PURPOSE. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscopy (HRT; Heidelberg retinal tomograph II) and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-variable corneal compensator [VCC]) were used to investigate whether early indicators of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness loss could be observed in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that had no associated retinopathy or optic neuropathy and were concomitantly receiving antiretroviral medications. METHODS. HRT and GDx-VCC parameters obtained from a group of 13 HIV-positive subjects (n = 26 eyes) on antiretroviral therapy examined with HRT, with a subgroup of six subjects (n = 12 eyes) examined with both HRT and GDx-VCC, were compared with those of a matched HIV-negative control cohort (13 subjects, n = 26 eyes) examined with HRT, with a subgroup of five subjects (n = 10 eyes) examined with both HRT and GDx-VCC. We employed generalized estimating equations for statistical analysis. RESULTS. Reduced mean values for the HRT height variation contour (p < 0.045) and HRT mean RNFL thickness (p < 0.023) were observed in HIV-positive subjects controlling for age, sex, and race. A significantly reduced mean value corresponding to the GDx-VCC superior maximum (p < 0.014) and inferior maximum (p < 0.016) were also observed for the HIV-positive cohort analyzed controlling for age, sex, and race. CONCLUSION. HRT and GDx-VCC indicators of RNFL thickness appear to be significantly reduced in HIV-positive subjects without retinopathy or optic nerve disease using antiretroviral medication, suggesting RNFL loss occurs in this population of HIV-positive patients. The lack of correlation between CD4 counts, viral load, number of antiretroviral medications used, or years from diagnosis of HIV and RNFL thinning, suggests that possibly other factors associated with HIV infection may contribute to the apparent RNFL thickness loss.

Final publication is available at http://www.nature.com/articles/srep12283 / 京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(医学) / 甲第19559号 / 医博第4066号 / 新制||医||1013(附属図書館) / 32595 / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医学専攻 / (主査)教授 木村 剛, 教授 小池 薫, 教授 山下 潤 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

Cette thèse constitue à la fois un apport de nature clinique et technologique dans l’approche diagnostique du glaucome. Plus précisément, nous nous proposons d’étudier une nouvelle façon de détecter le glaucome par la mesure de l’asymétrie du rapport de la surface de l’anneau neurorétinien et de la surface de la papille ou du disque optique ou rim to disc area asymmetry ratio (RADAAR). Pour atteindre cet objectif, nous avons recours à une base de données composée d’une population subdivisée en 4 différents groupes de diagnostic (normal, glaucome possible, glaucome probable et glaucome définitif). Les mesures du RADAAR sont calculées de différentes façons à partir des paramètres stéréométriques de la tête du nerf optique des sujets, produits par la microscopie confocale à balayage laser (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany)). Nous procédons à une analyse de données grâce au logiciel SPSS où nous mettons en exergue la distribution du RADAAR dans les différentes populations, sa validité et son utilité dans le dépistage du glaucome. Nous enrôlons donc 523 sujets dans cette étude avec 82 sujets atteints de glaucome définitif. La moyenne d’âge est de 62 ans. Il y a plus de femmes que d’hommes et plus de Caucasiens que d’Africains Caribéens. Nous trouvons que la distribution de la mesure du RADAAR est différente des sujets d’un groupe de diagnostic à l’autre. En termes de performance, la sensibilité de la mesure du RADAAR est très basse c'est-à-dire que sa capacité de détecter la maladie est basse. En revanche la mesure du RADAAR est plus spécifique c'est-à-dire que sa capacité d’identifier les sujets exempts de la maladie est plus grande. Elle tendrait à être aussi plus performante chez les Africains Caribéens que chez les Caucasiens. De même, elle serait plus sensible chez les hommes que chez les femmes. La mesure du RADAAR est utile si on l’associe à une autre méthode de diagnostic comme l’analyse de Régression de Moorfields (MRA) incluse dans le logiciel du HRT3 spécialement lors de la détection du glaucome dans la population à haut risque. En définitive, nous déterminons que la mesure du RADAAR se veut un outil d’aide au diagnostic. Elle est particulièrement intéressante dans le contexte de dépistage de glaucome. / This thesis describes a new clinical and technological approach to the diagnosis of glaucoma. Specifically, we intend to study a new way to detect glaucoma by measuring rim area to disc area asymmetry ratio (RADAAR). For this purpose, we use a database consisting of a population divided into 4 different diagnostic groups (normal, possible glaucoma, probable glaucoma and definitive glaucoma). The RADAAR measurements are calculated in different ways based on the stereometric parameters of the optic nerve head of subjects, produced by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany)). We conduct an analysis of data with SPSS or we put forward the RADAAR distribution in different populations, its validity in detecting open angle glaucoma and its usefulness in screening for glaucoma. We therefore enroll 523 subjects in this study with about 82 subjects with definitive glaucoma. The average age is 62 years. There are more females than males and more Caucasians than Africans Caraibeans. We find that the distribution of RADAAR measures is different in each diagnosis group. In terms of performance, the sensitivity of the RADAAR measurement is very low. So, its ability to detect the disease is low. However the RADAAR measure is much more specific so, its ability to identify subjects free of the disease is high. RADAAR measure would also be much more effective in African Caribbean’s than in Caucasians. Similarly, it would be much more sensitive in males than in females. The RADAAR measurement is useful if it is combined with another method of diagnosis like the Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) included in the HRT3 software especially in case of the detection of glaucoma in populations at high risk. Ultimately, we determine that the RADAAR is an interesting tool for the diagnosis of glaucoma particularly in the context of screening for glaucoma.

