Transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II is regulated by an array of protein complexes. Among various elongation factors, Spt5 is conserved in the three kingdoms of life. I investigated functional interactions of its C-terminal repeats (CTR) domain with several elongation protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. By using genetics and molecular biology methods, I established two major pathways in this thesis. The first describes how BUR kinase-mediated phosphorylation of CTR domain leads to co-transcriptional recruitment of the PAF complex to regulate histone modifications on active genes. The second describes how CTR phosphorylation facilitates recruitment of capping enzymes to enhance gene splicing. Finally, several Spt5-associated protein complexes were studied, and potential molecular mechanisms underlying these observations are proposed and discussed.

Transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II is regulated by an array of protein complexes. Among various elongation factors, Spt5 is conserved in the three kingdoms of life. I investigated functional interactions of its C-terminal repeats (CTR) domain with several elongation protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. By using genetics and molecular biology methods, I established two major pathways in this thesis. The first describes how BUR kinase-mediated phosphorylation of CTR domain leads to co-transcriptional recruitment of the PAF complex to regulate histone modifications on active genes. The second describes how CTR phosphorylation facilitates recruitment of capping enzymes to enhance gene splicing. Finally, several Spt5-associated protein complexes were studied, and potential molecular mechanisms underlying these observations are proposed and discussed.

Inhibitor of growth (ING) proteins have been classified as type II tumour suppressor proteins due to their ability to facilitate cellular events such as chromatin remodelling, apoptosis, angiogenesis, DNA replication, DNA repair, cell cycle progression, cell senescence and hormone response regulation. These processes are all associated with combating oncogenesis; conversely, recent evidence suggesting that ING proteins also function as oncogenes in certain cancers has spurred the investigation of ING proteins as potential anticancer targets. In order to better understand the complex role ING proteins play in the cell, the mechanisms that direct ING proteins to the chromatin template require extensive study. This dissertation investigates the role the chromatin environment plays in recruiting ING proteins by characterizing the interaction between ING proteins and chromatin. ING proteins have been shown to interact with the histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylated (H3K4me3) epigenetic mark through binding studies between peptides comprising the ING plant homeodomain (PHD) finger and the H3 N-terminal tail. However, these studies do not take into account the effect of organizing H3 into a nucleosome or the effect of the remaining ING protein structural domains. In order to address these elements, this dissertation describes binding studies between the PHD finger of Yng1 (Yng1PHD) and H3K4me3 in the context of a nucleosome, and between full-length Xenopus laevis ING1 (xING1) and H3K4me3 in the context of a nucleosome. A 6XHis tagged xING1 protein was purified, Yng1PHD was obtained from Dr. Leanne Howe, and an analog of H3K4me3 (H3KC4me3) was installed into recombinant H3 protein and used to reconstitute nucleosomes. Affinity-tag based anti-Yng1PHD and anti-xING1 pull-down assays were then used to display an in vitro H3K4 methylation-dependent interaction between Yng1PHD / xING1 and H3KC4me3 containing nucleosomes. In addition, analytical ultracentrifuge (AUC) analysis of the xING1 protein displayed the presence of 3 species containing sedimentation coefficients consistent with those that would be expected from monomeric, dimeric and tetrameric forms of xING1. Several studies have focused on the interaction between ING proteins and DNA binding proteins such as transcription factors and hormone receptors which recruit ING proteins to specific genes. However, little knowledge is available regarding the role chromatin plays in recruiting ING proteins with the exception of the interaction between the ING PHD fingers and H3K4me3. This dissertation addresses this gap in knowledge by investigating the nature of chromatin bound by the human ING1b (hING1b) protein. For this purpose, HEK293 cells were transfected with a Flag-hING1b construct. Upon fractionation of the HEK293 chromatin, Flag-hING1b was found to localize exclusively to the “Pellet” fraction. ChIP analysis of the HEK293 chromatin showed that Flag-hING1b bound nucleosomes were deprived of H3K9me3, H3K27me3 and H3S10P, contained no enrichment for H3K4me3 and H3K36me3, and were significantly enriched for H2A.Z. Lastly, a hING1b-GFP construct was transiently transfected into SKN-SH human neuroblastoma cells and found to be evenly distributed throughout the nucleus with moderate enrichment on chromatin and within the nucleolus. / Graduate

Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV-1) establishes latent infections in neurons in vivo and lytic infections in epithelial cells and fibroblasts. During latent infections, HSV-1 transcription is restricted and the genomes are not replicated. Latent HSV-1 genomes are chromatinized, such that digestion with micrococcal nuclease (MCN) releases DNA fragments with sizes characteristic of nucleosomal DNA. During lytic infections, in contrast, all HSV-1 genes are expressed, the genomes are replicated, and their digestion produces primarily heterogeneously sized fragments. However, as evaluated by ChIP assays, HSV-1 DNA interacts with histones during lytic infections, although in most cases only a small percentage of HSV-1 DNA co-immunoprecipitates with histones (or is cleaved to nucleosome sizes following MCN digestion). Therefore, although current models propose that chromatin regulates HSV-1 transcription, it remains unclear how the association of histones with only a small percentage of HSV-1 DNA can globally regulate viral transcription. Moreover, the physical properties of the complexes containing histones and HSV-1 DNA are unknown. My objective was therefore to evaluate the biophysical properties of the HSV-1 DNA-containing complexes during lytic infection. Differing from pervious studies, however, I used classical chromatin purification techniques. I show that most HSV-1 DNA is in unstable nucleoprotein complexes and, consequently, more accessible to MCN than DNA in cellular chromatin. This HSV-1 DNA is protected from MCN redigestion only after crosslinking, similar to unstable cellular nucleosomes. HSV-1 DNA is in such complexes throughout lytic infection. Using unrelated small-molecule inhibitors, I further show that inhibition of HSV-1 transcription is associated with a decrease in MCN accessibility of HSV-1 DNA. Roscovitine, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, prevents activation but not elongation of IE, E, and L HSV-1 transcription. Consistent with a functional association between accessibility and transcription, roscovitine only decreases the accessibility of DNA templates of which it also inhibits transcription, independent of specific promoter sequences. In summary, I show that most HSV-1 DNA is in unstable nucleosome-like complexes during lytic infection and that accessibility to HSV-1 DNA likely plays a key role in regulating HSV-1 transcription.

Genomic imprinting is a phenomenon through which a subset of genes are epigenetically marked during gemtogenisis. This mark is maintained in the soma to often manifest parent of origin-specific monoalleleic expresson patterns. Genetics evidence suggests that gene expression patterns in mprinted genes, which are frequently organised in clusters, are regulated by the imprinting control regions (ICR). This thesis is mainly focused on the mechanisms through which the ICRs control the imprinting in the cluster, containing the Kcnq1, Igf2 and H19 genes, located at the distal end of mouse chromosome 7. The H19 ICR, located in the 5' flank of the H19 gene represses paternal H19 and maternal Igf2 expression, respectively, but has no effect on Kcnq1 expression, which is controlled by another ICR located at the intron 10 of the Kcnq1 gene. This thesis demonstrates that the maternal H19 ICR allele contains several DNase I hypersensitive sites, which map to target sites for the chromatin insulator protein CTCF at the linker regions between the positioned nucleosomes. The thesis demonstrates that the H19 ICR acts as a unidirectional insulator and that this property invovles three nucleosome positioning sites facilitating interaction between the H19 ICR and CTCF. The Kcnq1 ICR function is much more complex, since it horbours both lineage-specific silencing functions and a methylation sensitive unidirectional chromatin insulator function. Importantly, the thesis demonstrates that the Kcnq1 ICR spreads DNA methylation into flanking region only when it is itself unmethylated. Both the methylation spreading and silencing functions map to the same regions. In conclusion, the thesis has unraveled and unrivalled complexity of the epigenetic control and function of short strtches of sequences. The epigenetic status of these cis elements conspires to control long-range silencing and insulation. The manner these imprinting control regions can cause havoc in expresson domains in human diseases is hence emerging.

