This work describes three case studies conducted to address two major problems in the area of chemistry education research, the lack of reported psychometrics regarding instrument scores, and the need for well-characterized assessments to evaluate college chemistry curricula. The first case study describes a psychometric evaluation of the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS), an instrument designed to assess student beliefs about the learning of chemistry. Results from this work suggest that the CLASS instrument provides fertile ground for short instruments with reasonable psychometric properties. Responses to a single scale instrument, created from CLASS, showed that students in an introductory general chemistry course tend to be slightly more expert-like than novice-like in their beliefs about chemistry towards the end of the semester. The second case study discusses the use of a two-tier diagnostic instrument in assessing student understanding of the particulate nature of matter and chemical bonding. In addition to examining psychometric properties of the instrument's scores, this study uses student responses to think about the role of a preparatory chemistry course in promoting understanding of the measured concepts. Results of this study showed that the performance of students with the preparatory chemistry course was slightly better than those without it. The third case study focuses on the development of the Targeted Misconception Inventory (TMI), a two-tier instrument designed to measure student understanding of Bond Energy, Ionic, Bonding, and Phase Changes. The TMI was used to create an instructional intervention. Results from the intervention suggested a learning gain for Bond Energy concept. The three instruments discussed above were multiple-choice given as paper and pencil tests in an introductory chemistry course. The work described in this dissertation showcase a method for examining psychometric evidence. The three case studies provide a significant addition to the psychometric information available on existing instruments. This work makes an emphasis on the importance of pilot testing instruments and gathering psychometric information to provide evidence that the instrument is functioning as intended when used with different samples. This work provides a model for researchers to follow when refining an instrument, and implications for the use of assessment tools in chemistry curricula evaluation.

Two models for learning disabilities (LD) identification are explicitly allowed in federal regulations: (a) ability-achievement discrepancy and (b) response to intervention. Dissatisfaction with both models has led to calls for a third model, which identifies a pattern of cognitive processing strengths and weaknesses (PSW model) as a marker of LD. However, little empirical research has investigated this proposed model. This study investigated two proposed approaches for implementing a PSW model: (a) the concordance/discordance model (C/DM) and (b) the cross battery assessment (XBA) approach. All 139 participants demonstrated inadequate response to a Tier 2 intervention in sixth or seventh grade. Following Tier 2 intervention, participants completed a comprehensive battery of cognitive and academic tests. I utilized results to empirically categorize each participant as either meeting or not meeting LD criteria according to the two PSW approaches at different academic deficit cut points. Resulting group status was utilized to determine: (a) LD identification rates, (b) agreement between approaches, and (c) the relative academic performance and sociodemographic characteristics of resulting groups. The number of participants that met LD criteria varied widely, dependent upon the approach and deficit cut point (range: 10.8% - 47.5%). More participants met criteria for both approaches at higher deficit cut points. More participants met C/DM criteria than XBA criteria at similar cut points. Agreement between the two approaches was generally low. Kappa ranged from -.04 - .56 when comparing classification decisions across different iterations of the two approaches. Comparisons of groups that met and did not meet C/DM and XBA criteria on external academic and sociodemographic variables were largely null. The results highlight several potential challenges to widespread implementation of a PSW model. Both approaches identified a low percentage of students, raising questions of efficiency. Low agreement is an inevitable result of measurement error and implementation differences between the two approaches. Such variability in classification decisions suggests the models may be incompatible and should be independently validated. Further, the failure to find qualitative differences in academic needs between groups that met and did not meet LD criteria for either approach raises questions about the utility of the identification model. / text

Thesis (Specialist in School Psychology)--Eastern Illinois University, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 46-52).

