The concern with the effect of the public expenses in the economy is recurrent, over all with the impacts of them on the economic growth with this the society waits always an efficient allocation of the public resources, since limits for the expansion of the prescriptions exist that finance the increase of the expenses per capita. This only strengthens the necessity of increase of the productivity of the public expenses. In end the objective of this study is to analyze theoretician and empirically the effect of the public expenses in the sergipana economy in the period of 2000 the 2007, over all the impacts of the investments in infrastructure on the economic growth of the State, of form added, catching the liquid rocking of the participation of the expenses on the internal product. / A preocupação com os efeitos dos gastos públicos na economia é recorrente, sobretudo com os impactos deles sobre o crescimento econômico, com isso a sociedade espera sempre uma alocação eficiente dos recursos públicos, já que existem limites para a expansão das receitas que financiam o aumento dos gastos per capita . Isso só reforça a necessidade de aumento da produtividade dos gastos públicos. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar teórica e empiricamente os efeitos dos gastos públicos na economia sergipana no período de 2000 a 2007, sobretudo os impactos dos investimentos em infraestrutura sobre o crescimento econômico do Estado, de forma agregada, captando o balanço líquido da participação dos gastos sobre o produto interno.

La question de la responsabilité de l’État sans faute du fait des engagements internationaux devant le juge administratif français est soumise aux évolutions jurisprudentielles. En 2011, le Conseil d’État a consacré la responsabilité de l’État sans faute des coutumes internationales. Cette consécration a provoqué un débat sur l’assimilation entre la responsabilité du fait des lois et la responsabilité du fait des conventions internationales. Pour le comprendre, il faut se tourner vers le passé: le régime de responsabilité du fait des conventions internationales inauguré avec l’arrêt Compagnie générale d’énergie radioélectrique. En 1966, le Conseil d’État a dépassé la problématique de la théorie des actes de gouvernement et a constitué un régime de responsabilité fondé sur le principe d’égalité devant les charges publiques. La règle de réparation est destinée à réparer non pas les dommages résultant directement de la convention, mais ceux causés par son application. Elle ne concerne que les dommages anormaux et spéciaux. Ce régime de responsabilité a été accepté dans des termes proches du régime de la responsabilité du fait des lois. Aujourd’hui, et avec l’évolution jurisprudentielle, une dissociation s’opère entre la responsabilité du fait des engagements internationaux et la responsabilité du fait des lois. Il semble possible de consacrer l’indépendance du régime de la responsabilité du fait des engagements internationaux de celui des lois. / The question of the state’s responsibility towards international engagements is subject to jurisprudential evolutions. In 2011, the Counsel of the State dedicated the responsibility without fault due to the international customs. These dedications provoked a debate about the founded assimilation between the responsibility of the acts of laws and the responsibility due to the international conventions. Concerning this, one must turn to the past: the system of responsibility based on the occurrences of international conventions inaugurated with the stop of the company of radio electric energy. In 1966, the Counsel of the State overtook the problem of the theory of government act and constituted a system of responsibility based on the principle of equality before the public charges. The rule of reparation is not destined to repair the damages directly resulting from the convention, but those caused by its application. It only concerns the abnormal and particular damages. This state of responsibility was accepted under the close terms of the system of responsibility on the acts of laws.Today and with the jurisprudential evolution, a disassociation operates between the responsibility of actions on international engagements and the responsibility of the acts of law. It seems possible to sanction independence from the system of responsibility of actions of international engagements and that of law.