No description available.

Gene deletions are a powerful method to uncover the cellular functions of a given gene in living systems. A limitation to this methodology is that it is not applicable to essential genes. Even for non-essential genes, gene knockouts cause complete absence of gene product thereby limiting genetic analysis of the biological pathway. Alternatives to gene deletions are mutants that are conditional, for e.g, temperature sensitive (ts) mutants are robust tools to understand temporal and spatial functions of genes. By definition, products of such mutants have near normal activity at a lower temperature or near-optimal growth temperature which is called as the permissive temperature and reduced activity at a higher, non-optimal temperature called as the non-permissive temperature. Generation of ts alleles in genes of interest is often time consuming as it requires screening a large population of mutants to identify those that are conditional. Often many essential proteins do not yield ts such alleles even after saturation mutagenesis and extensive screening (Harris et al., 1992; Varadarajan et al., 1996). The limited availability of such mutants in many essential genes prompted us to adopt a biophysical approach to design temperature-sensitive missense mutants in an essential gene of fission yeast. Several studies report that mutations in buried or solvent-inaccessible amino acids cause extensive changes in the thermal stability of proteins and specific substitutions create temperature-sensitive mutants (Rennell et al., 1991; Sandberg et al., 1995). We used the above approach to generate conditional mutants in the fission yeast gene spprp18+encoding an essential predicted second splicing factor based on its homology with human and S. cerevisiae proteins. We have used a missense mutant coupled with a conditional expression system to elucidate the cellular functions of spprp18+. Further, we have employed the same biophysical principle to generate a missense mutant in spago1+ RNA silencing factor that is non-essential for viability but has critical functions in the RNAi pathway of fission yeast. Fission yeast pre-mRNA splicing: cellular functions for the protein factor SpPrp18 Pre-mRNA splicing is an evolutionarily conserved process that excises introns from nascent transcripts. Splicing reactions are catalyzed by the large ribonuclear protein machinery called the spliceosome and occur by two invariant trans-esterification reactions (reviewed in Ruby and Abelson, 1991; Moore et al., 1993). The RNA-RNA, RNA–protein and protein-protein interactions in an assembly of such a large protein complex are numerous and highly dynamic in nature. These interactions in in vitro splicing reactions show ordered recruitment of essential small nuclear ribonucleic particles snRNPs and non–snRNP components on pre-mRNA cis-elements. Further these trans acting factors recognize and poise the catalytic sites in proximity to identify and excise introns. The precision of the process is remarkable given the diversity in architecture for exons and introns in eukaryotic genes (reviewed in Burge et al., 1999; Will and Luhrmann, 2006). Many spliceosomal protein components are conserved across various organisms, yet introns have diverse features with large variations in primary sequence. We hypothesize that co-evolution of splicing factor functions occurs with changes in gene and intron architectures and argue for alternative spliceosomal interactions for spliceosomal proteins that thus enabling splicing of the divergent introns. In vitro biochemical and genetic studies in S. cerevisiae and biochemical studies with human cell lines have indicated that ScPRP18 and its human homolog hPRP18 function during the second catalytic reaction. In S. cerevisiae, ScPrp18 is non-essential for viability at growth temperatures <30°C (Vijayraghavan et al., 1989; Vijayraghavan and Abelson, 1990; Horowitz and Abelson, 1993b). The concerted action of ScSlu7 - ScPrp18 heteromeric complex is essential for proper 3’ss definition during the second catalytic reaction (Zhang and Schwer, 1997; James et al., 2002). These in vitro studies also hinted at a possible intron -specific requirement for ScPrp18 and ScSlu7 factors as they were dispensable for splicing of intron variants made in modified ACT1 intron containing transcripts (Brys and Schwer, 1996; Zhang and Schwer, 1997). A short spacing distance between branch point adenosine to 3’splice site rendered the substrate independent of Prp18 and Slu7 for the second step (Brys and Schwer, 1996; Zhang and Schwer, 1997). Extensive mutational analyses of budding yeast ScPrp18 identified two functional domains and suggested separate roles during splicing (Bacikova and Horowitz, 2002; James et al., 2002). Fission yeast with its genome harboring multiple introns and degenerate splice signals has recently emerged as a unique model to study relationships between splicing factors and their role in genomes with short introns. Previously, studies in our lab had initiated genetic and mutational analysis of S. pombe Prp18, the predicted homolog of budding yeast Prp18. Genetic analysis showed its essentiality, but a set of missense mutants based on studies of budding yeast ScPrp18 (Bacikova and Horowitz, 2002) gave either inactive null or entirely wild type phenotype for the fission yeast protein. In this study, we have extended our previous mutational analysis of fission yeast Prp18 by adopting biophysical