Den större ischiasskåran (incisura ischiadica major) är en inskärning i höftbenet som karakteriseras av morfologier, användbara för att estimera biologiskt kön. Slutsatser gjorda från okulära observationer kan variera beroende på utövare och därmed kan morfologiska metoder anses vara mindre tillförlitliga gentemot metriska metoder. Tillvägagångssättet för denna uppsats bestod av en jämförande studie mellan en metod som använder formanalys och en som använder vinkelgrad för att bedöma biologiskt kön, på den större ischiasskåran. I denna uppsats användes ett praktiskt tillvägagångssätt för att observera 33 höftben från Sankt Hans medeltida kyrkogård. Det osteologiska materialet var inlånat från Gotlands museum och det praktiska arbetet utfördes på plats på magasinet, under våren 2024. Undersökningsmaterialet avgränsades till att inkludera endast vuxna individer av både manligt och kvinnligt kön. Resultaten visade att det finns en korrelation mellan kurvan på inskärningen och biologiskt kön. I diskussionsdelen av uppsatsen diskuterades tillförlitlighet och användarvänlighet för de två metoderna samt hur de kan nyttjas i osteologiska sammanhang. / The greater sciatic notch (incisura ischiadica major) is an incision in the hip bone that is characterized by morphologies, useful to assess biological sex. Conclusions that are made from visual observations may vary between practitioners, and therefore, morphological methods can be less reliable than metric methods. The approach of this essay consisted of a comparative study between a method using shape analysis and one using angle degree to assess biological sex, on the greater sciatic notch. In this essay, a practical approach was applied to observe 33 hip bones from Sankt Hans medieval cemetery. The material was borrowed from Gotland’s Museum, and the practical work was performed on site, during spring of 2024. The studied material was delimitated to include only adult individuals consisting of both males and females. The results showed that there is a correlation between the curve of the incision and biological sex. In the discussion, the essay explored the reliability and user-friendliness of the two methods, along with their potential applications in osteological contexts.

The aim of this work is sexual dimorphism quantification of greater sciatic notch profile using 2D geometric morphometrics methods. The curvature was digitized by two different methods - manually with contact digitizer MicroScribe G2 and automatically with software Morphome3cs. Results from each method were comparised and advatages and disadvantages of boths methods were discussed. Target sample of 114 adult specimens of known sex was analyzed. This collection comes from Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque and contains 57 male and 57 female hip bones. For the method verification the test smaple contains 112 adult specimens of known sex was used. This collection comes from Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México (UNAM). This collection contains 56 male and 56 female hip bones. The procrustes analysis, principal components analysis, thin plate spine and discriminant function analysis were used for analysis. We could make a detail description of morphologic differences in greater sciatic notch shape of men and women because of shape visualisation and difference of both group was confirmed by discriminant function analysis. Sex assesment achieves accuracy 92,11% - 98,25% in dependence on used methods and number of semilandmarks.