No description available.

This research analyzes the National Students Union (NSU/UNE) political intervention fighting for a higher public education that would be of good quality and free, through the University Reform in two precise moments: 1) In the 1960 s while the first Guidelines and Basis for the National Education Law (Law nº4.024/61) and for the occasion of its reformulation in 1968 through Law 5.540/68; and 2) In the 2000 s, while Luis Inácio Lula da Silva´s presidential mandates. We make use of the French lines as theoretical referential on the Speech Analysis to run through and unveiling the speech of that entity. In order to confront the speeches in the two different moments we made use of the documents of those times centered, initially, on the elaborations of the UNE´s seminaries of 1961, in Salvador, 1962, in Curitiba and 1963, in Belo Horizonte; in related articles written in those years, such as O Metropolitano and Jornal do Brasil (both collected from the Studies Program and Education Documentation and Society, at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Proedes/UFRJ) and on second moment of the research, some articles found at UNE´s site were also used, detach here the entity´s primer about the University Reform´s anti-project (2008). It is intended to deepen the actual SNU´s constitution´s debate and your way of acting before University Reform implanted in the years of brazil´s particular way of neoliberalism. / Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Alagoas / Esta pesquisa faz uma análise da intervenção política da União Nacional dos Estudantes (UNE) na luta pelo ensino superior público, gratuito e de qualidade via debate da Reforma Universitária em dois momentos especificamente: 1) nos anos de 1960, durante a elaboração da primeira Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional (Lei nº 4.024/61) e por ocasião de sua reformulação em 1968 via Lei 5.540/68; e 2) nos anos 2000, durante o governo do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Lançamos mão do referencial teórico da Análise do Discurso de linha francesa para percorrer e desvelar o discurso da referida entidade. Para o confronto discursivo dos dois momentos supracitados, utilizamos documentos da época centrados, inicialmente, nas elaborações dos seminários da UNE, nos anos de 1961, em Salvador; 1962, em Curitiba e 1963, em Belo Horizonte; em matérias veiculadas nos jornais da época, como O Metropolitano e Jornal do Brasil (ambos colhidos no acervo do Programa de Estudos e Documentação Educação e Sociedade, da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Proedes/UFRJ) e, no segundo momento da pesquisa, foram utilizadas algumas matérias disponíveis atualmente no sítio da UNE, com destaque para a cartilha da UNE sobre o anteprojeto da Reforma Universitária (2008). Busca-se aprofundar o debate sobre a atual constituição da UNE e sua forma da atuação perante a Reforma Universitária implantada em anos de neoliberalismo à brasileira .

<p dir="ltr">International friendship (i.e., friendship between host-national and international students) is an important area of study for counseling psychologists. Host-national students’ engagement with international friendship is associated with cross-cultural learning, cognitive benefits, and a more nuanced understanding of race and stereotyping. Even with these benefits, international friendships appear to be infrequent. In this dissertation, I present two distinct chapters to investigate international friendship more deeply. In Chapter 1, I summarized benefits of and barriers to international friendship. Additionally, I described how relevant friendship theories have guided the current international friendship literature. I concluded Chapter 1 by identifying limitations to current research, making recommendations for future research, and offering implications for counseling psychologists. In Chapter 2, I performed a latent profile analysis to identify three profiles of host-national students based on their attitudes, behaviors, and demographic factors. I used these profiles to analyze how international friendship engagement varies by their profile group membership. I then contextualized these profiles in research and theory and identified limitations to the current study.</p>