and computational approaches to generate temperature-sensitive mutants. A missense mutant was used to understand the splicing functions and interactions of SpPrp18 and the findings are summarized below. Fission yeast SpPrp18 is an essential splicing factor with transcript-specific functions and links efficient splicing with cell cycle progression We initiated our analysis of SpPrp18 by adopting a biophysical approach to generate ts mutants. We used the PREDBUR algorithm to predict a set of buried residues, which when mutated could result in a temperature-sensitive phenotype that complements the null allele at permissive temperature. These predictions are based upon two biophysical properties of amino acids: 1) Hydrophobicity, which is calculated in a window of seven amino acids 2) Hydrophobic moment, which is calculated in a sliding window of nine amino acids in a given protein sequence. Several studies correlate these properties to protein stability and function (Varadarajan et al., 1996). One of the buried residue mutants V194R, in helix 1 of SpPrp18 conferred weak temperature- sensitivity and strong cold-sensitivity even when the protein was over expressed from a plasmid. Through semi-quantitative RT-PCR we showed splicing-defects for tfIId+ intron1 in these cells even when grown at permissive temperature. The primary phenotype was the accumulation of pre-mRNA. Further, we showed this splicing arrest is co-related with reduced levels of SpPrp18 protein, linking protein stability and splicing function. Next we examined the effects of this mutation on function by further reduction of protein levels. This was done by integrating the expression cassette nmt81:spprp18+/spprp18V194R at the leu1 chromosomal locus and by metabolic depletion of the integrated allele. Through RT-PCRs we demonstrated that depletion of wild type or missense protein has intron specific splicing defects. These findings showed its non-global and possibly substrate-specific splicing function. In the affected introns, precursor accumulation is the major phenotype, confirming prior data from our lab that hinted at its likely early splicing role. This contrasts with the second step splicing role of the human or budding yeast Prp18 proteins. Previous data from our lab showed loss of physical interaction between SpPrp18 and SpSlu7 by co-immunoprecipitation studies. This again differs from the strong and functionally important ScPrp18 and ScSlu7 interaction seen in budding yeast. We show the absence of charged residues in SpSlu7 interaction region formed by SpPrp18 helix1 and helix2 which can explain the altered associations for SpPrp18 in fission yeast. Importantly, as the V194R mutation in helix 1 shows splicing defects even at permissive temperature, the data indicate a critical role for helix 1 for splicing interactions, possibly one that bridges or stabilizes the proposed weak association of SpPrp18-SpSlu7 with a yet unknown splicing factor. We also investigated the effects of mutations in other helices; surprisingly we recovered only mutations with very subtle growth phenotypes and very mild splicing defects. Not surprisingly, stop codon at L239 residue predicted to form a truncated protein lacking helices 3, 4 and 5 conferred recessive but null phenotype implicating essential functions for other helices. Other amino acid substitutions at L239 position had near wild type phenotype at 30°C and 37°C. Helix 3 buried residue mutant I259A conferred strong cold-sensitivity when over expressed from plasmid, but semi quantitative analysis indicated no splicing defects for intron1 in the constitutively expressed transcript tfIId+. These findings indicate cold sensitivity either arises due to compromised splicing of yet unknown transcripts or that over-expressed protein has near wild type activity. We find mutations in the helix 5 buried residues L324 also conferred near WT phenotype. Earlier studies in the lab found that substitution of surface residues KR that are in helix 5 with alanine lead to null phenotypes (Piyush Khandelia and Usha Vijayraghavan unpublished data). We report stable expression of all of these mutant proteins; L239A, L239P, L239G, I259A, I259V, L324F, L324A as determined by our immunoblot analysis at 30°C and 37°C. The mild phenotypes of many buried residues can be attributed to orientation of their functional groups into a protein cavity between the helices. Lastly, our microscopic cellular and biochemical analysis of cellular phenotypes of spprp18 mutant provided a novel and direct role of this factor in G1-S transition of cell cycle. Our RT-PCR data suggest spprp18+ is required for efficient splicing of several intron containing transcripts involved in G1-S transition and subsequent activation of MBF complex (MluI cell cycle box-binding factor complex) during S-phase and shows a mechanistic link between cell cycle progression and splicing. A tool to study links between RNA interference, centromeric non-coding RNA transcription and heterochromatin formation S.pombe possesses fully functional RNA interference machinery with a single copy for essential RNAi genes ago1+, dcr1+ and rdp1+. Deletion of any of these genes causes loss of heterochromatinzation with abnormal cytokinesis, cell-cycle deregulation and mating defects (Volpe et al., 2002). In S.pombe, exogenous or endogenously generated dsRNA’s from transcription of centromeric repeats are processed by the RNaseIII enzyme dicer to form siRNA. These siRNA’s