Genomic imprinting is responsible for monoallelic gene expression that depends on the sex of the parent from which the alleles (one active, one silent) were inherited. X-chromosome inactivation is also a form of monoallelic gene expression. One of the two X chromosomes is transcriptionally silenced in the somatic cells of females, effectively equalising gene dosage with males who have only one X chromosome that is not complemented by a gene poor Y chromosome. X chromosome inactivation is random in eutherian mammals, but imprinted in marsupials, and in the extraembryonic membranes of some placentals. Imprinting and X inactivation have been studied in great detail in placental mammals (particularly humans and mice), and appear to occur also in marsupial mammals. However, both phenomena appear to have evolved specifically in mammals, since there is no evidence of imprinting or X inactivation in non-mammalian vertebrates, which do not show parent of origin effects and possess different sex chromosomes and dosage compensation mechanisms to mammals.¶ In order to understand how imprinting and X inactivation evolved, I have focused on the mammals most distantly related to human and mouse. I compared the sequence, location and expression of genes from major imprinted domains, and genes that regulate genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation in the three extant mammalian groups and other vertebrates. Specifically, I studied the evolution of an autosomal region that is imprinted in humans and mouse, the evolution of the X-linked region thought to control X inactivation, and the evolution of the genes thought to establish and control differential expression of various imprinted loci. This thesis is presented as a collection of research papers that examines each of these topics, and a review and discussion that synthesizes my findings.¶ The first paper reports a study of the imprinted locus responsible for the human Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes (PWS and AS). A search for kangaroo and platypus orthologues of PWS-AS genes identified only the putative AS gene UBE3A, and showed it was in a completely different genomic context to that of humans and mice. The only PWS gene found in marsupials (SNRPN) was located in tandem with its ancient paralogue SNRPB, on a different chromosome to UBE3A. Monotremes apparently have no orthologue of SNRPN. The several intronless genes of the PWS-AS domain also have no orthologues in marsupials or monotremes or non-mammal vertebrates, but all have close paralogues scattered about the genome from which they evidently retrotransposed. UBE3A in marsupials and monotremes, and SNRPN in marsupials were found to be expressed from both alleles, so are not imprinted. Thus, the PWA-AS imprinted domain was assembled from many non-imprinted components relatively recently, demonstrating that the evolution of imprinting has been an ongoing process during mammalian radiation.¶ In the second paper, I examine the evolution of the X-inactivation centre, the key regulatory region responsible for X-chromosome inactivation in humans and mice, which is imprinted in mouse extraembryonic membranes. By sequencing and aligning flanking regions across the three mammal groups and non-mammal vertebrates, I discovered that the region homologous to the X-inactivation centre, though intact in birds and frogs, was disrupted independently in marsupial and monotreme mammals. I showed that the key regulatory RNA of this locus (X-inactive specific transcript or XIST) is absent, explaining why a decade-long search for marsupial XIST was unsuccessful. Thus, XIST is eutherian-specific and is therefore not a basic requirement for X-chromosome inactivation in all mammals.¶ The broader significance of the findings reported in these two papers is explored with respect to other current work regarding the evolution and construction of imprinted loci in mammals in the form of a review. This comparison enabled me to conclude that like the PWS-AS domain and the X-inactivation centre, many domains show unexpected construction from disparate genomic elements that correlate with their acquisition of imprinting.¶ The fourth and last paper examines the evolution of CCCTC-binding Factor (CTCF) and its parologue Brother Of Regulator of Imprinted Sites (BORIS) which contribute to the establishment and interpretation of genomic imprinting at the Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2/H19 locus. In this paper I show that the duplication of CTCF giving rise to BORIS occurred much earlier than previously recognised, and demonstrate that a major change in BORIS expression (restriction to the germline) occurred in concert with the evolution of genomic imprinting. The papers that form the bulk of this thesis show that the evolution of epigenetic traits such as genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation is labile and has apparently responded rapidly to different selective pressures during the independent evolution of the three mammal groups. I have introduced these papers, and discussed them generally in terms of current theories of how and why these forms of monoallelic expression have evolved in mammals.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Title proper from title frame. Also available in printed format.

