Venture Capitals (VCs) are important providers of funds and competence to new technology-based firms (NTBFs) and VC-backed NTBFs are more likely to succeed than those that are not. Past researches into VC selection criteria suggested people-related criteria as being the most important out of all the criteria but as they were focused on ranking certain criteria against each other, they did not describe what they mean and how they are used and could have overlooked other criteria used that were not ranked. This research is addressing such gap by exploring people-related criteria used by VCs through collecting qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with Swedish VC investment managers. The results present 25 people-related criteria; what they mean, when they are used, and how they are assessed. Twelve of these criteria are new and have not been featured in past studies. In the screening stage, only a few people-related criteria are used while all but one people-related criteria identified are used in the assessment stage. The criteria most commonly used in the evaluation stage are new to this study. Themes arising from results are also discussed, such as coachable entrepreneurs as positive criterion and technical-driven NTBF teams as negative criterion. This research extends the knowledge in the area of entrepreneurship studies and provides practical implications for NTBFs seeking to raise funds.

Combining agency theory and the resource-dependence perspective as well as signalling theory, this thesis examines the role venture capitalists (VCs) and founders play with respect to both structural board characteristics and board capital in terms of experience and prestige and whether these are linked to performance. It claims that VCs and founders shape the governance system of the firms going public and are influential in the professionalisation of the ventures especially in terms of human and social capital of its board of directors. It also argues that the board of directors represents a signal of firm quality in the initial public offering (IPO) market and should thus be linked to performance. Similarly, according to the venture capital certification hypothesis, being funded by VCs signals a firm¿s quality and potential. In order to assess these claims, this thesis employs a unique sample of matched venturecapital- backed and non-venture-capital-backed entrepreneurial IPOs that floated either on the London Stock Exchange¿s Official List or the Alternative Investment Market (AIM). Extending previous research this thesis employs more fine-grained measures and introduces new conceptually relevant variables in the analysis. The findings indicate that VCs and founders are influential in shaping corporate governance of IPO-stage ventures both from an agency and resource-provision perspective. Findings from the examination of governance and professionalisation characteristics with respect to IPO short-run performance (underpricing) indicate that it may the involvement of prestigious auditors that signal firm quality while a founder bias discount seems to exist. While evidence is found that VC involvement (and to a lesser extent director/board characteristics) is related to post-IPO market performance, this seems to depend on the time period following the IPO examined, whereas auditor prestige shows a positive association in all of these time periods. / Bradford University School of Management

Entrepreneurs who need funding often turn to the venture capital industry. In Sweden, women entrepreneurs represent a third of the total number of entrepreneurs. Meanwhile, women-owned businesses only raise one percent of the total venture capital in Sweden. Previous research has attempted to explain why male entrepreneurs raise more venture capital than women entrepreneurs, however, more research is needed to understand the circumstances for success. This leads to the study’s aim which is to create an understanding of what makes women entrepreneurs successful when raising venture capital, and how they do it, and the research questions, which are How do drivers enable women entrepreneurs to raise venture capital? How do women entrepreneurs overcome the different challenges that they meet when raising venture capital? To reach the study’s aim and answer the research questions a qualitative method was used. Semi-structured interviews with ten respondents, who were women entrepreneurs who had raised venture capital, were conducted. This study contributes new perspectives to the already existing field of entrepreneurship and venture capital, by providing a new framework showing how women entrepreneurs overcome challenges and use drivers for raising venture capital successfully. The results show how the respondents use their entrepreneurial, risk-prone, and highly self-confident personality in their relationship with investors and other entrepreneurs, to successfully raise venture capital. The findings in this study suggest that governmental agencies should provide more network possibilities with venture capitalist firms and investors for women entrepreneurs.

No description available.

No description available.

Today’s the concept of social entrepreneurship; social capital and venture capital are defined by several experts. This case study sets out to gain an understanding of the relation between social capital and venture capital in Uppstart Malmö, a new social entrepreneurial organization which focuses on creating job opportunities in the city of Malmö, where unemployment rate is comparatively high. Analyzing empirical data from interview and other documentation, the results show that Uppstart Malmö is concentrating in the social dimension of enterprise and emphasizing on social capital more than venture capital. While by some means, the foundation is going toward achieving social goal. Uppstart Malmö is not yet an ideal model for completely social organization and commercial signs can be seen in their plans.

