<p>Syftet med uppsatsen är att titta närmare på skillnaderna mellan den judiska och den kristna bilden av och resonemangen avseende Messias, så som de kom till uttryck i medeltidens mest berömda disputation i Barcelona år 1263.</p><p>Det är intressant att försöka förstå hur en medeltida judisk lärd såg på Messias och hur en dominikan försökte få honom på andra tankar om Messias. Dessutom har ämnet större aktualitet idag än tidigare, eftersom antalet och storleken av de messianska judiska församlingarna i världen, de flesta naturligtvis i Israel, växer. I de messianska församlingarna behöver det judiska och det kristna inte längre vara åtskiljande utan förenande faktorer.  </p><p>Disputationen i Barcelona var en sista uppflammande påminnelse om den tid som varit, den sista gången som den rika judiska kulturens representant fick någorlunda fritt framträda och uttrycka sig. Enligt Maccoby var Barcelonadisputationen den mest högklassiga, relevanta och bäst återgivna av alla disputationer. Därför bör den också vara bäst ämnad till att nå syftet genom följande frågeställningar:</p><p>1.      Vilken bild av Messias gav Paulus Christianus?</p><p>2.      Vilken bild av Messias gav Moses Nahmanides?</p><p>3.      Väsentliga skillnader mellan Paulus Christianus och Moses Nahmanides uppfattning om Messias</p>

Syftet med uppsatsen är att titta närmare på skillnaderna mellan den judiska och den kristna bilden av och resonemangen avseende Messias, så som de kom till uttryck i medeltidens mest berömda disputation i Barcelona år 1263. Det är intressant att försöka förstå hur en medeltida judisk lärd såg på Messias och hur en dominikan försökte få honom på andra tankar om Messias. Dessutom har ämnet större aktualitet idag än tidigare, eftersom antalet och storleken av de messianska judiska församlingarna i världen, de flesta naturligtvis i Israel, växer. I de messianska församlingarna behöver det judiska och det kristna inte längre vara åtskiljande utan förenande faktorer.   Disputationen i Barcelona var en sista uppflammande påminnelse om den tid som varit, den sista gången som den rika judiska kulturens representant fick någorlunda fritt framträda och uttrycka sig. Enligt Maccoby var Barcelonadisputationen den mest högklassiga, relevanta och bäst återgivna av alla disputationer. Därför bör den också vara bäst ämnad till att nå syftet genom följande frågeställningar: 1.      Vilken bild av Messias gav Paulus Christianus? 2.      Vilken bild av Messias gav Moses Nahmanides? 3.      Väsentliga skillnader mellan Paulus Christianus och Moses Nahmanides uppfattning om Messias

