• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 13
  • 13
  • 6
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

DNA and DNA-Interacting Proteins as Anticancer Drug Targets

Punchihewa, Chandanamalie January 2006 (has links)
DNA is both the oldest and newest of targets for cancer therapy. While it is already being targeted by many anticancer drugs in the clinic, the development of sequence-specific DNA binders has brought it back to the limelight as a valuable anticancer drug target.My studies on DNA interacting agents was initiated with the DNA intercalator campotothecin, and also included topoisomerase I enzyme. I have evaluated the structure of topoisomerase I C-terminal domain that consists of the active site tyrosine. My data indicate that this domain exists in a molten globule conformation with a fluctuating tertiary structure. These fluctuations are suggested to be important in interaction with the topoisomerase I core domain and DNA. I have also evaluated the DNA interactions of the camptothecin analogue homocamptothecin and have determined that homocamptothecin intercalate with DNA in the absence of topoisomerase I, and that such intercalation results in its lactone stabilization. Subsequently, the mechanism of topoisomerase I mediated inhibition of HIF-1 by camptothecin was explored. I have shown that camptothecin stimulate topoisomerase I cleavage complex formation in the HIF-1 binding site, which is suggested to prevent the DNA binding of HIF-1.The second part of this study was focused on understanding the mechanism of action of another DNA binder, XR5944. Designed as a dual topoisomerase inhibitor, XR5944 was subsequently shown to have a different mechanism of action - inhibition of trancription. The NMR structural analysis, in our lab, of the drug-DNA complex showed that XR5944 bis-intercalate with DNA, while binding in the DNA major groove. Driven by these combined interaction modes, XR5944 is shown to inhibit the DNA binding and the subsequent transcriptional activity of specific transcription factors such as estrogen receptors and AP-1, which are overexpressed in certain cancers.Finally, I have analyzed G-quadruplex structures formed by telomeric DNA. The formation and stabilization of DNA G-quadruplexes in the human telomeric sequence have been shown to inhibit the activity of telomerase. Thus the telomeric DNA G-quadruplex has been considered as an attractive anticancer drug target. Telomeric DNA forms multiple G-quadruplex conformations, and my data reveal the conformations of the major G-quadruplexes formed by human telomeres.
2

Immunoaffinity isolation of Btk´s signalosome, a proteomic approach to identifying interacting proteins

Herron, John Paul January 2006 (has links)
<p>The Signalosome is a term used to define a putative signalling complex, which assembles near the plasma membrane in response to external signals received at cell surface receptors and then migrates towards downstream effectors. It is proposed to regulate the level of intracellular Ca2+ and subsequent downstream signalling events. To date it has been defined to consist of BTK, BLNK, BCAP, VAV, PLCγ2 and PI3K1-4 in B-Cells.</p><p>This work entailed initiating a new proteomic approach to investigate the nature and extent of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, Btk, involvement in the signalosome – inherently, the aim was to study multiple interactions of Btk with other molecules. By transfecting host cells with a Btk gene-transfer plasmid, virus particles were produced that were used to up-regulate and analyse the expression of Btk in three haematopoietic cell lines: B-cells, Pre-B-cells and a myeloid cancer cell. The construction of a new gene-transfer vector was successfully carried out by plasmid sub-cloning and it was subsequently found to effectively transfect the host cells and produce virus particles. The recombinant virus particles were employed with success in transducing three haematopoietic cell lines and with immunopurification and subsequent gel separation protein signalosome complexes were obtained ready for analysis by mass spectrometrical fingerprinting (to be carried out as a joint effort in Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Canada).</p>
3

Immunoaffinity isolation of Btk´s signalosome, a proteomic approach to identifying interacting proteins

Herron, John Paul January 2006 (has links)
The Signalosome is a term used to define a putative signalling complex, which assembles near the plasma membrane in response to external signals received at cell surface receptors and then migrates towards downstream effectors. It is proposed to regulate the level of intracellular Ca2+ and subsequent downstream signalling events. To date it has been defined to consist of BTK, BLNK, BCAP, VAV, PLCγ2 and PI3K1-4 in B-Cells. This work entailed initiating a new proteomic approach to investigate the nature and extent of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, Btk, involvement in the signalosome – inherently, the aim was to study multiple interactions of Btk with other molecules. By transfecting host cells with a Btk gene-transfer plasmid, virus particles were produced that were used to up-regulate and analyse the expression of Btk in three haematopoietic cell lines: B-cells, Pre-B-cells and a myeloid cancer cell. The construction of a new gene-transfer vector was successfully carried out by plasmid sub-cloning and it was subsequently found to effectively transfect the host cells and produce virus particles. The recombinant virus particles were employed with success in transducing three haematopoietic cell lines and with immunopurification and subsequent gel separation protein signalosome complexes were obtained ready for analysis by mass spectrometrical fingerprinting (to be carried out as a joint effort in Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Canada).
4

Functional analysis of CBFA2T3: a breast cancer tumour suppressor from chromosome band 16q24.3