Mismatch repair corrects errors made during DNA replication and inactive mismatch repair is associated with Lynch Syndrome and sporadic cancer. Genome replication in eukaryotes is accompanied by chromatin formation. The first step in chromatin establishment is nucleosome assembly, that starts with histone tetramer deposition. It is not clear how three important cellular processes: genome replication, mismatch repair and nucleosome assembly are coordinated. Here we analyzed human mismatch repair in the presence of histone deposition in a reconstituted system. We showed that mismatch repair factor inhibits nucleosome assembly on the DNA region with the replicative error. Such a mechanism is important, since in this way DNA with errors remains accessible for mismatch repair system to perform the repair. The DNA synthesis step in mismatch repair is performed by DNA polymerase. Eukaryotes possess two major replicative DNA Polymerases: DNA Polymerase delta and DNA Polymerase epsilon. DNA polymerase delta is involved in mismatch repair. However, it was unknown whether DNA polymerase epsilon can also work in mismatch repair. Here we analyzed human mismatch repair with DNA Polymerase delta and DNA Polymerase epsilon in the environment of histone deposition. Our results indicated that repair activity with both polymerases was activated by histone deposition. Here it was first shown that human DNA Polymerase epsilon performs DNA synthesis during mismatch repair in vitro. Importantly, recent studies have revealed association of Polymerase epsilon mutations with cancer. Since our data showed activity of DNA Polymerase epsilon in mismatch repair, a possible tumor development mechanism may involve inactivation of mismatch repair due to Polymerase epsilon mutations. Overall, our study expanded the understanding of the mechanism of human mismatch repair in the chromatin environment.

ATP dependent chromatin remodelers use the energy from ATP hydrolysis to move, disassemble or alter the composition of nucleosomes. Though all remodelers share a conserved ATP hydrolysis and DNA translocase domain, their biochemical actions and in-vivo characteristics differ because of their subunits and accessory domains in the catalytic subunit that regulate its activity. Understanding how these domains contribute to remodeler regulation in terms of substrate interaction and regulation of the catalytic subunit is therefore important to understanding what causes a remodeler to behave differently, and what are the mechanistic underpinnings of such behavior. In this study we have addressed these questions using the SWI/SNF remodeler from budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) to explore how different remodelers compare to SWI/SNF in terms of nucleosome interaction. Using a chemical based histone – remodeler photo-crosslinking and labeling approach, we show that different remodelers contact nucleosomes in patterns unique to their functions, and even remodelers that belong to the same family interact with nucleosomes in a unique manner to accomplish their respective remodeling results. In addition we delineate the functions of the AT hook motifs in the catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF using in-vitro and in-vivo techniques. We demonstrate the necessity of the regulatory action of the motif in the context of SWI/SNF remodeling due to its requirement for efficient ATP hydrolysis by the catalytic domain and therefore efficient remodeling. We also demonstrate for the first time that SWI/SNF in yeast is involved in transcriptional repression with evidence that the AT hook alters SWI/SNF activity at particular genomic regions. Regulation of SWI/SNF activity is an increasingly important topic of study, with mutations that cause SWI/SNF dysfunction being implicated in a large number of cancers and neurological diseases. We attempt to find out the biochemical implications of mutations in the catalytic, SnAC and AT hook motifs with respect to SWI/SNF activity. Taken together, this study provides an insight into some of the different mechanisms in which remodelers are regulated using budding yeast as a model system.

京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(理学) / 甲第21599号 / 理博第4506号 / 新制||理||1647(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院理学研究科化学専攻 / (主査)教授 杉山 弘, 教授 秋山 芳展, 准教授 竹田 一旗 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Science / Kyoto University / DGAM

