The following thesis deals with methods to increase the reliability of the results in life cycle assessment. The paper is divided into two parts. The first part points out the typologies and sources of uncertainty in LCA and summarises the existing methods dealing with it. The methods are critically discussed and pros and cons are contrasted. Within the second part a case study is carried out. This study calculates the carbon footprint of a cosmetic product of Li-iL GmbH. Thereby the whole life cycle of the powder bath Blaue Traube is analysed. To increase the reliability of the result a procedure, derived from the first part, is applied. Recommendations to enhance the product´s sustainability are then given to the decision-makers of the company. Finally the applied procedure for dealing with uncertainty in LCAs is evaluated. The aims of the thesis are to make a contribution to the understanding of uncertainty in life cycle assessment and to deal with it in a more consistent manner. As well, the carbon footprint of the powder bath shall be based on appropriate assumptions and shall consider occurring uncertainties. Basing on discussed problems, a method is introduced to avoid the problematic merging of variability uncertainty and data uncertainty to generate probability distributions. The introduced uncertainty importance analysis allows a consistent differentiation of these types of uncertainty. Furthermore an assessment of the used data of LCA studies is possible. The method is applied at a PCF study of the bath powder Blaue Traube of Li-iL GmbH. Thereby the analysis is carried out over the whole life cycle (cradle-to-grave) as well as cradle-to-gate. The study gives a practical example to the company determining the carbon footprint of products. In addition, it meets the requirements of ISO guidelines of publishing the study and comparing it with other products. Within the PCF study the introduced method allows a differentiation of variability uncertainty and knowledge uncertainty. The included uncertainty importance analysis supports the assessment of each aggregated unit process within the analysed product system. Finally this analysis can provide a basis to collect additional, more reliable or uncertain data for critical processes.

The following thesis deals with methods to increase the reliability of the results in life cycle assessment. The paper is divided into two parts. The first part points out the typologies and sources of uncertainty in LCA and summarises the existing methods dealing with it. The methods are critically discussed and pros and cons are contrasted. Within the second part a case study is carried out. This study calculates the carbon footprint of a cosmetic product of Li-iL GmbH. Thereby the whole life cycle of the powder bath Blaue Traube is analysed. To increase the reliability of the result a procedure, derived from the first part, is applied. Recommendations to enhance the product´s sustainability are then given to the decision-makers of the company. Finally the applied procedure for dealing with uncertainty in LCAs is evaluated. The aims of the thesis are to make a contribution to the understanding of uncertainty in life cycle assessment and to deal with it in a more consistent manner. As well, the carbon footprint of the powder bath shall be based on appropriate assumptions and shall consider occurring uncertainties. Basing on discussed problems, a method is introduced to avoid the problematic merging of variability uncertainty and data uncertainty to generate probability distributions. The introduced uncertainty importance analysis allows a consistent differentiation of these types of uncertainty. Furthermore an assessment of the used data of LCA studies is possible. The method is applied at a PCF study of the bath powder Blaue Traube of Li-iL GmbH. Thereby the analysis is carried out over the whole life cycle (cradle-to-grave) as well as cradle-to-gate. The study gives a practical example to the company determining the carbon footprint of products. In addition, it meets the requirements of ISO guidelines of publishing the study and comparing it with other products. Within the PCF study the introduced method allows a differentiation of variability uncertainty and knowledge uncertainty. The included uncertainty importance analysis supports the assessment of each aggregated unit process within the analysed product system. Finally this analysis can provide a basis to collect additional, more reliable or uncertain data for critical processes.

