This study determined whether a pre-operative cardiac “pre-habilitation” (Prehab) program improves the health of elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients to a greater extent than standard care (StanC). Seventeen elective CABG patients were randomized to StanC (n= 9) or Prehab (n= 8) at Baseline and were followed at 1-2 weeks pre-operatively (Preop) and Three months post-operatively. Functional walking ability was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and 5-meter Gait Speed Test. Baseline data was not different between groups. Patients in StanC did not improve 6MWT scores; whereas Prehab patients improved 6MWT distance by 35% and 39% at Preop and Three months post-operatively, respectively (p<0.05). Gait speed scores were 25% and 27% lower in Prehab patients at Preop and Three months post-operatively, respectively, as compared to StanC (p<0.05). These data suggest that Prehab is an attractive intervention for enhancing functional walking ability before and after elective CABG surgery.

Hintergrund: Der Artikel berichtet Ergebnisse einer kontrollierten Studie zu Effekten einer Minimalintervention in der Wartezeit auf Beginn einer ambulanten Psychotherapie. Methoden: 75 Personen, die sich in einer universitären Verhaltenstherapieambulanz aufgrund von Angst- oder depressiven Störungen anmeldeten, wurden parallelisiert nach Alter, Geschlecht und Diagnose zwei Bedingungen zugeordnet. Die Versuchsgruppe (VG) erhielt während der Wartezeit auf den Behandlungsplatz bibliotherapeutische Materialien; die Kontrollgruppe (KG) wartete ohne Intervention. Vor und nach der Wartezeit wurden Einstellungen und Erwartungen zur Behandlung, nach der Wartezeit zusätzlich die Zufriedenheit mit der behandelnden Einrichtung sowie das Hilfesuchverhalten während der Wartezeit erhoben. Ergebnisse: Es konnten keine global positiven Effekte der Wartezeitintervention nachgewiesen werden. Es fanden sich lediglich zwei grundlegende Gruppenunterschiede: Die Teilnehmer der VG beurteilten sich subjektiv als besser vorbereitet auf Wartezeit und Therapie, und ihre Angst vor Stigmatisierung hatte sich signifikant reduziert. Weiterführende Analysen in einzelnen Patientengruppen ergaben zusätzlich Hinweise darauf, dass Angstpatienten und Patienten mit geringem Vorwissen mehr von der Maßnahme profitierten; allerdings traten bei einigen Patienten mit depressiven Störungen auch negative Effekte durch die Minimalintervention auf. Schlussfolgerung: Die Befunde erlauben eine differenziertere Bewertung der Frage, ob und in welcher Form unspezifische minimale Interventionen während der Wartezeit auf Psychotherapie nutzbringend sind. Weiterführende Studien sollten die differenzielle Wirksamkeit spezifischerer Maßnahmen in ausgewählten Patientengruppen prüfen. / The article describes a controlled study that explores effects of a minimal intervention for outpatients waiting for their behavior therapy to start. Methods: Patients applying for psychotherapy for anxiety disorders or depression at an outpatient psychotherapy unit, matched for age, sex and diagnosis, were assigned to either a waiting list as usual (WL) or to an active waiting group (AW) that received bibliotherapeutic materials. Attitudes towards treatment and therapy expectations were assessed before and after waiting time; consumer satisfaction and help-seeking behavior during the waiting time were assessed post waiting. Results: After the waiting time, the two groups differed only in their fear of stigmatization, which had significantly declined in the AW group, and in the subjective preparedness for waiting list and treatment. Additional analyses regarding different patient groups suggested that especially patients with anxiety disorders and patients with little knowledge about psychotherapy benefited from the intervention; on the other hand, some patients with depressive disorders reported negative effects due to the minimal intervention. Conclusions: Findings point out the need for a more sophisticated evaluation of minimal interventions for patients waiting for psychotherapy. Further studies should clarify the differential effectiveness of custom-tailored interventions addressing specific patient populations. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

This study determined whether a pre-operative cardiac “pre-habilitation” (Prehab) program improves the health of elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients to a greater extent than standard care (StanC). Seventeen elective CABG patients were randomized to StanC (n= 9) or Prehab (n= 8) at Baseline and were followed at 1-2 weeks pre-operatively (Preop) and Three months post-operatively. Functional walking ability was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and 5-meter Gait Speed Test. Baseline data was not different between groups. Patients in StanC did not improve 6MWT scores; whereas Prehab patients improved 6MWT distance by 35% and 39% at Preop and Three months post-operatively, respectively (p<0.05). Gait speed scores were 25% and 27% lower in Prehab patients at Preop and Three months post-operatively, respectively, as compared to StanC (p<0.05). These data suggest that Prehab is an attractive intervention for enhancing functional walking ability before and after elective CABG surgery.