are loaded in Ago1 to form minimal RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) complex or specialized transcription machinery complex RNA induced transcriptional silencing (RITS) complex and target chromatin or complementary mRNAs for silencing. Thus as in other eukaryotes, fission yeast cells deploy RNAi mediated silencing machinery to regulate gene-expression and influence chromatin status. Several recent studies point to emerging new roles of RNAi and its association with other RNA processes (Woolcock et al., 2011; Bayane et al., 2008; Kallgren et al., 2014). Many recent reports suggest physical interactions of RISC or RITS and RNA dependent RNA polymerase complex (RDRC) with either some factors of the spliceosomal machinery, heterochromatin machinery (CLRC complex) and the exosome mediated RNA degradation machinery (Bayne et al., 2008 and Chinen et al., 2010 ; Hiriart et al., 2012; Buhler et al., 2008; Bayne et al., 2010 ). Thus we presume conditional alleles in spago1+ will facilitate future studies to probe the genetic network between these complexes as most analyses thus far rely on ago1∆ allele or have been based on proteomic pull down analyses of RISC or RITS complexes. In this study, we employed biophysical and modeling approaches described earlier to generate temperature sensitive mutants in spago1+ and spdcr1+. We tested several mutants for their ability to repress two reporter genes in a conditional manner. Our modeling studies on SpAgo1 PAZ domain indicated structural similarities with human Ago1 PAZ domain. We created site-directed missense mutants at predicted buried residues or in catalytic residues. We also analyzed the effects of random amino acid replacements in specific predicted buried or catalytic residues of SpAgoI. These ago1 mutants were screened as pools for their effects on silencing of GFP or of ura4+ reporter genes. These assays assessed post transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) or transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) activity of these mutants. We obtained three temperature sensitive SpAgo1 mutants V324G, V324S and L215V while the V324E replacement was a null allele. Based upon our modeling, a likely explanation for the phenotype of these mutants is structural distortion or mis-orientation of the functional groups caused due to these mutations, which affect activity in a temperature dependent manner. This distortion in the PAZ domain may affect binding of siRNA and thereby lead to heterochromatin formation defects that we observed. Our data on the SpAgo1 V324 mutant shows conditional centromeric heterochromatin formation confirmed by semi quantitative RT-PCR for dh transcripts levels that shows temperature dependent increase in these transcripts. We find reduced H3K9Me2 levels at dh locus by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, linking the association of siRNAs for establishment of heterochromatin at this loci. The data on PTGS of GFP transcripts show SpAgo1 V324G mutation has decreased slicing activity as semi-quantitative RT-PCR for GFP transcripts show increased levels at non permissive temperature. These studies point out the importance of siRNA binding to the PAZ domain and its effect on slicing activity of SpAgo1. The mutations in Y292 showed residue loss of centromeric heterochromatin formation phenotype. Thus, we ascribe critical siRNA binding and 3’ end recognition functions to this residue of SpAgo1. These studies point out functional and structural conservation across hAgo1 and SpAgo1. Adopting the aforementioned biophysical mutational approach, we generated mutants in spdcr1+ and screened for those with conditional activity. Our modeling studies on SpDcr1 helicase domain shows it adopts the conserved helicase domain structure seen for other DEAD Box helicases. Our data on mutational analysis of a conserved buried residue I143 in the walker motif B created inactive protein. The data confirm critical functions for dicer in generation of siRNAs and also in recognition of dsRNA ends. Mutants in buried residues L1130 and I1228 of RNase IIIb domain were inactive and the proximity of these residues to the catalytic core suggest that the critical structural alignment of catalytic residues is indispensable for carrying out dsRNA cleavage to generate siRNAs. We also attribute critical catalytic functions to SpDcr1 D1185 residue for generation of siRNA and heterochromatin formation as measured by our transcriptional gene silencing assay. Our studies employing biophysical and computational approaches to design temperature-sensitive mutants have been successfully applied to an essential splicing factor SpPrp18, which was refractory for ts mutants by other methods. Using a missense mutant, we showed its intron-specific splicing function for subsets of transcripts and deduced that its ubiquitous splicing role is arguable. We have uncovered a link between the splicing substrates of SpPrp18 and direct evidence of splicing based cell cycle regulation, thus providing a mechanistic link to the cell cycle arrest seen in some splicing factor mutants. The same methodology was applied to another important biological pathway, the RNAi machinery, where central factors SpAgoI and SpDcrI were examined We report the first instance of conditional gene silencing tool by designing Ago1 ts mutants which will be useful for future studies of the global interaction network between RNAi and other RNA processing events.