Le polyhandicap est la conséquence d'une atteinte massive et précoce du Système Nerveux Central. Les personnes polyhandicapées présentent donc des difficultés motrices sévères ainsi qu'une déficience intellectuelle profonde, leur QI étant statistiquement estimé comme étant inférieur à 20. De ce fait, ces personnes ont besoin d'une assistance dans la réalisation des actes de la vie quotidienne, présentent des capacités d'apprentissage très limitées et n'ont pas accès à une communication symbolique. Aujourd'hui, nous ne savons que très peu de choses sur la vie cognitive des personnes polyhandicapées, et sur la manière unique et originale dont chacune d'entre elles construit ses connaissances sur le monde et développe ses propres compétences. Si l'étude et la compréhension du développement de l'enfant et du jeune polyhandicapé peut s'adosser sur les modèles et outils d'évaluation issus de la psychologie du développement, l'appréhension de sujets adultes reste, en revanche, très peu balisée. Ceci serait principalement lié au fait que chaque personne polyhandicapée présente des restrictions motrices importantes, une absence de langage oral et un répertoire de réponses comportementales dont l'interprétation va rester soumise à une importante variabilité inter-observateurs. L'objectif de ce projet de recherche est de mettre au point une méthode d'étude des compétences cognitives des personnes polyhandicapées de tout âge qui puisse tenir compte à la fois des spécificités liées à leurs handicaps multiples, tout en favorisant un cadre d'interprétation objectif des réponses comportementales de chaque personne. Pour cela, nous nous sommes donc inspirés des études menées chez des nourrissons âgés de quelques mois, basées sur le principe de l'habituation visuelle. Le paradigme d'habituation visuelle postule qu'un sujet exposé de manière répétée à un même stimulus visuel présentera un déclin progressif de la durée de fixation, correspondant à la construction et à la consolidation d'une représentation en mémoire de l'objet. La présentation d'un nouveau stimulus va donc entraîner une augmentation des temps de fixation, signe que le sujet s'est montré capable de comparer le nouvel objet à la représentation interne du précédent. Ainsi, il est possible d'étudier les capacités de discrimination et de mémorisation de sujets humains et non-humains, indépendamment de toute aptitude motrice ou verbale, seul le comportement visuel étant pris en compte. La première étape de notre travail de recherche a d'abord consisté à créer des conditions favorables à l'implémentation d'épreuves basées sur le paradigme d'habituation visuelle auprès d'un public de personnes polyhandicapées adultes. Une étude de faisabilité a donc d'abord été conduite à travers laquelle nous avons pu traiter d'aspects aussi bien matériels que méthodologiques. Nous avons ainsi pu mettre au point des conditions de passation et un matériel adapté. Ensuite, nous avons pu valider l'utilisation de cette approche auprès d'un échantillon plus large d'individus, en mettant en évidence un phénomène d'habituation et de déshabituation sur une épreuve de perception simple. Enfin, nous nous sommes penchés plus spécifiquement sur la manière dont ce paradigme pouvait s'appliquer à l'étude de certains domaines de compétences cognitives, et plus spécifiquement la perception du nombre et des quantités. Pour cela, trois tâches inspirées de la littérature en psychologie du développement ont été mises au point. Nous avons trouvé que les participants sont capables de différencier deux quantités d'objets lorsqu'aucune variable confondue n'est contrôlée, et que la position des objets reste déterminante dans leur capacité d'encodage des stimuli. Ces données nous ont conduits à réfléchir de manière plus globale sur la manière dont ces personnes peuvent construire leurs connaissances en l'absence d'action directe sur les objets de leur environnement. / L'auteur n'a pas fourni de résumé en anglais.

O transtorno cognitivo no idoso acarreta repercussões na sua vida, na família e na relação com a sociedade. Um instrumento de avaliação cognitiva amplamente utilizado é o MEEM - Mini Exame do Estado Mental - que é um teste de rastreamento com o objetivo de selecionar pessoas com provável déficit cognitivo. Uma amostra representativa da população de 394 idosos do município de Batatais SP foi avaliada através de inquérito domiciliar em relação às condições socioeconômicas e de saúde, e foi feito rastreamento dos sintomas depressivos e do desempenho cognitivo através de um instrumento baseado no MEEM. A maioria dos entrevistados era do sexo feminino (66%), sendo que 75,4% dos idosos pertenciam a uma faixa etária de 60-74 anos, chamada idoso jovem. Com relação à escolaridade a grande maioria (62.2%) cursou o primeiro grau. Com relação aos analfabetos 77,1% eram mulheres e 22,9% eram homens. Para o estado conjugal a diferença foi na proporção da viuvez 80.2% para o sexo feminino e 19.8% para o masculino. Quanto à renda familiar, 43.7% da população recebiam menos de 2,5 salários mínimos. Para avaliação do desempenho cognitivo usou um ponto de corte ? a 23 para o MEEM. Observou-se que 81.7% ficaram acima deste ponto e 18.3% ficaram abaixo. Os idosos que tiveram os escores mais elevados foram associados aos fatores como idade (60-69 anos), maior nível escolaridade, ter hábito de leitura, ter boa relação social principalmente com parentes, não ter hipertensão arterial, diabete, incontinência urinária, catarata e ausência de sintomas depressivos. / The cognitive impairment in the old has its effects on their lives, families and relationships with society. A widely used instrument of cognitive assessment is the MMSE- Mini Mental State - that is a screening test whose aim is to select people with probable cognitive deficiency. A significant sample of the population of 394 old people from Batatais - SP, was evaluated through a home survey considering the socioeconomic and health conditions and a screening of depressive symptoms and cognitive performance was done through an instrument based on MMSE. The great majority of people who were interviewed were female (66%) and 75.4% of the old belonged to an age group from 60 to 74 years old, being considered \"younger old\". Regarding scholarship, most of them had attended primary school (62.2%). Considering the illiterate 77.1% were women and 22.9% were men. Concerning marital status a huge difference between the proportion of widows (80.2%) and widowers (19.8%) was found. With reference to familiar income 43.7% of the population earned less than 2.5 minimum wages. To evaluate the cognitive performance a cut off ? 23 for MMSE was used. It was observed that 81.7% of the old were above and 18.3% were under this point. The old who achieved the highest scores had factors such as age (60-69 years old), better scholarship level, reading habits, a good social relationship (mainly with relatives), no high blood pressure, no diabetes, no urinary incontinence, no cataract and absence of depressive symptoms.