<p>Genomic imprinting marks a subset of autosomal loci expressed in parent of origin-dependent monoallelic expression in a non-Mendelian fashion. To restore totipotency and to reset the imprint according to the sex of the individual, the mark must be erased during germline development. The imprinted <i>Igf2-H19</i> loci located distally on chromosome 7 in mouse and 11p15.5 in human, share common regulatory elements that regulate differential expression. Where the <i>H19 </i>is silenced when paternally inherited, the <i>Igf2</i> is silenced when maternally inherited. </p><p>The differentially methylated 5'-flank of <i>H19</i> gene, termed imprinting control region (ICR), shown to display a unique chromatin organisation harbours hypersensitive sites in linker regions flanked by positioned nucleosomes on the maternal allele. This unique chromatin conformation functions as a methylation-sensitive and unidirectional chromatin insulator, which later was found to depend on the chromatin insulator protein CTCF. </p><p>The <i>H19</i> ICR exhibits default-silencing functions in promoter-proximal positions. The maximal distance between the <i>H19</i> ICR and the promoter of the reporter gene required for this effect was 1.2 ± 0.3kb which can be compared to the 1.9 kb distance between the endogenous <i>H19 </i>ICR and <i>H19</i> promoter. Results suggest that the <i>H19</i> ICR adopts a chromatin conformation that must be separated by a minimal distance from pivotal <i>cis</i>-regulatory elements to avoid adverse effects on neighbouring promoters. </p><p>Poly(ADP-ribosy)lation represents a novel post-translational epigenetic mark that segregates with exclusively the maternal derived <i>H19</i> ICR and associated with factors that interact with the CTCF target sites. CTCF is itself poly(ADP-ribosy)lated and the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide relieves the insulator function of the <i>H19</i> ICR. </p><p>Designed zinc finger proteins were applied to examine if epigenetic marks provided an obstacle for targeted activation and silencing. The zinc finger protein ZFP809 with activator/repressor domain able to efficiently activate/silence the <i>IGF2</i> target. Murine hybrid cell lines of human chromosome 11, demonstrated that the ZFP809 overcame the epigenetic marks that repressed maternal <i>IGF2</i> and paternal <i>H19</i> allele, respectively. Results suggested that imprinted genes are not normally exposed to strong <i>cis</i>-regulatory elements and that the designed ZFPs can be exploited to develop a therapeutic method for rectifying epigenetic lesions.</p>

<p>An overall coordination between the expressions of genes is required for the proper development of an individual. Although most genes are expressed from both the constituent alleles of the genome, a small subset of autosomal genes are preferentially expressed from only one of the parental alleles, a phenomenon known as genomic imprinting. </p><p>The imprinted <i>H19</i> and <i>Igf2</i> genes are considered paradigms of genomic imprinting as their monoallelic expression pattern is coordinated by a short stretch of sequence located upstream of <i>H19</i>, known as the imprinting control region (ICR). This region shows differential methylation, with hypermethylation specifically on the paternal allele. On the maternal allele this region acts as an insulator and harbours maternal specific hypersensitive sites. </p><p>The hypersensitive sites were identified as the result of association of the vertebrate insulator protein CTCF with the region. This association was investigated in both an <i>in vitro</i> episomal system and in an <i>in vivo</i> mouse model system by mutating the CTCF target sites at the <i>H19</i> ICR. The importance of CTCF for the insulator property of the region was confirmed in both instances. In the mouse model, the disruption of the binding was also observed to affect the methylation profile of the ICR, which ultimately resulted in the de-repression of the maternal <i>Igf2</i> allele.