Abstract Angiopoietins 1 and 2 (Ang1 and Ang2) are the ligands of the Angiopoietin/Tie signalling system, which is a binary pathway offering mechanisms for healthy vessels to reach and maintain their quiescence but also to rapidly respond to activating stimuli leading to a remodelling of endothelium. The latter is linked to disease settings such as inflammation and cancer where endothelial cell (EC) integrity is compromised and is often related to an increase in Ang2 expression. This study focused on the mechanisms enabling Ang1 to mediate both EC stability and migration and molecular and cellular determinants for ligand-specific functions of Ang2 and its isoform Ang2443. The findings revealed that Ang1 induces differential signalling depending on whether it anchors and activates Tie2 in cell-cell junctions in quiescent ECs, or in cell-matrix contacts in mobile ECs, thus leading to cellular phenotypes characteristic of resting and mobile ECs, respectively. In the second part of the thesis Ang2-Tie2 specific cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) contact sites were studied. Formation of Ang2/Tie2 EC-ECM contact sites was dependent on the collagen I and IV matrices, low Ang2 oligomerization state, α2β1-integrins, and intact microtubules. In the third part of the thesis the comparison of Ang2 mRNA splice variant Ang2443 with full length Ang2 (Ang2FL) revealed both redundant and ligand form–specific effects, expression of Ang2443443 increased the amount of monomeric ligand forms due to proteolytic processing and promoted transendothelial migration of cancer cells in vitro. On the other hand, both Ang2443 and Ang2FL were stored in endothelial Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs), similarly induced Ang2-specific Tie2 cellular redistribution, and were mostly comparable in developmental angio- and lymphangiogenesis. / Tiivistelmä Angiopoietiinit 1 ja 2 (Ang1 ja Ang2) ovat Ang/Tie signalointireitin kasvutekijöitä. Ang1 kasvutekijää tarvitaan sydämen ja verisuoniston sikiöaikaiseen kehittymiseen, se vähentää Tie2 reseptorin kautta verisuonten läpäisevyyttä, mutta edistää myös yksittäisten endoteelisolujen liikkumista. Saman Tie2 signalointireitin toisen kasvutekijän Ang2:n ilmeneminen johtaa verisuonten läpäisevyyden kasvuun tulehduksessa, uusien verisuonten muodostumiseen syöpäkasvaimissa ja syöpäsolujen leviämiseen elimistössä. Väitöskirjatutkimuksessa selvitettiin niitä solutason mekanismeja, joilla Ang1 kykenee välittämään sekä endoteelisolujen tiiviyttä että liikkumista. Lisäksi tutkittiin niitä molekyyli- ja solutason mekanismeja, joilla Ang2 ja sen isomuoto Ang2443 välittävät kasvutekijäspesifisiä vaikutuksiaan. Väitöskirjassa osoitettiin että Tie2 reseptori paikantuu verisuonten endoteelisoluissa Ang1 sitoutumisen seurauksena joko solu-soluliitoksiin, tai yksittäisissä endoteelisoluissa solu-soluväliaine rajapinnalle. Tie2:n siirtyminen solu-soluliitoksiin aktivoi soluissa signalointireittejä, jotka ovat tyypillisiä normaaleille tiiviille verisuonille ja solu-soluväliaineliitoksissa liikkuville endoteelisoluille tyypillisiä piirteitä. Väitöskirjatyön toisessa osassa tutkittiin Ang2:lle ominaisia vaikutuksia ja Ang2-Tie2 kompleksin paikantumista erityisiin solu-soluväliaineliitoksiin. Tämä oli riippuvaista Ang2:n oligomerisaatiosta, kollageenisoluväliaineesta, α2β1-integriinistä ja normaalista mikrotubulusverkostosta. Väitöskirjatyön kolmannessa osassa osoitettiin että Ang2443 isomuodolla on sekä yhteisiä että isomuotospesifisiä piirteitä verrattuna kokopitkään Ang2:een (Ang2FL). Liukoinen Ang2443, mutta ei Ang2FL, esiintyi yleisesti monomeerisenä ligandimuotona proteiinin multimerisaatio-osan pilkkomisen seurauksena. Ang2443 lisäsi myös syöpäsolujen liikkumista endoteelisolujen läpi. Toisaalta sekä Ang2443 että Ang2FL varastoitiin endoteelisoluissa Weibel-Palade varastokappaleisin, ne välittivät samanlaista Tie2 reseptorin paikantumista endoteelisoluissa ja toimivat pääsääntöisesti samanlaisina kasvutekijöinä veri- ja imusuonten kehityksen aikana hiiressä.