A doença hepática terminal reduz de forma significativa a qualidade de vida de pacientes e com o transplante do órgão é possível melhorar as condições de saúde. A sexualidade é aspecto central do ser humano durante todo o ciclo vital. É área complexa do comportamento humano, assim a sexualidade de candidatos e receptores de transplante de fígado não deve ser menosprezada. O presente estudo teve como objetivo analisar as evidências disponíveis na literatura sobre as alterações na sexualidade de candidatos e receptores de transplante de fígado. Trata-se de revisão integrativa da literatura: as bases de dados selecionadas para a busca dos estudos primários foram PubMed, CINAHL e LILACS. Os 16 estudos primários incluídos na revisão foram agrupados em três categorias: (1) sexualidade feminina (n=5); (2) sexualidade masculina (n=5) e; (3) sexualidade masculina e feminina (n=6). Na categoria 1, os principais temas de investigação foram contracepção, gravidez, disfunção sexual, presença de sintomas ginecológicos e doença sexualmente transmissível. Na categoria 2, o foco principal dos estudos primários agrupados foi a disfunção erétil e investigou-se também desejo/satisfação sexual e as consequências de homens que tiveram filhos, em regime imunossupressor com ácido mycofenólico. Na categoria 3, a avaliação da função sexual foi o principal tema abordado nas pesquisas analisadas. A sexualidade é problemática desafiadora, revestida por tabus e preconceitos, vivenciada de forma diferente pelos indivíduos. Assim, os pacientes podem apresentar dificuldades em relatar para os profissionais da saúde seus problemas, acarretando atraso do diagnóstico e tratamento, prolongando a sensação de desconforto e sentimento de angústia. A dificuldade em abordar sobre sexualidade também ocorre por parte dos profissionais de saúde que não recebem capacitação adequada. O conhecimento sobre as dúvidas e problemas vivenciados pelos candidatos e receptores de transplante de fígado pode proporcionar a implementação de intervenções direcionadas para prevenção, redução ou controle das complicações no período pré e pós-transplante. O presente estudo forneceu subsídios para encorajar os profissionais de saúde a incorporar a sexualidade na rotina de atendimento destes pacientes, bem como indicou lacunas no conhecimento para a condução de novas pesquisas com o propósito de implementar intervenções na pratica clínica para prevenir, minimizar e/ou controlar as alterações relacionadas à sexualidade do paciente, contribuindo para a melhoria da assistência de enfermagem e, consequentemente, para o sucesso do tratamento / The end-stage liver disease significantly reduces the quality of life of patients. However, with organ transplantation it is possible to improve health conditions. Sexuality is a central aspect of the human being throughout the life cycle. It is a complex area of the human behavior and therefore the sexuality of liver transplant candidates and recipients should not be overlooked. The present study aimed to analyze the evidence available in the literature on the changes in the sexuality of candidates and recipients of liver transplant. This is an integrative literature review, and the databases selected for the search of the primary studies were PubMed, CINAHL and LILACS. The 16 primary studies included in the review were grouped into three categories: (1) female sexuality (n = 5), (2) male sexuality (n = 5) and (3) male and female sexuality (n = 6). In category 1, the main research topics were contraception, pregnancy, sexual dysfunction, presence of gynecological symptoms and sexually transmitted disease. In category 2, the focus of the primary studies grouped was erectile dysfunction, it was also investigated the sexual desire/satisfaction, and the consequences of men who had children under immunosuppressive regimen with mycophenolic acid. In category 3, the evaluation of sexual function was the main topic addressed in the studies analyzed. Sexuality is a challenging problem, enrobed with taboos and prejudices, and experienced differently by individuals. Thus, patients may present difficulties in reporting their problems to health