Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-15T19:34:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Denis Cortiz Da Silva.pdf: 635637 bytes, checksum: 1a7ebf94d0c52b532e04b77476b20409 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-02-10 / This study aims to analyse if whether there are and what are the legal limits of freedom of the press, one of the pillars of democracy, especially in relation to media coverage of criminal news. It will analyze which factors can mitigate this freedom of speech, especially their union with the government, a practice that could endanger the democratic regime itself and the influence that economic power has on the media, which are today very dependent on advertising revenues, whether private, whether public. Also the rights of the defendant, during and after the criminal prosecution, will be studied and how these can be restrictors of the press activities, which must be applied the balancing interests techinical to solve this conflict, according to the circumstances of the case. Finally it will be analyzed some trials which recognize the limitation of media freedom against the fundamental rights of the defendant. / Este estudo visa analisar se existem e quais seriam os limites jurídicos da liberdade de imprensa, um dos pilares do regime democrático, principalmente em relação à cobertura jornalística do noticiário criminal. Serão analisados quais fatores podem mitigar essa liberdade de imprensa, principalmente sua união com o poder público, prática que pode colocar em risco o próprio regime democrático e a influência que o Poder Econômico exerce sobre os meios de comunicação, que atualmente são extremamente dependentes das verbas publicitárias, sejam elas privadas, sejam elas estatais. Também serão estudados os direitos do acusado durante e depois da persecução penal e como estes podem ser limitadores da atuação da imprensa, devendo, de acordo com as circunstâncias do caso concreto, aplicar-se a técnica da ponderação de interesses para solucionar este conflito. Por fim serão analisados alguns julgados em que foi reconhecida a limitação da liberdade de imprensa face os direitos fundamentais dos noticiados.

Si le respect du droit à un procès équitable devrait occuper une place éminente au sein de toute société démocratique, cette exigence revêt un caractère axiomatique au sein d'une juridiction tournée vers la lutte contre l'impunité et la protection des droits de l'homme, telle que la Cour pénale internationale. Le peu de jugements rendus depuis plus de dix ans par la Cour permanente pourrait laisser penser qu'une telle étude est encore prématurée. Cette analyse met au contraire en exergue la densité de son activité et la singularité de ses procédures. Sacralisé par la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme, le droit à un procès équitable se décline en règles qui régissent non seulement les relations entre les parties mais aussi les rapports des individus avec la juridiction. Si la notion de droit à un procès équitable est familière des juristes, son interprétation pose un certain nombre de difficultés nouvelles. L'hybridité structurelle et normative de la Cour pénale internationale influencera nécessairement la réception que celle-ci réservera au principe, mais également l'interprétation unique qu'il conviendra de donner à ce droit fondamental. Prenant acte du caractère novateur de cette juridiction, cette thèse n'omettra pas d'envisager le droit à un procès équitable sous le prisme singulier de la victime, nouveau visage du procès. Souvent exclue du débat judiciaire relatif à l'équité des procédures, cette analyse s'attèle à replacer cet acteur au coeur des préoccupations régissant la conduite équitable du procès. / While the right to a fair trial should be at the heart of any democratic society, this requirement has an axiomatic significance in a court dedicated to the fight against impunity and the protection of human rights, such as the International Criminal Court. In view of the few judgments rendered in over ten years of this permanent Court's existence, this study might seem somewhat premature.Rather, this analysis purports to shed light on the diverse nature of the Court's activities and the unique character of its procedures. Enshrined by the European Court of Human Rights, the right to a fair trial is expressed in the form of regulations that govern not only the relationships between the parties, but also the interaction of individuals with the Court. The concept of the right to a fair trial may be familiar to legal experts trained in different legal traditions. Still its interpretation is fraught with challenges that are new and specific to this permanent Court. The structural and normative hybridity of the ICC will inevitably influence not only the treatment of this concept, but also the unique interpretation that this fundamental right deserves. Against the backdrop of the innovative nature of this Court, it would be remiss of the author of this thesis not to consider the right to a fair trial through the unique prism of the victim, the new face in the trial. Often excluded from the judicial debate on the fairness of the proceedings, this analysis will nevertheless endeavour to place this stakeholder back in the heart of the concerns over the conduct of a fair trial.