O objetivo desse estudo foi comparar a habilidade da avaliação subjetiva do disco óptico e da camada de fibras nervosas (CFN) por oftalmologistas generalistas e por um glaucomatólogo com medidas objetivas pela tomografia de coerência óptica (Stratus OCT), oftalmoscopia confocal de varredura a laser (HRTIII), e a polarimetria de varredura a laser (GDxECC) para discriminar olhos glaucomatosos de olhos normais. 61 olhos glaucomatosos e 57 olhos normais de 118 indivíduos foram incluídos nesse estudo. Três oftalmologistas generalistas independentes e um glaucomatólogo avaliaram fotografias estereoscópicas do disco óptico. Curvas ROC (Receiver Operator Characteristic) foram construídas para cada técnica de imagem e a sensibilidade a uma especificidade fixa foi determinada. Comparações das áreas sob essas curvas (AROC) e a concordância (k) foram determinadas entre a graduação das fotografias estereoscópicas e o melhor parâmetro de cada exame de imagem computadorizado. O melhor parâmetro de cada técnica de imagem computadorizada (CFN temporal inferior do Stratus OCT = 0,92; área integrada vertical da topografia do disco óptico pelo Stratus OCT = 0,86; espessura macular do setor inferior externo fornecido pelo Stratus OCT = 0,82; NFI do GDxECC = 0,91; razão área E/D do HRT3 = 0,83) mostrou AROC maior do que a graduação das fotografias estereoscópicas por oftalmologistas generalistas (0,80) para separar olhos glaucomatosos de olhos normais. A graduação por glaucomatólogo forneceu AROC igual ou maior (0,92) do que o melhor parâmetro de exame computadorizado de imagem. A avaliação das fotografias estereoscópicas por glaucomatólogo mostrou melhor concordância com o melhor parâmetro de cada técnica de imagem quantitativa na classificação de olhos como glaucomatosos ou normais comparadas à avaliação de fotografias estereoscópicas por oftalmologistas generalistas. A combinação da avaliação subjetiva do disco óptico por oftalmologistas generalistas com parâmetros objetivos da CFN melhorou a identificação de olhos com glaucoma em uma proporção maior do que a combinação desses parâmetros objetivos com a avaliação do disco óptico por um glaucomatólogo (29,5% versus 19,7%, respectivamente). Os resultados sugerem que a habilidade diagnóstica de todos os exames de imagem computadorizados estudados mostrou melhor desempenho que a avaliação subjetiva do disco óptico por oftalmologistas generalistas, mas não por um glaucomatólogo. Medidas objetivas da CFN podem permitir um aperfeiçoamento na detecção de glaucoma quando combinados com a avaliação subjetiva do disco óptico por oftalmologistas generalistas ou por um glaucomatólogo. / The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of subjective assessment of optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer by general ophthalmologists and by a glaucoma expert with objective measurements by optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.), confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRT III; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx ECC; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) in discriminating glaucomatous and normal eyes. 61 glaucomatous and 57 normal eyes of 118 subjects were included in the study. Three independent general ophthalmologists and one glaucoma expert evaluated ONH stereophotographs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for each imaging technique and sensitivity at fixed specificity was estimated. Comparisons of areas under these curves (aROC) and agreement (k) were determined between stereophoto grading and best parameter from each technique. Best parameter from each technique showed larger aROC (StratusOCT RNFL = 0.92; StratusOCT ONH vertical integrated area = 0.86; StratusOCT macular thickness = 0.82; GDxECC = 0.91; HRT3 global cup-to-disc area ratio = 0.83) compared to stereophotograph grading by general ophthalmologists (0.80) in separating glaucomatous and normal eyes. Glaucoma expert stereophoto grading provided equal or larger aROC (0.92) than best parameter of each computerized imaging device. Stereophoto evaluated by a glaucoma expert showed better agreement with best parameter of each quantitative imaging technique in classifying eyes either as glaucomatous or normal compared to stereophoto grading by general ophthalmologists. The combination of subjective assessment of the optic disc by general ophthalmologists with RNFL objective parameters improved identification of glaucoma patients in a larger proportion than the combination of these objective parameters with subjective assessment of the optic disc by a glaucoma expert (29.5% versus 19.7%, respectively). The results suggests that the diagnostic ability of all imaging techniques showed better performance than subjective assessment of the ONH by general ophthalmologists, but not by a glaucoma expert. Objective RNFL measurements may provide improvement in glaucoma detection when combined with subjective assessment of the optic disc by general ophthalmologists or by a glaucoma expert.

