A greater understanding of critical periods of body weight regulation, including pregnancy, may aid in efforts to optimize weight management strategies for the mother and her baby. The gestational period has been implicated to play, in the child, a vital role in the developmental origins of obesity and other cardiometabolic diseases later in life. Therefore, we initially examined existing literature on the role of maternal obesity and its link to pediatric obesity and documented the known underlying physiological mechanisms responsible for this relationship while suggesting potential intervention targets that may improve maternal-fetal outcomes. In a second paper, we aimed to quantify maternal predictors of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates in the Ottawa and Kingston (OaK) birth cohort with specific hypotheses verifying the independent contribution of maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) to fetal overgrowth. This paper also highlights the clinical utility of the revised 2009 Institute of Medicine GWG guidelines and discusses the potential role of physiological factors underlying the observed associations between BMI, excessive GWG and LGA neonates. As a follow-up to our population-level analysis (i.e., OAK cohort), papers three and four highlight how the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis, a vital regulator of growth and development, may be compromised at the molecular level in cases of maternal obesity (paper 3) and excessive GWG (paper 4). In paper 3 we show that maternal obesity is associated with attenuated expression of IGF binding protein-4 (IGFBP4) in umbilical cord blood and discuss how this may preferentially promote fetal adipogenesis. The effects of excessive GWG on IGF axis protein expression are addressed in paper four where we show that excessive weight gain during pregnancy is associated with increased expression of IGFBP3 in maternal circulation in normoglycemic term pregnancies. In this paper we discuss the potential inhibitory role of IGFBP3 on adipogenesis and how it relates to glucose intolerance during pregnancy. Recognizing that both obesity and excessive GWG can alter physiological processes in mother and her baby, appropriate evidence-based interventions are warranted to best optimize outcomes. In paper five, we discuss the results of a study which sought to assess patient information channels and knowledge of nutrition and physical activity during pregnancy with the intent that these findings be applied to best design efficacious strategies that cater to the needs of our target group of pregnant women. In our analysis we show that the majority of pregnant women studied would be willing to participate in a lifestyle intervention for their own personal health and that of their child. Of great interest was the observation that most women were not informed of the importance of pregnancy-specific energy intake, or made aware of their own healthy GWG targets. Additionally, many of the respondents reported receiving no information pertaining to appropriate physical activity recommendations; despite the fact that the vast majority of participants consider this lifestyle modality to be safe during their pregnancy. Finally in paper six, we build on the results of our previous work and evaluate the risks and benefits of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal-fetal outcomes through a review of the literature and note that engaging in non-sedentary pursuits during gestation may aid in maternal weight regulation, protect against metabolic disorders and optimize neonatal birth weight and body composition. Overall, the collective nature of the papers presented in this dissertation provides qualitative and quantitative evidence to support not only the complexity of body weight regulation in the mother and her baby, but also highlights potential avenues for intervention that may improve maternal-fetal outcomes during this critical period.

Obesity is a serious health concern in modern society. One way to reduce caloric intake is with nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS). However, recent research suggests they may be compounding the obesity problem. Nonnutritive sweeteners have been linked to increased body mass in a few studies and may be a barrier to effective weight management for some individuals. Under the framework of the health belief model, the research question was: Does this pattern of NNS-BMI covariance exist in young adults at the University of North Florida and, if so, are there other dietary or activity differences that might partially explain this relationship? A sample of 113 students completed an online survey based on the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey to answer this question. Their responses quantified BMI, activity level estimates, NNS intake, and produce consumption. There was a no trend of covariance between BMI and NNS intake overall. However, there was a significant relationship between length of NNS usage and both BMI (p<0.01) and NNS intake (p<0.05). A positive correlation also existed between NNS usage and fruit and vegetable intake (p<.005). Weight variability was positively related to NNS due to the maintenance of previous weight loss (p<0.005). There was no correlation between NNS and activity. There is a tendency to have a higher BMI the longer NNS is consumed. This pattern does not appear to be explained by nutrient intake or activity. However, it may be due to increased tolerance towards sweets over time. Nurse practitioners can make recommendations that facilitate healthy behaviors amongst their patients. Therefore, this is an important issue for advanced practice nursing.

La première cause de maigreur chez les femmes dans les pays occidentaux est l’anorexie mentale (AM). La maigreur constitutionnelle (MC) regroupe des femmes d’Indice de masse corporelle identique aux AM mais sans les anomalies psychologiques, biologiques ou hormonales (pas d’aménorrhée) rencontrées dans l’AM. Les troubles du comportement alimentaire (TCA) comprennent l’AM restrictive pure (AM-R), l’AM avec crises boulimiques (AM-BP) et la boulimie nerveuse (BN). Notre travail explore ces troubles à la lumière de la régulation de l’appétit dont le centre organique (noyau arqué) reçoit des afférences de peptides périphériques tels que la leptine, le PYY, le GLP1 , la ghréline et l’obéstatine. Nous montrons un profil orexigène dans l’AM-R, témoignant d’une intégrité du système de régulation de la prise alimentaire et adaptatif, luttant contre la restriction alimentaire. Nous avançons le concept de ghrélino-résistance dans l’AM-R dont le substratum biologique est peut-être l’obéstatine. Nous montrons une ghréline basse chez les AM-BP comme chez les BN permettant un diagnostic différentiel précis et rapide. A l’inverse, nous montrons un profil anorexigène constitutif chez les MC participant au maintien du poids bas, proposant la MC comme un modèle humain de résistance à la prise de poids. Ces hormones peuvent agir comme arbitre organique objectif entre des entités cliniques parfois à tort confondues. Une leptine basse chez une jeune fille maigre signe une AM, une ghréline basse chez une AM signe la présence de crises boulimiques. Ces éléments forts nous poussent à continuer notre travail de précision et de phénotypage de ces entités pour mieux en comprendre la physiopathologie / The commonest group of underweight young women in the developed world is restrictive anorexia nervosa (AN). However, constitutional thinness (CT) is a condition described in the same low weight range as AN. CT women display normal menstruation an do not present with psychological or hormonal features of AN. Eating disorders (EA) displays Anorexia Nervosa with restrictive food behaviour (AN-R), Anorexia Nervosa with binge purge associated (AN-BP) and bulimia Nervosa (BN ). Food intake is controlled by the arcuate nucleus through integration of peripheral hormonal signals such as leptin, ghrelin, peptide YY (PYY) and glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Our objective was to understand thinness and EA through those hormonal signals. AN-R presents an orexigenic adaptative profile contrasting with the anorexigenic constitutive one in CT, proving the integrity of the appetite regulation system. We propose the ghrelin resistance concept with the putative obestatin. AN-BP presents a very different profile of appetite regulatory peptides when compared with AN-R, with low ghrelin levels. The hormones appear to be valuable biomarkers to distinguish AN and CT in severe underweight patients and to diagnose binge purge in AN. The assessment of ghrelin (and eventually obestatin) could be of particular interest for differential diagnosis between AN-R and AN-BP. The assessment of leptin could also be useful for differential diagnosis between AN and CT