities – and specifically the Freudian theories, together with our field survey, shows that we might be at the edge of a new sexual era, presenting new boundaries between the private and the public spheres. This allows us to talk about a new sexual revolution following the one that occured in the Occident in the 1970s. This sexual revolution, as asserted in his time by Michel Foucault, brings to mind the idea of a sexuality that reveals its social and political power and can lead us to speak of a « sexual monarchy ». Through this analysis based on a theoretical study and a field survey, this thesis helps us understand our sexual and emotional choices and the way we handle our love feeling in a society where the links between sexual speeches and their political representations seem to be ambiguous. This leads us to question our sexual freedom. Furthermore, how to consider the new place of sexual minorities in France today ? Is bisexuality the embodiment of a new revolution regarding how we live our sexuality and the way we love each other ?

L’objectif de cette thèse est de chercher à savoir ce qui, dans la société occidentale actuelle et notamment en France, caractérise nos choix en termes de sexualité aussi bien dans nos comportements intimes que dans notre représentation sociale identitaire. La bisexualité nous semble incarner une nouvelle forme de sexualité qui pose le problème du lien qui existerait entre le sexe – et tous les dispositifs qui le sous-tendent, comme, par exemple l’identité bisexuelle, le militantisme bisexuel ou plus encore la simple pratique de la bisexualité – et les institutions sociales en place actuellement. Notre thèse a pris pour point départ la question de notre liberté sexuelle pour aboutir à l’hypothèse selon laquelle nous nous révélons être les acteurs autant que les victimes d’un pouvoir de la sexualité qui mêle action institutionnelle sur notre sphère privée et résistance de chacun d’entre nous dans l’espace public. Ainsi, la sexualité est prise ici comme un objet où des enjeux politiques se jouent et participent à un mécanisme complexe dont les rouages font interagir des notions multiples : le corps, le désir, la procréation, la parentalité, mais encore le genre, comme jonction de cet ensemble. Si nous avons prioritairement étudié la bisexualité, nous n’avons, dans ce travail, jamais quitté l’analyse critique de l’hétérosexualité et de l’homosexualité – et de l’homoparentalité – dans une société française que nous interrogeons par rapport à la pratique de la sexualité de ses membres. Une enquête de terrain a donc été nécessaire pour comprendre comment les Français considèrent ce lien tout en les interrogeant sur les notions qui sont chères à l’ensemble de notre problématique. Après avoir préalablement travaillé sur les théories psychanalytiques qui concernent la sexualité et les sexualités – notamment les théories freudiennes – notre étude de terrain nous a permis d’aboutir à la thèse selon laquelle l’existence réelle d’une sexualité politique démontre que nous entrons dans une nouvelle ère sexuelle, de nouvelles frontières entre ce qui est privé et ce qui est public naissant. En ce sens, nous sommes peut-être en droit de parler d’une nouvelle révolution sexuelle faisant suite à celle qu’a connu l’Occident dans les années 70, révolution sexuelle où, comme Michel Foucault l’affirmait déjà, la sexualité s’avère aisément démontrer sa puissance socio-politique, jusqu’à pouvoir parler de « monarchie du sexe ». A travers une analyse qui s’appuie sur une étude théorique et une enquête de terrain, cette thèse tente de mieux comprendre ce qui guide nos choix sexuels et affectifs et la façon dont nous gérons nos sentiments amoureux dans une société où les liens qui unissent le discours sexuel et les représentations politiques de cette même sexualité, semblent ambigus. Qu’en est-il, alors, de notre liberté sexuelle ? Plus encore, comment considérer la place nouvelle que les sexualités minoritaires prennent aujourd’hui en France ? La bisexualité est-elle l’incarnation d’une nouvelle révolution de la façon de vivre la sexualité et d’aimer ? / The aim of this thesis is to find out what guides our choices in terms of sexuality, private behaviour, in our social identity representation in western society and more precisely in France. Bisexuality embodies a new form of sexuality that questions the link that may exist between sex (and all the devices that go along with such as bisexual identity, bisexual militancy and the actual practice of bisexuality) and social institutions. Our thesis goes from the question of our sexual freedom all the way up to the hypotheses that we are the stakeholders and the victims at the same time of a power of sexuality that mingles institutional actions in our private sphere and opposition in our public sphere. Therefore sexuality becomes the object of political stakes and the object of a complex mechanism, a kind of machinery that intermingles with a variety of notions : body, desire, procreation, parenthood and gender as a link-up of the whole. While bisexuality being a priority in this study, the critical analysis of heterosexuality, homosexuality and homoparenthood in the french society is transversal, being questioned in relation to the actual practice of sexuality in the french society. A first survey helped us understand how french people look at this link and question the key-ideas wich are essential to our thesis. The psychanalytic theories on sexuality – and sexualities – and specifically the Freudian theories, together with our field survey, shows that we might be at the edge of a new sexual era, presenting new boundaries between the private and the public spheres. This allows us to talk about a new sexual revolution following the one that occured in the Occident in the 1970s. This sexual revolution, as asserted in his time by Michel Foucault, brings to mind the idea of a sexuality that reveals its social and political power and can lead us to speak of a « sexual monarchy ». Through this analysis based on a theoretical study and a field survey, this thesis helps us understand our sexual and emotional choices and the way we handle our love feeling in a society where the links between sexual speeches and their political representations seem to be ambiguous. This leads us to question our sexual freedom. Furthermore, how to consider the new place of sexual minorities in France today ? Is bisexuality the embodiment of a new revolution regarding how we live our sexuality and the way we love each other ?

