The major challenge for multimedia designers is to create user experiences that enrich the reception of content, designer�s traditional reliance on intuition not ensuring audience�s interest or understanding. The developing philosophy of user-centred design argues that designers should begin from an appreciation of their audience. In design there are various positions on how to achieve this, ranging from traditional market research through psychological, ethnographic, anthropological and sociological research to the direct involvement of users in the design process. This study draws on established knowledge about the cognitive processes, psychological motivations and preferences of user groups to advance a model for better-targeted and more effective design. In particular, it uses Howard Gardener�s multiple intelligences theory to extend design thinking. Where a specific audience is apparent multiple intelligences theory implies that (1) the interface should match user�s perceptual tools, cognitive styles and responses and (2) there is far greater scope than presently recognized to vary the design of the graphical user interface. The research explores how interactive multimedia can harness the �language of vision� (Johannes Itten) for certain audiences, in this case Taiwanese drawing students aiming to enter tertiary art and design programs where high academic drawing skills are an important selection criterion. The high �visual intelligence� of the target audience indicates their heightened capacity to process visual concepts and elements. The application of Gardner�s ideas is a speculative one, based on hypothesis and the formulation of an experimental graphical user interface environment built around predominantly visual cues. The designed outcome incorporates knowledge and understanding that is widely applicable to GUI design, challenging designers to develop multimedia products with innovative, imaginative design approaches that cater for the different needs and interests of users where the audience is a specific and identifiable one.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the students&rsquo / multiple intelligences according to their preferences and how students&rsquo / multiple intelligences differ in terms of grade level (first, third fifth and eighth) and gender. This research was conducted at Middle East Technical University Development Foundation School in the spring of the 2001-2002 academic-year with three classes from each level namely first grade, third grade, fifth grade and eight grade. In this study, Pictorial Teele Inventory for Multiple Intelligences was applied on 321 students and the results were analyzed. In order to examine the effect of the gender and grade level on students&rsquo / Multiple Intelligences mean, standard deviation and MANOVA were used. Results showed that students multiple intelligences showed variety according to their grade levels. For example, the students at the first grade level demonstrated strong preference for linguistic intelligence and logical-mathematical intelligence in the first grade and the two intelligences were followed by spatial intelligence, and bodily kinesthetic intelligence. While the third grade students&rsquo / most dominant intelligences preferences were interpersonal, spatial, logical-mathematical, and linguistic intelligence the fifth and eight grade students&rsquo / preferences were interpersonal intelligence bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, musical intelligence, and spatial intelligence. When results are eximined in terms of gender, it can be said that the male students&rsquo / logical-mathematical and bodily kinesthetic intelligence mean scores were higher than female students&rsquo / whereas the female students&rsquo / musical intelligence mean score was higher than male students&rsquo / .

The main purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between pupils¡¦ multiple intelligences, action control, self-regulation, demographic variables, and their competences of everyday problem solving. The participants were 453 fifth and sixth graders (238 boys and 215 girls) sampling from elementary schools in Kaohsiung City. The employed instruments included The Multiple Intelligences Appraisal, The Action Control Scale (ACS), The Self-regulated Learning Strategies Inventory, and The Everyday Problem-Solving Test (EPST). The applied analysis methods were Descriptive Statistics, One-way Multivariate Analysis of Variance, One-way Analysis of Variance, Canonical Correlation Analysis, and Discriminant Analysis. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1.The participants were not very competent in everyday problem solving. Among the four indices of everyday problem solving, the participants had comparably better abilities in ¡§defining multiple problems¡¨ and ¡§setting priority¡¨ than those in ¡§proposing solutions¡¨ and ¡§deciding the best solution¡¨. 2.The participants¡¦ development of multiple intelligences and their abilities in action control as well as self-regulation were in above-average level. 3.The pupils who had higher multiple intelligences outperformed their counterparts in everyday problem solving; moreover, the pupils¡¦ logical-mathematical intelligence was strongly correlated with their problem solving abilities of ¡§proposing solutions¡¨ and ¡§deciding the best solution¡¨. 4.Pupils with the action-oriented style of action control outperformed those with the state-oriented style in everyday problem solving; in addition, the pupils¡¦ abilities in dealing with ¡¨non-preoccupation with failure¡¨ and ¡§non-hesitation with decision¡¨ were positively correlated with their problem solving ability of ¡§proposing solutions¡¨. 5.The pupils who had more mechanism of self-regulation outperformed their counterparts in everyday problem solving; besides, the pupils¡¦ ¡§self-evaluating and confidence¡¨ in self-regulation was highly correlated with their problem solving ability of ¡§proposing solutions¡¨. 6.The sixth graders¡¦ overall competence in everyday problem solving was better than that of the fifth graders. Moreover, the sixth graders outperformed the fifth graders on the abilities of ¡§setting priority¡¨, ¡§proposing solutions¡¨, and ¡§deciding the best solution¡¨. 7.There were no significant gender differences on the pupils¡¦ overall performance in everyday problem solving, nor on the four indices of everyday problem solving. 8.Birth order had significant effects on the pupils¡¦ performance of everyday problem solving. More specifically, those first-born pupils (including the only child and the first born children) outperformed the middle-born pupils in ¡§defining multiple problems¡¨ and ¡§proposing solutions¡¨. 9.The pupils¡¦ multiple intelligences, action control, self-regulation, and demographic variables could jointly predict their ability group of everyday problem solving, among the three levels of ability group, the ¡§high ability¡¨ group could be best predicted. Finally, after discussion, some suggestions were proposed for educational institutions, teachers, parents and future further studies.