professionals, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment, prolonging feelings of discomfort and distress. The difficulty in addressing sexuality also occurs on the part of health professionals who do not receive adequate training. Knowledge about the doubts and problems experienced by candidates and recipients of liver transplant can facilitate the implementation of interventions aimed at prevention, reduction or control of complications in the pre- and post-transplantation period. The present study provided subsidies to encourage health professionals to incorporate sexuality in the care routine of these patients, it also indicated gaps in knowledge for the conduct of new research with the purpose of implementing interventions in clinical practice to prevent, minimize and/or to control the changes related to the patient\'s sexuality, contributing to the improvement of nursing care and, consequently, to the success of the treatment

Hintergrund: Der Artikel berichtet Ergebnisse einer kontrollierten Studie zu Effekten einer Minimalintervention in der Wartezeit auf Beginn einer ambulanten Psychotherapie. Methoden: 75 Personen, die sich in einer universitären Verhaltenstherapieambulanz aufgrund von Angst- oder depressiven Störungen anmeldeten, wurden parallelisiert nach Alter, Geschlecht und Diagnose zwei Bedingungen zugeordnet. Die Versuchsgruppe (VG) erhielt während der Wartezeit auf den Behandlungsplatz bibliotherapeutische Materialien; die Kontrollgruppe (KG) wartete ohne Intervention. Vor und nach der Wartezeit wurden Einstellungen und Erwartungen zur Behandlung, nach der Wartezeit zusätzlich die Zufriedenheit mit der behandelnden Einrichtung sowie das Hilfesuchverhalten während der Wartezeit erhoben. Ergebnisse: Es konnten keine global positiven Effekte der Wartezeitintervention nachgewiesen werden. Es fanden sich lediglich zwei grundlegende Gruppenunterschiede: Die Teilnehmer der VG beurteilten sich subjektiv als besser vorbereitet auf Wartezeit und Therapie, und ihre Angst vor Stigmatisierung hatte sich signifikant reduziert. Weiterführende Analysen in einzelnen Patientengruppen ergaben zusätzlich Hinweise darauf, dass Angstpatienten und Patienten mit geringem Vorwissen mehr von der Maßnahme profitierten; allerdings traten bei einigen Patienten mit depressiven Störungen auch negative Effekte durch die Minimalintervention auf. Schlussfolgerung: Die Befunde erlauben eine differenziertere Bewertung der Frage, ob und in welcher Form unspezifische minimale Interventionen während der Wartezeit auf Psychotherapie nutzbringend sind. Weiterführende Studien sollten die differenzielle Wirksamkeit spezifischerer Maßnahmen in ausgewählten Patientengruppen prüfen. / The article describes a controlled study that explores effects of a minimal intervention for outpatients waiting for their behavior therapy to start. Methods: Patients applying for psychotherapy for anxiety disorders or depression at an outpatient psychotherapy unit, matched for age, sex and diagnosis, were assigned to either a waiting list as usual (WL) or to an active waiting group (AW) that received bibliotherapeutic materials. Attitudes towards treatment and therapy expectations were assessed before and after waiting time; consumer satisfaction and help-seeking behavior during the waiting time were assessed post waiting. Results: After the waiting time, the two groups differed only in their fear of stigmatization, which had significantly declined in the AW group, and in the subjective preparedness for waiting list and treatment. Additional analyses regarding different patient groups suggested that especially patients with anxiety disorders and patients with little knowledge about psychotherapy benefited from the intervention; on the other hand, some patients with depressive disorders reported negative effects due to the minimal intervention. Conclusions: Findings point out the need for a more sophisticated evaluation of minimal interventions for patients waiting for psychotherapy. Further studies should clarify the differential effectiveness of custom-tailored interventions addressing specific patient populations. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