Em nossa sociedade, a relação heterossexual ainda parece ser a única possibilidade legitimada para formação de um casal ou até mesmo de uma família. Porém, é cada vez maior o número de pessoas que desafia os discursos normativos presentes e busca a constituição de parcerias afetivo-sexuais com outras de seu próprio sexo, muitas vezes associando essas parcerias à experiência da parentalidade, seja com filhos biológicos ou adotivos. Com as crescentes discussões sobre os direitos sexuais reprodutivos e com o surgimento de novos arranjos familiares, entre eles o formado por casais homossexuais, começa-se a desconstruir o modelo ideal de família nuclear e abre-se caminho para discussão de temas como a maternidade lésbica. Este trabalho pretende contribuir com o debate da homoparentalidade, procurando demonstrar as especificidades existentes entre essas mulheres e suas formas de construir sua cidadania íntima dentro do contexto heteronormativo da sociedade brasileira. Para tanto, foi traçado o seguinte objetivo geral: compreender as concepções sobre a parentalidade de mulheres lésbicas que buscam a gravidez por meio de doadores de sêmen, sejam eles conhecidos ou desconhecidos. O estudo proposto baseia-se nos pressupostos da pesquisa qualitativa, como forma de privilegiar os discursos dos sujeitos como fonte de informação. Doze mulheres lésbicas aceitaram participar do estudo e foram entrevistadas entre os anos de 2009 e 2011. Os dados foram transcritos, organizados e analisados. A partir dos resultados, foi possível perceber que a vivência da maternidade por parte das mulheres lésbicas depende de fatores diversos como o histórico-cultural, o social, o jurídico-legal, o econômico e os relacionados às políticas públicas, além, é claro, da história de vida de cada uma dessas mulheres. Desta forma, para a mulher assumir a homossexualidade em uma sociedade heteronormativa e, ao mesmo tempo, optar pela maternidade, é necessário percorrer um árduo caminho, onde uma das saídas parece ser a luta pela cidadania plena e consolidação dos direitos humanos. Isto aponta para a importância de se abordar o tema em estudos e discussões acadêmicas com outras esferas da política pública e da vida social, incluindo a saúde pública / In our society, the heterosexual relationship still appears to be the only legitimate form to be a couple or to be a family. However, an increasing number of people who challenge the normative discourse are seeking for same-sex partnerships, often associating these partnerships to the experience of parenting, with biological or adoptive children. The increasing discussions about reproductive and sexual rights and the emergence of new family arrangements, including the one formed by homosexual couples, began to deconstruct the ideal model of nuclear family and its opens up the way for new discussions such as lesbian motherhood. This study intend to contribute to the homoparenthood debate, by demonstrating the specificities between these women and their ways to construct an intimate citizenship within the context of Brazilian heternormative society. To do so, the following overall aim was: to comprehend the parenthood concepts of lesbian women who seek pregnancy through known or unknown semen donor. The proposed study is based on the assumptions of qualitative research, which means that the subjects discourse was the source of information. Twelve lesbians were interviewed between the years 2009 and 2011. The data were transcribed, organized and analyzed. From the results, it was revealed that the motherhood experience by lesbians depends on several factors such as historical, cultural, social, juridical, legal, economic, public policies, and, of course, the personal history of each of these women. Thus, for women who come out as a lesbian in a heteronormative society and at the same time, opt for motherhood, they have a hard road to face. The solution seems to be to struggle for citizenship and human rights consolidation. So, its important working up this issue in academic studies and to discuss with other spheres of public policy and social life, including public health