The purpose of this study was to understand the relationships between multiple intelligences, thinking styles, and critical-thinking abilities of the fifth- and sixth-grade students. Investigation method was employed in the study. 578 fifth- and sixth-grade students in the suburban and urban areas of Tainan and Kaohsiung participated in this study. The employed instruments included Multiple Intelligences Appraisal, Thinking Styles Appraisal for the Primary Students, and the Test of Critical-thinking Skills for Primary and Secondary School Students. The applied analysis methods were Descriptive Statistics, Hotelling¡¦s , Multivariate Analysis of Variance, Canonical Correlation Analysis, and Discriminant Analysis. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1. There were no significant gender differences in critical-thinking abilities. 2.The students¡¦ critical-thinking abilities in urban areas were better than those in suburban areas. 3. The students¡¦ logical-mathematical intelligence and linguistic intelligence were positively correlated with their abilities of making deductions and evaluating arguments. 4. There were no significant differences in critical-thinking abilities for students with different level of executive thinking style. 5. There were significant differences in critical-thinking abilities for students with different level of legislative thinking style. 6. There were significant differences in critical-thinking abilities for students with different level of judicial thinking style. 7. The students¡¦ living areas, logical-mathematical intelligence, linguistic intelligence, and judicial thinking style were positively correlated with their abilities in recognizing assumptions, making deductions, and evaluating arguments. Finally, the researcher proposed some suggestions for the educational organizations, the primary school teachers, and future studies.

It has become increasingly apparent that anthropology has much to offer when it comes to educating our youth. This is true for all grade levels, kindergarten through senior level studies in high school. Here, this idea will be explored further by focusing on the students of Durant High School (DHS) of Plant City, Florida.This project was designed to explore the idea of combining widely accepted pedagogical theories (Gardner 1983, 1993, 1999; Geraci 2000; Silver, Strong and Perini 1997) with anthropological theory and methods in order to devise effective curricula for high school archaeology and other anthropology courses. More essentially, teachers must combine four approaches when designing curricula: multiple intelligences (MI), learning styles(LS), modes of presentation, and the use of ethnographic field methods. Through a combination of MI, LS, available modes of presentation, and ethnographic methods three major goals were accomplished.