Most viruses can infect only a reduced range of organisms and an effective replication is possible only in selected hosts. These hosts are called permissive for the virus. Molecular principles of a nonpermissiveness and viral mechanisms of overcoming replication obstacles are still not clearly elucidated. This thesis discusses the molecular causes of the cellular nonpermissiveness against a model retrovirus - Rous sarcoma virus. The research is conducted on duck cells which are semipermis- sive to the subgroup C of Rous sarcoma virus. The virus can enter those cells, but it is not able to produce enough infectious viral progeny. Two blocks of the viral replication cycle in the duck cells are described in the thesis. The first one is the probably not optimal cellular receptor recognition. The second one is in the late phase of the replication cycle when the viral proteins are synthesized. The amount of the envelope glyco- protein coding mRNA is reduced due to the altered splicing ratios, and the virions produced from the duck cells are less infectious. This block is recessive and can be partially omitted by cell fusions with permissive chicken cells; therefore, the block is not caused by specific restriction fac- tors in sensu stricto. Additionally, the influence of mutations in duck adapted Rous...

Cellular function and physiology are largely established through regulated gene expression. The first step in gene expression, transcription of the genomic DNA into RNA, is a process that is highly aligned at the levels of initiation, elongation and termination. In eukaryotes, protein-coding genes are exclusively transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). Upon transcription of the first 15-20 nucleotides (nt), the emerging nascent RNA 5’ end is modified with a 7-methylguanosyl cap. This is one of several RNA modifications and processing steps that take place during transcription, i.e. co-transcriptionally. For example, protein-coding sequences (exons) are often disrupted by non-coding sequences (introns) that are removed by RNA splicing. The two transesterification reactions required for RNA splicing are catalyzed through the action of a large macromolecular machine, the spliceosome. Several non-coding small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and proteins form functional spliceosomal subcomplexes, termed snRNPs. Sequentially with intron synthesis different snRNPs recognize sequence elements within introns, first the 5’ splice site (5‘ SS) at the intron start, then the branchpoint and at the end the 3’ splice site (3‘ SS). Multiple conformational changes and concerted assembly steps lead to formation of the active spliceosome, cleavage of the exon-intron junction, intron lariat formation and finally exon-exon ligation with cleavage of the 3’ intron-exon junction. Estimates on pre-mRNA splicing duration range from 15 sec to several minutes or, in terms of distance relative to the 3‘ SS, the earliest detected splicing events were 500 nt downstream of the 3‘ SS. However, the use of indirect assays, model genes and transcription induction/blocking leave the question of when pre-mRNA splicing of endogenous transcripts occurs unanswered. In recent years, global studies concluded that the majority of introns are removed during the course of transcription. In principal, co-transcriptional splicing reduces the need for post-transcriptional processing of the pre-mRNA. This could allow for quicker transcriptional responses to stimuli and optimal coordination between the different steps. In order to gain insight into how pre-mRNA splicing might be functionally linked to transcription, I wanted to determine when co-transcriptional splicing occurs, how transcripts with multiple introns are spliced and