Eukaryotic genomes are densely compacted into chromatin, so that they can be contained in the nucleus. Despite the tight packaging genes need to be accessible for normal metabolic activities to occur, such as transcription, repair and replication. These processes are regulated by a vast number of proteins but also by the level of compaction of chromatin. The translocation of motor proteins along DNA produces torsional stress which in turn alters chromatin compaction both upstream and downstream. Few single-molecule studies have investigated the behaviour of nucleosomes when subjected to torsion. The inability to measure the applied torque though represented a major limitation to those reports. The implementation of the rotor bead assay, which allows to directly measure the torque applied in magnetic tweezers experiments, has been hindered by a difficult sample preparation procedure. In order to overcome this limitation an efficient protocol for the insertion of chemical or structural modifications in long DNA substrates was developed. This was then further expanded to allow the introduction of labels in multiple loci and/or both strands and has been used successfully in a number of studies. Furthermore this is the first report of tensile experiments performed on nucleosomes with a histone variant. H2AvD nucleosomes were studied due to the interest in the biological role of H2A.Z-family proteins. Interestingly, the variant nucleosomes appear to bind less DNA and to be evicted from the DNA at lower forces than those observed for canonical nucleosomes. These findings show an important role for the H2A-H2B dimers in the mechanical stability of nucleosomes. Furthermore these results are in agreement with recently proposed models of a dynamic nucleosome, in contrast to the long-standing view of nucleosomes as static structures.:Abstract Table of contents 1 Introduction 1.1 The transforming principle 1.2 Chromatin 1.2.1 Nucleosomes 1.2.2 The 30 nm fibre: a mirage? 1.2.3 Histone code 1.3 Histone variant H2A.Z 1.3.1 H2A.Z and transcription 1.4 Single molecule studies of chromatin 1.4.1 Chromatin under tension 1.4.2 Open nucleosome 1.4.3 Twisted chromatin 1.5 Single molecule techniques 1.5.1 Atomic force microscopy 1.5.2 Foerster resonance energy transfer 1.5.3 Magnetic tweezers 1.5.4 Worm-like chain model 2 Aims of the project 3 Cut and paste method for internal DNA labelling 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Experimental design 3.3 Results 3.3.1 Sequence design and cloning 3.3.2 Labelling and religation efficiency 3.3.3 Structural modifications 3.3.4 Labelling of multiple loci 3.3.5 Opposite-strand labelling 3.4 Discussion 4 Reconstituting chromatin 4.1 Long array of NPSs 4.1.1 Polymer physics applied to molecular cloning 4.1.2 Preventing homologous recombination 4.2 Expression and purification of histone proteins 4.2.1 Protein expression 4.2.2 Inclusions bodies 4.2.3 Histone purification 4.2.4 Octamer reconstitution and isolation 4.2.5 H2AvD 4.3 Reconstitution of nucleosomal arrays and biochemical analysis 4.3.1 Reconstitution procedure 4.3.2 Biochemical analysis 4.4 Tweezers construct with nucleosomes 5 Eviction of nucleosomes 5.1 Nucleosome eviction 5.1.1 A two-stage process 5.1.2 Chromatin fibres 5.1.3 Reassembly of nucleosomes 5.1.4 Distinct populations within nucleosome eviction events 5.1.5 Nicked and supercoilable nucleosomal arrays 5.2 Eviction of H2AvD-nucleosomes 5.2.1 H2AvD-nucleosomes bind less inner turn DNA 5.2.2 H2AvD-nucleosomes evict at lower forces 5.2.3 Likelihood of nucleosome reassembly 5.2.4 Gradual weakening of nucleosomes 5.2.5 Analysis software NucleoStep 5.3 Towards a rotor-bead assay on chromatin 5.4 Discussion 5.4.1 Nucleosome eviction in two stages 5.4.2 The fate of dimers in single molecule experiments 5.4.3 Structural origin and biological relevance of the mechanical properties of H2AvD-nucleosomal core particles 5.4.4 Monolithic or dynamic nucleosomes 6 Conclusions Bibliography Appendix 6.1 Internal labelling Procedure 6.1.1 Cloning 6.1.2 Nicking & cutting 6.1.3 The replace reaction 6.1.4 Purification 6.1.5 Ligation (optional) 6.1.6 Opposite strand labelling 6.1.7 Assessing the results of the labelling reaction 6.2 Chromatin reconstitution 6.2.1 Long array of NPSs 6.2.2 Expression and purification of histone proteins 6.2.3 Reconstitution of nucleosomal arrays and biochemical characterization 6.2.4 Simple Phenol:chloroform isolation of DNA 6.3 Magnetic tweezers experiments 6.3.1 Flow cell assembly 6.3.2 Functionalization of flow cells 6.3.3 Magnetic tweezers and rotor bead measurements 6.3.4 Force calibration List of Figures List of Tables List of publications Acknowledgements Declaration of originality

No description available.