No description available.

There are two general approaches to myth, the literal and the symbolic. The literal method considers myth a record of man's responses to factors external to himself, while the symbolic approach evaluates myth as the externalization of internal conflicts. The purpose of this paper is to examine several examples of each type of scholarship and to show the efficacy of both in gaining a complete understanding of the Oedipus myths.

Thesis (Ph. D. in Psychology)--University of California, Berkeley, June 1959. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 133-135).

No description available.

Igor Stravinsky’s 1927 opera-oratorio Oedipus Rex (with libretto by Jean Cocteau) contains quintessential Neoclassical qualities: it is a reduced, mechanical, and austere version of the Sophocles play, using older operatic devices within static harmonic momentum and ambiguous functionality. A closer look into the conception and intrinsic fabric of the work, however, betrays certain ideological bonds with the Russian neonationalist movement of the late 19th century. This movement had its origins in the visual arts but soon its principles carried over to music. The neonationalists valued the intrinsic properties of the folk subject (ornamentation in art, geometrical aspects of line, folk song) rather than the folk subject itself. In other words, the abstraction of the folk subject’s innate qualities, rather than mere quotation, served as the means to a wholly modern artwork. Neonationalist ideals would serve as the catalyst for Stravinsky’s modernist revolt in Le Sacre du Printemps (as explored by Richard Taruskin.) Although the movement itself is distanced from Stravinsky’s Neoclassical period and Oedipus Rex, its ideals can be traced from Le Sacre to Oedipus and beyond. In addition, the social and cultural milieu of Jean Cocteau in interwar France serves to position this work as distinctly modernist mainly through its abbreviation of the original source. In this study, I will explore the perpetuation of these ideals in Oedipus through its musical language and abstraction from sources to place it as an entirely new musical concept. / text

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of London, 1929. / "Landmarks in anthropology." Series title also at head of t.p. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--Rowan University, 2006. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references.

A series of scenes taken from Greek theatre were collaborated and chosen to form what became known as An Evening of Greek Theatre. Along with the normal challenges of creating a production, such as memorization, blocking, costuming, and others, came challenges that were unique to this particular one. The training we are most familiar with is in the confines of realism, and this particular production had little to do with realism. The stylization created an amalgamation of techniques, which became a functional process used to create An Evening of Greek Theatre. Along with these problems were other ones, such as dealing with the mythological significance of the characters and the stigmas that go with them. This, too, provided a breeding ground for creativity and experimentation. All this came together to form a successful and rewarding production.

Between 1900 and 1970 seven different versions of Sophocles’ play Oedipus Tyrannos were performed or published in Arabic in Egypt. This thesis looks at the first 71 years’ history of this iconic Greek tragedy in Arabic and the ways it can be used to think through the cultural debates of the period. The long history of contact between Greece and Egypt and the 19th and 20th century interpretations of this history can be used to look at different models of colonial and post-colonial cultural interaction. Classicism offered Egyptian writers a constructive way of looking at their cultural identity and contemporary world – a way which takes in to account the legacies of colonialism but also engages Greek literature to create their own models of nationhood. Following the history of performance and adaptation of the play throughout the 20th century, this thesis offers close readings of the most prominent adaptations of Oedipus, particularly those of Farah Antun (whose text was used for Actor-Director George Abyad’s first version of the play in 1912), Tawfiq al-Hakim (1949), Ali Ahmed Bakathir (1949) and Ali Salem (1970). Using performance and translation theory, I show how performance of translated plays like Oedipus was a crucial but complex part of the formation of an Egyptian dramatic tradition through the dynamic interaction of diverse views of what the theatre should be, using, for instance, the role of singing in turn of the century drama. This thesis also revisits and revises misconceptions about the relationship between Islam and theatre. In addition to examining Egyptian Oedipus’ 19th and 20th century context, I also stress the contribution of performance and adaptation to readings of the original text. In particular, these versions of Oedipus ask questions about monarchical rule and democracy that form one link between this classical play and 20th century Egypt. Through its interdisciplinary approach as well as the close readings it offers, this thesis aims to make valuable contributions to the fields of Arabic Theatre Studies and Classical Reception in Colonial and Post-Colonial contexts as well as Performance and Translation Theory.

Chapter One of this thesis explores the identity of the Eumenides, the resident deities in Sophocles' Oedipus at Colonus. By examining the language and contents of two important ritual acts in the play, it is proven that their title is euphemistic; these goddesses are the transformed Erinyes of Aeschylus. / Oedipus and his sinfulness is the focus of Chapter Two. Although he has committed the heinous crimes of incest and parricide, Oedipus seems to be exempt from the Erinyes' hounding. By reviewing the charges laid against him, it is revealed that Oedipus is a morally innocent man. / The final chapter deals with Oedipus' apotheosis and the role played by the Eumenides. By examining the play's dramatic action, it is demonstrated that Oedipus, a man of innate heroic nature, is deserving of heroization. But to reach his exalted end, the championship of the Eumenides is required.