if and how the transcription termination process is influenced by pre-mRNA splicing. I chose two yeast species, S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, to study co-transcriptional splicing. Small genomes, short genes and introns, but very different number of intron-containing genes and multi-intron genes in S. pombe, made the combination of both model organisms a promising system to study by next-generation sequencing and to learn about co-transcriptional splicing in a broad context with applicability to other species. I used nascent RNA-Seq to characterize co-transcriptional splicing in S. pombe and developed two strategies to obtain single-molecule information on co-transcriptional splicing of endogenous genes: (1) with paired-end short read sequencing, I obtained the 3’ nascent transcript ends, which reflect the position of Pol II molecules during transcription, and the splicing status of the nascent RNAs. This is detected by sequencing the exon-intron or exon-exon junctions of the transcripts. Thus, this strategy links Pol II position with intron splicing of nascent RNA. The increase in the fraction of spliced transcripts with further distance from the intron end provides valuable information on when co-transcriptional splicing occurs. (2) with Pacific Biosciences sequencing (PacBio) of full-length nascent RNA, it is possible to determine the splicing pattern of transcripts with multiple introns, e.g. sequentially with transcription or also non-sequentially. Part of transcription termination is cleavage of the nascent transcript at the polyA site. The splicing status of cleaved and non-cleaved transcripts can provide insights into links between splicing and transcription termination and can be obtained from PacBio data. I found that co-transcriptional splicing in S. pombe is similarly prevalent to other species and that most introns are removed co-transcriptionally. Co-transcriptional splicing levels are dependent on intron position, adjacent exon length, and GC-content, but not splice site sequence. A high level of co-transcriptional splicing is correlated with high gene expression. In addition, I identified low abundance circular RNAs in intron-containing, as well as intronless genes, which could be side-products of RNA transcription and splicing. The analysis of co-transcriptional splicing patterns of 88 endogenous S. cerevisiae genes showed that the majority of intron splicing occurs within 100 nt downstream of the 3‘ SS. Saturation levels vary, and confirm results of a previous study. The onset of splicing is very close to the transcribing polymerase (within 27 nt) and implies that spliceosome assembly and conformational rearrangements must be completed immediately upon synthesis of the 3‘ SS. For S. pombe genes with multiple introns, most detected transcripts were completely spliced or completely unspliced. A smaller fraction showed partial splicing with the first intron being most often not spliced. Close to the polyA site, most transcripts were spliced, however uncleaved transcripts were often completely unspliced. This suggests a beneficial influence of pre-mRNA splicing for efficient transcript termination. Overall, sequencing of nascent RNA with the two strategies developed in this work offers significant potential for the analysis of co-transcriptional splicing, transcription termination and also RNA polymerase pausing by profiling nascent 3’ ends. I could define the position of pre-mRNA splicing during the process of transcription and provide evidence for fast and efficient co-transcriptional splicing in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, which is associated with highly expressed genes in both organisms. Differences in S. pombe co-transcriptional splicing could be linked to gene architecture features, like intron position, GC-content and exon length.

No description available.

No description available.