Saif, Zarqa January 2009 (has links)
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 16q is an early event occurring in 36-60% of primary sporadic breast cancers. CBFA2T3 (MTG16) is a putative breast cancer tumour suppressor gene, localized at chromosome band 16q24.3. CBFA2T3 (MTG16) belongs to the CBFA2T protein family and shares a high homology with other two members, CBFA2T1 (MTG8) and CBFA2T2 (MTGR1). CBFA2T1 and CBFA2T3 proteins form transcriptional repressor complexes with the DNA binding zinc finger proteins like BCL6, PLZF, Gfi1 and ZNF652. CBFA2T3 protein exists as isoform “a” and “b” that arise from alternate start sites. These isoform differ in their N-terminal sequences. Previous studies determined that CBFA2T3a localized to the nucleolus, while CBFA2T3b has a putative role as tumour suppressor protein. The present study confirms that the database entries of CBFA2T3a are incomplete and an extended N-terminus region is present to CBFA2T3a (NCBI NM_005187) isoform by RTPCR and DNA sequencing. Two rabbit polyclonal anti CBFA2T3 antibodies were raised against the region unique to CBFA2T3. These antibodies specifically detect the endogenous CBFA2T3 proteins and not CBFA2T1 and CBFA2T2. Cell fractionation studies show that endogenous CBFA2T3a localized to the cytoplasm, while CBFA2T3b targeted to the nucleus. The N-terminus region specific to “a” isoform determined the cytoplasmic localization. The detailed studies show that CBFA2T3a localized to centrosome and this was confirmed by co–localization with known centrosomal proteins γ- tubulin. This was further confirmed by immunoprecipitation of γ-tubulin with N-terminus regions of CBFA2T3a protein. Further investigation showed that CBFA2T3a localizes to the centrosome through out the centrosomal duplication. Presence of CBFA2T3a on procentriole was further confirmed by co-localization with known proteins having a crucial role in centrosome duplication like HsSAS6 and polyglutamilated tubulin. Experiments were conducted to determined if the different subcellular localization of “a” and “b” isoforms resulted into functional differences between two isoforms. Immunoprecipitation experiments with known DNA binding proteins like BCL6 and PLZF showed that CBFA2T3b interacts with BCL6, while no interaction was found with PLZF. Consistent with the known transcriptional co-repressor function, real time RT-PCR showed that CBFA2T3b has an additive effect on BCL6 mediated repression of its target cyclin D2, while no effect was observed with CBFA2T3a. Real time RT-PCR data also showed that BCL6 not only recruits CBFA2T3b to repress its target but also have repressive effects on CBFA2T3 transcription. CBFA2T3b transcription regulation by BCL6 was found to be mediated through one or two BCL6 putative binding sites in CBFA2T3b promoter. Immuno histochemical studies were carried out to analyse CBFA2T3b function as a breast cancer tumour suppressor. CBFA2T3 proteins are highly expressed in epithelial cell lineage of normal breast ducts, while its expression is lost in some tumours. CBFA2T3 expression was further analysed in a cohort of commercially available breast tumour sections. Data from these studies showed the loss of CBFA2T3 nuclear expression in some tumours, which was significantly correlated with tumours positive for HER2 expression, molecular subtypes and histological staging of the tumours. CBFA2T3 cytoplasmic expression was also down regulated in tumour sections. A significant association of CBFA2T3 cytoplasmic expression was observed with the TNM grading for tumour invasion and centrosomal abnormalities in BR701 TMA. Knock down studies using shRNA were conducted to investigate the role of CBFA2T3a. Following CBFA2T3 knock down in cells with minimal CBFA2T3b expression, an increase in centrosomal abnormalities was observed. These abnormalities were associated with a significant increase in metaphase anomalies. Since the “a” isoform is localized to cytoplasm and particularly centrosome, it was considered that this isoform is determining centrosome integrity. This work has provided a new insight into the localization pattern of CBFA2T3 isoforms, as CBFA2T3a and b isoforms were localized to different cellular compartments and were involved in distinct functions. CBFA2T3b function as a transcriptional co repressor, CBFA2T3b expression was lost in a group of breast tumours sections. Given that CBFA2T3a has a critical centrosomal function, the expression of this isoform would be expected to be maintained, even in the absence of the CBFA2T3b isoform in tumours. CBFA2T3a specific knock down studies may give a full insight on direct targets of CBFA2T3a, having a controlling role in normal centrosome duplication cycle. / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1474414
5

Analýza buněčné signalizace zprostředkované adaptérovým proteinem Daxx / Analysis of cell signaling mediated by the adapter protein Daxx

Švadlenka, Jan January 2016 (has links)
2 Abstract Multifunctional adapter protein and histone chaperone Daxx has been described in nu- merous cellular processes, including the regulation of apoptotic and stress signalling, antiviral response and processes connected to chromatin (e. g. transcription). Its influ- ence on chromatin-related processes is mainly carried out by several associated en- zymes, such as DNA-methyltransferase-1, histone deacetylases and chromatin- remodelling ATPase ATRX. In the complex with ATRX Daxx functions as a chaperone of histone-3.3, maintaining the constitutive heterochromatin e. g. at centromeric and telomeric regions. The main aim of this Thesis was a better understanding of the Daxx cellular functions through identification and functional characterization of its novel interacting proteins. Using the yeast two-hybrid screen, several such new Daxx-interacting proteins were identified. These proteins were mainly nuclear, connected to the regulation of chroma- tin-related processes. More detailed analysis focused on the interaction of Daxx with chromatin-remodelling ATPase Brg1. This interaction was confirmed both in vitro and in the cells, where Daxx and Brg1 associated mainly in high molecular weight pro- tein complexes. These likely chromatin-remodelling complexes contain, in addition to Brg1, several...
6