This study explores cognitive impairment and its correlation to early- life adverse experiences in non-patient population between the ages of 50 to 65. This developmental approach and observational study design explores cognition in pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Using a standardized neuropsychological instrument, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and clinically administered questionnaire, the ACE (Adverse Childhood Experiences), I hypothesized that participants with high ACE scores will inversely have low MoCA scores. My goal was to use a multiple linear regression model with 3 covariates and 1 predictor of interest (ACEs). At 80% power, a sample size of 40 was calculated as needed. This would mean that the results would have 80 % chance of declaring statistical significance. This corresponds to an R-squared value (percentage of variation in MoCA score explained by the predictor) of 17.2%. The desired sample size was not attained successfully due to several barriers in receiving sample data from the collaborating site and the 2017 Hurricane Irma causing a drop in participation rate. Overall 13 participants had successfully participated. The analysis of the results is demonstrated in a line graph indicating a relationship between ACE and MoCA scores. The accuracy of the descriptive statistics could be argued against due to the low sample size. The analysis of the ethnographic interviews brings out some trends in the participant responses. The focus here has been to discuss these responses as to how they advocate for the entanglement theory of aging. In other words, how the exposure to social and environmental factors at various stages of an individual’s lifecourse can interact with one’s physiology, resulting in exposure- specific health conditions at later life stages. Among the period of exposure, my focus through this study is specifically on the early exposures in the lifecourse. This is facilitated by the use of the ACE questionnaire regarding exposures to adverse experiences such as sexual/ physical abuse, familial mental health issues, alcohol/ drug abuse in the family and loss or separation from parents. The entanglement theory further allows for race or culture specific exposures to adversity that raises the question of varying health consequences among cultural or racial groups and the need for a more critical approach in providing access to healthcare and healthcare policy development. Trends in ethnographic results obtained have allowed for the critical discourse in the transgenerational effects of social adversity, effects of resilience- building from adversity and the need for care- giver mental health services. The study brought out critiques on how the ACE module could be made more inclusive of experiences specific to diverse cultures and regions, as well as the need to address the severity of individual experiences. We conclude by discussing how effects of social or environmental experiences can be used toward AD and aging research and what supporting literature and initiatives currently exist. The discussion is also inspired by the existing political discourse around the medicalization of AD and how that influences the reductionist methods in AD research. This new direction of applied and holistic approach derives its perspective from neuroanthropology and applied medical anthropology. The overall aim of this study is to ask questions challenging existing research methods with the ultimate hope to newly influence the allocation of AD research and risk reduction toward interdisciplinary focus and funding, involving early-life lived experiences and life course perspectives.

