Purpose - The authors propose that angry individuals are much more likely to consider the emotional state of their partner than are neutral individuals. They then apply a lay theory dictating that anger decreases cooperation and react accordingly by lowering their own level of cooperation. Design/methodology/approach - The authors report four experiments involving different samples, manipulations, payment schemes and interfaces. The methodological approach was to capitalize on the positives of experimental research (e.g. establishing causality) while also trying to conceptually replicate the findings in different settings. Findings - The authors found evidence for a lay theory (i.e. expectation) that anger decreases cooperation, but that actual cooperation was lowest when angry individuals were paired with other angry individuals, supporting the hypotheses. Research limitations/implications - Anger can spill over from unrelated contexts to affect cooperation, and incidental anger by itself is not enough to decrease cooperation. However, the findings are limited to anger and cannot necessarily be used to understand the effects of other emotions. Practical implications - Before entering into a context that requires cooperation, such as a negotiation, be wary of the emotional state of both yourself and of your partner. This paper suggests that only if both parties are angry, then the likelihood of cooperation is low. Originality/value - To the best of the authors' knowledge, they are the first researchers to address the question of how incidental anger affects single-round cooperation. By going back to the basics, the authors believe that the findings fill a gap in existing research and offer a building block for future research on anger and cooperation.

付記する学位プログラム名: グローバル生存学大学院連携プログラム / 京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(経済学) / 甲第22111号 / 経博第604号 / 新制||経||291(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院経済学研究科経済学専攻 / (主査)教授 依田 高典, 教授 岡 敏弘, 講師 五十川 大也 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Economics / Kyoto University / DGAM

Punishment is the act of penalizing an individual as a response to a transgression. This thesis will deal with punishment in experimental game scenarios and in experimental criminal punishment scenarios, along with their different adaptations. The aim will be to provide an overview of both psychological and neurological underpinnings of punishment by reviewing existing literature. While punishment ought to deter transgressions and promote cooperative behavior, internal neural reward-related systems seem to be a driving factor of the desire to punish wrongdoings. Decisions on whether a transgressor is guilty and deserves punishment is mediated by the medial prefrontal cortex with an emphasis on the ventromedial parts. External influences affect the behavioral output and its underlying neural signatures of punishment. Social context such as peer pressure and in-group bias emphasize the importance of theory of mind related areas when conducting punishment.

No description available.

No description available.

We approach the topic of provision of public goods in an experimental economic study using the Public Goods Game setting. We allow subjects to punish each other but vary the structure and amount of information they can base their decisions upon. We try to add to the current literature on reciprocity and study whether people are willing to punish under such incomplete information. Since punishment under uncertain conditions can be quite destructive in terms of welfare, this closely relates to whether people are able to provide public good themselves or whether they need some external assistance. In terms of public policy, this can add to the debate on when should government provide certain services and when it should be left to individuals. In terms of behaviour inside of an enterprise, our study could be well applied to problems that arise when teams work on a common project but some people free-ride on effort of others.

Several experimental studies show that ex post communication mitigates opportunistic behavior in social dilemmas. The source of this effect, especially in a repeated interaction, is nonetheless still obscure. This study provides a novel empirical testbed for two channels by which ex post communication may affect behavior in a repeated public goods game. One is related to strategic signaling. The other involves emotions induced by others' expressed disapproval. The presence of ex post communication strongly fosters pro-social behavior. The data do not support the signaling hypothesis, favouring the emotion-based explanation instead. (author's abstract) / Series: Department of Economics Working Paper Series

In this paper, we propose and develop a model for a prototype research tool based on a social dilemma game which use is widely spread in social psychology and experimental economics, the Public Goods Game. This tool generates from the necessity to expand the accessibility and versatility of this popular game as well as reach for newer audiences that might be otherwise deterred by the traditional Public Goods Game. Also, using this tool, we perform an experiment to try to find a possible preference towards either punishment or reward in the current population and find a possible correlation between said preference and three different cultural spheres (geographical, generational and gender).