Functionally Interacting Proteins : Analyses And Prediction

Mohanty, Smita 11 1900 (has links) (PDF)
Functional interaction of proteins is a broad term encompassing many different types of associations that are observed amongst proteins. It includes direct non-covalent interactions where the interacting proteins physically associate using an interface. There are also many protein-protein interactions where the proteins concerned are not involved in direct physical interactions but affect each other’s functions. Central focus of this thesis is to understand the various aspects of functionally interacting proteins. Chapter 1 of this thesis provides an introduction to functional interactions between proteins and discusses the key developments available in the literature. This chapter discusses the different types of functional associations observed commonly between proteins. Various approaches developed over time to elucidate such interactions have also been discussed. This chapter highlights how functional interactions between proteins have been helpful in understanding different cellular processes such as organization of metabolic pathways. The chapter emphasizes the importance of functional interactions between proteins, providing a motivation for development of methods with enhanced accuracy and sensitivity for the prediction of functional interactions. In this thesis, domain families which are found to co-exist in multidomain proteins have been used to understand and subsequently predict functional associations amongst proteins. Domains in proteins typically serve as modules associated with specific functions. There exist proteins with a single domain which describes the entire function of a protein, while there also exist proteins containing multiple domains, where various domains in unison describe the complete function of the multidomain protein. Therefore, by virtue of “guilt by association” domain families found together in multidomain proteins are functionally linked. This forms the basic premise for understanding functional association amongst proteins and is explained in great detail in the Introduction chapter. Using domain families which co-occur in multidomain proteins as the basis for functional association has many merits. First, as stated before, constituent domain families act as effective descriptors of function(s) of proteins. For example, members of SH3 domain family mediate protein-protein interactions by binding to regions with polyproline conformation irrespective of the multidomain protein in which it occurs. Thus, studies of domain families co-existing in multidomain proteins act as an accurate resource of functional associations between proteins. Also, assignment of domains to a protein relies on homology detection which has achieved a high level of reliability, thus, resulting in reasonably accurate prediction of functions. Such approaches enable exhaustive coverage of many diverse proteins including many multidomain proteins leading to detection of large numbers of functional associations between domains of multidomain proteins. Given the advantages attributed to functionally linked domain families in further understanding of functional associations, it is imperative to exhaustively enumerate all possible pairs of functionally linked domain families in multidomain proteins and study their various properties. This aspect is covered in the second chapter of the thesis. In the second chapter, analysis of domain families which co-occur in multidomain proteins, termed as 'tethered domain families', has been reported. For this analysis, a large dataset of multidomain proteins was considered from a diverse set of fully sequenced genomes from many eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms. In every multidomain protein, all possible pairs of unique domain family pairs have been considered and they are assumed to be under the same functional/evolutionary constraint. Thus, from the entire dataset of multidomain proteins, all possible pairs of tethered domain families are obtained. For a given domain family, the number of other uniquely tethered families is referred to as the tethering number of a domain family. Therefore, tethering number of a domain family is an indicator of the diverse functional contexts in which a particular domain family is involved. Further analysis was carried out to understand various other attributes of domain families and its relation to tethering number. The results are summarized in the following points: 1) Distribution of tethering numbers of domain families in the entire dataset is found to be highly heterogeneous. Nearly 88% of domain families (10783 out of 12249 domain families) have tethering number of 10 or less and only 78 domain families show more than 100 unique associations. Further analysis reveals bias in functions of families showing high and low tethering numbers. The domain families with high tethering numbers are involved in processes such as signaling and protein-protein interactions. The domain families with low tethering numbers are often found to be involved in metabolic processes. 2) Differences are also observed in the type of organisms containing the domain families and their tethering numbers. Typically, domain families with high tethering numbers are ubiquitously found across almost all the kingdoms of life. In contrast, most of the domain families exclusively found in a kingdom have low tethering numbers. Furthermore, for the ubiquitously occurring domain families with high tethering numbers, the number of associations made and the type of associations are not strictly conserved across the kingdoms. Thus, the tethering preferences of such domain families vary across the kingdoms depending on their function. For instance, the protein kinase domain family which is a key regulator of signaling processes in eukaryotes, has a high tethering number in eukaryotes (270), and low tethering number in prokaryotes (96). 3) Tethering number of domain families is found to be correlated with the number of members (population) comprising a family. A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.78 at a p-value ≤0.001 is obtained for the correlation between tethering number of domain families and their population. 4) Tethering numbers of domain families are also found to be well correlated with sequence and functional diversity within families. Thus, domain families with high tethering numbers comprise of members showing diversity in both sequence and functions. Thus, the work presented in second chapter provides a framework for understanding the tethering preferences of domain families. The use of tethered domain families to identify functional association amongst proteins is the central theme of third and fourth chapters of this thesis. The use of tethered domain families for the prediction of functionally interacting proteins originates from the initial idea of “Rosetta stone” approach, which was proposed by Ouzounis and coworkers and Eisenberg and coworkers in 1999. Rosetta stone approach demonstrated the use of fused genes in predicting functional interaction. It stems from the observation that in many organisms, genes corresponding to proteins acting in a metabolic pathway are found fused in another organism. Thus, enumeration of 'fused genes' in a template database could provide a good basis for prediction of functionally interacting proteins in target organisms in which the homologous genes are not found to be fused. The method has been shown, by others, to work quite effectively in prokaryotes, especially in the identification of interactions between metabolic proteins. Chapter 3 of this thesis explores the idea of “Rosetta stones” at the level of domain families, by considering tethered domain families as analogs to the fused genes. In this analysis, tethered domain families derived from multidomain proteins comprises the template dataset. If members of two domain families occurring in a multidomain protein are found to occur independently in two different proteins in the target organism then an interaction is predicted between these two proteins (collection of such predicted interactions is henceforth referred as TEDIP database, Tethered Domain-based Interaction Prediction). During this analysis, care is taken such that none of the proteins in the template dataset belongs to the target organisms. The entire analysis has been conducted on 6 model organisms which act as the target dataset where functional interactions between proteins are predicted. The effectiveness of tethered domain families in functional interaction prediction is compared with two other datasets 1) all experimentally known interactions and 2) interactions predicted on the basis of their homology with interacting domain families with known structure. Subsequently, an attempt has been made to answer these questions: 1) how effective is the information on tethered domain families in predicting functional linkages amongst proteins operating in pathways in eukaryotic organisms? 