Although Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent childhood disorders, occurring in about three to five percent of the school-going population, there is a dearth of information in literature concerning ADHD learners' intellectual strengths and weaknesses and concomitant learning preferences. An abundance of literature sources can, however, be traced dealing with ADHD learners' behavioural and scholastic problems. Because of this predominantly negative focus on ADHD, these learners are often misunderstood and didactically neglected by teachers in regular classrooms. In 1983, Howard Gardner proposed a new model for understanding intelligence, namely the Theory of Multiple Intelligences (Ml). He stated that a person can be intelligent in more than one way and identified eight intelligences, namely linguistic-verbal, logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, musical, bodily-kinaesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal and naturalist. Ml theory provides teachers with a positive model for understanding, supporting and accommodating ADHD learners better in classrooms. The aims of the research were to determine: - what the Ml profiles of ADHD learners reveal in terms of their intellectual strengths and weaknesses; - whether the Ml profiles of ADHD and non-ADHD learners differ significantly; and - what the implications of ADHD learners' Ml profiles are for their teaching and learning. With a view to achieve these aims, a literature study and an empirical investigation were undertaken. The literature study focussed on ADHD, Ml theory and its implications for the teaching and learning of ADHD learners. \n the empirical section of the research, a self-report questionnaire (MIDAS-KIDS) was administered to a group of ADHD and non-ADHD learners who attend five Section 21 primary schools (ex-model C schools) in the D12 school district (Roodepoort) of the Gauteng Province. The data was statistically analysed and the following findings were made: - The Ml profile of the ADHD learners revealed no visible intellectual strengths and weaknesses. - With the exception of Writing and Reading, no differences of real practical significance were observed in the Ml profiles of the ADHD and non-ADHD participants. The following conclusions were drawn, based on these findings: - The MIDAS-KIDS is a measure of perceived intellectual disposition and because factors such as positive illusory bias (PIB) may cause disparities between ADHD learners' perceived and demonstrated intellectual competence, Ml profiles need to be reviewed and interpreted carefully against the backdrop of other diagnostic information when decisions are made with regard to ADHD learners' intellectual strengths and weaknesses. - Although with the exception of Writing and Reading, no differences of real practical significance were observed in the Ml profiles of the ADHD and non-ADHD learners, it is still important that teachers and other professionals take cognisance of Ml theory and its application potential for the optimal intellectual development of ADHD and other learners in classrooms. / Thesis (M.Ed.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.

Although Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent childhood disorders, occurring in about three to five percent of the school-going population, there is a dearth of information in literature concerning ADHD learners' intellectual strengths and weaknesses and concomitant learning preferences. An abundance of literature sources can, however, be traced dealing with ADHD learners' behavioural and scholastic problems. Because of this predominantly negative focus on ADHD, these learners are often misunderstood and didactically neglected by teachers in regular classrooms. In 1983, Howard Gardner proposed a new model for understanding intelligence, namely the Theory of Multiple Intelligences (Ml). He stated that a person can be intelligent in more than one way and identified eight intelligences, namely linguistic-verbal, logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, musical, bodily-kinaesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal and naturalist. Ml theory provides teachers with a positive model for understanding, supporting and accommodating ADHD learners better in classrooms. The aims of the research were to determine: - what the Ml profiles of ADHD learners reveal in terms of their intellectual strengths and weaknesses; - whether the Ml profiles of ADHD and non-ADHD learners differ significantly; and - what the implications of ADHD learners' Ml profiles are for their teaching and learning. With a view to achieve these aims, a literature study and an empirical investigation were undertaken. The literature study focussed on ADHD, Ml theory and its implications for the teaching and learning of ADHD learners. \n the empirical section of the research, a self-report questionnaire (MIDAS-KIDS) was administered to a group of ADHD and non-ADHD learners who attend five Section 21 primary schools (ex-model C schools) in the D12 school district (Roodepoort) of the Gauteng Province. The data was statistically analysed and the following findings were made: - The Ml profile of the ADHD learners revealed no visible intellectual strengths and weaknesses. - With the exception of Writing and Reading, no differences of real practical significance were observed in the Ml profiles of the ADHD and non-ADHD participants. The following conclusions were drawn, based on these findings: - The MIDAS-KIDS is a measure of perceived intellectual disposition and because factors such as positive illusory bias (PIB) may cause disparities between ADHD learners' perceived and demonstrated intellectual competence, Ml profiles need to be reviewed and interpreted carefully against the backdrop of other diagnostic information when decisions are made with regard to ADHD learners' intellectual strengths and weaknesses. - Although with the exception of Writing and Reading, no differences of real practical significance were observed in the Ml profiles of the ADHD and non-ADHD learners, it is still important that teachers and other professionals take cognisance of Ml theory and its application potential for the optimal intellectual development of ADHD and other learners in classrooms. / Thesis (M.Ed.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.

