Global ETD Search

1	Hota att göra det som är fel att göra? : -En analys av kärnvapenavskräckningens varande utifrån ”Just war theory” Gustafsson, Douglas January 2024 (has links) The aim of this thesis is to discuss the ethical issues which arise by nuclear deterrence. I have taken the position that the use of nuclear weapons is morally wrong. Nuclear deterrence is kind of a preventive measure, but not a way of fighting a war. Therefore, I used the ‘just war theory’ as a starting point to formulate analytical questions through which I have interpreted my material. The analytical questions are based on proportionality, utilitarianism, deontology and the ‘Doctrine of double effect’. I have used contemporary material by political scientists which form a symposium where they discussed on the topic of ‘just deterrence’. In my thesis, I argue that the liberty, life and happiness must be defended, but not to any price. I argue that we must see the value life itself has, because if our life, liberty and happiness is threatened, we have nothing to defend. The question that arises is whether there is an ethical approach which can help us understand these questions. Nuclear deterrence just war theory just deterrence utilitarism deontology proportionality The Doctrine of Double Effect ethics Kärnvapenavskräckning Det rättfärdiga kriget rättfärdig avskräckning utilitarism deontologi proportionalitet Doktrinen om dubbeleffekt etik Ethics Etik