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-03T12:19:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Roberto de Jesus.pdf: 990691 bytes, checksum: 45c590bc6782917477256fbccbf6764a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-03-07 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The book of the prophet Dêutero-Isaiah approaches that Javé comes to console its people exiled in Babylonia. Foreign king Cyrus, in the text of Is 45,1-7 is intitled of Messiahs de Javé. Therefore, this research has as objective to reflect on the messianic heading attribution to king Cyrus, in the context of the Babylonian exile. For this, I analyze some contributions of diverse authors and authors of the Biblical area, exploring the diversity of analyses on this subject. It has many interpretations on the meaning of the messianic heading attributed to the king Cyrus, between them, it has who defines Cyrus as the Messiahs de Javé, that is, Cyrus as liberating of the exiled ones and not as the substitute of the messianic hope in a Messiahs proceeding from the house of David. In this work, I still argue has messianic hope, manifest in the exilic period and after-exilic, detaching the faith that the messianic communities exerted in these periods. At last, I analyze the messianic of the neo-testamentary communities after-macabaicas and in the attempt discovering if Cyrus was one messianic figure, in these periods. / O livro do profeta Dêutero-Isaías aborda que Javé vem consolar seu povo exilado na Babilônia. O rei estrangeiro Ciro, no texto de Is 45,1-7 é intitulado de Messias de Javé. Portanto, esta pesquisa tem como objetivo refletir sobre o título messiânico atribuído ao rei Ciro, no contexto do exílio babilônico. Para isto, analiso algumas contribuições de diversos autores e autoras da área bíblica, explorando a diversidade de pesquisas sobre este tema. Há muitas interpretações sobre o significado do título messiânico atribuído ao rei Ciro, entre elas, há quem define Ciro como o Messias de Javé, ou seja, Ciro como libertador dos exilados e não como o substituto da esperança messiânica em um Messias proveniente da casa de Davi. Neste trabalho, discuto ainda a esperança messiânica, manifesta no período exílico e pós-exílico, destacando a fé que as comunidades messiânicas exerciam nestes períodos. Enfim, analiso o messianismo das comunidades pós-macabaicas e neo-testamentárias na tentativa de descobrir se Ciro era uma figura messiânica, nestes períodos.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-03T12:19:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 VandersonRodrigues.pdf: 980791 bytes, checksum: c75b486c816884d68ef3f9530f2a049d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-04-10 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / A presente dissertação objetiva demonstrar as causas do conflito da comunidade joanina na segunda metade do século I, bem como revelar as estratégias de releitura da história de Jesus a partir do prisma do autor do QE para combater os inimigos da comunidade, assegurar-lhes a fé, fortalecer os perseguidos e duvidosos e formar uma cristologia solidificada em um pensamento soteriológico quanto a pessoa de Jesus como Messias. Para tanto pretende-se analisar a pluralidade sociopolítica e religiosa da Palestina no século I, demonstrando como o meio influenciou a escolha do autor do QE ao redigir um texto de forma a fazer uma releitura da vida de Jesus em defesa da fé de sua comunidade. Também serão estudadas as vozes em conflito dentro do texto e as vozes discordantes que cercam a perícope, buscando entendê-las a partir do texto do QE, pois este é o elemento mais palpável de que dispomos para o estudo dos conflitos e motivos que geraram esse evangelho. Para melhor expor e entender o argumento de defesa do autor que representa a comunidade joanina, será desenvolvido um estudo sobre o uso dos verbos pe,mpw e avposte,llw no texto do QE, especialmente no capítulo 7, com o intuito de mostrar como o autor entendia este Jesus Messias e como isto moldou sua teologia.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-03T12:20:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Edson Martins1.pdf: 3088305 bytes, checksum: b90a934fe301b6d9b070dd9e59138385 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-02-20 / This thesis is a sociological analysis of the main motivations that made men and women let go of everything they were doing up to a certain moment and follow a messianic leader known as Inri Cristo, who claims to be the reincarnation of Jesus Christ. It shows, at first, a brief historical account of the three most important and thoroughly documented Brazilian messianic movements: Canudos, Juazeiro and Contestado, so as to understand the context in which such movements were brought up. This account enables the making of comparisons between these three movements and the Inri Cristo one. The research presents and analyses the appearance of the messiah, the content of his message, and the structure of his church, localized in a popular district of Curitiba. After that, there will be an analysis of the data about his disciples, which was gathered in a field research. This analysis will make it possible to understand who they are, their everyday living within the community, the way they absorb the official discourses and how they pass them on, and, most important, which the main motivations are that made them follow the messianic leader. There is also a comparative analysis between the disciples of Inri Cristo and the followers of the movements mentioned above, so as to establish convergent and divergent aspects between them. Finally, there is a presentation of the innovations brought by this messianic movement and its contributions for the study of Brazilian messianic movements. / A presente tese é uma análise sociológica das principais motivações que levam homens e mulheres a abandonarem tudo o que estavam fazendo até então, para seguir um líder messiânico denominado de Inri Cristo, que proclama ser a reencarnação de Jesus Cristo. Ela apresenta um breve histórico dos três principais e mais documentados movimentos messiânicos brasileiros que são os de Canudos, Juazeiro e Contestado, permitindo entender o contexto em que surgiram tais movimentos, estabelecendo uma base de contato para as comparações entre eles e o movimento do Inri Cristo. A pesquisa apresenta e analisa o surgimento do messias, o conteúdo de sua mensagem e a estrutura da sua igreja, localizada em um bairro popular da cidade de Curitiba. A seguir, são analisados os dados colhidos sobre os seus discípulos através da pesquisa de campo, objetivando descobrir quem são eles, como é o cotidiano dentro do movimento, de que maneira é feita a assimilação dos discursos oficiais e como se dá a sua retransmissão, e principalmente, quais são as principais motivações que os levam a seguir o líder messiânico. Também é feita uma análise comparativa entre os discípulos do Inri Cristo e os adeptos dos movimentos já citados, procurando pontos convergentes e divergentes entre eles. Por fim, são apresentadas as inovações que o referido movimento messiânico apresenta e quais são as suas contribuições para o estudo dos messianismos brasileiros.