This study explored the articulation of multiple and empathic intelligences in educational drama. The investigation used a qualitative multiple-case study to examine the teaching methodologies of two teachers, as well as the structure of the drama units they taught. Following the observations the two teachers were then interviewed to explore their interpretation of their drama teaching. The findings indicate that multiple and empathic intelligences are articulated in educational drama in varied and complex ways. This finding was similar for both units, whether or not the teachers specifically planned with multiple and empathic intelligences in mind. The teachers confirmed that drama integrates the intelligences. Furthermore, they modelled the intelligences in their teaching. Also demonstrated was the ability of drama strategies to address individual needs of the students while exploring complex topics within a metaphorical context.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of multiple intelligences based instruction on sixth grade students&amp / #65533 / science achievement, and attitudes towards science. This experimental research was conducted in the 2nd term of 2002 &amp / #65533 / 2003 educational year with sixth graders in METU Ankara College Primary School, and lasted for three weeks. A randomly chosen class was assigned to the experimental group and instructed by Multiple Intelligences Science Instruction, and the other randomly chosen class was assigned to the control group and instructed by Traditionally Designed Science Instruction. A total 50 students&amp / #65533 / scores were used for the analyses. Two classes were instructed with the same teacher. The background of the teacher was sufficient to apply multiple intelligences teaching strategies from the seminars that the teacher had been participated. The measuring tools were Science Achievement Test and Science Attitude Scale. Also an interview were made with the teacher of the groups. The pilot study was conducted with 57 sixth grade students in Atat&uuml / rk Primary School in Nigde. According to the results of the pilot study, some questions were revised in Science Achievement Test. Science Achievement Test and Science Attitude Scale were administered twice as pretest before the treatment and as posttest after the treatment to both groups to assess and compare the effectiveness of two different types of instruction utilized in science teaching. The data obtained from the posttests were analyzed by statistical techniques of multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVA). Results of the statistical analyses indicated that multiple intelligences science instruction was more effective than traditionally designed science instruction with respect to science achievement. However, the statistical analyses failed to show any significant differences between the experimental and control group&amp / #65533 / s attitudes towards science. The teacher of the groups had positive views and opinions about the implementation of the theory.

The purpose of the study was to explore in what ways the principles of Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT) are implemented on the 1st graders&rsquo / Literacy Education (LE), to find out the effects of the implementation on 1st graders&rsquo / tendency towards the course and their teachers / on the 1st grade teachers&rsquo / tendency towards their students / on the 1st graders&rsquo / literacy achievement / on improvements of the 1st graders&rsquo / multiple intelligences. The qualitative data were gathered through interviews, observations, checklist form, students&rsquo / drawings and writings about the LE, students&rsquo / portfolios, photographs, written document and Teele Inventory for Multiple Intelligences. Descriptive and content analysis were done. The study was conducted during the 2003-2004 academic year. Based on purposeful sampling methods, the participants of the study was comprised of one 1st grade classroom with 26 students, five 1st grade teachers from BaSkent University College AySe Abla Schools and four 1st grade teachers from Gazi University Foundation Private Primary School. The results of the data analysis indicated that the teachers&rsquo / main focus was on preparing learning activities while planning the LE lesson based on the principles of MIT. They had difficulty in preparing and implementing the learning activities for naturalistic intelligence. However, they prepared and implemented learning activities for linguistic, interpersonal, bodily-kinesthetic, visual-spatial intelligences easily. Also, the students willingly participated in the learning activities that were based on bodily-kinesthetic, visual-spatial, musical-rhythmic, interpersonal intelligences / that were based on their most dominant intelligences and that activated more than one intelligence. Also, when the students who faced difficulty throughout the LE were helped by using the way based on the students&rsquo / dominant intelligences, they overcame the difficulties. Besides, most of the teachers knew various assessment methods based on the principles of MIT, but they rarely used them. Moreover, the teachers&rsquo / views about the differences and similarities between the LE based on MIT and that based on traditional methods were different from each other. The effects of the implementation on the 1st graders&rsquo / tendency towards the course, their teachers / on the 1st grade teachers&rsquo / tendency towards their students / on the 1st graders&rsquo / LE achievement were positive. Also, some variations were observed in terms of the students&rsquo / multiple intelligences throughout the LE.