INTRODUÇÃO: O transplante hepático (TxH) vem mudando o curso de doenças graves, incapacitantes e potencialmente fatais, se tornando o tratamento de escolha quando há falência do órgão. OBJETIVO: Comparar as taxas de TxH, exclusão e sobrevida entre candidatos com cirrose descompensada (CIR), situações especiais (SPE) e carcinoma hepatocelular (HCC). MÉTODOS:Foram realizados dois estudos em 358 pacientes: uma coorte retrospectiva (agosto de 2008 - julho de 2009, incluindo 189 pacientes listados) e uma prospectiva (de novembro de 2012 a maio de 2014, com um período de acompanhamento até novembro de 2015, incluindo 169 candidatos a transplante hepático, comparando CIR, HCC e SPE. Foram avaliadas as seguintes variáveis: K-in (taxas de entrada da lista de espera: K-1in se CIR, K-2in se HCC e K-3in se SPE); K-out (taxa de TxH); K-1out (drop out no grupo CIR); K-2out (drop out no grupo HCC) e K-3out(drop out no grupo SPE). RESULTADOS: Na coorte retrospectiva, 112 casos (59,3%) tinham CIR, 63 (33,3%) com HCC e 14 (7,4%) se enquadraram em SPE. Os tempos médios de avaliação até a inscrição em lista para TxH foram 194 dias (IC 95% 152-236), 36 dias (IC95% 21-50) e 98 dias (IC95% 0-308) para CIR, HCC e SPE, respectivamente (P <0,001). Dos 86 pacientes transplantados (K-out = 45,5%), 31 tinham CIR (K-1in = 27,7%), 44 HCC (K-2in = 69,8%) e 11 SPE (K-3in = 88,6%) (P <0,001). As taxas de drop out foram maiores em CIR (K-1out = 64,3%, K-2out = 30,2%, K-3out = 21,4%, P <0,001). O hazar ratio (HR) para TxH foi 85% (IC95% 1,35-2,55) maior em HCC do que CIR. Na coorte prospectiva, 110 dos 167 pacientes avaliados foram listados (K-in = 65,9%). Os tempos médios de avaliação foram de 783 dias (IC95% 330-1236), 52 dias (IC95% 17-87) e 184 dias (IC95% 19-349) para CIR, HCC e SPE, respectivamente (P <0,001). Em relação ao TxH, o K1-in foi 21,7%, K2-in, 76,4% e K3-in, 92,3 % (P <0,001). K-out foi 57,3% (63/110), K1-out = 50%, K2-out = 21,1% e K3-out = 3,84% (P <0,001). HR para TxH foi 329% superior em HCC do que CIR (HR = 4,29; IC95%: 2,74-6,72). CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, os pacientes com cirrose descompensada tiveram um tempo de avaliação para transplante significativamente maior que os outros grupos avaliados, bem como maior taxa de drop out em lista. A taxa de transplante foi significativamente menor nos pacientes com cirrose descompensada, demonstrando que as políticas de alocação de órgãos merecem ser revistas. / INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation (LT) has been changing the course of serious, incapacitating and potentially fatal diseases becoming the treatment of choice when there is organ failure. AIM: To compare transplant, delisting, and survival rates between candidates with decompensated cirrhosis (CIR), special conditions (SPE), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We carried out two studies with 358 patientes: a retrospective one (Aug 2008-Jul 2009, including 189 enlisted patients) and another prospective (Nov 2012-May 2014, with a follow-up period up to Nov 2015, including 169 LT candidates), comparing CIR, HCC, and SPE. The following variables were assessed: K-in (rates of waitlist entry – K-1in if CIR, K-2in if HCC, and K-3in if SPE); K-out (rate of LT); K-1out (drop-out in CIR); K-2out (drop-out in HCC); and K-3 out (drop-out in SPE). RESULTS: In the retrospective study, 112 cases (59.3%) were due to CIR, 63 (33.3%) to HCC, and 14 (7.4%) to SPE. The average time from selection to enlisting was 194 days (CI95% 152-236), 36 days (CI95% 21-50), and 98 days (CI95% 0-308) for CIR, HCC, and SPE, respectively (P<0.001). Of the 86 transplanted patients (K-out = 45.5%), 31 had CIR (K-1in = 27.7%), 44 HCC (K-2in = 69.8%), and 11 SPE (K-3in = 88.6%) (P<0.001). Drop-out rates were higher in CIR (K-1out = 64.3%, K-2out = 30.2%, K-3out = 21.4%, P<0.001). The hazar ratio (HR) for LT was 85% (CI95% 1.35-2.55) higher in HCC than CIR. In the prospective study, 110 out of 167 evaluated patients were enlisted (K-in = 65.9%). The average time from selection to enlisting was 783 days (CI95% 330-1236), 52 days (CI95% 17-87), and 184 days (CI95% 19-349) for CIR, HCC, and