Em nossa sociedade, a relação heterossexual ainda parece ser a única possibilidade legitimada para formação de um casal ou até mesmo de uma família. Porém, é cada vez maior o número de pessoas que desafia os discursos normativos presentes e busca a constituição de parcerias afetivo-sexuais com outras de seu próprio sexo, muitas vezes associando essas parcerias à experiência da parentalidade, seja com filhos biológicos ou adotivos. Com as crescentes discussões sobre os direitos sexuais reprodutivos e com o surgimento de novos arranjos familiares, entre eles o formado por casais homossexuais, começa-se a desconstruir o modelo ideal de família nuclear e abre-se caminho para discussão de temas como a maternidade lésbica. Este trabalho pretende contribuir com o debate da homoparentalidade, procurando demonstrar as especificidades existentes entre essas mulheres e suas formas de construir sua cidadania íntima dentro do contexto heteronormativo da sociedade brasileira. Para tanto, foi traçado o seguinte objetivo geral: compreender as concepções sobre a parentalidade de mulheres lésbicas que buscam a gravidez por meio de doadores de sêmen, sejam eles conhecidos ou desconhecidos. O estudo proposto baseia-se nos pressupostos da pesquisa qualitativa, como forma de privilegiar os discursos dos sujeitos como fonte de informação. Doze mulheres lésbicas aceitaram participar do estudo e foram entrevistadas entre os anos de 2009 e 2011. Os dados foram transcritos, organizados e analisados. A partir dos resultados, foi possível perceber que a vivência da maternidade por parte das mulheres lésbicas depende de fatores diversos como o histórico-cultural, o social, o jurídico-legal, o econômico e os relacionados às políticas públicas, além, é claro, da história de vida de cada uma dessas mulheres. Desta forma, para a mulher assumir a homossexualidade em uma sociedade heteronormativa e, ao mesmo tempo, optar pela maternidade, é necessário percorrer um árduo caminho, onde uma das saídas parece ser a luta pela cidadania plena e consolidação dos direitos humanos. Isto aponta para a importância de se abordar o tema em estudos e discussões acadêmicas com outras esferas da política pública e da vida social, incluindo a saúde pública / In our society, the heterosexual relationship still appears to be the only legitimate form to be a couple or to be a family. However, an increasing number of people who challenge the normative discourse are seeking for same-sex partnerships, often associating these partnerships to the experience of parenting, with biological or adoptive children. The increasing discussions about reproductive and sexual rights and the emergence of new family arrangements, including the one formed by homosexual couples, began to deconstruct the ideal model of nuclear family and its opens up the way for new discussions such as lesbian motherhood. This study intend to contribute to the homoparenthood debate, by demonstrating the specificities between these women and their ways to construct an intimate citizenship within the context of Brazilian heternormative society. To do so, the following overall aim was: to comprehend the parenthood concepts of lesbian women who seek pregnancy through known or unknown semen donor. The proposed study is based on the assumptions of qualitative research, which means that the subjects discourse was the source of information. Twelve lesbians were interviewed between the years 2009 and 2011. The data were transcribed, organized and analyzed. From the results, it was revealed that the motherhood experience by lesbians depends on several factors such as historical, cultural, social, juridical, legal, economic, public policies, and, of course, the personal history of each of these women. Thus, for women who come out as a lesbian in a heteronormative society and at the same time, opt for motherhood, they have a hard road to face. The solution seems to be to struggle for citizenship and human rights consolidation. So, its important working up this issue in academic studies and to discuss with other spheres of public policy and social life, including public health

L’objectif de cette thèse est de chercher à savoir ce qui, dans la société occidentale actuelle et notamment en France, caractérise nos choix en termes de sexualité aussi bien dans nos comportements intimes que dans notre représentation sociale identitaire. La bisexualité nous semble incarner une nouvelle forme de sexualité qui pose le problème du lien qui existerait entre le sexe – et tous les dispositifs qui le sous-tendent, comme, par exemple l’identité bisexuelle, le militantisme bisexuel ou plus encore la simple pratique de la bisexualité – et les institutions sociales en place actuellement. Notre thèse a pris pour point départ la question de notre liberté sexuelle pour aboutir à l’hypothèse selon laquelle nous nous révélons être les acteurs autant que les victimes d’un pouvoir de la sexualité qui mêle action institutionnelle sur notre sphère privée et résistance de chacun d’entre nous dans l’espace