Reading disability, as the most commonly diagnosed learning disability, continues to pose a tenacious problem to teachers, practitioners and researchers. In an effort to understand the causes of reading disability, voluminous research has been undertaken over the past decades to pinpoint its causes or developmental stumbling blocks. One approach, the Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive processing (PASS) model, combines neuropsychological theory with elements from cognitive psychology. Based on this model, the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS), as well as methods of intervention for reading disability were developed. Although many studies have been conducted that investigated reading disability in terms of PASS cognitive processes, the final version of the CAS and its predictive utility with respect to reading disability has not been explored to date. The present study aimed to investigate the utility of the CAS, administered at the beginning of grade 1, to predict reading proficiency at the end of grade 1. The sample was comprised of 119 “average” (i.e., belonging to the general population) grade 1 students from schools of the Calgary Board of Education (CBE). The Basic Battery of the CAS was administered to the children in the sample at the beginning of grade 1, as well as four reading subtests of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement – Third Edition (WJ-III ACH) at the end of grade 1. The WJ-III ACH yielded a cluster score for basic reading and one for reading comprehension. Correlational and regression analyses were used to address the first aim of this study, namely to explore the relationship between students’ scores on the CAS and their later reading proficiency. To this end, the children’s CAS Full Scale scores and WJ-III ACH cluster scores were subjected to a hierarchical regression analysis, whereby age, gender, and - xviii - SES were kept constant by entering them first in the equation. Next, the relationship between students’ PASS scale scores and the CAS subtest scores respectively and scores on the WJ-III ACH Basic Reading and Reading Comprehension Cluster scores was explored by means of stepwise regression analysis. To improve on the generalizability of results, the regression analyses were conducted on a randomly drawn analysis sample consisting of 80% of the sample, and cross-validated on the remaining 20% of the sample. The second aim of the present study was to ascertain whether clusters could be identified on the basis of CAS performance as well as levels of reading proficiency. To this end, the children’s CAS FS scores, PASS scale scores, and CAS subtest scores were subjected to cluster analyses. The investigation of aim 1 yielded some encouraging results, in that it was found that, together with the covariates: • The CAS FS emerged as a moderately strong predictor of both basic reading and reading comprehension; • Successive processing, in particular the Word Series subtest, significantly predicted basic reading skills; • Successive and simultaneous processing, particularly the Nonverbal Matrices and Sentence Repetition subtests, were significant predictors of reading comprehension; The second aim, which explored the relationship between patterns of CAS cognitive processes and their relationship with reading proficiency, yielded: • Two clusters with distinctly different PASS scale scores and with significant differences between their levels of reading proficiency. Higher PASS scales scores, particularly on the Attention and Planning scales, were associated with higher reading proficiency scores. • Four clusters with distinctly different CAS subtest scores that were also associated with distinctly different levels of reading performance. Good - xix - reading proficiency was associated with good CAS performance, whereas weaker reading proficiency was linked to weaker CAS performance. Biographical variables, such as age and SES were found to be related to performance on the CAS and reading proficiency, while gender did not emerge as an important predictor variable. The present study demonstrated the usefulness of the CAS, particularly its Successive and Simultaneous scales, as potential early predictor of reading disability. An exploration of the relationship between patterns of CAS cognitive processes and later reading proficiency also yielded encouraging and interesting results.

