The actin and microtubule cytoskeleton plays a critical role in the establishment of cell polarity. Cell processes like mitosis and migration rely on the reorganization of the cytoskeleton to properly function. One driver of cell polarity is the formin, Inverted Formin-1 (INF1). INF1 is able to induce F-actin formation, activate the Serum Response Factor (SRF) pathway, stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi body. Regulation of INF1 is unique, since it does not possess conserved formin regulatory domains. However, INF1 does possess many potential phosphorylation sites. In this study, we demonstrate that INF1’s ability to induce F-actin stress fibers and activate SRF is inhibited by Microtubule-Affinity Regulating Kinase 2 (MARK2). Inhibition of INF1’s actin polymerization activity by MARK2 likely occurs near INF1’s C-terminus. However, MARK2 was unable to inhibit INF1’s ability to stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi. Furthermore, we show that INF1 overexpression is associated with primary cilium absence and in some cases, the presence of long cilia, suggesting that INF1 plays a role in primary cilium formation.

In this work, a general dynamic model was proposed to simulate the dynamic motion of microtubules driven by dynein motors, which is of importance to the design of potential nano-bio machines composed of dynein motors and microtubules. The model was developed based on Newton's law of motion. By incorporating a DPD technique, the general model was applied to simulate the unidirectional motion of microtubule. The functions of dyneins and their coordination with each other, which plays an important role in the motion of microtubules, were studied. By taking into account the bending energy of microtubules, we extended the general model to study possible mechanisms responsible for the microtubule-microtubule and microtubule-wall interactions, which are essential to the design of optimal track patterns for potential nanomachine systems. This study helps to evaluate the influence of bending and rotation on microtubule joining processes, involving bumping force, bending moment and torque generation. Finally, a phenomenal modeling study based on the Monte Carlo method, was conducted to investigate the self-organization of microtubules driven by dynein motors and identify out key parameters that control the self-organized movement of microtubules, giving crucial information for nano device design. This modeling study helps to clarify several important issues regarding the interaction between dynein motors and microtubules as a power transfer medium, which provides important information for the development of potential nanobio-machines using dynein as a biological motor.

Thesis (M.Sc.). / Written for the Dept. of Biochemistry. Title from title page of PDF (viewed 2008/07/30). Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph.D.). / Written for the Dept. of Biology. Title from title page of PDF (viewed 2008/01/12). Includes bibliographical references.

The work presented here describes novel functions for centrosome proteins, specifically for pericentrin and centriolin. The first chapter describes the involvement of pericentrin in ciliogenesis. Cells with reduced pericentrin levels were unable to form primary cilia in response to serum starvation. In addition we showed novel interactions between pericentrin, intraflagellar transport (IFT) proteins and polycystin 2 (PC2). Pericentrin was co-localized with IFT proteins and PC2 to the base of primary cilia and motile cilia. Ciliary function defects have been shown to be involved in many human diseases and IFT proteins and PC2 have been implicated in these diseases. We conclude that pericentrin is required for assembly of primary cilia possibly as an anchor for other proteins involved in primary cilia assembly. The second chapter describes identification of centriolin, a novel centriolar protein that localizes to subdistal appendages and is involved in cytokinesis and cell cycle progression. Depletion of centriolin leads to defects in the final stages of cytokinesis, where cells remain connected by thin intercellular bridges and are unable to complete abscission. The cytokinesis defects seemed to precede the G0/G1 p53 dependant cell cycle arrest. Finally, the third chapter is a continuation of the cytokinesis study and it identifies pericentrin as an interacting partner for centriolin. Like centriolin, pericentrin knockdown induces defects in the final stages of cytokinesis and leads to G0/G1 arrest. Moreover, pericentrin and centriolin interact biochemically and show codependency in their centrosome localization. We conclude that pericentrin and centriolin are members of the same pathway and are necessary for the final stages of cytokinesis.