</p><p>The relevance of multiple CTCF target sites in higher vertebrates for the proper insulator function was investigated using another knock-in mouse model with mutation at a single CTCF target site in the <i>H19</i> ICR. The investigation confirmed the cooperation between the target sites for the establishment of a functional insulator on the maternal allele. Target sites in the ICR were also analysed for their differential binding affinity for the CTCF protein.</p><p>The utilisation of the CTCF target sites was examined in different human tumours and cell lines. Methylation analysis conveyed a lack of correlation between the loss of insulator function and methylation status of the ICR with the loss of imprinting (LOI) of <i>IGF2</i>. Investigations also identified a novel mechanism, which neutralised the chromatin insulator function of the <i>H19</i> ICR without affecting its chromatin conformation. This principle might also help in explaining the loss of <i>IGF2</i> imprinting observed in some instances.</p><p>In conclusion, this thesis confirms the importance of CTCF in the formation of an epigenetically regulated chromatin insulator at the ICR, which in turn controls the expression pattern of <i>H19</i> and <i>Igf2</i>. The studies also confirm the role of CTCF in the maintenance of the methylation profile of the region. Investigations into the loss of <i>IGF2 </i>imprinting in human cancer indicate the involvement of other novel mechanisms besides CTCF in the regulation of insulator function.</p>

<p>Genomic imprinting is a phenomenon through which a subset of genes are epigenetically marked during gemtogenisis. This mark is maintained in the soma to often manifest parent of origin-specific monoalleleic expresson patterns. Genetics evidence suggests that gene expression patterns in mprinted genes, which are frequently organised in clusters, are regulated by the imprinting control regions (ICR). This thesis is mainly focused on the mechanisms through which the ICRs control the imprinting in the cluster, containing the <i>Kcnq1, Igf2</i> and <i>H19</i> genes, located at the distal end of mouse chromosome 7.</p><p>The <i>H19</i> ICR, located in the 5' flank of the <i>H19</i> gene represses paternal <i>H19</i> and maternal <i>Igf2</i> expression, respectively, but has no effect on <i>Kcnq1</i> expression, which is controlled by another ICR located at the intron 10 of the <i>Kcnq1</i> gene. This thesis demonstrates that the maternal <i>H19</i> ICR allele contains several DNase I hypersensitive sites, which map to target sites for the chromatin insulator protein CTCF at the linker regions between the positioned nucleosomes. The thesis demonstrates that the <i>H19</i> ICR acts as a unidirectional insulator and that this property invovles three nucleosome positioning sites facilitating interaction between the <i>H19</i> ICR and CTCF. The <i>Kcnq1</i> ICR function is much more complex, since it horbours both lineage-specific silencing functions and a methylation sensitive unidirectional chromatin insulator function. Importantly, the thesis demonstrates that the <i>Kcnq1</i> ICR spreads DNA methylation into flanking region only when it is itself unmethylated. Both the methylation spreading and silencing functions map to the same regions.</p><p>In conclusion, the thesis has unraveled and unrivalled complexity of the epigenetic control and function of short strtches of sequences. The epigenetic status of these cis elements conspires to control long-range silencing and insulation. The manner these imprinting control regions can cause havoc in expresson domains in human diseases is hence emerging.</p>