Cette thèse constitue à la fois un apport de nature clinique et technologique dans l’approche diagnostique du glaucome. Plus précisément, nous nous proposons d’étudier une nouvelle façon de détecter le glaucome par la mesure de l’asymétrie du rapport de la surface de l’anneau neurorétinien et de la surface de la papille ou du disque optique ou rim to disc area asymmetry ratio (RADAAR). Pour atteindre cet objectif, nous avons recours à une base de données composée d’une population subdivisée en 4 différents groupes de diagnostic (normal, glaucome possible, glaucome probable et glaucome définitif). Les mesures du RADAAR sont calculées de différentes façons à partir des paramètres stéréométriques de la tête du nerf optique des sujets, produits par la microscopie confocale à balayage laser (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany)). Nous procédons à une analyse de données grâce au logiciel SPSS où nous mettons en exergue la distribution du RADAAR dans les différentes populations, sa validité et son utilité dans le dépistage du glaucome. Nous enrôlons donc 523 sujets dans cette étude avec 82 sujets atteints de glaucome définitif. La moyenne d’âge est de 62 ans. Il y a plus de femmes que d’hommes et plus de Caucasiens que d’Africains Caribéens. Nous trouvons que la distribution de la mesure du RADAAR est différente des sujets d’un groupe de diagnostic à l’autre. En termes de performance, la sensibilité de la mesure du RADAAR est très basse c'est-à-dire que sa capacité de détecter la maladie est basse. En revanche la mesure du RADAAR est plus spécifique c'est-à-dire que sa capacité d’identifier les sujets exempts de la maladie est plus grande. Elle tendrait à être aussi plus performante chez les Africains Caribéens que chez les Caucasiens. De même, elle serait plus sensible chez les hommes que chez les femmes. La mesure du RADAAR est utile si on l’associe à une autre méthode de diagnostic comme l’analyse de Régression de Moorfields (MRA) incluse dans le logiciel du HRT3 spécialement lors de la détection du glaucome dans la population à haut risque. En définitive, nous déterminons que la mesure du RADAAR se veut un outil d’aide au diagnostic. Elle est particulièrement intéressante dans le contexte de dépistage de glaucome. / This thesis describes a new clinical and technological approach to the diagnosis of glaucoma. Specifically, we intend to study a new way to detect glaucoma by measuring rim area to disc area asymmetry ratio (RADAAR). For this purpose, we use a database consisting of a population divided into 4 different diagnostic groups (normal, possible glaucoma, probable glaucoma and definitive glaucoma). The RADAAR measurements are calculated in different ways based on the stereometric parameters of the optic nerve head of subjects, produced by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany)). We conduct an analysis of data with SPSS or we put forward the RADAAR distribution in different populations, its validity in detecting open angle glaucoma and its usefulness in screening for glaucoma. We therefore enroll 523 subjects in this study with about 82 subjects with definitive glaucoma. The average age is 62 years. There are more females than males and more Caucasians than Africans Caraibeans. We find that the distribution of RADAAR measures is different in each diagnosis group. In terms of performance, the sensitivity of the RADAAR measurement is very low. So, its ability to detect the disease is low. However the RADAAR measure is much more specific so, its ability to identify subjects free of the disease is high. RADAAR measure would also be much more effective in African Caribbean’s than in Caucasians. Similarly, it would be much more sensitive in males than in females. The RADAAR measurement is useful if it is combined with another method of diagnosis like the Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) included in the HRT3 software especially in case of the detection of glaucoma in populations at high risk. Ultimately, we determine that the RADAAR is an interesting tool for the diagnosis of glaucoma particularly in the context of screening for glaucoma.