public. Ainsi, la sexualité est prise ici comme un objet où des enjeux politiques se jouent et participent à un mécanisme complexe dont les rouages font interagir des notions multiples : le corps, le désir, la procréation, la parentalité, mais encore le genre, comme jonction de cet ensemble. Si nous avons prioritairement étudié la bisexualité, nous n’avons, dans ce travail, jamais quitté l’analyse critique de l’hétérosexualité et de l’homosexualité – et de l’homoparentalité – dans une société française que nous interrogeons par rapport à la pratique de la sexualité de ses membres. Une enquête de terrain a donc été nécessaire pour comprendre comment les Français considèrent ce lien tout en les interrogeant sur les notions qui sont chères à l’ensemble de notre problématique. Après avoir préalablement travaillé sur les théories psychanalytiques qui concernent la sexualité et les sexualités – notamment les théories freudiennes – notre étude de terrain nous a permis d’aboutir à la thèse selon laquelle l’existence réelle d’une sexualité politique démontre que nous entrons dans une nouvelle ère sexuelle, de nouvelles frontières entre ce qui est privé et ce qui est public naissant. En ce sens, nous sommes peut-être en droit de parler d’une nouvelle révolution sexuelle faisant suite à celle qu’a connu l’Occident dans les années 70, révolution sexuelle où, comme Michel Foucault l’affirmait déjà, la sexualité s’avère aisément démontrer sa puissance socio-politique, jusqu’à pouvoir parler de « monarchie du sexe ». A travers une analyse qui s’appuie sur une étude théorique et une enquête de terrain, cette thèse tente de mieux comprendre ce qui guide nos choix sexuels et affectifs et la façon dont nous gérons nos sentiments amoureux dans une société où les liens qui unissent le discours sexuel et les représentations politiques de cette même sexualité, semblent ambigus. Qu’en est-il, alors, de notre liberté sexuelle ? Plus encore, comment considérer la place nouvelle que les sexualités minoritaires prennent aujourd’hui en France ? La bisexualité est-elle l’incarnation d’une nouvelle révolution de la façon de vivre la sexualité et d’aimer ? / The aim of this thesis is to find out what guides our choices in terms of sexuality, private behaviour, in our social identity representation in western society and more precisely in France. Bisexuality embodies a new form of sexuality that questions the link that may exist between sex (and all the devices that go along with such as bisexual identity, bisexual militancy and the actual practice of bisexuality) and social institutions. Our thesis goes from the question of our sexual freedom all the way up to the hypotheses that we are the stakeholders and the victims at the same time of a power of sexuality that mingles institutional actions in our private sphere and opposition in our public sphere. Therefore sexuality becomes the object of political stakes and the object of a complex mechanism, a kind of machinery that intermingles with a variety of notions : body, desire, procreation, parenthood and gender as a link-up of the whole. While bisexuality being a priority in this study, the critical analysis of heterosexuality, homosexuality and homoparenthood in the french society is transversal, being questioned in relation to the actual practice of sexuality in the french society. A first survey helped us understand how french people look at this link and question the key-ideas wich are essential to our thesis. The psychanalytic theories on sexuality – and sexualities – and specifically the Freudian theories, together with our field survey, shows that we might be at the edge of a new sexual era, presenting new boundaries between the private and the public spheres. This allows us to talk about a new sexual revolution following the one that occured in the Occident in the 1970s. This sexual revolution, as asserted in his time by Michel Foucault, brings to mind the idea of a sexuality that reveals its social and political power and can lead us to speak of a « sexual monarchy ». Through this analysis based on a theoretical study and a field survey, this thesis helps us understand our sexual and emotional choices and the way we handle our love feeling in a society where the links between sexual speeches and their political representations seem to be ambiguous. This leads us to question our sexual freedom. Furthermore, how to consider the new place of sexual minorities in France today ? Is bisexuality the embodiment of a new revolution regarding how we live our sexuality and the way we love each other ?