Cells as dynamic, interactive, and self contained units of life have a need for molecular motors that can create physical forces to move cargoes within the cell. Cytoplasmic dynein 1 is one such molecular motor that has many functions in the cell. The number and variety of functions that involve cytoplasmic dynein 1 suggest that there are a number of different binding sites on dynein for different proteins. Cytoplasmic dynein 1 is a multiprotein complex made up of six different subunit families. The many different combinations of subunits that could be used to make up a cytoplasmic dynein 1 holocomplex provides the variety of different binding sites for cargoes that can be individually regulated. The following chapters flush out how light intermediate chain 1 (LIC1), a subunit of cytoplasmic dynein 1, is involved with multiple dynein functions involving the binding of different cargoes to the cytoplasmic dynein 1 holocomplex, and how the binding of these cargoes can be regulated. First, LIC1 is found to be involved in the spindle assembly checkpoint. LIC1 appears to facilitate the removal of Mad1-Mad2, a complex important in producing a wait anaphase signal, from kinetochores. Second, the involvement of LIC1 in the spindle assembly checkpoint requires the phosphorylation of LIC1 at a putative Cdk1 phosphorylation site. This site is located in a domain of LIC1 that binds various proteins suggesting that this phosphorylation could also regulate these interactions. Third, LIC1 is involved in the centrosomal assembly of pericentrin, an important centrosomal protein. From the data presented herein, LIC1 is shaping up as a multifunctional cargo binder for cytoplasmic dynein 1 that requires regulation of its various cargoes.

ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus has always been an interesting organelle of study because of its unique morphology as well as the critical roles it plays in cell biology. It is situated next to the endoplasmic reticulum and secreted proteins must pass through the Golgi vesicular pathway for modifications and targeting. In addition, the Golgi apparatus plays an essential role in establishing cellular polarity. Cell polarity refers to difference in orientation of cell structures spatially, and is involved in establishing functionality. The Golgi apparatus establishes cell polarity in various ways including orienting itself spatially, biasing vesicular trafficking within the cell, and most importantly through its role as a microtubule organizing center. The cytoskeleton provides the structural framework for cells. Microtubules nucleated from the Golgi-dependent microtubule organizing center result in an asymmetric cytoskeleton. An asymmetric cytoskeleton is essential to establishing cell polarity. Neurons require cell polarity to establish the essential structures such as the axon and dendrites. The Golgi apparatus establishes neuronal polarity through its extensive network of associated proteins. In this review, we will discuss the growing evidence supporting the role of the Golgi apparatus in establishing neuronal polarity.

Spontaneous mutations in the human LIS1 gene are responsible for Type I lissencephaly ("smooth brain"). The distribution of neurons within the cerebral cortex of lissencephalic children appears randomized, probably owing to a defect in neuronal migration during early development. LIS1 has been implicated in the dynein pathway by genetic analyses in fungi. We previously reported that the vertebrate LIS1 co-localized with dynein at prometaphase kinetochores, and interference with LIS1 function at kinetochore caused misalignment of chromosomes onto the metaphase plate. This leads to a hypothesis that LIS1 might regulate kinetochore protein targeting. In order to test this hypothesis, I created dominant inhibitory constructs of LIS1. After removal of the endogenous LIS1 from the kinetochore by overexpression of the N-terminal self-association domain of LIS1, dynein and dynactin remained at the kinetochores. This result indicated that LIS1 is not required for dynein to localize at the kinetochore. Next, CLIP-170 was displaced from the kinetochores in the LIS1 full-length and the C-terminal WD-repeat overexpressers, suggesting a role for LIS1 in targeting CLIP-170 onto kinetochores. LIS1 was co-immunoprecipitated with dynein and dynactin. Its association with kinetochores was mediated by dynein and dynactin, suggesting LIS1 might interact directly with subunits of dynein and/or dynactin complexes. I found that LIS1 interacted with the heavy and intermediate chains (HC and IC) of dynein complex, and the dynamitin subunit of dynactin complex. In addition to kinetochore targeting, the LIS1 C-terminal WD-repeat domain was responsible for interactions with dynein and dynactin. Interestingly, LIS 1 interacted with two distinct sites on HC: one in the stem region containing the subunit-binding domain, and the other in the first AAA motif of the motor domain, which is indispensable for the ATPase function of the motor protein. This LIS1-dynein motor domain interaction suggests a role for LIS1 in regulating dynein motor activity. To test this hypothesis, changes of dynein ATPase activity was measured in the presence of LIS1 protein. The ATPase activity of dynein was stimulated by the addition of a recombinant LIS1 protein. Besides kinetochores, others and we have found LIS1 also localized at microtubule plus ends. LIS1 may mediate dynein and dynactin mitotic functions at these ends by interacting with astral microtubules at cortex, and associating with the spindle microtubules at kinetochores. Overexpression of LIS1 displaced dynein and dynactin from the microtubule plus ends, and mitotic progression was severely perturbed in LIS1 overexpressers. These results suggested that the role for LIS1 at microtubule plus ends is to regulate dynein and dynactin interactions with various subcellular structures. Results from my thesis research clearly favored the conclusion that LIS1 activates dynein ATPase activity through its interaction with the motor domain, and this activation is important to establish an interaction between dynein and microtubule plus ends during mitosis. I believe that my thesis work not only has provided ample implications regarding dynein dysfunction in disease formation, but also has laid a significant groundwork for more future studies in regulations of the increasing array of dynein functions.

