Pre-mRNA splicing is an important level in posttranscriptional gene regulation that is essential for accurate protein synthesis and generating protein diversity. The abundance of cryptic splice sites and long intronic DNA sequences makes their splicing a complex one. The identification of correct exons and introns needs additional information in the form of splicing regulatory elements (SREs) along with canonical splice signals. The interplay among these SREs and the trans factors (which bind to SREs) gives the identity to introns and exons which in turn leads to precise pre-mRNA splicing. Previous studies from our laboratory showed, that when expressed in mammalian cells from an expression vector, PDGF-B ORF was re-spliced at 4/5 exon junction with the downstream SV40 splice acceptor site in the vector. However, deletion of the 66-nt PDGF-B 3’ UTR region resulted in about 25% reduction in re-splicing. Sequence analysis of this region revealed presence of binding sites for splicing factors ASF/SF2 and SRp55, and an AU-rich element (ARE), mutation each of which affected re-splicing partially. In mammals, AREs are commonly found in the 3’UTR of mRNAs encoding proteins involved in diverse functions and are involved in selective mRNA degradation. Several ARE binding proteins are crucial for ARE’s function. Since mutation of the single ARE in the 3’UTR region altered the re-splicing efficiency, the role of AU-rich elements and ARE-binding proteins (AU-BPs) in modulation of splicing was investigated using siRNAs against AU-BPs, BRF1, hnRNPD, HuR, GAPDH and TTP. Down regulation of expression of these factors indeed affected the level of re-spliced product. We have studied the interactions between the full-length splicing factors (U1-70K and U2AF35) and the AU-BPs (BRF1, hnRNPD and HuR) as well as among the AU-BPs using three different assay methods: Yeast-two hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation and pull down assays. Our study has revealed that the BRF1 interacts with U1-70K and U2AF35 as well as the other AU-BPs hnRNPD and HuR but with different affinities. We have also analyzed the ability of AU-BPs to interact with SR proteins SRp20 and 9G8. We did find strong interaction of BRF1 with SRp20 and 9G8. Generation of a large number of nested deletion mutants of all the proteins allowed us to identify the interaction regions on the surface of BRF1, U1-70K, hnRNPD, U2AF35 and HuR. The results of Y2H analyses were further confirmed by pull down assay using purified interacting regions. It was found that a single region from aa 181-254 in BRF1 interacts with multiple partners i.e., splicing factors and the AU-BP hnRNPD. However, the RNA-binding zinc-finger domain from residue 120-181 independently interacts with HuR. Further, the multiple protein interacting region (MPIR) (aa 181-254) in BRF1 exhibits different affinities towards its interacting partners with that for U1-70K and hnRNPD being stronger than that for U2AF35 and HuR. This observation suggests that BRF1 activity can be modulated by interaction with different partners at different sites. U1-70K interacted only with BRF1 among the proteins tested in this study and this interaction appears to be RNA independent .This could have implications in splice site selection and RNA stability since BRF1 has been shown to promote RNA degradation. While the Arg/Glu-rich C-terminal region in U1-70K is sufficient for its interaction with BRF1, U2AF35 requires both the zinc-finger 2 and the arg/Gly/Ser-rich C-terminal regions for its association with BRF1. hnRNPD also interacts with multiple partners that include BRF1, HuR and U2AF35 using the N-terminal region that harbors a Ala-rich domain. The interaction of hnRNPD with HuR is RNA dependent while with BRF1 and U2AF35, it is RNA independentt. Further, its interaction with all the partners is equally strong. This suggests that hnRNPD could exert differential influence depending on the context of its interaction and abundance of the interacting partner. HuR, primarily known as an mRNA stabilizing factor, interacts with both BRF1 and hnRNPD with equal affinity involving the hinge region, the interaction with the former being RNA-independent and the later being RNA-dependent. This differential RNA-dependent and independent interactions with the two AU-BPs using a single interacting domain suggests a balancing act of HuR on the activities of BRF1 and hnRNPD. These interactions can further be differentially modulated by posttranslational modifications on one or all of the interacting partners depending on the physiological status of the cell. We have also analyzed the multiple protein complexes formed in absence of cellular RNA. Though we are unable to see direct protein-protein interaction between HuR and U1-70K in Yeast two hybrid analysis, we could detect the presence of U1-70K in HuR immunoprecipitate. It appears that U1-70K associates with HuR via BRF. We also detected the presence of HuR in U1-70K complexes which could be due to its association with BRF1. We are unable to find hnRNPD and U2AF35 in these complexes indicating that they may have been excluded. In anti-U2AF35 immunoprecipitates, we detected the presence of U1-70K as well as hnRNPD but no HuR. This may be due to RNase treatment as hnRNPD and HuR interactions are RNA dependent. Our findings that AU-rich elements in conjunction with AU-BPs function as intronic splicing modulators or enhancers, reveal hitherto unidentified new players in the poorly understood complex mechanisms that mediate alternative splicing. The possibility of dynamic nature of the interactions among splicing factors and AU-BPs mediated by post-translational modifications provide a basis for rapid cellular responses to changing environmental cues through generation of differentially spliced mRNAs and corresponding protein products that differ in their stability and hence their relative abundance. Our results also unfold enormous possibilities for future investigations on interactions among the many splicing factors and AU-BPs, and in understanding these complex interactions in modulation of pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA translation and degradation. The finding of coupling of AU-BPs to splicing machinery could further lead to better understanding of the mechanism of AU-BP-mediated targeting of mRNAs to processing bodies and ultimate degradation of the mRNAs.