Submitted by Aelson Maciera (aelsoncm@terra.com.br) on 2017-08-01T19:31:00Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DissALF.pdf: 2099978 bytes, checksum: 7eb8a96e9c4894db8d4334e89700a547 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ronildo Prado (ronisp@ufscar.br) on 2017-08-08T17:50:53Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DissALF.pdf: 2099978 bytes, checksum: 7eb8a96e9c4894db8d4334e89700a547 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ronildo Prado (ronisp@ufscar.br) on 2017-08-08T17:50:59Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DissALF.pdf: 2099978 bytes, checksum: 7eb8a96e9c4894db8d4334e89700a547 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-08T17:55:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DissALF.pdf: 2099978 bytes, checksum: 7eb8a96e9c4894db8d4334e89700a547 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-21 / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) / Corruption is an object of study in several researches, but only recently it began to be investigated experimentally. Despite the progress, some gaps remain open, particularly in regards to the variables of which the observed behaviors are function, one aspect in which behavior analysis can contribute to operationalize the phenomenon and investigate the environmental variables that control these behaviors characterized as corrupt. One way to study this phenomenon is to expose the participants to a context in which they need to contribute to producing a particular public good, and then need to make decisions about how this good will be distributed among all participants. In this context, the participant can make three decisions: distribute in an egalitarian way; Distribute in an unequal way, favoring others, or distribute in an unequal way, favoring their own gains. A participant who makes distributions unequally for his own benefit shall behaving in a manner analogous to that described in the crime of embezzlement. Through the Public Goods Game (JBP), by modifying its original protocol, allowing the participants to manage the public resource, deciding how it will be distributed, it is possible to experimentally study this type of corrupt behavior. The aim was to investigate how the participants managed public resources under a PGG. Six participants were exposed to the procedure. They had to decide how the resource produced by her/his own contribution and that of the other players would be distributed among them. Five participants made unequal distributions, i.e, allocated most of the resources to themselves. This type of distribution is in correspondence with an embezzlement definition, allowing an approximation to real contexts. From these results, we suggest changes in the contingencies that control the occurrence of this type of behavior. / A corrupção foi objeto de estudo em diversas pesquisas, mas apenas recentemente ela passou a ser investigada experimentalmente. Apesar dos avanços obtidos, algumas lacunas permanecem em aberto, principalmente no que diz respeito as variáveis das quais os comportamentos observados são função, aspecto em que a Análise do Comportamento pode contribuir ao operacionalizar o fenômeno e investigar as variáveis ambientais que controlam estes comportamentos caracterizados como corruptos. Uma maneira de estudar este fenômeno é expor os participantes a um contexto em que eles precisem contribuir para produzir um determinado bem público, e em seguida, precisem tomar decisões a respeito da maneira como este bem será distribuído entre todos. Neste contexto, o participante pode tomar três decisões: distribuir de maneira igualitária; distribuir de maneira desigual, favorecendo os demais, ou distribuir de maneira desigual, favorecendo os seus próprios ganhos. Um participante que faça distribuições desigualmente em benefício próprio estará de comportando de maneira análoga a descrita no crime de peculato. Utilizando o Jogo dos Bens Públicos (JBP), modificando o seu protocolo original, é possível permitir que os participantes façam a gestão do recurso público, decidindo como ele será distribuído entre si mesmo e os demais participantes, o que torna possível estudar experimentalmente este tipo de comportamento corrupto. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar o comportamento de contribuir e distribuir recursos públicos sob controle da quantidade de recursos produzidos pela contribuição de todos os participantes. Ao todo, seis participantes foram recrutados. As contingências programadas no presente estudo foram o número de fichas que um participante possuía em sua “carteira” no início da tentativa (condição antecedente), a resposta de contribuir e distribuir as fichas e o ganho obtido pela contribuição e distribuição efetuada. Como resultado, todos os participantes emitiram respostas de contribuições desiguais, isto é, contribuíram menos do que os demais participantes, e cinco destes participantes emitiram respostas de distribuições desiguais, isto é, distribuíram para si mesmos a maior parte das fichas produzidas. Esse tipo de distribuição encontra correspondência na definição de peculato, o que permite aproximar este estudo de contextos reais. A partir dos resultados discute-se mudanças nas contingências em vigor para controlar a ocorrência deste tipo de comportamento.