Alors que les principales activités d’un chef de projet s’effectuent à travers le processus de communication, on observe que de nombreux projets font l'objet de retards, dérives ou défauts de spécifications. Excès de mesures pour prévenir le risque ou gestion déficiente de la communication laissant trop de place à l’incertitude ? La Théorie de la Réduction de l’Incertitude développée par Berger et Calabrese (1975) dans le champ de la communication ne permet pas de totalement saisir comment un chef de projet dissipe l’incertitude existante entre les acteurs. En revisitant un projet opérationnel dans le cadre d’une recherche-action, nous nous employons à identifier comment incertitude et communication s’influencent et se structurent mutuellement. Nous avons convoqué l’approche constructiviste et la théorie de l’acteur-réseau de Callon et Latour pour accéder au sens de cette relation circulaire. Nous avançons les hypothèses selon lesquelles : - L’incertitude est un actant qui intervient dans la construction du réseau (au sens de Bruno Latour (2007) « ce qui est tracé par les traductions »).- Le processus de communication diffère suivant la nature de l’incertitude rencontrée ou ressentie. - Le processus de communication performe et scelle les relations en les rendant si coûteuses à défaire et si économiques à maintenir, qu’elles deviennent irréversibles. L’approche communicationnelle de l’incertitude mettra en évidence plusieurs caractéristiques de cet actant, comme sa capacité à peupler un « réseau de manques », la façon dont le réseau se hiérarchise pour faire sens, la description du processus d’estimation continue dont il fait l’objet (l’Incertus). Si nous concevons l’incertitude comme l’attribut d’un phénomène alors la « communication-incertitude » fabrique le sens en même temps qu’elle détermine la valeur de cet attribut. En positionnant l’incertitude comme un phénomène socialement construit, nous présentons un modèle constructiviste de « communication-incertitude » où l’observateur est un acteur intentionnel limité par des contraintes (Boudon, 2009) et proposons de distinguer la nature de l’incertitude suivant une typologie : l’incertitude de variabilité (inhérente à la variabilité des choses), l’incertitude épistémique ambiguë ou non (due à l’imperfection de nos connaissances) et l’incertitude d'échelle (en rapport avec l’imperfection de nos modèles de représentations). Dans ce mouvement vers l’irréversibilité, les processus de communication participent au remplacement des médiateurs (qui transforment, redonnent du sens, font faire des choses inattendues) par des intermédiaires (qui transmettent, transfèrent sans modifier) et les actants les plus réversibles sont évacués vers la périphérie du réseau. / While the main activities of a project manager are done through the communication process, it is observed that many projects are subject to delays, excesses or defects specifications. Excess of measurements to prevent the risk ? Defective management of the communication which leaves too much place to uncertainty ? The Theory of Uncertainty Reduction developed by Berger and Calabrese (1975) in the field of communication does not fully understand how a project dissipates the existing uncertainty between actors. By revisiting an operational project within the framework of action research, we strive to identify how uncertainty and communication influence and form themselves mutually. We used the constructivist approach and the actor-network theory of Callon and Latour to reach the meaning of this circular relationship. We advance the following hypotheses: - Uncertainty is a nonhuman actor involved in the construction of the network (as defined by Bruno Latour (2007) "which is drawn by translations"). - The communication process differs according to the nature of the uncertainty encountered or felt. - The communication process performs and seals relationships by making them so expensive to undo and so economic to maintain, that they become irreversible. The communicational approach of the uncertainty will highlight several features of this nonhuman actor, as its ability to populate a "network of gaps", the way the network ranks into a hierarchy to make sense, the description of the continuous process of estimation (the Incertus). If we conceive uncertainty as an attribute of a phenomenon, then "communication-uncertainty" makes sense at the same time it determines the value of this attribute. By positioning uncertainty as a socially constructed phenomenon, we present a constructivist model of "communication-uncertainty" where the observer is an intentional actor limited by constraints (Boudon, 2009). We propose to distinguish the nature of uncertainty following a typology: the variability uncertainty (inherent variability of things), the epistemic uncertainty ambiguous or not (due to the imperfection of our knowledge) and the scale uncertainty (in touch with the imperfection of our models of representations). In this movement towards irreversibility, the communication processes involved in replacing mediators (which transform, give meaning, make unexpected things do) by intermediaries (which transmit, transfer without changing) and the most reversible nonhumans actors are evacuated to the network edge.