Pre-mRNA splicing is an important level in posttranscriptional gene regulation that is essential for accurate protein synthesis and generating protein diversity. The abundance of cryptic splice sites and long intronic DNA sequences makes their splicing a complex one. The identification of correct exons and introns needs additional information in the form of splicing regulatory elements (SREs) along with canonical splice signals. The interplay among these SREs and the trans factors (which bind to SREs) gives the identity to introns and exons which in turn leads to precise pre-mRNA splicing. Previous studies from our laboratory showed, that when expressed in mammalian cells from an expression vector, PDGF-B ORF was re-spliced at 4/5 exon junction with the downstream SV40 splice acceptor site in the vector. However, deletion of the 66-nt PDGF-B 3’ UTR region resulted in about 25% reduction in re-splicing. Sequence analysis of this region revealed presence of binding sites for splicing factors ASF/SF2 and SRp55, and an AU-rich element (ARE), mutation each of which affected re-splicing partially. In mammals, AREs are commonly found in the 3’UTR of mRNAs encoding proteins involved in diverse functions and are involved in selective mRNA degradation. Several ARE binding proteins are crucial for ARE’s function. Since mutation of the single ARE in the 3’UTR region altered the re-splicing efficiency, the role of AU-rich elements and ARE-binding proteins (AU-BPs) in modulation of splicing was investigated using siRNAs against AU-BPs, BRF1, hnRNPD, HuR, GAPDH and TTP. Down regulation of expression of these factors indeed affected the level of re-spliced product. We have studied the interactions between the full-length splicing factors (U1-70K and U2AF35) and the AU-BPs (BRF1, hnRNPD and HuR) as well as among the AU-BPs using three different assay methods: Yeast-two hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation and pull down assays. Our study has revealed that the BRF1 interacts with U1-70K and U2AF35 as well as the other AU-BPs hnRNPD and HuR but with different affinities. We have also analyzed the ability of AU-BPs to interact with SR proteins SRp20 and 9G8. We did find strong interaction of BRF1 with SRp20 and 9G8. Generation of a large number of nested deletion mutants of all the proteins allowed us to identify the interaction regions on the surface of BRF1, U1-70K, hnRNPD, U2AF35 and HuR. The results of Y2H analyses were further confirmed by pull down assay using purified interacting regions. It was found that a single region from aa 181-254 in BRF1 interacts with multiple partners i.e., splicing factors and the AU-BP hnRNPD. However, the RNA-binding zinc-finger domain from residue 120-181 independently interacts with HuR. Further, the multiple protein interacting region (MPIR) (aa 181-254) in BRF1 exhibits different affinities towards its interacting partners with that for U1-70K and hnRNPD being stronger than that for U2AF35 and HuR. This observation suggests that BRF1 activity can be modulated by interaction with different partners at different sites. U1-70K interacted only with BRF1 among the proteins tested in this study and this interaction appears to be RNA independent .This could have implications in splice site selection and RNA stability since BRF1 has been shown to promote RNA degradation. While the Arg/Glu-rich C-terminal region in U1-70K is sufficient for its interaction with BRF1, U2AF35 requires both the zinc-finger 2 and the arg/Gly/Ser-rich C-terminal regions for its association with BRF1. hnRNPD also interacts with multiple partners that include BRF1, HuR and U2AF35 using the N-terminal region that harbors a Ala-rich domain. The interaction of hnRNPD with HuR is RNA dependent while with BRF1 and U2AF35, it is RNA independentt. Further, its interaction with all the partners is equally strong. This suggests that hnRNPD could exert differential influence depending on the context of its interaction and abundance of the interacting partner. HuR, primarily known as an mRNA stabilizing factor, interacts with both BRF1 and hnRNPD with equal affinity involving the hinge region, the interaction with the former being RNA-independent and the later being RNA-dependent. This differential RNA-dependent and independent interactions with the two AU-BPs using a single interacting domain suggests a balancing act of HuR on the activities of BRF1 and hnRNPD. These interactions can further be differentially modulated by posttranslational modifications on one or all of the interacting partners depending on the physiological status of the cell. We have also analyzed the multiple protein complexes formed in absence of cellular RNA. Though we are unable to see direct protein-protein interaction between HuR and U1-70K in Yeast two hybrid analysis, we could detect the presence of U1-70K in HuR immunoprecipitate. It appears that U1-70K associates with HuR via BRF. We also detected the presence of HuR in U1-70K complexes which could be due to its association with BRF1. We are unable to find hnRNPD and U2AF35 in these complexes indicating that they may have been excluded. In anti-U2AF35 immunoprecipitates, we detected the presence of U1-70K as well as hnRNPD but no HuR. This may be due to RNase treatment as hnRNPD and HuR interactions are RNA dependent. Our findings that AU-rich elements in conjunction with AU-BPs function as intronic splicing modulators or enhancers, reveal hitherto unidentified new players in the poorly understood complex mechanisms that mediate alternative splicing. The possibility of dynamic nature of the interactions among splicing factors and AU-BPs mediated by post-translational modifications provide a basis for rapid cellular responses to changing environmental cues through generation of differentially spliced mRNAs and corresponding protein products that differ in their stability and hence their relative abundance. Our results also unfold enormous possibilities for future investigations on interactions among the many splicing factors and AU-BPs, and in understanding these complex interactions in modulation of pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA translation and degradation. The finding of coupling of AU-BPs to splicing machinery could further lead to better understanding of the mechanism of AU-BP-mediated targeting of mRNAs to processing bodies and ultimate degradation of the mRNAs.

