The dissertation consists of four self-contained essays on consumption. Essays 1 and 2 consider different measures of aggregate consumption, and Essays 3 and 4 consider how the distributions of income and wealth affect consumption from a macro and micro perspective, respectively. Essay 1 considers the empirical practice of seemingly interchangeable use of two measures of consumption; total consumption expenditure and consumption expenditure on nondurable goods and services. Using data from Sweden and the US in an error correction model, it is shown that consumption functions based on the two measures exhibit significant differences in several aspects of econometric modelling. Essay 2, coauthored with Thomas Holgersson, considers derivation of a univariate and a multivariate version of a test for asymmetry, based on the third central moment. The logic behind the test is that the dependent variable should correspond to the specification of the econometric model; symmetric with linear models and asymmetric with non-linear models. The main result in the empirical application of the test is that orthodox theory seems to be supported for consumption of both nondurable and durable consumption. The consumption of durables shows little deviation from symmetry in the four-country sample, while the consumption of nondurables is shown to be asymmetric in two out of four cases, the UK and the US. Essay 3 departs from the observation that introducing income uncertainty makes the consumption function concave, implying that the distributions of wealth and income are omitted variables in aggregate Euler equations. This implication is tested through estimation of the distributions over time and augmentation of consumption functions, using Swedish data for 1963-2000. The results show that only the dispersion of wealth is significant, the explanation of which is found in the marked changes of the group of households with negative wealth; a group that according to a concave consumption function has the highest marginal propensity to consume. Essay 4 attempts to empirically specify the nature of the alleged concavity of the consumption function. Using grouped household level Swedish data for 1999-2001, it is shown that the marginal propensity to consume out of current resources, i.e. current income and net wealth, is strictly decreasing in current resources and net wealth, but approximately constant in income. Also, an empirical reciprocal to the stylized theoretical consumption function is estimated, and shown to bear a close resemblance to the theoretical version.

[pt] Esta tese é composta por três ensaios. Os dois primeiros investigam a relação entre a renda per capita das famílias e as frações dos gastos setoriais, tanto em séries temporais quanto em cross-section nos EUA do pós-guerra. O primeiro usa uma abordagem parcial para estimar o aumento da dispersão do consumo (renda) e os efeitos de renda nos EUA de 1980 a 2010. Mostramos que os efeitos da renda são heterogêneos entre as famílias agrupadas por quintis de renda e, em seguida, a dispersão do consumo é correlacionada com as duas principais forças de transformação estrutural (efeitos de preço e renda) na contabilização da magnitude de transformação estrutural nas partes das despesas de consumo nos EUA durante esse período. O segundo estende um modelo canônico de Bewley-Aiyagari em tempo contínuo incorporado a um ambiente de dois setores para representar quantitativamente três regularidades empíricas nos EUA do pós-guerra (o preço relativo dos bens cai e a parcela de gastos dos produtos cai sistematicamente com a renda per capita, tanto em séries temporais quanto no cross-section) sem se afastar das preferências padrão Stone-Geary. Avaliamos a importância de mudanças na renda e nos preços relativos para mudanças estruturais nas parcelas dos gastos de consumo nos EUA do pós-guerra e concluímos que são forças equivalentes. Reforçamos que a conciliação dessas três principais regularidades empíricas nos EUA do pós-guerra exige uma teoria do crescimento que acomode a demanda de longo prazo e forneça fatores de mudança estrutural. Finalmente, o terceiro ensaio usa um conjunto de dados de painel exclusivo com registros administrativos em nível individual de transações de crédito, benefícios do programa, demografia individual e características de contratos de trabalho para estudar como os consumidores respondem a um choque de liquidez decorrente de liberações de saques de contas inativas do Fundo de Garantia por tempo de serviço (FGTS) no Brasil em 2017. Usando um design de identificação de diferenças entre diferenças, encontramos um aumento no consumo e uma dívida total diminuída após o anúncio: durante até doze meses subsequentes, para cada USD 1 de benefício do programa, os consumidores a média aumentaram os gastos de consumo em USD 0,53 - 25 porcento dos quais ocorrem durante a janela de anúncio - e a dívida total diminuiu em USD 0,07, especialmente em dívidas de folha de pagamento. A resposta ao consumo ocorreu principalmente por meio de gastos com cartão de crédito, mas também foram encontradas evidências de bens duráveis financiados por dívida. Os consumidores endividados usaram liquidez de curto prazo nas modalidades de dívida (cheque especial e dívida com cartão de crédito), além dos gastos com cartão de crédito para suavizar consumo. Consumidores restritos, medidos como jovens ou idosos, mostraram respostas mais fortes ao consumo. / [en] This thesis is comprised of three essays. The first two investigate the relationship between households per capita income and sectoral expenditure shares both in times series and in cross-section in the postwar US. The first uses a partial approach to estimate the rise of consumption (income) dispersion and income effects in the US from 1980 to 2010. We show that income effects are heterogeneous across households grouped by income quintiles and then consumption dispersion correlates the two main driving forces of structural change (price and income effects) in accounting for the magnitude of structural change in the shares of consumption expenditure in the US over this period. The second extends a canonical Bewley-Aiyagari model in continuous time embedded with a two-sector environment to depict quantitatively three empirical regularities in the postwar US (relative price of goods falls and expenditure shares of goods falls systematically with per capita income, both in times series and in cross-section) without departing from benchmark Stone-Geary preferences. We assess the importance of changes in income and relative prices for structural change in the shares of consumption expenditure in the postwar US and conclude they are nearly equivalent forces. We reinforce that reconciling these three main empirical regularities in the postwar US calls for a growth theory that accommodates long-run demand and supply drivers of structural change. Finally, the third essay uses a unique panel dataset with individual-level administrative records of credit transactions, program benefits, individual demographics and features of labor contracts to study how consumers respond to a liquidity shock arising from withdrawals releases from inactive accounts of the Guarantee Fund for Time of Service (FGTS) in Brazil in 2017. Using a difference-in-differences identification design, we find consumption rose and total debt declined after the announcement: during up to twelve subsequent months, for each USD 1 of program benefit, consumers on average increased consumption spending by USD 0.53 - 25 percent of which occurs during the announcement window - and total debt declined by USD 0.07, specially in payroll debt. Consumption response occurred mostly via credit card spending, but evidence of debt-financed durables was also found. Indebted consumers used short-term liquidity in debt modalities (overdraft debt and credit card debt) in addition to credit card spending to smooth consumption. Constrained consumers, measured as young or old, showed stronger consumption responses.