Context. The appropriate stakeholder selection for software engineering is an essential stage and the precondition of software requirements elicitation. However, the stakeholder analysis hasn’t get enough attention in the requirement elicitation field as it was commonly recognized as a self-evidence process in practice. Objectives. In this study, we investigated the current status of this area. Collated the affecting factors which influence the appropriate stakeholder selection on Software Engineering (SE) with respect to the requirement elicitation purpose. On the basic of this objective, we investigated a systematic conceptual model which aims to guide the appropriate stakeholder selection of software projects. Finally, we evaluate the meaning to practice of our model. Methods. We conducted the systematic mapping study for the first objective. The objective of selecting affecting factors is on the basic of the first objective. The objective to evaluate the meaning to practice is realized by interviewing 10 experienced software product managers. Results. The recent studies on this area have been classified according to their different focuses. We described the methods of each included papers on systematic mapping study. We collected 12 factors used by previous studies and select 6 factors for our model. And we generated our model by six steps. The interview to ten practitioners is used to evaluate our model. Conclusions. We extracted six factors according to previous studies, then proposed a systematic stakeholder selection model for software projects on the basic of analysis to those factors. Generally, our model’s meaning to practice has been confirmed by interviews with experienced practitioners.

A challenge related to the expansion of wind power concerns how wind power developers can foster a good relationship with local communities. Building on research on social acceptance for wind power, this thesis addresses two identified gaps. The main focus is a theoretical gap, where previous research is criticized for assuming perfectly flexible organizations when suggesting how social acceptance can be enhanced. Also, an empirical gap is addressed by studying India, a different socio-economic and socio-cultural context compared to western contexts, which previous research has focused on. The aim is to study how management’s stakeholder prioritization affects community acceptance through a qualitative case study of a large Indian wind power developer with data from semi-structured interviews with senior management and internal company reports. The results show that managers’ stakeholder prioritizations and organizational constraints affect community acceptance and that the factors that enhance community acceptance has to be adapted to the context.

Stakeholder salience has emerged from the ambiguity of stakeholder theory and is intended to better describe the aspects of identification and prioritization of stakeholders. Despite the fact that 95% of businesses worldwide are SMEs and comprise 99.8% of all European enterprises, the stakeholder salience aspects of identification and prioritization, in relation to SMEs, are empirically underdeveloped and mainly focused on the owner/manager perspective. Therefore, this qualitative single-case study has explored the stakeholder salience aspects of identification and prioritization in order to better understand the intraorganizational perceptions of stakeholders, processes, and motivations, within a European SME. The findings revealed that intraorganizational perceptions focused on a narrow view of stakeholder identification, which contradicts the broad view advocated by researchers in relation to stakeholders and sustainable development. Furthermore, there is a need to develop broader intraorganizational understanding of stakeholders in terms of claims and processes if businesses are going to be able to create holistic strategies with a sustainable development focus.