Les ARNm sont des molécules centrales pour la régulation des gènes, aidant à convertir l'information génétique stockée dans l'ADN en protéines fonctionnelles. En tant que polymère simple brin, mesurant des centaines à des milliers de nucléotides, les ARNm peuvent former des structures secondaires et tertiaires étendues formant des particules appelés ribonucléoprotéines messagères (RNPm) en s’assemblant avec des protéines. L'organisation 3D des (pré-)RNPm influence de nombreux aspects de leur métabolisme, incluant la régulation de leur maturation, de leur export et de leur traduction dans le cytoplasme. Malgré leur importance, notre compréhension de l'organisation structurelle des (pré-)RNPm in vivo, et des principes qui la régissent est minime. Au cours de ma thèse, j'ai analysé l'organisation des (pré-)mRNP en développant une vision centrée sur l'ARN. Pour cela, j'ai mis en place une approche combinant l'hybridation in situ d'ARN monomoléculaire (smFISH) avec la microscopie à illumination structurée (SIM) et l'ai utilisée pour étudier l'organisation des mRNP dans le noyau et le cytoplasme. Nos résultats suggèrent que l'organisation (pré-)mRNP varie à différents stades de sa vie. Nous montrons que l'empaquetage (pré-)mRNP commence de manière co-transcriptionnelle, avec des introns organisés en conformations compactes. Cette organisation est modifiée au cours de la transcription au fur et à mesure que la polymérase se déplace le long du gène, assemblant finalement un intron avec les extrémités à proximité l’une de l’autre, d'une manière dépendante du spliceosome, suggérant que l'organisation co-transcriptionnelle des introns pourrait être critique pour déterminer son excision. Une fois libérés, les mRNP ont une organisation linéaire compacte dans le nucléoplasme et éventuellement une conformation en tige. L'organisation d’un mRNP dans le cytoplasme est influencée par sa traduction. Alors que la traduction ouvre les mRNP, la séparation des extrémités de l'ARNm, l'inhibition de la traduction et la libération de ribosomes, ou le recrutement dans les granules de stress, donnent aux mRNP une structure très compacte. Fait intéressant, nous trouvons rarement des ARNm avec les extrémités 5' et 3' à proximité, ce qui suggère que la traduction en boucle fermée n'est pas un état universel pour tous les ARNm en cours de traduction. Ensemble, nos résultats fournissent une image essentielle de l'organisation du mRNP dans les cellules et souligne le rôle important de la conformation du RNPm dans la régulation de la traduction et de la maturation d’une RNPm. / mRNAs act as the central molecules in gene regulation, helping convert the genetic information stored in the DNA to functional proteins. As a single-stranded polymer, hundreds to thousands of nucleotides in length, mRNAs can form extensive secondary and tertiary structures and, together with proteins, are packaged into assemblies called messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs). The 3D organisation of (pre-)mRNPs influences many aspects of what happens to them, including regulating their processing, export and translation in the cytoplasm. Despite their significance, our understanding of the structural organisation of (pre-)mRNPs in vivo is minimal, as is our comprehension of the principles that govern it. During my PhD, I have developed an RNA-centric view on (pre-)mRNP organisation. For this, I have established an approach combining single-molecule RNA in situ hybridisation (smFISH) with structured illumination microscopy (SIM) and used it to study mRNP organisation in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Our results suggest that (pre-)mRNP organisation is altered at various stages during its lifetime. We show that (pre-)mRNP packaging starts co-transcriptionally, with introns organised into compact conformations. This organisation is altered during the course of transcription as the polymerase travels along the gene, finally assembling an intron with the ends in proximity in a spliceosome dependent manner, suggesting that co-transcriptional intron organisation could be critical in determining its excision. Once released, mRNPs have a compact linear organisation in the nucleoplasm and possibly a rod-like conformation. mRNP organisation in the cytoplasm is influenced by its translational status. While translation opens up mRNPs, separating the ends of the mRNA, translation inhibition and release of ribosomes, or recruitment to stress granules result in mRNPs having a highly compact structure. Interestingly, we rarely find mRNAs with the 5’ and 3’ ends in proximity, suggesting that closed-looped translation is not a universal state for all translating mRNAs. Together, our results provide a unique and essential view of mRNP organisation in cells and reveal important insight into the role of mRNP conformation in regulating translation and mRNP processing.