SPE, respectively (P<0.001). Regarding LT, K1-in was 21.7%, K2-in, 76.4%, and K3-in, 92.3% (P<0.001). K-out was 57.3% (63/110), K1-out = 50%, K2-out = 21.1%, and K3-out = 3.84% (P<0.001). HR for LT was 329% times higher in HCC than CIR (HR = 4.29; CI95% 2.74–6.72).CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a time evaluation for transplantation significantly higher than other evaluated groups as well as a higher rate of waiting list drop out. Transplant rate was significantly lower in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, demonstrating that organ allocation policies deserve to be reviewed.

<p>Lengthy waiting times have been a problem in Swedish health services for many years. In 1992, Sweden implemented a national maximum waiting-time guarantee (MWG) through an agreement between the Swedish Government and the Federation of Swedish County Councils. The “guarantee” assured patients that the waiting time between the decision-to-treat and the treatment itself would not exceed three months. The national MWG covered twelve different treatments/interventions and remained in force for five years. This dissertation describes the genesis of the MWG, its implementation, and its effects.</p><p>Four papers serve as a foundation for the dissertation. Paper I describes how the guarantee was implemented during the first two years. Paper II studies the impact that the MWG had on cataract surgery. Paper III uses the results of two questionnaire surveys of department heads to explain why the MWG, although successfully launched, became increasingly difficult to maintain. Paper IV analyses data from the national cataract register to determine how production and waiting times in cataract surgery were affected by termination of the MWG.</p><p>This dissertation confirms that waiting time for health care is a complex phenomenon resulting from multiple causes. “Guarantees” are of particular interest because they define what constitutes too long in reference to waiting times. Beyond that, they are only a framework for developing a plan of action. The positive effects of the MWG were transient and based on rationalisation, introduction of new technology, and stricter prioritisation. The MWG contributed towards empowering patients and slowing the expansion of treatment indications, but it was unsuccessful in levelling out the wide regional variations in surgical rates.</p>

Lengthy waiting times have been a problem in Swedish health services for many years. In 1992, Sweden implemented a national maximum waiting-time guarantee (MWG) through an agreement between the Swedish Government and the Federation of Swedish County Councils. The “guarantee” assured patients that the waiting time between the decision-to-treat and the treatment itself would not exceed three months. The national MWG covered twelve different treatments/interventions and remained in force for five years. This dissertation describes the genesis of the MWG, its implementation, and its effects. Four papers serve as a foundation for the dissertation. Paper I describes how the guarantee was implemented during the first two years. Paper II studies the impact that the MWG had on cataract surgery. Paper III uses the results of two questionnaire surveys of department heads to explain why the MWG, although successfully launched, became increasingly difficult to maintain. Paper IV analyses data from the national cataract register to determine how production and waiting times in cataract surgery were affected by termination of the MWG. This dissertation confirms that waiting time for health care is a complex phenomenon resulting from multiple causes. “Guarantees” are of particular interest because they define what constitutes too long in reference to waiting times. Beyond that, they are only a framework for developing a plan of action. The positive effects of the MWG were transient and based on rationalisation, introduction of new technology, and stricter prioritisation. The MWG contributed towards empowering patients and slowing the expansion of treatment indications, but it was unsuccessful in levelling out the wide regional variations in surgical rates.