[ES] El correcto desarrollo de tejidos vasculares depende del ajuste preciso entre la proliferación de células vasculares y la diferenciación celular. En Arabidopsis thaliana, la proliferación de células vasculares en el cambium es potenciada por la citoquinina, la síntesi de la cual está promovida por la actividad dependiente de auxina de un heterodímero de factores de transcripción (TF) formado por LONESOME HIGHWAY (LHW) y por TARGET OF MONOPTEROS 5 (TMO5). Como mecanismo de seguridad, las auxinas también activan un módulo inhibidor que implica la inducción precisa de la Termospermina (Tspm) sintasa ACAULIS5 (ACL5) en células vasculares proliferantes por acción conjunta de las auxinas y del TF Class III HD-ZIP (C3HDZ) AtHB8. Entonces, la Tspm permite la traducción de las proteínas SACL de forma celular autónoma, que perjudican la actividad de LHW. Sin embargo, la observación de que estos elementos están presentes en los genomas de todas las plantas terrestres - y no sólo de las plantas vasculares - plantea dos preguntas desde una perspectiva evolutiva: (i) ¿cuál es la función de estos genes en las plantas terrestres no vasculares? y (ii) ¿cuándo se creó el módulo regulador concreto? En esta Tesis, mediante la combinación de análisis filogenéticos, celulares y moleculares con la hepática Marchantia polymorpha, proponemos que la auxina y C3HDZ son reguladores ancestrales de la expresión de ACL5, y que esta conexión se mantiene en las traqueófitas y las briófitas existentes. Por el contrario, la traducción dependiente de Tspm de SACL parece ser específica de las traqueófitas, basado en la aparición de un uORF conservado en la secuencia 5' líder de los tránscritos de SACL y en evidencia experimental basada en ensayos transitorios para la traducción de SACL. De acuerdo con estas observaciones, las funciones de MpACL5 y MpSACL son diferentes en M. polymorpha. MpACL5 se expresa en "notches" apicales y modula la bifurcación de los meristemos. Por otro lado, la expresión de MpSACL está mayoritariamente excluida de los "notches" apicales y su actividad afecta negativamente la producción de gemas y rizoides mediante la interacción con MpRSL1. Finalmente, la hibridación de ARN in situ de ortólogos de C3HDZ, ACL5 y SACL en la gimnosperma Ginkgo biloba, el helecho Ceratopteris richardii y la licófita Selaginella kraussiana indican que la expresión de los tres genes se solapa en los tejidos vasculares. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la función de C3HDZ, ACL5 y SACL ha seguido trayectorias evolutivas divergentes en briófitas y traqueófitas, para controlar, finalmente, diferentes funciones específicas dentro de cada linaje. Sólo en las traqueófitas se formó el módulo regulador y se asoció con la restricción de la proliferación de células vasculares. / [CA] El correcte desenvolupament dels teixits vasculars depèn del precís ajust entre la proliferació de cèl·lules vasculars i la diferenciació cel·lular. En Arabidopsis thaliana, la proliferació de cèl·lules vasculars al càmbium és potenciada per la citoquinina, la síntesi de la qual està promoguda per l'activitat dependent d'auxina d'un heterodímer de factors de transcripció (TF) format per LONESOME HIGHWAY (LHW) i TARGET OF MONOPTEROS 5 (TMO5). Com a mecanisme de seguretat, l'auxina també activa un mòdul inhibidor que implica la inducció precisa de la Termospermina (Tspm) sintasa ACAULIS5 (ACL5) en cèl·lules vasculars proliferants per l'acció conjunta de l'auxina i del TF Class III HD-ZIP (C3HDZ) AtHB8. Llavors, la Tspm permet la traducció de les proteïnes SACL de forma autònoma cel·lular, que perjudiquen l'activitat de LHW. Tanmateix, l'observació de que aquests elements estan presents en els genomes de totes les plantes terrestres - i no només de les plantes vasculars - planteja dues preguntes des d'una perspectiva evolutiva: (i) quina és la funció d'aquests gens en les plantes terrestres no vasculars? i (ii) quan es va crear el mòdul regulador complet? En aquesta Tesi, mitjançant la combinació d'anàlisis filogenètics, cel·lulars i moleculars amb la hepàtica