This study investigates which mechanisms that needs to be improved in order to facilitate more early stage venture capital (VC) investments on emerging markets. For this purpose a qualitative case study of the VC scene in Nairobi, Kenya was performed. The study has a 'best-practice' viewpoint aiming to provide insights to venture capitalists on how to operate within the Kenyan startup scene. The empirical findings of the case study indicate that the region is still an untapped market for VC investments, partly as a result of an equity gap towards early stage startups. The success stories of mobile money transfer startup M-Pesa and information crowdsourcing startup Ushahidi ignited the Nairobi startup scene in 2008 and enabled the city to become the startup hub of East Africa. M-Pesa has not only demonstrated that it is possible to develop highly successful tech companies but also created a payment infrastructure that facilitates for future startups. In light of this, Kenya presents an interesting case study, as the market poses opportunities as well as challenges. Our result indicates that the present equity gap hampers early stage VC and is derived from a lack of experience and knowledge from investor’s and entrepreneurs. In conclusion, the entire "ecosystem" needs to be aligned in order to diminish the gap; VC’s must adopt a more hands on approach in their investment strategy, entrepreneurs need a global mindset, development financial institutions (DFIs) and private equity (PE) funds should act more catalytic in early stage rounds and governmental entities should focus on enhancing entrepreneurial education and the overall economic performance. These alignments will in the long run lead to a more effective startup and VC scene and should be applicable on similar markets. However, specific adjustments for the subject market should always be considered before implemented. / Denna studie undersöker vilka mekanismer som behöver förbättras på tillväxtmarknader i syfte att attrahera tidigt riskkapital. Arbetet har utförts genom en kvalitativ studie över riskkapitalscenen i Nairobi, Kenya. Studien syftar till att beskriva god praxis samt underlätta och vägleda riskkapitalister inom den Kenyanska startup-scenen. En litteraturstudie och granskning av den Kenyanska marknaden indikerar att det finns investeringsmöjligheter inom startup-scenen. Möjligheterna grundas i en bristande konkurrenssituation, där få aktörer erbjuder finansiering till startups i uppstartsfas. Startup-scenen i Kenya är förhållandevis ung men framgångarna för M-Pesa och Ushahidi har bidragit till ett ökat intresse för scenen i Kenya. M-Pesa bevisade inte bara att det går att starta högteknologiska startups i Kenya utan utvecklade även en infrastruktur för mobilbetalningar som i sin tur främjar företagande. Med hänsyn till detta utgör Kenya en intressant fallstudie, då marknaden är kantad av både möjligheter och utmaningar. Resultaten indikerar att bristen på kapital för startups härstammar från en brist av erfarenhet och kunskap från investerare och entreprenörer. Slutsatsen är att hela "ekosystemet" behöver förändras för att minska bristen på kapital; riskkapitalister bör understödja portföljbolag med handledning, lokala entreprenörer behöver tänka mer globalt, Development Finance Institutions (DFI) och Private Equity (PE) firmor bör agera mer katalytiskt och staten bör fokusera på att erbjuda och förbättra utbildning inom entreprenörskap. Dessa anpassningar kommer med tiden leda till en mer effektiv startup och riskkapitalscen. Lärdomar och slutsatser från studien bör med framgång kunna användas på andra tillväxtmarknader, men bör anpassas utefter dess lokala förutsättningar.

This study has theoretical, substantive, and methodological objectives following Brinberg and McGrath (1985). First, the resource-based view of the firm provides a context to support relationships determined from theory in Sociology, Finance and Entrepreneurshp. Using these interdisciplinary theories, the expected contributions of National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) member venture capital firm networks' human-based factors to the performance of initial public offerings are examined. Second, the substantive domain-venture capital-lacks articulation and quantification regarding the impact of venture capital firms on the start-up firms they support, which in this study is identified as IPO performance. Third, methodologically, the operationalization of organizational-related capital is proposed. The independent variables (human-based factors) include reputational capital, cumulative experience, social capital, and organizational-related capital. Organizational-related capital is a construct representing a firm's strategy that incorporates preferences specific to the venture capital industry, namely financing stage preference, industry relatedness, and geographic proximity. Venture capital firm networks are assessed at the syndicate and constellation levels (within and between industries) and bounded by membership in the National Venture Capital Association. Abnormal IPO stock price performance (the dependent variable) is assessed as the new issue's stock price benchmarked to the NASDAQ index and compounded over 21-day periods for up to 126 consecutive days after offering. Control variables were gleaned from economic-based theories found in the finance literature. Positive relationships were hypothesized between the independent variables and the dependent variable. Data constraints limited the number of observations examined, and the selection of IPOs investigated displayed little variance. Thus, explaining additional abnormal performance variance in IPOs backed by NVCA-member venture capital firms above and beyond that controlled for by economic-based theory was not fruitful. Although this study's findings were not statistically significant, many insights were generated that may positively influence future research in this area. The quest to better understand venture capital firms' contributions to entrepreneurial firms and the impact they have on publicly traded stocks remains meaningful. / Ph. D.