2) what is the false positive rate of the predictions? The above mentioned datasets show very little overlap in the coverage of functional interactions. This is largely attributed to insufficient sampling and inherent bias existing in each of the methods. The TEDIP datasets in the six organisms led to an average three-fold more functional interaction predictions in cellular pathways than the other two datasets. Nearly 90% of the predicted interactions derived from tethered domain families are amongst proteins across different pathways. In yeast, more than 60% of such interactions were found to be overlapping with a recent large scale genetic interaction screen based on synthetic lethality especially performed for metabolic proteins, thus establishing the effectiveness of this approach in understanding pathway crosstalk. Along with efficacy in identifying functional interactions, an assessment based on co-localization, co-expression and overall functional similarity based on Gene Ontology (GO) terms was carried out. It was found that the TEDIP predictions and experimentally found interactions show poor correspondence with co-expression and co-localization data (10% and 20% respectively for the two methods). Additionally, it was found that functional similarity between predicted interacting proteins in TEDIP dataset is low (5%) and is comparable to experimentally known interactions that shows 10% similarity in functions based on a scoring function for GO term similarity. From Chapter 3, it was concluded that the use of tethered domain families is effective in exhaustive enumeration of functionally associated proteins. However, the low co-expression and functional similarity measures are a cause for concern. On the one hand, co-expression and GO functional similarity have been found to be weak predictors of functional interactions, explaining the low values obtained for both predictions in the TEDIP datasets and experimentally known interactions. On the other hand, the poorer values shown for predictions in the TEDIP datasets suggest that further improvement in prediction accuracy is possible. Chapter 4 explores the use of machine learning in improving the accuracy of functional interaction prediction based on TEDIP dataset. In Chapter 4, two distinct machine learning approaches have been employed on a training dataset derived exclusively from yeast. Since the objective of the work is to improve the accuracy of prediction of functional interactions, the GO based functional similarity measures have been used to define positive and negative datasets. Thus, in the training dataset, positive interactions comprises of protein pairs which show high GO similarity in functions as defined in chapter 3 and 10% of this data overlaps with experimentally known interactions, while the negative dataset consists of protein pairs with no or insignificant similarity in their functions and additionally do not show similarity to any experimentally known interactions. Two machine learning approaches, namely Support vector machine (SVM) and Random forest, have been used on this training dataset. Use of two distinct approaches helps in addressing the weakness, if any, of these methods. Fourteen carefully chosen features have been utilized during the training process to aid in the process of distinguishing potentially correctly predicted interactions from incorrect predictions. Out of 14 features, some of the features chosen for the analysis are involved in quantifying the extent of similarity between the template proteins containing the fused domain families and the target protein pairs predicted to interact. The analysis also incorporates graph theory based parameters which are derived from a domain family based graph. In such a graph, each of the domain families which are involved in forming multidomain proteins represents the nodes and an edge is constructed between domain families which are found to co-exist in at least one multidomain protein. Graph theory based parameters such as clustering coefficient, degree and topological overlap have been employed. These are useful in down weighting appropriately the domain family pairs showing large number of associations which are expected to be promiscuous in their functions. These features also enable in identifying domain family pairs which are functionally related. Apart from the above mentioned features, coevolution and phylogenetic profiling of tethered domain families is also utilized to identify functionally related domain family pairs. Utilizing all these features in training, the machine learning approach yielded an accuracy of 94% using SVM and 92% using Random forest against the training data. Furthermore, the importance of using all these features has been addressed by performing principle component analysis, training both SVM and Random forest by removing one feature at a time and by quantifying the sensitivity by using only one feature. All of these suggest that the features used provide non-redundant information and contributed significantly to the classification. The models so generated were finally used on all the predicted functional interactions after the removal of the training dataset in yeast. The true positives observed were 56% using SVM and 63% using Random forest with around 80% of the interactions common between the two methods. Further analysis has been carried out on these interactions by first imparting a confidence score to these interactions using support vector regression that provides a probabilistic measure for SVM classification. Based on a cutoff of 0.5, 62455 interactions in total were termed as high confidence interactions. Further analysis was carried out for the high confidence interactions. Out of these, in 2855 interactions, both the proteins predicted to interact could be associated with a pathway in KEGG database. In-depth case studies have been performed on this dataset of 2855 interactions. Literature mining suggested that many known cross-pathway interactions such as between TCA and glycolysis are captured as high confidence interactions using TEDIP dataset. A few other case studies of high confidence interactions with supporting literature evidence are also presented in the chapter. These predictions could further aid in experimental characterization of pathway cross-talk between important metabolic and signaling pathways. So far, the thesis discussed analyses involving functional interactions and their prediction. In the subsequent chapters, analyses pertaining to two different types of functional interactions are discussed. Chapters 5 and 6 involve analyses incorporating metabolic proteins in diverse pathways in the pathogenic organism Plasmodium falciparum. Chapter 5 attempts to improve the coverage of the repertoire of metabolic proteins in P.falciparum while in Chapter 6 interactions and pathways prevalent in different stages in the life cycle of the parasite are deciphered and discussed. Apart from functionally interacting proteins in metabolic pathways, physically and transiently interacting proteins have been analyzed and discussed in Chapters 7 and 8. In Chapter 5, metabolic proteins participating in pathways in Plasmodium falciparum have been analyzed. P.falciparum is the causative agent of malaria, a disease which affects large populations in the subtropical regions. P.falciparum genome is atypical and is rich in Adenine/Thymine pairs, and there is presence of large stretches of amino acid repeats encoded in protein coding regions. Various sequence-related features of P.falciparum proteins when compared with those of other organisms show extensive divergence. All of these have made reliable function prediction, by homology to other proteins with known functions, daunting. Like other proteins in P.falciparum, metabolic proteins have also diverged significantly from their functional counterparts in model eukaryotes such as yeast. Metabolic pathways play an important role in the survival of the organism and hence are amenable towards the identification of proteins susceptible to drugs, thereby combating pathogenesis. Chapter 5 of the thesis aims at furthering knowledge pertaining to metabolic proteins by first quantifying the extent of divergence observed in the already characterized metabolic proteins. This knowledge is further used in identification of potential metabolic proteins which are not identified as proteins involved in metabolic pathways by other annotation efforts undertaken for P.falciparum. In the first part of the chapter, the extent of divergence in the sequences of metabolic proteins in P.falciparum has been determined by comparing the P.falciparum proteins with their functional counterparts from 34 completely sequenced unicellular eukaryotic organisms. Comparison of domain architectures between the P.falciparum proteins with their functional counterparts reveals that in nearly 54% of metabolic pathways, proteins show nearly the same domain architecture as the other functional counterparts. Inversion, deletion and duplication of domains are observed in rest of the proteins. Further analysis reveals that P.falciparum proteins are longer than their functional counterparts. It was also observed in nearly 15% of the cases, the domains are characterized by the presence of large non-conserved or plasmodium genus specific inserts within the domain assigned regions. There is also prevalence of unassigned regions in the N- and C- terminal regions in P.falciparum proteins when compared with their functional counterparts. Finally, it was also observed that metabolic proteins of P.falciparum show significantly low sequence similarity when compared with other functional counterparts. From this analysis, it can be clearly seen that metabolic proteins of P.falciparum have significantly diverged from such proteins in other organisms, thus making function prediction by homology very difficult. There are several steps in metabolic pathways in P.falciparum which are expected to be active based on experimental analysis. However, some of these proteins with expected functions have not been identified so far. One of the reasons for this apparent incompleteness is the high divergence observed in the metabolic proteins of P. falciparum. To overcome this limitation, in the second part of the chapter, a sensitive approach based on domain family assignment (MulPSSM), developed in-house, has been used to identify proteins which are potentially involved in metabolic pathways. The approach is based on reverse PSI–BLAST, where multiple sequence profiles for each family are used to search against sequence databases. This approach has been shown to be better or at-par with other remote homology detection procedures. Using this approach, 15 P. falciparum proteins have been identified which can potentially function as metabolic proteins and were not characterized in P.falciparum so far. All the proteins identified by the approach show low sequence similarity to other well characterized proteins and contain significant fractions of unassigned regions thus, making function recognition non-trivial. Supporting literature and other data is provided to demonstrate the robustness of the homology-based annotation of the identified pathway proteins. Chapter 6 is an analysis of the dynamic changes occurring in the metabolic network of P.falciparum during its life cycle. In this chapter, two aspects of P. falciparum metabolic proteins have been integrated and analyzed. First, the dataset of protein-protein interactions derived from experimental studies and