Marchantia polymorpha, proposem que l'auxina i C3HDZ són reguladors ancestrals de l'expressió d'ACL5, i que aquesta connexió es mantén en els traqueòfits i briòfits existents. Per contra, la traducció depenent de Tspm de SACL sembla ser específica dels traqueòfits, basat en l'aparició d'un uORF conservat a la seqüència 5' líder dels trànscrits de SACL i en evidència experimental basada en assajos transitoris per a la traducció de SACL. D'acord amb aquestes observacions, les funcions de MpACL5 i MpSACL són diferents a M. polymorpha. MpACL5 s'expressa en "notch" apicals i modula la bifurcació dels meristems. D'altra banda, l'expressió de MpSACL està majoritàriament exclosa dels "notch" apicals i la seva activitat afecta negativament la producció de gemmes i rizoids mitjançant la interacció amb MpRSL1. Finalment, la hibridació d'ARN in situ d'ortòlegs de C3HDZ, ACL5 i SACL a la gimnosperma Ginkgo biloba, la falguera Ceratopteris richardii i el licòfit Selaginella kraussiana indica que l'expressió dels tres gens es solapa als teixits vasculars. Els nostres resultats suggereixen que la funció de C3HDZ, ACL5 i SACL va seguir trajectòries evolutives divergents en briòfits i traqueòfits, per controlar, finalment, diferents funcions específiques dins de cada llinatge. Només en els traqueòfits es va formar el mòdul regulador i es va associar amb la restricció de la proliferació de cèl·lules vasculars. / [EN] The correct development of vascular tissues depends on the precise adjustment between vascular cell proliferation and cell differentiation. In Arabidopsis thaliana, vascular cell proliferation in the cambium is enhanced by cytokinin, whose synthesis is promoted by the auxin-dependent activity of a transcription factor (TF) heterodimer formed by LONESOME HIGHWAY (LHW) and TARGET OF MONOPTEROS 5 (TMO5). As a safety mechanism, auxin also deploys a negative feedforward regulatory module which involves the precise induction of the Thermospermine (Tspm) synthase ACAULIS5 (ACL5) in proliferating vascular cells by the joint action of auxin and the class-III HD-ZIP (C3HDZ) AtHB8 TF. Tspm then allows the cell-autonomous translation of the SACL proteins, which impair the activity of LHW. However, the observation that these elements are present in the genomes of all land plants -and not only vascular plants- poses two questions from an evolutionary perspective: (i) what is the function of these genes in non-vascular land plants? and (ii) when was the full regulatory module assembled? In this Thesis, through the combination of phylogenetic, cellular, and molecular genetic analyses with the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha, we propose that auxin and C3HDZ are ancestral regulators of ACL5 expression, and that this connection is maintained in extant tracheophytes and bryophytes. On the contrary, thermospermine-dependent translation of SACL seems to be specific of tracheophytes, based on the appearance of a conserved uORF in the 5' leader sequence of SACL transcripts and on experimental evidence using transient assays for SACL translation. In agreement with these observations, the functions of MpACL5 and MpSACL are different in M. polymorpha. MpACL5 is expressed in apical notches and modulates meristem bifurcation. On the other hand, MpSACL expression is mostly excluded from apical notches and its activity negatively affects gemmae and rhizoid production through the interaction with MpRSL1. Finally, in situ RNA hibridization of C3HDZ, ACL5 and SACL orthologs in the gymnosperm Ginkgo biloba, the fern Ceratopteris richardi and the lycophyte Selaginella kraussiana indicates that the expression of the three genes overlaps in vascular tissues. Our results suggest that the function of C3HDZ, ACL5 and SACL followed divergent evolutionary trajectories in bryophytes and tracheophytes, to ultimately control different lineage-specific functions. Only in tracheophytes was the regulatory module assembled and associated with the restriction of vascular cell proliferation. / Solé Gil, A. (2023). Origin & Evolution of the C3HDZ-ACL5-SACL Regulatory Module in Land Plants [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/196681