The Microtubule (MT) network is a central component of the eukaryotic cell cytoskeleton. In the fission yeast S. pombe, a complex of three proteins specifically tracks MT +ends and stabilizes MTs in the cell. It is composed of the proteins Mal3, Tip1 and Tea2. Mal3, the S. pombe homologue of EB1, is a highly conserved ubiquitous protein found to be at the centre of many MT related processes. Tip1 is a CLIP170 homologue and Tea2 a kinesin-like motor protein. The mechanism by which they target the growing end of MTs and stabilize them is still unknown. A combination of biochemistry, electron microscopy and crystallography were used in an attempt to get a more precise understanding of the MT stabilization by this +Tip complex. Protein-A pull-down of the endogenous complex and analysis of its constituents by mass spectrometry revealed that Tea2 and Tip1 form a tight stoichiometric complex, making a much more labile interaction with Mal3. Biochemical experiments, light scattering and DIC microscopy demonstrate that Mal3 stabilizes the MT structure in a stoichiometric fashion by suppressing catastrophe events. 3D helical reconstruction of electron micrographs of Mal3 bound to the MT show that it most probably stabilizes the MT structure by bridging protofilaments together. Deletion mutant analysis suggests that contact with one of the protofilaments is via an interaction between the charged tails of tubulin and Mal3. Mal3 MT binding domain structure was solved by X-ray crystallography so that eventually it may be docked into a higher resolution electron microscopy map to provide a more precise structural insight on how Mal3 stabilizes the MT lattice. The EM analysis also shows that Mal3 regulates MT structure in vitro by restraining their protofilament number to 13, which is the number always found in vivo, and by driving the assembly of MTs with a high proportion of A-lattice. It is the first time that a protein is found to promote formation of A-lattice MTs. The fact that EB1 is such a ubiquitous protein reopens the question of MT structure in cells and has important implications for in vivo MT dynamics.

The actin and microtubule cytoskeleton plays a critical role in the establishment of cell polarity. Cell processes like mitosis and migration rely on the reorganization of the cytoskeleton to properly function. One driver of cell polarity is the formin, Inverted Formin-1 (INF1). INF1 is able to induce F-actin formation, activate the Serum Response Factor (SRF) pathway, stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi body. Regulation of INF1 is unique, since it does not possess conserved formin regulatory domains. However, INF1 does possess many potential phosphorylation sites. In this study, we demonstrate that INF1’s ability to induce F-actin stress fibers and activate SRF is inhibited by Microtubule-Affinity Regulating Kinase 2 (MARK2). Inhibition of INF1’s actin polymerization activity by MARK2 likely occurs near INF1’s C-terminus. However, MARK2 was unable to inhibit INF1’s ability to stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi. Furthermore, we show that INF1 overexpression is associated with primary cilium absence and in some cases, the presence of long cilia, suggesting that INF1 plays a role in primary cilium formation.