second, the datasets of microarray analysis providing information on stage specific expression of P. falciparum genes corresponding to the metabolic proteins. As a first step, protein-protein interaction information for the metabolic proteins was gathered. A total of 810 interactions have been obtained, where one or both proteins are involved in a pathway. Subsequently, these interactions were compared with 14070 interactions involving metabolic proteins from free-living and non-pathogenic unicellular eukaryote yeast. Comparison across the two organisms shows wide discrepancy in the number of proteins involved in interactions and also the pathways in which they participate. Out of the 810 interactions in P.falciparum, 173 are found uniquely in plasmodium where both or one of the protein have no identifiable homolog in yeast. Insufficient sampling of interactions made by proteins in P.falciparum in comparison to yeast, is one of the reasons for the observed discrepancy. However, the differences due to the parasitic lifestyle of P.falciparum could also be a potential reason. Further analysis of the protein-protein interactions by the metabolic proteins revealed that a large fraction of interactions are made between a metabolic protein and a non-metabolic protein. For instance, interaction observed between glycolytic protein phospoglycerate kinase with MAP kinase. This trend is observed in both plasmodium and yeast where 65% and 77% of the interactions, respectively, involve proteins not directly participating in metabolic pathways. Further, interactions between proteins belonging to different pathways and lastly, interactions between proteins in the same pathway are uncovered. All of these interactions depict the different modes by which metabolic pathways are regulated through protein-protein interactions. Another aspect explored in this analysis is the stage specific expression of genes encoding these metabolic proteins. The analysis is especially relevant in the parasite because its entire life cycle is divided into seven distinct stages. Upon integrating the protein-protein interactions with the gene expression data, it became apparent that the trophozoite, schizont and gametocyte stages show large fractions of co-expressed genes encoding proteins involved in protein-protein interactions within metabolic pathways. The high preponderance of co-expressed genes encoding for interacting protein pairs in these stages is also consistent with metabolic requirement of plasmodium in the various stages. Glycolytic pathway is central to energy production in the parasite and is discussed at length in this chapter. Members of this pathway are involved in interactions with other glycolytic proteins (9 such interactions), they also interact with proteins involved in other pathways (30 interactions) and with proteins not involved directly in any metabolic pathway (75 interactions). Nearly 70% of the interactions made by the glycolytic proteins are encoded by genes found to be co-expressed across the various stages. Integration of gene expression data along with protein-protein interaction information for metabolic pathways such as the glycolytic pathway thus, highlights the complex mode of regulation underlying this pathway. The analysis carried out in this chapter emphasizes on the intricacies involved in the regulation of metabolic proteins in P.falciparum. Chapter 7 describes an in-depth analysis carried out to understand the basis for interaction specificity between small monomeric GTPases and their regulators, the Guanine nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs). Monomeric GTPases are involved in binding to guanine nucleotide. These proteins can bind to both GTP and GDP. However, transition from GDP bound to GTP bound form occurs with large conformational changes and requires binding of the GEFs. The conformational changes that arise due to the nucleotide exchange are required for the GTPases to bind to its various effectors. For the analysis carried out in Chapter 7, GTPases belonging to the Ras superfamily have been considered. The superfamily is further subdivided into 5 distinct families based on their functions. The 5 families are Ras, Ran, Rab, Arf and Rho. Members belonging to each of these families are involved in a wide array of cellular processes such as signaling and cytoskeletal remodeling. Members of each of these GTPase families bind to structurally distinct GEFs, and in some cases, multiple GEFs are involved in nucleotide exchange within a family. It is intriguing therefore, to understand how GTPases belonging to the same structural family maintain specificity across the highly dissimilar GEFs and this forms the main objective of this analysis. So far, 13 distinct complexes between GTPases and their cognate GEFs have been solved using X-ray crystallography. This set of structural complexes forms the starting point of the analysis. As a first step, pairwise structural comparison of the interfaces has made between various pairs of complex structures. Based on these comparisons, it is apparent that most of the interfaces in the GTPase and GEF complexes comprise of residue positions which are topologically not equivalent suggesting different modes of binding across these complexes. Further analysis was carried out to probe the extent of specificity underlying these complexes. This is achieved by determining interface residues which are found to be conserved in a family specific manner. Such residue positions have been obtained by using a statistically robust algorithm Contrast Hierarchical Alignment and Interaction Network (CHAIN) that extracts sequence patterns most distinguishing two sets of homologous sequences. The analysis indicated the presence of family specific residues at the GTPase and GEF interface. Such residues could be implicated in maintaining the specific interactions between the GTPases and the GEFs. The robustness in the specificity of the interactions was further interrogated by providing an energetic basis to the specificity in the interactions mediated by the cognate GTPases and the GEFs and also understanding how crosstalk is prevented across the non-cognate complexes. For each of the 13 cognate complexes, empirical interaction energies have been estimated using FoldX. The interaction energy is compared to non-cognate complexes which are obtained by swapping the interface residues of the cognate GTPase with the non-cognate GTPase residues. For most of the complexes, it was observed that the interaction energies for the cognate complexes are much lower than the non-cognate complexes. Energy values across the non-cognate complexes are usually indicative of reduced stability, thereby precluding such interactions from occurring. Such large energy differences between cognate and non-cognate interactions arise due to drastic substitutions at the interface patch due to difference in the charge or other stereochemical aspects of the amino acids. Both evolutionary and energy based analysis indicates the presence and importance of few family specific residues in the cognate complexes and also the presence of unfavorable residues in the non-cognate complexes thus preventing crosstalk. However, apart from changes at the interfaces, many positions outside the interface also undergo changes across the various homologs within the same family/subfamily of GTPase. Coevolutionary analysis of GTPase and GEFs from multiple eukaryotic organisms has been carried out in these complexes and it was observed that most of the coevolving positions are not found at the interface. Many of these residue positions are near the active site or near the interface. Identification of such coevolving positions, where residue variations in the GTPase are strongly coupled to the GEF, may provide initial clues to the possible allosteric path adopted in connecting the binding of GEF to the vast structural changes observed during GTP exchange in GTPases. Thus, the analysis provides a comprehensive framework to understand how interaction specificity has evolved between the GTPase and GEF complexes. Chapter 8 discusses another example of transient protein-protein interaction observed between proteins implicated in signaling process in Dictyostelium discoideum. The work reported in this chapter was carried out in collaboration with Prof. Nanjundaiah and coworkers from Molecular Reproduction and Developmental Genetics department, Indian Institute of Science. All the experimental analyses mentioned in this chapter were carried out by Prof. Nanjundaiah and coworkers and the author carried out all the computational analysis. Experimental analysis indicated the presence of a ribosomal protein S4 in D. discoideum which mediates interactions with CDC24 and CDC42. The protein is speculated to be a functional analog of yeast scaffolding protein Bem1. However, the exact structural and sequence features of the protein which can accommodate its non-ribosomal function as a scaffold by mediating protein-protein interactions are not clearly understood. With the aid of structural modeling, a 3-D structure was generated for the C-terminal regions of D. discoideum protein S4. The modeled structure, as in the template used for modelling, resembled the fold of SH3 domain which has been shown to be involved in protein-protein interactions. Structural and sequence analyses were carried out to evaluate the potential mode by which interactions could be mediated by this protein. The hypothesis generated was further corroborated by experimental analysis. Thus, both experimental and computational analysis provide evidence for the functional role of the ribosomal protein S4 from Dictyostelium discoideum as a scaffold. Chapter 9 summarizes the conclusions reached in various chapters of the thesis. The thesis embodies analyses probing various aspects of functional interactions between proteins. A frame work has been provided to elucidate functional interactions using tethered domain families in multidomain proteins. Further, the role of these functional interactions have been explored in different scenarios by exhaustively analyzing metabolic proteins and their regulation in pathogenic organism Plasmodium falciparum and by also analyzing two distinct types of transient protein-protein interactions.
7

