Spelling suggestions: "subject:"metaphysical off morals"" "subject:"metaphysical oof morals""
1 |
On the Relationship between Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals and the Metaphysics of MoralsHall, Christopher Adam 22 September 2010 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Kant e o fundamento da moralidade: um estudo da dedução do imperativo categórico em GMS IIIRibeiro, Elton Cândido 18 March 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2016-08-04T11:44:43Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Elton Candido Ribeiro.pdf: 777004 bytes, checksum: d5e6945a62798adb4f9002ce36be78ff (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-04T11:44:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Elton Candido Ribeiro.pdf: 777004 bytes, checksum: d5e6945a62798adb4f9002ce36be78ff (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-18 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / This work aims to study the deduction of the categorical imperative in the third section of Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Undoubtedly, this deduction is an important Kantian attempt to offer a foundation for his a priori ethics. More than two centuries later, there is no consensus among scholars and commentators regarding what is the structure of the argument, as well as its aim and its importance in the Kantian Critical Philosophy. This thesis is structured in three chapters. The first chapter studies the analysis of the concept of “good will” in the first section of Groundwork. The second chapter follow the analysis of the concept of “finite rational agent” in the second section. Lastly, the third chapter studies the deduction of the categorical imperative in the third section of Groundwork. The argument of the deduction is comprised in the following steps: the analytical relationship between liberty and morality; the presupposition of the effectiveness of the liberty of all rational being; the presupposition of the effectiveness of the liberty of the rational-sensitive being; the deduction of the categorical imperative / Este trabalho tem como objetivo estudar a dedução do imperativo categórico na terceira seção da Fundamentação da Metafísica dos Costumes, de Immanuel Kant. Sem dúvida, esta dedução é uma importante tentativa do filósofo de oferecer uma fundamentação para sua ética a priori. Mais de dois séculos depois, ainda não há consenso entre os estudiosos e comentadores sobre a estrutura do argumento, seu objetivo e sua importância na filosofia crítica kantiana. Para lidar com a questão, esta dissertação é estruturada em três capítulos. O primeiro capítulo estuda a análise do conceito de "boa vontade" empreendida na primeira seção da Fundamentação. O segundo capítulo segue a análise do conceito de "agente racional finito", na segunda seção. Finalmente, o terceiro capítulo estuda a dedução do imperativo categórico na terceira seção da Fundamentação. O argumento da dedução é compreendido nos seguintes passos: a relação analítica entre liberdade e moralidade; a pressuposição da efetividade da liberdade de todos os seres racionais; a pressuposição da efetividade da liberdade do ser racional-sensível; a dedução do imperativo categórico
|
3 |
康德法權論在其道德哲學中之定位 / The Status of Kant’s Rechtslehre in His Moral Philosophy王冠龍, Wang, Kuan Lung Unknown Date (has links)
做為康德道德哲學最後一本主要的著作,《道德底形上學》一書長期以來一直受到康德研究者們的忽視。許多論者們認為,〈法權論〉做為《道德底形上學》一書中的第一部份,其中的許多觀點與康德道德哲學中的理念並不一致。然而,在本論文中,筆者即試圖捍衛〈法權論〉的道德地位,以及《道德底形上學》一書的重要性。是故,本論文有兩個主要的論點:第一,康德的〈法權論〉並不會與其道德哲學理念產生衝突,相對的,法權的法則必須由定言令式演繹而來,而法權的系統本身也未違反自律的原則;第二,《道德底形上學》一書扮演了「道德義務學」及「道德實踐學」的角色,從而與《道德底形上學之基礎》及《實踐理性批判》共同構成康德道德哲學系統中不可或缺的重要部份。 / As the last major work of Kant’s morality, the Metaphysics of Morals has long been neglected in Kantian literatures. Many Scholars argue that the Rechtslehre, or Doctrine of Right, as the first part of Metaphysics of Morals, is not consistent with Kant’s moral theory. This research intends to defend the moral status of Rechtslehre and the importance of Metaphysics of Morals in Kant’s moral philosophy. There are two main arguments - firstly, Rechtslehre does not conflict with Kant’s moral theory; instead, the laws of Right should be derived from categorical imperative, and the system of Right does not contradict to the principle of autonomy. Secondly, the Metaphysics of Morals can be regarded as the “doctrine of moral duties” and the “doctrine of practical morality”, and, together with the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and the Critique of Practical Reason, constitutes an essential part in Kant’s moral philosophy.
|
4 |
Kant's Departure from Hume's Moral NaturalismSaunders, Josiah Paul January 2007 (has links)
This thesis considers Kant's departure from moral naturalism. In doing so, it explores the relationship between ethics, naturalism, normativity and freedom. Throughout this exploration, I build the case that Kant's ethics of autonomy allows us to make better sense of ethics than Hume's moral naturalism. Hume believes that morality is ultimately grounded in human nature. Kant finds this understanding of ethics limiting. He insists that we are free - we can critically reflect upon our nature and (to an extent) alter it accordingly. This freedom, I contend, renders the moral naturalist's appeal to nature lacking. Of course, a Kantian conception of freedom - some form of independence from the causal order - is fairly unpopular in contemporary circles. In particular, a commitment to naturalism casts doubt on such a notion of freedom. I argue with Kant that such a conception of freedom is essential to the conception of ourselves as rational agents. The critical turn, unlike naturalism, warrants this conception of freedom, accommodating the point of view of our rational agency. It thus allows Kant's ethics of autonomy to better grasp certain key elements of morality - normativity and our agency - than Hume's moral naturalism.
|
5 |
Το ηθικό, το νόμιμο, το πολιτικό : θεμελιώσεις και διακρίσεις, ανεξαρτησία και σύνδεση της ηθικής, του δικαίου και της πολιτικής, με βάση τη Θεωρία του Δικαίου του Καντ και σε προβολή προς τις θεωρίες δικαίου του νομικού θετικισμού / The ethical, the rightful, the politicalΧατζηνάσου, Ευθυμία 04 May 2011 (has links)
Στην εργασία παρουσιάζεται η Θεωρία Δικαίου του Καντ, σε συνδυασμό με την Ηθική και Πολιτική Φιλοσοφία του φιλοσόφου προκειμένου να αναδειχθεί η κοινή θεμελίωσή τους στον ηθικό νόμο που ενυπάρχει στον ανθρώπινο Λόγο και ελευθερία..
Η σύνδεση πολιτικής, δικαίου και ηθικής διατυπώνεται ρητά από τον Καντ, και επίσης υπό την ανάλυση του σύγχρονου φιλοσοφικού στοχασμού (Τίμμονς, Βίλλασεκ, ΜακΝτάουελ) τεκμηριώνεται η ανεξάλειπτη ηθική διάσταση εντός του δικαίου και της πολιτικής μέσα από την πραγμάτευση των σύγχρονων αντιλήψεων, όπως η περιγραφικότητας, η εξωτερικότητα και η επιτακτικότητα, και μέσα από την απόρριψη των επιμέρους θέσεων της ανεξαρτησίας και της εξωτερικότητας του δικαίου. / In this paper, the Kant’s Doctrine of Right is presented in combination with his Moral and Political Philosophy, in order to display; their common foundation on the moral law that prevails on the human Reason and freedom.
Kant has explicitly expressed the connection between politics, law and morality, and additionally in the modern philosophical thought (Timmons, Willaschek, McDowell) the ineffaceable moral dimension of right and politics is validated through the modern concepts of descriptivity, externality and prescreptivity, by the refutation of Independence and Externality Theses.
|
Page generated in 0.0863 seconds