Nature has always served as a model for mimicking and inspiration to humans in their efforts to improve their life. Researchers have been inspired by nature to produce biomimetic materials with molecular recognition properties by design rather than evolution. Molecular imprinting is one way to prepare such materials. Such smart materials with new functionalities are at the forefront of the development of a relevant number of ongoing and perspective applications ranging from consumer to space industry. Molecularly imprinted polymers were developed by mimicking the natural enzymes or antibodies that serve as host for binding target molecules. These imprints were used as a recognition element to substitute natural biomolecules in biosensors. The concept behind molecular imprinting is to mold a material (with the desired chemical properties) around individual molecules. Upon removal of the molecular templates, one is left with regions in the molded material that fit the shape of the template molecules. Thus, molecular imprinting results in materials that can selectively bind to molecules of interest. Imprinted materials resulted in applications ranging from chemical separation to bioanalytics. In this work attempts were made particularly in the development of molecularly imprinted polymer based thermometric sensors. The main effort was focused towards the development of an covalently imprinted polymer that would be able to selectively bind fructosyl valine (Fru-Val), the N-terminal constituent of hemoglobin A1c ß-chains. Taking into account the known advantages of imprinted polymers, e.g. robustness, thermal and chemical stability, imprinted materials were successfully used as a recognition element in the sensor. One of the serious problems associated with the development of MIP sensors and which lies in the absence of a generic procedure for the transformation of the polymer-template binding event into a detectable signal has been addressed by developing the "thermometric" approach. In general the developed approach gives a new insight on MIP/Analyte interactions. / In dem Bestreben, ihr eigenes Leben zu verbessern, haben die Menschen stets die Natur nachgeahmt und sich von ihr inspirieren lassen. Die Natur hat Forscher zur Erzeugung smarter biomimetischer Stoffe mit molekularen Erkennungseigenschaften nach dem Vorbild der Evolution inspiriert. Eine der Methoden zur Herstellung solcher Substanzen ist das molekulare Prägen. Smarte Materialien mit neuen Eigenschaften stehen an der Spitze der Entwicklung potentieller Anwendungen vom Verbraucher bis hin zur Raumfahrtindustrie. Durch Nachahmung von natürlichen Enzymen oder Antikörpern wurden molekular geprägte Polymere (MIPs) entwickelt, die der Bindung von Zielmolekülen dienen. Diese geprägten Polymere (imprints) wurden anstelle von Biomolekülen als Erkennungselemente in Biosensoren eingesetzt. Das Konzept, das dem molekularen Prägen zugrunde liegt, besteht in der Formung eines Polymers (mit den entsprechenden chemischen Eigenschaften) um einzelne Zielmoleküle herum. Nach Entfernen dieser molekularen Template bleiben Abdrücke im Polymer übrig, die der Form der Templatmoleküle entsprechen. Mit Hilfe des molekularen Prägens kann man also Stoffe herstellen, die sich selektiv an bestimmte Moleküle binden können. Geprägte Polymere finden breite Anwendung, etwa in chemischen Aufreinigungsprozessen und der Bioanalytik. Hauptanliegen der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, thermometrische Sensoren auf der Basis molekular geprägter Polymere zu entwickeln. Die Anstrengungen richteten sich vor allem auf die Entwicklung eines kovalent geprägten Polymers, das in der Lage ist, selektiv Fruktosyl-Valin (Fru-Val), den N-terminalen Bereich von Hämoglobin A1c, zu binden. Aufgrund der bekannten Vorzüge geprägter Polymere – z. B. Robustheit und thermische und chemische Stabilität – wurden geprägte Polymere erfolgreich als Erkennungselement im Sensor angewendet. Eine der größten Herausforderungen bei der Entwicklung von MIP-Sensoren, das Fehlen eines generischen Verfahrens zur Umwandlung der Bindungsreaktion in ein nachweisbares Signal, wurde mit der Entwicklung der thermometrischen Methode in Angriff genommen. Diese Methode führt allgemein zu neuen Einsichten in die Interaktionen zwischen MIP und Analyt.