Identification Of Novel MLH 1p Interacting Proteins By Biochemical And Genetic Methods

Kumaran, M 01 1900 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
8

Role of methyltransferases in fungal development and secondary metabolite production

Sarikaya Bayram, Özlem 17 January 2014 (has links)
Pilzentwicklung und Sekundärmetabolismus werden durch Einwirkung von Umwelteinflüssen von Regulatorproteinen kontrolliert. Das VeA Protein repräsentiert die velvet-Domänen-Familie der Pilzregulatoren. VeA passt die sexuelle Entwicklung und den dazu gehörenden Sekundärmetabolismus von Aspergillus nidulans an die Lichtverhältnisse an. VeA bindet im Dunkeln an VelB und bildet schließlich den trimeren VelB-VeA-LaeA (velvet) Komplex. VeA dient als Brückenprotein für das velvet-Domänen-Protein VelB als Regulator der Entwicklung und die Methyltransferase LaeA als Regulator des Sekundärmetabolismus. VelB kann mit VosA einen zweiten licht-regulierten Komplex bilden, der die asexuelle Entwicklung reprimiert. Auch VosA gehört zur Familie der Velvet- Proteine. LaeA kontrolliert die Bildung der VelB-VosA und VelB-VeA-LaeA Komplexe während der Entwicklung. laeA Nullmutationen können nicht mehr auf Licht reagieren, was ihre Schlüsselrolle als Regulatoren der Entwicklung unterstreicht. Die Abwesenheit von LaeA führt zur Bildung von wesentlich kleineren Fruchtkörpern. Grund hierfür ist das Fehlen runder Hülle-Zellen, die den jungen Fruchtkörper ernähren und in seiner Entwicklung unterstützen. LaeA spielt damit eine dynamische Rolle während der morphologischen und biochemischen Entwicklung des Pilzes, indem die Expression, Interaktion und die Modifikation der velvet Regulatoren kontrolliert werden. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit wurde die VeA-Plattform für Protein-Protein Interaktionen weiter untersucht. VeA interagierende Proteine (Vips) identifiziert in einen „Yeast-two-hybrid“ System führten zu einem trimeren Methyltransferase-Komplex, der Signaltransduktion mit epigenetischer Kontrolle verbindet. Der neuartige Komplex enthält das Plasmamembran-assoziierte Trimer VapA-VipC-VapB. Das Dimer VipC-VapB ist über das FYVE-ähnliche Zinkfinger Protein VapA an die Plasmamembran gebunden und ermöglicht dem nuklearen VelB-VeA-LaeA Komplex die Aktivierung der Transkription der sexuellen Entwicklung. Sobald die Abkopplung vom VapA stattgefunden hat, wird VipC-VapB zum Kern transportiert. VipC-VapB interagiert physikalisch mit VeA, vermindert dessen Transport zum Kern und die Stabilität. Folglich wird der Anteil des VelB-VeA-LaeA Komplexes im Kern reduziert. Die nukleare VapB Methyltransferase vermindert die Entstehung des fakultativen Chromatins indem es die Histon 3 Lysin 9 Methylierung (H3K9 me3) vermindert. Dies begünstigt die Aktivierung der frühen Regulatorgene flbA und flbC, die dann das asexuelle Programm im Licht vorantreiben. Der VapA-VipC-VapB Methyltransferase-Weg vereinigt die Kontrolle des Kernimportes und der Stabilität von Transkriptionsfaktoren mit der Modifikation von Histonen. Erst dieses komplexe Zusammenspiel unterschiedlicher Mechanismen erlaubt eine angemessene Antwort für die Differenzierung des Pilzes.
9