O objetivo desse estudo foi comparar a habilidade da avaliação subjetiva do disco óptico e da camada de fibras nervosas (CFN) por oftalmologistas generalistas e por um glaucomatólogo com medidas objetivas pela tomografia de coerência óptica (Stratus OCT), oftalmoscopia confocal de varredura a laser (HRTIII), e a polarimetria de varredura a laser (GDxECC) para discriminar olhos glaucomatosos de olhos normais. 61 olhos glaucomatosos e 57 olhos normais de 118 indivíduos foram incluídos nesse estudo. Três oftalmologistas generalistas independentes e um glaucomatólogo avaliaram fotografias estereoscópicas do disco óptico. Curvas ROC (Receiver Operator Characteristic) foram construídas para cada técnica de imagem e a sensibilidade a uma especificidade fixa foi determinada. Comparações das áreas sob essas curvas (AROC) e a concordância (k) foram determinadas entre a graduação das fotografias estereoscópicas e o melhor parâmetro de cada exame de imagem computadorizado. O melhor parâmetro de cada técnica de imagem computadorizada (CFN temporal inferior do Stratus OCT = 0,92; área integrada vertical da topografia do disco óptico pelo Stratus OCT = 0,86; espessura macular do setor inferior externo fornecido pelo Stratus OCT = 0,82; NFI do GDxECC = 0,91; razão área E/D do HRT3 = 0,83) mostrou AROC maior do que a graduação das fotografias estereoscópicas por oftalmologistas generalistas (0,80) para separar olhos glaucomatosos de olhos normais. A graduação por glaucomatólogo forneceu AROC igual ou maior (0,92) do que o melhor parâmetro de exame computadorizado de imagem. A avaliação das fotografias estereoscópicas por glaucomatólogo mostrou melhor concordância com o melhor parâmetro de cada técnica de imagem quantitativa na classificação de olhos como glaucomatosos ou normais comparadas à avaliação de fotografias estereoscópicas por oftalmologistas generalistas. A combinação da avaliação subjetiva do disco óptico por oftalmologistas generalistas com parâmetros objetivos da CFN melhorou a identificação de olhos com glaucoma em uma proporção maior do que a combinação desses parâmetros objetivos com a avaliação do disco óptico por um glaucomatólogo (29,5% versus 19,7%, respectivamente). Os resultados sugerem que a habilidade diagnóstica de todos os exames de imagem computadorizados estudados mostrou melhor desempenho que a avaliação subjetiva do disco óptico por oftalmologistas generalistas, mas não por um glaucomatólogo. Medidas objetivas da CFN podem permitir um aperfeiçoamento na detecção de glaucoma quando combinados com a avaliação subjetiva do disco óptico por oftalmologistas generalistas ou por um glaucomatólogo. / The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of subjective assessment of optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer by general ophthalmologists and by a glaucoma expert with objective measurements by optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.), confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRT III; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx ECC; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) in discriminating glaucomatous and normal eyes. 61 glaucomatous and 57 normal eyes of 118 subjects were included in the study. Three independent general ophthalmologists and one glaucoma expert evaluated ONH stereophotographs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for each imaging technique and sensitivity at fixed specificity was estimated. Comparisons of areas under these curves (aROC) and agreement (k) were determined between stereophoto grading and best parameter from each technique. Best parameter from each technique showed larger aROC (StratusOCT RNFL = 0.92; StratusOCT ONH vertical integrated area = 0.86; StratusOCT macular thickness = 0.82; GDxECC = 0.91; HRT3 global cup-to-disc area ratio = 0.83) compared to stereophotograph grading by general ophthalmologists (0.80) in separating glaucomatous and normal eyes. Glaucoma expert stereophoto grading provided equal or larger aROC (0.92) than best parameter of each computerized imaging device. Stereophoto evaluated by a glaucoma expert showed better agreement with best parameter of each quantitative imaging technique in classifying eyes either as glaucomatous or normal compared to stereophoto grading by general ophthalmologists. The combination of subjective assessment of the optic disc by general ophthalmologists with RNFL objective parameters improved identification of glaucoma patients in a larger proportion than the combination of these objective parameters with subjective assessment of the optic disc by a glaucoma expert (29.5% versus 19.7%, respectively). The results suggests that the diagnostic ability of all imaging techniques showed better performance than subjective assessment of the ONH by general ophthalmologists, but not by a glaucoma expert. Objective RNFL measurements may provide improvement in glaucoma detection when combined with subjective assessment of the optic disc by general ophthalmologists or by a glaucoma expert.