Kürzlich wurde mithilfe von Ribo-seq Experimenten die Translation hunderter Mikroproteine in menschlichen Herzen entdeckt. Diese blieben zuvor aufgrund ihrer geringen Größe (< 100 Aminosäuren) unentdeckt, und ihre physiologische Rolle ist noch weitgehend unbekannt. Ziel dieser Promotionsarbeit ist es, potentielle Funktionen dieser neuartigen Mikroproteine zu entschlüsseln. Dabei sollen insbesondere die Aufklärung ihrer evolutionären Konservierungssignatur, subzellulären Lokalisierung und ihres Proteininteraktoms helfen. Die Konservierungsanalyse ergab, dass fast 90% der Mikroproteine nur in Primaten konserviert ist. Weiterhin konnte ich die Produktion von Mikroproteine in vitro und in vivo nachweisen, die subzelluläre Lokalisierung von 92 Mikroproteinen definieren, und Interaktionspartner für 60 Mikroproteine identifizieren. Dutzende dieser Mikroproteine lokalisieren in Mitochondrien. Dazu gehörte ein im Herzen angereichertes Mikroprotein, das aufgrund der Interaktions- und Lokalisationsdaten einen neuartigen Modulator der mitochondrialen Proteintranslation darstellen könnte. Der Interaktom-Screen zeigte außerdem, dass evolutionär junge Mikroproteine ähnliche Interaktionsfähigkeiten wie konservierte Kandidaten haben. Schließlich wurden kurze Sequenzmotive identifiziert, die Mikroprotein-Protein-Wechselwirkungen vermitteln, wodurch junge Mikroproteine mit zellulären Prozessen – wie z.B. Endozytose und Spleißen – in Verbindung gebracht werden konnten. Zusammenfassend wurde die Produktion vieler kleiner Proteine im menschlichen Herzen bestätigt, von denen die meisten lediglich in Primaten konserviert sind. Zusätzlich verknüpften umfangreiche Lokalisierungs- und Interaktionsdaten mehrere Mikroproteine mit Prozessen wie Spleißen, Endozytose und mitochondrialer Translation. Weitere Untersuchungen dieses zuvor verborgenen Teils des Herzproteoms werden zu einem besseren Verständnis von evolutionär jungen Proteinen und kardiologischen Prozessen beitragen. / Recently, the active translation of hundreds of previously unknown microproteins was detected using ribosome profiling on tissues of human hearts. They had remained undetected due to their small size (< 100 amino acids), and their physiological roles are still largely unknown. This dissertation aims to investigate these novel microproteins and validate their translation by independent methods. Particularly, elucidating their conservation signature, subcellular localization, and protein interactome shall aid in deciphering their potential biological role. Conservation analysis revealed that sequence conservation of almost 90% of microproteins was restricted to primates. I next confirmed microprotein production in vitro and in vivo by in vitro translation assays and mass spectrometry-based approaches, defined the subcellular localization of 92 microproteins, and identified significant interaction partners for 60 candidates. Dozens of these microproteins localized to the mitochondrion. These included a novel cardiac-enriched microprotein that may present a novel modulator of mitochondrial protein translation based on its interaction profile and subcellular localization. The interactome screen further revealed that evolutionarily young microproteins have similar interaction capacities to conserved candidates. Finally, it allowed identifying short linear motifs that may mediate microprotein-protein interactions and implicated several young microproteins in distinct cellular processes such as endocytosis and splicing. I conclude that many novel small proteins are produced in the human heart, most of which exhibit poor sequence conservation. I provide a substantial resource of microprotein localization and interaction data that links several to cellular processes such as splicing, endocytosis, and mitochondrial translation. Further investigation into this hidden part of the cardiac proteome will contribute to our understanding of recently evolved proteins and heart biology.