This dissertation focuses on the many tales of distressed women found in mid-eighteenth-century British magazines and essay serials. On the one hand, I argue, scenes of “virtue in distress” and amatory fiction more generally demonstrate the increasing commercialization of literature and the rise of the sentimental reader. On the other hand, they reveal the periodical writers’ drive to educate readers both in and through the passions. I propose that two factors complicate the pathos of these narratives. In the first place, the periodical form was thought to work against the arousal of vehement passions. In the second place, even if such passions could be raised in the miscellaneous format, there were moral reasons why indolent, distracted periodical readers craving sympathetic identification should not be indulged. Driven by market forces and yet constrained by the unique nature of periodical publication, writers of miscellanies responded with ingenuity to these challenges, crafting and deploying literary depictions of “virtue in distress” that suited this compressed and constrained medium. In part because of the challenges and risks associated with raising powerful feelings on the limited canvas of the periodical, some periodicalists worked to suppress or otherwise complicate the most affecting aspects of their amatory fictions. Others strove to correct the reader’s passions in their operation; and others still called into question, elsewhere in their periodicals, the suitability of a passionate response. All attempted to justify their efforts on aesthetic and/or ethical grounds. Drawing on their knowledge of eighteenth-century aesthetic theory, classical models of rhetoric and composition, and early modern theories of the passions, periodical writers strove to raise useful, calm passions through their fictions—passions in some sense suited to the periodical form—and to suppress vehement, dangerous ones. By examining mid-century periodicals in relation to broad strands of enlightenment and also classical thought, my thesis uncovers an important proto-disciplinary moment in eighteenth-century Britain, when the fields of psychology, rhetoric, and moral theory were not yet separated. The organization of my study is, with some exceptions, chronological, with sections on Eliza Haywood’s Female Spectator (1744-46), Samuel Johnson’s Rambler (1750-52) and Idler (1758-60), Christopher Smart’s Student (1750-51) and Midwife (1750-53), John Hawkesworth’s Adventurer (1752-54), and Oliver Goldsmith’s Citizen of the World (1760-61). My purpose is not to chart a change over time, but to reveal the innovative ways mid-century periodical writers responded to a set of interrelated questions and concerns: is it possible to import the famously sentimental motif of “virtue in distress” into the miscellany, given the structural limitations of the form; which passions should, ethically speaking, be raised by depictions of distressed women and which suppressed; and what aesthetic and rhetorical resources can be mobilized to convey such depictions effectively to readers and thereby influence their passions?

<p>It is rather undisputed that the United States has maintained its position of global primacy since the end of the Cold War. According to the current Bush- administration and the US National Security Strategy, this power will be used to fight terrorists as well as to encourage free and open societies on every continent. With this position held by the government, it becomes essential to know more about the US power to better understand world politics. What opinions an American foreign policy elite has on international politics in general and on the US power in particular, can be consideredto have a certain influence on the US governmental policy making and is hence an interesting object of analysis for an improved knowledge of the US power position. This thesis aims to analyse different foreign policy elite interpretations, both of the present US situation and of what can be expected in the near future. In addition to opinions on the power position itself, the question addressed is whether there seem to be any impact of modern theories of international politics among the elite and if these theories are relevant at all for policy- orientated estimations. The result of the analysis indicates at least some impact of neorealism, neoliberalism and social constructivism, while there tend to be no influence of feminist IR-theory. However, as a base assumption in this thesis, most modern theories of international politics are conceived as partly related to a realist tradition in the field of academics, and this might diminish the influence of the separate theories among the elite. Accordingly, nor can extreme theoretical differences be confirmed, neither can the differences be disregarded. A majority of the foreign policy elite representatives describe the present US position as unrivalled in all critical dimensions, with an unsurpassed military, economic, technological and cultural power. The opinions on the expected power position in the near future are more diverging and suggest different courses of development. However, as long as the US keeps the precedence of interpretation and attracts others to American values and ideas, in addition to a solid base of economic and military strength, the US power position will most probably last for a foreseeable future.</p>

It is rather undisputed that the United States has maintained its position of global primacy since the end of the Cold War. According to the current Bush- administration and the US National Security Strategy, this power will be used to fight terrorists as well as to encourage free and open societies on every continent. With this position held by the government, it becomes essential to know more about the US power to better understand world politics. What opinions an American foreign policy elite has on international politics in general and on the US power in particular, can be consideredto have a certain influence on the US governmental policy making and is hence an interesting object of analysis for an improved knowledge of the US power position. This thesis aims to analyse different foreign policy elite interpretations, both of the present US situation and of what can be expected in the near future. In addition to opinions on the power position itself, the question addressed is whether there seem to be any impact of modern theories of international politics among the elite and if these theories are relevant at all for policy- orientated estimations. The result of the analysis indicates at least some impact of neorealism, neoliberalism and social constructivism, while there tend to be no influence of feminist IR-theory. However, as a base assumption in this thesis, most modern theories of international politics are conceived as partly related to a realist tradition in the field of academics, and this might diminish the influence of the separate theories among the elite. Accordingly, nor can extreme theoretical differences be confirmed, neither can the differences be disregarded. A majority of the foreign policy elite representatives describe the present US position as unrivalled in all critical dimensions, with an unsurpassed military, economic, technological and cultural power. The opinions on the expected power position in the near future are more diverging and suggest different courses of development. However, as long as the US keeps the precedence of interpretation and attracts others to American values and ideas, in addition to a solid base of economic and military strength, the US power position will most probably last for a foreseeable future.

No description available.