INTRODUÇÃO: O transplante hepático (TxH) vem mudando o curso de doenças graves, incapacitantes e potencialmente fatais, se tornando o tratamento de escolha quando há falência do órgão. OBJETIVO: Comparar as taxas de TxH, exclusão e sobrevida entre candidatos com cirrose descompensada (CIR), situações especiais (SPE) e carcinoma hepatocelular (HCC). MÉTODOS:Foram realizados dois estudos em 358 pacientes: uma coorte retrospectiva (agosto de 2008 - julho de 2009, incluindo 189 pacientes listados) e uma prospectiva (de novembro de 2012 a maio de 2014, com um período de acompanhamento até novembro de 2015, incluindo 169 candidatos a transplante hepático, comparando CIR, HCC e SPE. Foram avaliadas as seguintes variáveis: K-in (taxas de entrada da lista de espera: K-1in se CIR, K-2in se HCC e K-3in se SPE); K-out (taxa de TxH); K-1out (drop out no grupo CIR); K-2out (drop out no grupo HCC) e K-3out(drop out no grupo SPE). RESULTADOS: Na coorte retrospectiva, 112 casos (59,3%) tinham CIR, 63 (33,3%) com HCC e 14 (7,4%) se enquadraram em SPE. Os tempos médios de avaliação até a inscrição em lista para TxH foram 194 dias (IC 95% 152-236), 36 dias (IC95% 21-50) e 98 dias (IC95% 0-308) para CIR, HCC e SPE, respectivamente (P <0,001). Dos 86 pacientes transplantados (K-out = 45,5%), 31 tinham CIR (K-1in = 27,7%), 44 HCC (K-2in = 69,8%) e 11 SPE (K-3in = 88,6%) (P <0,001). As taxas de drop out foram maiores em CIR (K-1out = 64,3%, K-2out = 30,2%, K-3out = 21,4%, P <0,001). O hazar ratio (HR) para TxH foi 85% (IC95% 1,35-2,55) maior em HCC do que CIR. Na coorte prospectiva, 110 dos 167 pacientes avaliados foram listados (K-in = 65,9%). Os tempos médios de avaliação foram de 783 dias (IC95% 330-1236), 52 dias (IC95% 17-87) e 184 dias (IC95% 19-349) para CIR, HCC e SPE, respectivamente (P <0,001). Em relação ao TxH, o K1-in foi 21,7%, K2-in, 76,4% e K3-in, 92,3 % (P <0,001). K-out foi 57,3% (63/110), K1-out = 50%, K2-out = 21,1% e K3-out = 3,84% (P <0,001). HR para TxH foi 329% superior em HCC do que CIR (HR = 4,29; IC95%: 2,74-6,72). CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, os pacientes com cirrose descompensada tiveram um tempo de avaliação para transplante significativamente maior que os outros grupos avaliados, bem como maior taxa de drop out em lista. A taxa de transplante foi significativamente menor nos pacientes com cirrose descompensada, demonstrando que as políticas de alocação de órgãos merecem ser revistas. / INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation (LT) has been changing the course of serious, incapacitating and potentially fatal diseases becoming the treatment of choice when there is organ failure. AIM: To compare transplant, delisting, and survival rates between candidates with decompensated cirrhosis (CIR), special conditions (SPE), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We carried out two studies with 358 patientes: a retrospective one (Aug 2008-Jul 2009, including 189 enlisted patients) and another prospective (Nov 2012-May 2014, with a follow-up period up to Nov 2015, including 169 LT candidates), comparing CIR, HCC, and SPE. The following variables were assessed: K-in (rates of waitlist entry – K-1in if CIR, K-2in if HCC, and K-3in if SPE); K-out (rate of LT); K-1out (drop-out in CIR); K-2out (drop-out in HCC); and K-3 out (drop-out in SPE). RESULTS: In the retrospective study, 112 cases (59.3%) were due to CIR, 63 (33.3%) to HCC, and 14 (7.4%) to SPE. The average time from selection to enlisting was 194 days (CI95% 152-236), 36 days (CI95% 21-50), and 98 days (CI95% 0-308) for CIR, HCC, and SPE, respectively (P<0.001). Of the 86 transplanted patients (K-out = 45.5%), 31 had CIR (K-1in = 27.7%), 44 HCC (K-2in = 69.8%), and 11 SPE (K-3in = 88.6%) (P<0.001). Drop-out rates were higher in CIR (K-1out = 64.3%, K-2out = 30.2%, K-3out = 21.4%, P<0.001). The hazar ratio (HR) for LT was 85% (CI95% 1.35-2.55) higher in HCC than CIR. In the prospective study, 110 out of 167 evaluated patients were enlisted (K-in = 65.9%). The average time from selection to enlisting was 783 days (CI95% 330-1236), 52 days (CI95% 17-87), and 184 days (CI95% 19-349) for CIR, HCC, and SPE, respectively (P<0.001). Regarding LT, K1-in was 21.7%, K2-in, 76.4%, and K3-in, 92.3% (P<0.001). K-out was 57.3% (63/110), K1-out = 50%, K2-out = 21.1%, and K3-out = 3.84% (P<0.001). HR for LT was 329% times higher in HCC than CIR (HR = 4.29; CI95% 2.74–6.72).CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a time evaluation for transplantation significantly higher than other evaluated groups as well as a higher rate of waiting list drop out. Transplant rate was significantly lower in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, demonstrating that organ allocation policies deserve to be reviewed.

INTRODUÇÃO: O transplante hepático (TxH) vem mudando o curso de doenças graves, incapacitantes e potencialmente fatais, se tornando o tratamento de escolha quando há falência do órgão. OBJETIVO: Comparar as taxas de TxH, exclusão e sobrevida entre candidatos com cirrose descompensada (CIR), situações especiais (SPE) e carcinoma hepatocelular (HCC). MÉTODOS:Foram realizados dois estudos em 358 pacientes: uma coorte retrospectiva (agosto de 2008 - julho de 2009, incluindo 189 pacientes listados) e uma prospectiva (de novembro de 2012 a maio de 2014, com um período de acompanhamento até novembro de 2015, incluindo 169 candidatos a transplante hepático, comparando CIR, HCC e SPE. Foram avaliadas as seguintes variáveis: K-in (taxas de entrada da lista de espera: K-1in se CIR, K-2in se HCC e K-3in se SPE); K-out (taxa de TxH); K-1out (drop out no grupo CIR); K-2out (drop out no grupo HCC) e K-3out(drop out no grupo SPE). RESULTADOS: Na coorte retrospectiva, 112 casos (59,3%) tinham CIR, 63 (33,3%) com HCC e 14 (7,4%) se enquadraram em SPE. Os tempos médios de avaliação até a inscrição em lista para TxH foram 194 dias (IC 95% 152-236), 36 dias (IC95% 21-50) e 98 dias (IC95% 0-308) para CIR, HCC e SPE, respectivamente (P <0,001). Dos 86 pacientes transplantados (K-out = 45,5%), 31 tinham CIR (K-1in = 27,7%), 44 HCC (K-2in = 69,8%) e 11 SPE (K-3in = 88,6%) (P <0,001). As taxas de drop out foram maiores em CIR (K-1out = 64,3%, K-2out = 30,2%, K-3out = 21,4%, P <0,001). O hazar ratio (HR) para TxH foi 85% (IC95% 1,35-2,55) maior em HCC do que CIR. Na coorte prospectiva, 110 dos 167 