Étude des mécanismes contrôlant l'efficacité et la spécificité de la signalisation du récepteur de la GnRH : identification et rôle de la protéine partenaire SET / Study of mechanisms controlling the efficacy and the specificity of GnRH receptor signaling : identification and role of the partner protein SET

Avet, Charlotte 12 December 2013 (has links)
La fonction de reproduction est sous le contrôle de la neurohormone hypothalamique GnRH qui régule la synthèse et la libération des gonadotropines hypophysaires. La GnRH agit par l’intermédiaire d’un récepteur couplé aux protéines G exprimé à la surface des cellules gonadotropes, le récepteur de la GnRH (RGnRH). Ce récepteur, chez les mammifères, a la particularité d’être dépourvu de queue C terminale ce qui le rend insensible aux systèmes classiques de désensibilisation. Ainsi, les mécanismes qui régulent l’efficacité et la spécificité de sa signalisation demeurent mal connus. Nous avons recherché des partenaires d’interaction du RGnRH, jusqu’alors inconnus, avec l’idée que ces protéines en interagissant avec les domaines intracellulaires du récepteur influenceraient son couplage aux voies de signalisation. Nos travaux ont permis d’identifier le premier partenaire d’interaction du RGnRH : la protéine SET. Par des expériences de « GST pull down », nous avons montré que SET interagit directement avec le RGnRH via le premier domaine intracellulaire du récepteur. Cette interaction implique des séquences riches en acides aminés basiques sur le récepteur et les domaines N- et C-terminaux de SET. Nous avons également montré, par co-immunoprécipitation, que le RGnRH dans sa conformation native interagit avec la protéine SET dans les cellules gonadotropes alphaT3-1 et, par immunocytochimie, que les deux protéines colocalisent à la membrane plasmique. En développant au laboratoire des outils biosenseurs permettant de mesurer avec une grande sensibilité et en temps réel les variations intracellulaires de calcium et d’AMPc, nous avons mis en évidence que le RGnRH se couple non seulement à la voie calcique mais aussi à la voie AMPc dans la lignée alphaT3-1, apportant pour l’AMPc la première démonstration d’un tel couplage. En utilisant différentes stratégies expérimentales visant à diminuer ou au contraire favoriser l’interaction du récepteur avec SET (ARN antisens, peptide correspondant à la première boucle intracellulaire du récepteur, surexpression de SET), nous avons montré que SET induit une réorientation de la signalisation du RGnRH de la voie calcique vers la voie AMPc. Nos résultats concernant l’activité du promoteur du gène du Rgnrh nous conduisent à postuler que SET pourrait favoriser l’induction par la GnRH de gènes régulés via la voie AMPc et notamment celui codant le RGnRH. Nos travaux mettent également en évidence que la GnRH régule non seulement l’expression de la protéine SET dans les cellules gonadotropes mais aussi son degré de phosphorylation favorisant ainsi sa relocalisation dans le cytoplasme des cellules alphaT3-1. Ceci suggère que la GnRH exerce une boucle de régulation permettant d’amplifier l’action de SET sur la signalisation de son propre récepteur. Enfin, nous avons mis en évidence que l’expression de SET est fortement augmentée dans l’hypophyse au moment du prœstrus chez le rat, apportant ainsi la première démonstration d’une variation de SET dans un contexte physiologique. Étant donné que le couplage du RGnRH à la voie de signalisation AMPc est augmenté au moment du prœstrus, nos résultats suggèrent que SET pourrait jouer un rôle important in vivo en favorisant ce couplage à ce stade particulier du cycle œstrien. / Reproductive function is under the control of the hypothalamic neurohormone GnRH, which regulates the synthesis and the release of pituitary gonadotropins. GnRH acts on a G-protein coupled receptor expressed at the surface of pituitary gonadotrope cells, the GnRH receptor (GnRHR). This receptor, in mammals, is unique because it is devoided of the C terminal tail, which makes it insensitive to classical desensitization processes. Therefore, the mechanisms that regulate the efficacy and the specificity of its signaling are still poorly known. We searched for interacting partners of GnRHR with the idea that these proteins by interacting with the intracellular domains of the receptor could influence receptor coupling to its signaling pathways. Our work identified the first interacting partner of GnRHR: the protein SET. By GST pull down assays, we showed that SET interacts directly with GnRHR through the first intracellular loop of the receptor. This interaction involves sequences enriched in basic amino acids in the receptor and both N- and C terminal domains of SET. We also showed, by co-immunoprecipitation, that GnRHR in its native conformation interacts with the endogenous SET protein in gonadotrope alphaT3-1 cells and, by immunocytochemistry that the two proteins colocalize at the plasma membrane. By developing in the laboratory biosensors tools that allow to measure with high sensitivity and in real-time intracellular variations in calcium and cAMP concentrations, we demonstrated that GnRHR couples not only to the calcium pathway but also to the cAMP pathway in alphaT3-1 cell line, providing for cAMP the first demonstration of such coupling. Using several experimental strategies to reduce or increase receptor interaction with SET (small interfering RNA, peptide corresponding to the first intracellular loop of the receptor, overexpression of SET), we have shown that SET induces a switch of GnRHR signaling from calcium to cAMP pathway. Our results concerning the activity of the Gnrhr gene promoter led us to postulate that SET could favor the induction by GnRH of genes regulated through the cAMP pathway, notably those encoding the GnRHR. Our study also showed that GnRH regulates not only SET protein expression in gonadotropes, but also its phosphorylation level leading to its relocation in the cytoplasm of alphaT3-1 cells. This suggests that GnRH induces a regulatory loop to amplify SET action on signaling of its own receptor. Finally, we demonstrated that SET expression is markedly increased in the pituitary gland at prœstrus in female rats, providing the first demonstration of a variation of SET expression in a physiological context. Given that GnRHR coupling to the cAMP pathway is increased at prœstrus, our results suggest that SET may play an important role in vivo by promoting such coupling at this particular stage of the estrus cycle.
10