Genomic imprinting marks a subset of autosomal loci expressed in parent of origin-dependent monoallelic expression in a non-Mendelian fashion. To restore totipotency and to reset the imprint according to the sex of the individual, the mark must be erased during germline development. The imprinted Igf2-H19 loci located distally on chromosome 7 in mouse and 11p15.5 in human, share common regulatory elements that regulate differential expression. Where the H19 is silenced when paternally inherited, the Igf2 is silenced when maternally inherited. The differentially methylated 5'-flank of H19 gene, termed imprinting control region (ICR), shown to display a unique chromatin organisation harbours hypersensitive sites in linker regions flanked by positioned nucleosomes on the maternal allele. This unique chromatin conformation functions as a methylation-sensitive and unidirectional chromatin insulator, which later was found to depend on the chromatin insulator protein CTCF. The H19 ICR exhibits default-silencing functions in promoter-proximal positions. The maximal distance between the H19 ICR and the promoter of the reporter gene required for this effect was 1.2 ± 0.3kb which can be compared to the 1.9 kb distance between the endogenous H19 ICR and H19 promoter. Results suggest that the H19 ICR adopts a chromatin conformation that must be separated by a minimal distance from pivotal cis-regulatory elements to avoid adverse effects on neighbouring promoters. Poly(ADP-ribosy)lation represents a novel post-translational epigenetic mark that segregates with exclusively the maternal derived H19 ICR and associated with factors that interact with the CTCF target sites. CTCF is itself poly(ADP-ribosy)lated and the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide relieves the insulator function of the H19 ICR. Designed zinc finger proteins were applied to examine if epigenetic marks provided an obstacle for targeted activation and silencing. The zinc finger protein ZFP809 with activator/repressor domain able to efficiently activate/silence the IGF2 target. Murine hybrid cell lines of human chromosome 11, demonstrated that the ZFP809 overcame the epigenetic marks that repressed maternal IGF2 and paternal H19 allele, respectively. Results suggested that imprinted genes are not normally exposed to strong cis-regulatory elements and that the designed ZFPs can be exploited to develop a therapeutic method for rectifying epigenetic lesions.

An overall coordination between the expressions of genes is required for the proper development of an individual. Although most genes are expressed from both the constituent alleles of the genome, a small subset of autosomal genes are preferentially expressed from only one of the parental alleles, a phenomenon known as genomic imprinting. The imprinted H19 and Igf2 genes are considered paradigms of genomic imprinting as their monoallelic expression pattern is coordinated by a short stretch of sequence located upstream of H19, known as the imprinting control region (ICR). This region shows differential methylation, with hypermethylation specifically on the paternal allele. On the maternal allele this region acts as an insulator and harbours maternal specific hypersensitive sites. The hypersensitive sites were identified as the result of association of the vertebrate insulator protein CTCF with the region. This association was investigated in both an in vitro episomal system and in an in vivo mouse model system by mutating the CTCF target sites at the H19 ICR. The importance of CTCF for the insulator property of the region was confirmed in both instances. In the mouse model, the disruption of the binding was also observed to affect the methylation profile of the ICR, which ultimately resulted in the de-repression of the maternal Igf2 allele. The relevance of multiple CTCF target sites in higher vertebrates for the proper insulator function was investigated using another knock-in mouse model with mutation at a single CTCF target site in the H19 ICR. The investigation confirmed the cooperation between the target sites for the establishment of a functional insulator on the maternal allele. Target sites in the ICR were also analysed for their differential binding affinity for the CTCF protein. The utilisation of the CTCF target sites was examined in different human tumours and cell lines. Methylation analysis conveyed a lack of correlation between the loss of insulator function and methylation status of the ICR with the loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2. Investigations also identified a novel mechanism, which neutralised the chromatin insulator function of the H19 ICR without affecting its chromatin conformation. This principle might also help in explaining the loss of IGF2 imprinting observed in some instances. In conclusion, this thesis confirms the importance of CTCF in the formation of an epigenetically regulated chromatin insulator at the ICR, which in turn controls the expression pattern of H19 and Igf2. The studies also confirm the role of CTCF in the maintenance of the methylation profile of the region. Investigations into the loss of IGF2 imprinting in human cancer indicate the involvement of other novel mechanisms besides CTCF in the regulation of insulator function.