AFRIKAANS:By die interpretasie van tekste moet die historiese en kultiese Sitze im Leben waarbinne hierdie tekste ontstaan en oorgelewer is in ag geneem word. Ou-Testamentiese tekste het elkeen ’n selfstandige betekenis wat nie van ander tekste afhanklik is om betekenis te kry nie. Hiervolgens handel die sogenaamde Koningspsalms (ook genoem messiaanse psalms) soos Psalm 45 en Psalm 110 inhoudelik oor ‘n Judese koning. Elke Dawidiese koning het as seun van God oor die volk Israel regeer. Hy was die verteenwoordiger van God se regering. Sy taak was om reg en geregtigheid te handhaaf. Elke koning was ‘n tipe verlossersfiguur. Deur die koning en die oorloë wat hy gevoer het, het Jahwe verlossing van hulle vyande, aan sy volk geskenk. As teken van sy gesag en sy besondere taak wat die koning van Jahwe ontvang het, is die Dawidiese koning met olie gesalf. Dit het van hom God se messias gemaak. In ooreenstemming met hulle Jebusitiese voorgangers was elke Dawidiese koning ‘n priester net soos Melgisedek, die koning van Salem. In hierdie Dawidiese dinastie van messiaanse priester-konings, was Israel se hoop gesetel. Die Ou Testament gee ‘n unieke betekenis aan die begrip messias. Hiervolgens is die sentrale figuur in Psalm 45 en 110 die aardse koning van Juda wat optree as Jahwe se messias. Met die Babiloniese ballingskap is die Dawidiese messias-dinastie verbreek. Nou is die messias-begrip na die toekoms geprojekteer sodat die verwagting van ‘n komende messias begin ontwikkel het. Die unieke betekenis wat die Ou Testament aan die messias-begrip gee, is op sy beurt deur die Nuwe Testament geherinterpreteer sodat dit op Jesus Christus dui. Daarom dat die Hebreërskrywer Psalms 45 en 110 herinterpreteer met betrekking tot Jesus Christus. Die Nuwe Testament is dus nie ’n sleutel tot die verstaan van Ou-Testamentiese tekste nie. ENGLISH: When texts are being interpreted, it is necessary to do so within their historic and cultic Sitze im Leben where they have originated and have been transmitted. Old Testament texts have their own unique meanings. Therefore it is not necessary to use other texts to give meaning to a specific text. According to this, the royal psalms such as Psalm 45 and Psalm 110 have a Judean king as its contents. The royal psalms are also messianic psalms. Every Davidic king ruled over his people as the son of God. He was the representative of God’s rule. His task was to uphold justice and righteousness. Every king was a type of redeemer. To his people God gave redemption from their enemies by the king and the holy wars he waged. As a sign of his authority and the fact that God chose him for a specific task, every Davidic king was anointed with oil. This made him the messiah of God. In co-ordinance with his Jebusite predecessors, every Davidic king also was a priest just as Melchizedek, the king of Salem, was. Upon this Davidic dynasty of messianic priest-kings, Israel’s hope as a nation rested. The Old Testament gives a unique significance to the concept of messiah. In this significancent context the central figure in Psalms 45 and 110 is the earthly king of Judea. As king, he is the messiah of Jahwe. With the Babylonian exile, the Davidic messiah-dynasty was ended. Now the concept of the messiah was futurised in such a way that the anticipation of a coming messiah was developed. In its turn the New Testament reinterprets the unique significance that the Old Testament gives to the concept of messiah as being fulfilled in Jesus Christ. This is why the writer of Hebrews reinterprets Psalm 45 and 110 as being fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The New Testament is therefore not the key to the interpretation of the Old Testament. / Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2009. / Old Testament Studies / unrestricted

Thesis (Ph.D.) - University, Aberdeen, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [323]-352) and indexes.

Psalm 110 is a messianic psalm, because it has a Judean king as its contents. As such, it is also a royal psalm. As the son of God, every Davidic king was a representative of Gods rule over Israel. His task was to uphold justice and righteousness. In addition, every king was an instrument through which God redeemed his people from their enemies. In this way, the king was a kind of redeemer. As a sign of his authority and the fact that God chose him for a specific task, every king was anointed with oil. This made the king the messiah of God. In co ordinance with his Jebusiete predecessors, every Davidic king also was ‘n priest just as Melgisedek the king of Salem. Israel’s hope as a nation rested upon this line of Davidic priest-kings. The First Testament gives a unique significance to the concept of messiah. The Second Testament reinterprets this significance as being fulfilled in Jesus Christ. However, the unique significance that the First Testament gives to the concept of messiah can only be valued if the unique character of the First Testament and its historical context are taken into consideration. / Dissertation (MTh (Old Testament Studies))--University of Pretoria, 2008. / Old Testament Studies / unrestricted