Investigação molecular dos genes PTEN e DREAM em pacientes portadores de bócio multinodular / Molecular investigation of PTEN and DREAM genes in patients with multinodular goiter

Shinzato, Amanda 28 July 2015 (has links)
INTRODUÇÃO: O bócio é um termo genérico usado para descrever o aumento no volume da glândula tireoide que pode estar associado à formação de múltiplos nódulos, o chamado bócio multinodular. Camundongos transgênicos tireoide específicos com depleção do Pten ou aumento de expressão do Dream, dois importantes genes que têm sido implicados nas vias de sinalização das células foliculares, apresentam desenvolvimento de bócio. Em humanos, uma larga porcentagem de pacientes com doença de Cowden apresentam bócio ou outras anormalidades tireoidianas associadas a mutações germinativas no PTEN. OBJETIVO: O objetivo desse estudo foi investigar a expressão dos genes PTEN e DREAM em tecido hiperplásico tireoidiano, bem como mutações germinativas e somáticas no PTEN e mutações somáticas no DREAM, em pacientes portadores de bócio multinodular, com a finalidade de avaliar o papel destes genes na etiologia do bócio. MÉTODOS: Foram investigados 60 pacientes com bócio multinodular (54 mulheres). A extração do DNA genômico foi realizada a partir de tecido hiperplásico da tireoide e do sangue periférico dos pacientes enquanto o RNA foi obtido apenas do tecido glandular. A quantificação relativa do RNA mensageiro do PTEN e do DREAM foi avaliada pelo método de 2-??Ct utilizando o GAPDH como normalizador em dados produzidos pela PCR em tempo real. A alta e a baixa expressão de PTEN e DREAM foram definidas, respectivamente, por valores de quantificação superiores a 2.0 e inferiores a 0.5 em comparação a um pool comercial de RNA de tireoide normal de humanos. Análise de mutação foi realizada por amplificação da região codificante dos genes PTEN e DREAM pela PCR convencional seguida por sequenciamento automático (RQ = quantificação relativa; x? = média e DP = desvio padrão). RESULTADOS: Foi observada alta expressão do PTEN em 58,3% dos pacientes portadores de bócio (x RQ = 3,81; DP = 2,26) enquanto apenas dois casos apresentaram baixa expressão (x? RQ = 0,34; DP= 0,09). Nos 38,3% casos restantes foi observada expressão normal de PTEN (x? RQ = 1,35; DP = 0,35). Em relação ao gene DREAM, alta e baixa expressão foram observadas em 33,3% (x RQ = 6,07; DP = 5,02) e 15,0% (x RQ = 0,30; DP = 0,10) dos pacientes com bócio respectivamente, enquanto pouco mais da metade dos casos (51,6%) teve expressão normal RQ = 1,12 ; DP = 0,40). A Análise de mutações do PTEN e do DREAM revelaram apenas polimorfismos intrônicos, previamente descritos no banco de dados do NCBI, tanto nos DNA de sangue e/ou de tecido hiperplásico. CONCLUSÕES: Nossos resultados demonstraram uma expressão aumentada de PTEN em bócio multinodular, sugerindo que este pode estar hiperexpresso, ou pelo menos tem sua expressão mantida, nesta hiperplasia benigna da tireoide. Alterações na sequência gênica codificante do PTEN não foram observadas. Na análise mutacional e de expressão do DREAM não foram encontradas alterações que pudessem ser relacionadas à patogênese de bócio em humanos / BACKGROUND: Multinodular goiter is a clinicopathological entity characterized by an increased volume of the thyroid gland with formation of nodules. A high proliferative status of thyroid follicular cells and goiter were observed in mutants mice with specifically deleted Pten or Dream overexpression in thyrocytes. In humans, a large percentage of patients with Cowden disease have goiters or other thyroid abnormalities associated with germ-line PTEN mutations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the tissue expression of PTEN and DREAM, as well as germ-line and somatic PTEN mutations and somatic DREAM mutations, in patients with multinodular goiter to evaluated the role of these genes in goitrogenesis. METHODS: We investigated 60 multinodular goiter patients (54 females). Genomic DNA was extracted from both patients\' hyperplastic thyroid tissue and peripheral blood whereas RNA was obtained only from glandular tissue. Relative quantification of PTEN and DREAM messenger RNA was evaluated using 2-Ct method normalized to GAPDH expression on data produced by real-time PCR. PTEN and DREAM over and lower expression were respectively defined by value > 2.0-fold and < 0.5-fold relative to a commercial pool of normal human thyroid RNA. Mutations analyses were performed by amplification of PTEN and DREAM coding region by PCR followed by automatic sequencing. RQ = relative quantification; x = average; SD = standard deviation. RESULTS: We observed a high expression of PTEN in 58.3% of multinodular goiter patients (RQ x = 3.81; SD = 2.26) and only two cases with lower expression (RQ x = 0.34; SD = 0.09). In the remaining 38.3% of patients expression of PTEN was normal (RQ x = 1.35; SD = 0.35). For the DREAM, over and lower expression were observed in 33.3% (RQ x = 6.07; SD = 5.02) and 15.0% (RQ x = 0.30; SD = 0.10) of patients respectively, whereas 51.6% had normal expression (RQ x = 1.12; SD = 0.40). Regarding PTEN and DREAM mutations analysis, only previously described intronic polymorphisms were observed in DNA from blood and/or thyroid hyperplastic tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that PTEN expression is higher in multinodular goiter suggesting that this gene is overregulated (or at least has its expression maintained) in this benign hyperplastic thyroid lesions. No evidence for the involvement of DREAM in goitrogenesis was observed in our cohort of multinodular goiter patients

Page generated in 0.1187 seconds