Non-coding antisense RNAs have been implicated in the epigenetic silencing of individual gene as well as chromosomal domains. While silencing of the overlapping gene by antisense RNAs has been well investigated, their functional role in silencing of chromosomal domains remains enigmatic. To elucidate mechanisms underlying the non-coding RNA mediated epigenetic silencing of chromosomal domains, we have chosen an antisense non-coding RNA, Kcnq1ot1, as a model system. Previously, a functional role of Kcnq1ot1 RNA and/or its transcriptional process has been implicated in silencing of multiple genes in the Kcnq1 imprinted cluster. However, these studies could not rule out the mechanisms involving other than Kcnq1ot1 RNA. Furthermore, it was also unclear how the Kcnq1ot1 promoter escapes silencing when its encoded RNA is capable of silencing flanking genes in cis. We have shown that NF-Y transcription factor plays a central role in the Kcnq1ot1 promoter activity, and that mutation of the NF-Y binding sites not only resulted in loss of silencing of flanking genes but also the ability of the Kcnq1ot1 promoter to protect against repressive chromatin marks, indicating that NF-Y maintains transcription-competent chromatin at the promoter through resisting the strong silencing effects of Kcnq1ot1 RNA. The Kcnq1ot1 RNA is an RNA Polymerase II encoded 91 kb long moderately stable nuclear transcript. We have demonstrated that it is the RNA not the act of transcription responsible for silencing and that the degree of silencing was proportional to the length of Kcnq1ot1 RNA. The kinetics of heterochromatin formation in relation to Kcnq1ot1 transcription revealed that overlapping gene was silenced initially by occlusion of basal transcription machinery and heterochromatin formation, whereas nonoverlapping gene was silenced subsequently by Kcnq1ot1-mediated heterochromatin spreading. This transcriptional silencing by Kcnq1ot1 RNA is mediated by an 890 bp region through promoting its interaction with the chromatin. Interestingly, we show that Kcnq1ot1 RNA establishes heterochromatin structures in a lineage-specific fashion by interacting with chromatin and chromatin remodelling complexes such as G9a and PRC2 complexes. More importantly, one of the parental chromosomes comprising Kcnq1 domain always found in the vicinity of perinucleolar region. Based on these data we proposed a mechanism whereby Kcnq1ot1 RNA establishes transcriptional silencing through recruitment of chromatin remodelling machinery and the maintenance of silencing achieved via targeting to the perinucleolar region.

In mammals, the most frequently observed hybrid dysgenesis effects are growth disturbances and male sterility. Profound defects in placental development have been described and our work on hybrids in genus Mus has demonstrated putative hybrid dysgenesis effects that lead to defects in lipid homeostasis and maternal behavior. Interestingly, mammalian interspecies hybrids exhibit strong parent-of-origin effects in that offspring of reciprocal matings, even though genetically identical, frequently exhibit reciprocal phenotypes. Recent studies have provided strong link between epigenetic regulation and growth, behavior and placental development. Widespread disruption of genomic imprinting has been described in hybrids between closely related species of the genus Peromyscus. The studies presented in this thesis aim to investigate the effects of disrupted epigenetics states on altered growth, female infanticide and placental dysplasia observed in Mus hybrids. We showed that loss-of-imprinting (LOI) of a paternally expressed gene, Peg1, was correlated with increased body weight of F1 hybrids. Furthermore, we investigated whether LOI of Peg1 in F1 females would interfere with maternal behavior. A subset of F1 females indeed exhibited highly abnormal maternal behavior in that they rapidly attacked and killed the pups. By microarray hybridization, a large number of differentially expressed genes in the infanticidal females as compared to normally behaving females were identified. In addtion to Peg1 LOI, we studied allelic expression of numerous imprinted genes in adult Mus interspecies hybrids. In contrast to the study from Peromyscus, patterns of LOI were not consistent with a direct influence of altered expression levels of imprinted genes on growth. Finally, we investigated the allelic interaction between an X-linked locus and a paternally expressed gene, Peg3, in placental defects in Mus hybrids. This study further strengthened the notion that divergent genetic and epigenetic mechanisms may be involved in hybrid dysgenesis in diverse groups of mammals.