L’impact du niveau d’études sur les performances cognitives est largement connu. Aussi, l’évaluation des sujets de bas ou très bas niveau d’études est un réel challenge pour les cliniciens. D’une part, les outils habituellement utilisés dans le bilan du sujet âgé ne sont pas adaptés aux individus analphabètes ou de bas niveau d’éducation, et, d’autre part, les normes nécessaires à l’interprétation des scores cognitifs ne prennent pas suffisamment en considération cette population de bas niveau scolaire. Ainsi, la question que pose ce travail de thèse est de savoir comment optimiser l’évaluation neuropsychologique de ces sujets de bas niveau scolaires. L’objectif poursuivi par la première étude de cette thèse est de déterminer s’il existe un effet propre du fait de savoir lire et écrire indépendamment de celui de la scolarisation. Pour répondre à cette question, nous avons pu accéder aux données recueillies dans la cohorte mexicaine de Coyoacán qui a la particularité d’avoir un échantillon important de sujets n’ayant jamais été scolarisés. Cette première étude a montré que des sujets n’ayant jamais accédé au système éducatif mais ayant des notions rudimentaires de lecture et d’écriture acquises de manière informelle, ont des performances plus élevées à tous les tests considérés, hormis pour le Set test d’Isaacs (IST), que des sujets ne sachant pas lire et écrire. Ainsi, ces résultats illustrent l’effet des capacités de lecture et d’écriture, un effet distinct de l’effet du niveau de scolarisation. Une seconde difficulté à laquelle doivent faire face les cliniciens est l’absence de normes adaptées aux sujets de bas niveau d’études. Ainsi, un travail autour de l’élaboration de normes adaptées aux sujets de bas niveau d’études a été réalisé dans la cohorte de Coyoacán et nous a permis d’élaborer des normes pour le Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), le Rappel libre/Rappel indicé 16 items (RL/RI-16) et l’IST, jusque-là inexistantes pour la population âgée mexicaine et qui a la particularité de présenter une forte proportion de sujets de bas niveau d’études. Un second travail de normalisation a été réalisé dans la cohorte AMI, une cohorte menée en milieu rural dans le département de la Gironde dans laquelle la proportion de sujets de bas niveaux est plus élevée qu’en population générale, pour un nouveau test de mémoire visuo-spatiale, le test des gobelets pour lequel nous avons également étudié sa validité dans la détection de la démence. Ces normes classiques, corrigées pour des variables démographiques sont essentielles à l’interprétation des scores cognitifs. Dans le même temps, dans le cas de la démence où l’âge et le niveau d’études sont deux facteurs de risque majeurs, cette pratique habituelle de corriger pour ces variables afin d’établir ou de prédire un diagnostic de démence peut être remise en question. Si des travaux antérieurs ont montré que l’utilisation de scores corrigés diminue la qualité de détection de la démence, la dernière étude de cette thèse a montré qu’il en est de même lorsqu’il s’agit de prédire la démence : les sujets qui deviennent déments à court terme sont mieux classés lorsque les scores ne sont pas corrigés que lorsqu’ils sont corrigés pour l’âge et le niveau d’études. Ainsi, loin de régler le vaste problème de l’évaluation du sujet de bas niveau d’études, cette thèse tente d’apporter des éléments pragmatiques au clinicien sous la forme de tests ou de normes adaptées, mais aussi des éléments de réflexion sur l’utilisation de ces scores. / The effect of education on cognitive performances and neuropsychological assessment outcomes has been well documented so far. Indeed, the assessment of cognitive performance of individuals with low and very low educational level remains a major clinical challenge for several reasons. Firstly, conventional cognitive assessment tools used with elderly patients are not suitable for illiterate or poorly instructed individuals. Secondly, traditional norms used to identify strengths and weaknesses of cognitive performance are not sensible enough to detect cognitive impairments among illiterate or scarcely instructed individuals. Therefore, how to improve the neuropsychological assessment of individuals with low formal educational level is the main research question of this doctoral thesis. To adequately answer to this prior question, four studies have been conducted. The aim of the first study presented in this thesis was to investigate the specific effect of literacy acquisition on cognitive performances independently of education. For this work, we used data collected from the Coyoacán study, a Mexican population-based cohort which presents an important sample of uneducated participants. The main finding of this study was that participants who never attended school but counting with informal literacy abilities, presented better performances for all cognitive tests, except for the Isaacs Set test (IST), compared to their uneducated illiterate counterparts. These findings illustrate the specific effect of literacy skills acquisition on cognitive performances independently of the influence of schooling. The lack of adapted comparative norms is the second major challenge of neuropsychological assessment of individuals with low-educational level. Consequently, our second study aimed at establishing comparative norms for the MMSE, the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test and the IST, three tests widely used for cognitive evaluation in elderly people. Of note, these norms were specifically established for the Mexican elderly population, which presents a high rate of illiteracy and low-educational level. Finally, a third study aiming at establishing comparative norms for a new visuo-spatial memory-test: the goblets test. For this study, we used data collected from the AMI cohort study which is conducted in rural areas in the South-West of France. Within this third study we also studied the validity of this test in detecting dementia illness. These comparative norms are necessary to interpret cognitive scores. However, as age and education are major risk factors for dementia, correcting for these demographic variables to improve the accuracy of detection or prediction of dementia may be questionable. Consistently with other studies showing that dementia detection accuracy is compromised when corrected scores are used; findings of our last study showed that regarding dementia prediction accuracy, participants developing dementia, in the short term, are better classified when using uncorrected scores for age and education than the corrected ones. To conclude, cognitive assessment of elderly individuals with low-educational level remains still a major clinical barrier to correctly diagnose dementia. However, besides providing clinicians with several pragmatic inputs such as cognitive tests and appropriated comparative norms, we believe that our findings will encourage clinical reflection regarding the use of these scores.

PDFには「高橋 由佳子」と記載 / 京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(医学) / 甲第21955号 / 医博第4497号 / 新制||医||1037(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医学専攻 / (主査)教授 川上 浩司, 教授 古川 壽亮, 教授 富樫 かおり / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

Many standardized measures of cognition include items that must be seen or heard. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon to overlook the possible effects of sensory impairment(s) on test scores. In the current study, we investigated whether sensory impairments could affect performance on a widely used screening tool, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Three hundred and one older adults (mean age = 71 years) completed the MoCA and also hearing and vision tests. Half of the participants had normal hearing and vision, 38% impaired hearing, 5% impaired vision, and 7% had dual-sensory impairment. More participants with normal sensory acuity passed the MoCA compared to those with sensory loss, even after modifying scores to adjust for sensory factors. The results suggest that cognitive abilities may be underestimated if sensory problems are not considered and that people with sensory loss are at greater risk of cognitive decline.