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:37:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 NataliaBD_DISSERT.pdf: 520010 bytes, checksum: 78f395f9cd75c470203c0d6fd6248c90 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-05-28 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / Human cooperation is a hallmark of this species due to its wide extension to genetically unrelated individuals and complex division of labor. It is considered an evolutionary puzzle, because the theory of evolution by natural selection predicts that self-interested individuals tend to be selected. Different theories have been proposed to explain the evolution of cooperation, which the most important are kin selection and reciprocal altruism. Considering the evolutionary continuity between species, humans and other primates have several common traits that help to promote cooperation between individuals of these species. Two features, however, seem to be particularly humans: inequality aversion and preferences in relation to others. Although human cooperation is not necessarily related to morality, cooperative traits are the basis for moral tendencies. The development of human morality is a combination of early prosocial tendencies, cooperative skills displayed at different ages, social learning and cultural transmission of norms. The social stimulus seems to be particularly important in promoting cooperative behavior in children and adults. In order to study the influence of social stimuli, as verbal feedback, on children cooperation, a study was conducted with children in a public goods game. 407 children from public schools in Natal / RN, divided into 21 groups, between six and nine years, participated in eight rounds of this game. After each round, seven groups received praise for larger donations, seven groups have been criticized by smaller donations, and the other seven received no comment. Children cooperated more when criticized, without significant differences between sexes, although young children have cooperated more negative than older children. The results are likely related to the anticipation and avoidance of punishment associated with the feedback (although this did not occur), and greater sensitivity to the authority in younger children. Nevertheless, the cooperation decreased in all groups until the last day of play. The results suggest an early sensitivity to moral punishment, whose role in the maintenance of social relations must have been important in the evolution of cooperation in humans / A coopera??o humana ? um tra?o distintivo da esp?cie, devido ? sua ampla extens?o ? n?o aparentados e elaborada divis?o do trabalho. ? considerada um quebra-cabe?a evolucionista, tendo em vista que a teoria da evolu??o por sele??o natural prev? que indiv?duos auto-interessados tendem a ser selecionados. Diferentes teorias foram propostas para explicar a evolu??o da coopera??o, sendo as mais importantes a sele??o de parentesco e o altru?smo rec?proco. Considerando a continuidade evolutiva entre esp?cies, seres humanos e outros primatas possuem v?rios tra?os em comum que ajudam a promover a coopera??o entre indiv?duos dessas esp?cies. Duas caracter?sticas, no entanto, parecem ser particularmente humanos: a avers?o ? desigualdade e as prefer?ncias em rela??o aos outros. Embora a coopera??o humana n?o necessariamente esteja relacionada ? moralidade, tra?os cooperativos servem de base para tend?ncias morais. O desenvolvimento da moralidade humana resulta da combina??o de tend?ncias pr?-sociais precoces, de habilidades cooperativas exibidas em diferentes idades, de aprendizagem social e transmiss?o cultural de normas. O est?mulo social parece ser particularmente importante na promo??o de comportamentos cooperativos em crian?as e adultos. Tendo como objetivo estudar a influ?ncia do est?mulo social, sob a foma de feedback verbal sobre a coopera??o infantil, foi realizado um estudo com crian?as em um jogo de bens p?blicos. 407 crian?as de escolas p?blicas de Natal/RN, divididas em 21 grupos, entre seis e nove anos, participaram de oito partidas desse jogo. Ao fim de cada partida, sete grupos receberam elogios pelas doa??es maiores, sete grupos foram criticados pelas doa??es menores, e os outros sete n?o receberam nenhum coment?rio. Crian?as cooperaram mais em situa??es de cr?tica, sem diferen?as significativas entre sexo, embora crian?as mais jovens tenham cooperado mais em feedback negativo do que as crian?as mais velhas. Os resultados provavelmente est?o relacionados ? expectativa e ? esquiva de puni??o associada ao feedback (embora esta n?o ocorresse), e ? maior sensibilidade ? autoridade em crian?as mais jovens. Apesar disso, a coopera??o diminuiu em todos os grupos at? o ?ltimo dia de jogo. Os resultados apontam para uma sensibilidade precoce ? puni??o moral, cujo papel na manuten??o das rela??es sociais deve ter sido importante na evolu??o da coopera??o na esp?cie humana