This work deals with possibilities of registration of retinal images from different mo-dalities, concretely optical coherence tomography (OCT), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) and fundus camera. In first stage is the interest focused on registration of SLO and fundus images, which will serve to determine area of interest for consecutive registration of OCT data. The final stage is finding correct location of OCT B-scans in fundus image. On the basis of the studied methods of registration was chosen method making use of computation of correlation coefficient for both cases. For finding optimal parameters of registration is used searching through whole space of parameters. In partial stages of the work was created algorithm for alignment of B-scans followed by detection of blood vessels and also simple algorithm for detection of blood vessels from fundus image. For more transparent registration the graphical user interface was created, which allows loading input images and displaying the result in several possible forms.

Objetivos: Determinar o efeito da panfotocoagulação retiniana (PFC) nos parâmetros topográficos do disco óptico e na camada de fibras nervosas da retina (CFNR) peripapilar em pacientes com retinopatia diabética proliferativa (RDP). Métodos: Este é um estudo observacional prospectivo, de centro único. Trinta e oito olhos de 26 pacientes diabéticos foram submetidos a PFC para retinopatia diabética proliferativa. As estereofotografias (EFs) e os parâmetros do disco óptico foram avaliados usando o retinógrafo Visucam da Zeiss e a Tomografia de varredura a laser (TVL), respectivamente. A espessura da CFNR peripapilar foi medida por tomografia de coerência óptica (OCT) e polarimetria de varredura a laser (PVL). Todas as medições foram realizadas no início e 12 meses após a conclusão da PFC. Resultados: Trinta e oito olhos de 26 pacientes (15 mulheres) com média de idade de 53,7 anos (faixa etária de 26 a 74 anos) foram recrutados. Nenhuma diferença significativa foi encontrada entre a média horizontal e vertical para relação escavação/disco óptico (E/D) determinadas pelas EFs antes e após o tratamento com PFC (P = 0,461 e 0,839, respectivamente). Os valores globais dos parâmetros do disco óptico analisados com a TVL não mostraram nenhuma mudança significativa entre o baseline e 12 meses após o tratamento (área do disco, área da escavação, área da rima, volume da escavação, volume da rima, relação área da escavação/área do disco, relação linear do tamanho da escavação/disco, profundidade média da escavação, profundidade máxima da escavação, medida do formato da escavação, variação na altura do contorno, espessura média da CFNR e área transversal da CFNR). O OCT e o PVL não encontraram diferença significativa entre a CFNR peripapilar antes e após a PFC (P = 0,114 e P = 0,813, respectivamente). Conclusões: Nossos resultados sugerem que a PFC nos padrões realizados no presente estudo não causa significantes alterações morfológicas no disco óptico em pacientes diabéticos com RDP após um ano de acompanhamento / Purpose: To determine the effect of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) on optic disc topographic parameters and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in nonglaucomatous patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods: This is a prospective, single center, observational study. Thirty-eight eyes of 26 diabetic patients underwent PRP for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Stereoscopic disc photographs and optic nerve head (ONH) parameters were evaluated using the Zeiss fundus camera and the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO), respectively. The peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP). All measurements were performed at baseline and 12 months after completion of PRP. Results: Thirty-eight eyes of 26 patients (15 female) with a mean age of 53.7 years (range 26 to 74 years) were recruited. No significant difference was found between mean horizontal and vertical cup to disc (C/D) ratio determined by stereoscopic disc photographs before and after PRP treatment (P=0.461 and 0.839, respectively). The global values of ONH parameters analyzed with the CSLO showed no significant change from baseline to 12 months (disc area, cup area, rim area, cup volume, rim volume, C/D area ratio, linear C/D ratio, mean cup depth, maximum cup depth, cup shape measure, height variation contour, mean retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and cross-sectional area). The OCT and SLP did not find significant difference between peripapillary RNFL before and after PRP (P=0.114 and P=0.813, respectively). Conclusion: Our results suggest that PRP as performed in this study does not cause significant morphological optic disk changes in diabetic PDR patients after one year of follow-up