pacientes avaliados foram listados (K-in = 65,9%). Os tempos médios de avaliação foram de 783 dias (IC95% 330-1236), 52 dias (IC95% 17-87) e 184 dias (IC95% 19-349) para CIR, HCC e SPE, respectivamente (P <0,001). Em relação ao TxH, o K1-in foi 21,7%, K2-in, 76,4% e K3-in, 92,3 % (P <0,001). K-out foi 57,3% (63/110), K1-out = 50%, K2-out = 21,1% e K3-out = 3,84% (P <0,001). HR para TxH foi 329% superior em HCC do que CIR (HR = 4,29; IC95%: 2,74-6,72). CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, os pacientes com cirrose descompensada tiveram um tempo de avaliação para transplante significativamente maior que os outros grupos avaliados, bem como maior taxa de drop out em lista. A taxa de transplante foi significativamente menor nos pacientes com cirrose descompensada, demonstrando que as políticas de alocação de órgãos merecem ser revistas. / INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation (LT) has been changing the course of serious, incapacitating and potentially fatal diseases becoming the treatment of choice when there is organ failure. AIM: To compare transplant, delisting, and survival rates between candidates with decompensated cirrhosis (CIR), special conditions (SPE), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We carried out two studies with 358 patientes: a retrospective one (Aug 2008-Jul 2009, including 189 enlisted patients) and another prospective (Nov 2012-May 2014, with a follow-up period up to Nov 2015, including 169 LT candidates), comparing CIR, HCC, and SPE. The following variables were assessed: K-in (rates of waitlist entry – K-1in if CIR, K-2in if HCC, and K-3in if SPE); K-out (rate of LT); K-1out (drop-out in CIR); K-2out (drop-out in HCC); and K-3 out (drop-out in SPE). RESULTS: In the retrospective study, 112 cases (59.3%) were due to CIR, 63 (33.3%) to HCC, and 14 (7.4%) to SPE. The average time from selection to enlisting was 194 days (CI95% 152-236), 36 days (CI95% 21-50), and 98 days (CI95% 0-308) for CIR, HCC, and SPE, respectively (P<0.001). Of the 86 transplanted patients (K-out = 45.5%), 31 had CIR (K-1in = 27.7%), 44 HCC (K-2in = 69.8%), and 11 SPE (K-3in = 88.6%) (P<0.001). Drop-out rates were higher in CIR (K-1out = 64.3%, K-2out = 30.2%, K-3out = 21.4%, P<0.001). The hazar ratio (HR) for LT was 85% (CI95% 1.35-2.55) higher in HCC than CIR. In the prospective study, 110 out of 167 evaluated patients were enlisted (K-in = 65.9%). The average time from selection to enlisting was 783 days (CI95% 330-1236), 52 days (CI95% 17-87), and 184 days (CI95% 19-349) for CIR, HCC, and SPE, respectively (P<0.001). Regarding LT, K1-in was 21.7%, K2-in, 76.4%, and K3-in, 92.3% (P<0.001). K-out was 57.3% (63/110), K1-out = 50%, K2-out = 21.1%, and K3-out = 3.84% (P<0.001). HR for LT was 329% times higher in HCC than CIR (HR = 4.29; CI95% 2.74–6.72).CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a time evaluation for transplantation significantly higher than other evaluated groups as well as a higher rate of waiting list drop out. Transplant rate was significantly lower in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, demonstrating that organ allocation policies deserve to be reviewed.