Prior research indicates that management forecast strategies affect investors' perceptions of management, which, in turn, influence investors' judgments about the firm. The current study hypothesizes and demonstrates that decisions about the completeness and form of management's forecast disclosure affect venture capitalists' (VCs) investment screening judgments. In an experiment, 53 experienced VCs indicate whether they would recommend conducting due diligence on a new venture. I manipulate the completeness (inclusion vs. omission of quantitative data about the components of earnings) and form (point vs. range forecast values) of management's financial forecasts in a 2 X 2 between-subjects design. When management is more (less) complete in its forecast disclosure, participants make more (less) favorable investment screening judgments. Additionally, when managers provide less complete disclosures, the use of point rather than range forecasts leads to particularly unfavorable screening judgments, whereas when managers provide more complete disclosures, the use of point rather than range forecasts leads to particularly favorable screening judgments. Taken together, these results indicate that the completeness of forecast disclosure increases the favorability of screening judgments and decisions about the form of financial forecasts can offset some of the adverse consequences of less complete disclosure. / Ph. D.

Thesis advisor: Thomas J. Chemmanur / My dissertation consists of three chapters. In the first chapter, I study the impact of a place-based tax credit policy, the Opportunity Zone program created under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, on local private investments and entrepreneurship. Using a difference-in-differences approach and comparing census tracts designated as Opportunity Zones and other eligible but non-designated tracts, I find that the policy has drawn significantly more private investments to economically distressed areas. Surprisingly, however, these private investments have led to decreases in local new business registration. The decrease in entrepreneurship was mainly in the non-tradable sector, which is more sensitive to local conditions than the tradable or construction sector. Further robustness tests suggest that the above results are causal. I provide one explanation for the above findings that more private investments went to existing and older firms in Opportunity Zones, discouraging potential entrepreneurs from competing with the better-financed firms locally. In the second chapter, I examine how changes in investor protection regulations affect local entrepreneurial activity, relying on the heterogeneous impact of a 2011 SEC regulation change on the definition of accredited investors across U.S. cities. Using a difference-in-differences approach, I show that cities more affected by the regulation change experienced a significantly larger decrease in local angel financing, entrepreneurial activity, innovation output, employment, and sales. I find that small business loans and second-lien mortgages became entrepreneurs’ partial substitutes for angel investment. My cost-benefit analysis suggests that the costs of protecting angel investors through the 2011 regulation change outweigh its benefits. In the third chapter, which is co-authored with Thomas Chemmanur and Harshit Rajaiya, we address three important research questions by using a large sample of angel and venture capital (VC) financing data from the Crunchbase and VentureXpert databases and private firm data from the NETS database. First, we analyze the relative extent of value addition by angels versus VCs to startup firms. We show that startups financed by angels rather than VCs are associated with a lower likelihood of successful exit (IPO or acquisition), lower sales and employment growth, lower quantity and quality of innovation, and lower net inflow of high-quality inventors. We disentangle selection and monitoring effects using instrumental variable (IV) and switching regression analyses and show that our baseline results are causal. Second, we investigate the complementarity versus substitution relationship between angel and VC financing. We find that a firm that received a larger fraction of VC or angel financing in the first financing round is likely to receive a larger fraction of the same type of financing in a subsequent round; however, when we include other non-VC financing sources such as accelerators and government grants into the analysis, a firm that received angel (rather than other non-VC) financing in the first round is also more likely to receive VC financing in a subsequent round. Third, we analyze how the financing sequence (order of investments by angels and VCs across rounds) of startup firms is related to their successful exit probability. We find that firms that received primarily VC financing in the first round and continued to receive VC financing in subsequent rounds (VC-VC) or those that received primarily angel financing in the first round and received VC financing in subsequent rounds (Angel-VC) have a higher chance of successful exit compared to those with other financing sequences (VC-Angel or Angel-Angel). / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2022. / Submitted to: Boston College. Carroll School of Management. / Discipline: Finance.