基於教育指標客觀而精簡的特性，本研究嘗試建立一套適合當前教育環境的「我國高級中學後設評鑑指標權重體系」。其方法首先經由文獻探討，分析國內外關於教育指標及後設評鑑的相關研究，並以此建立我國高級中學後設評鑑指標調查問卷初稿。再利用得懷術，結合專家學者智慧修正指標。最後則以臺灣區公、私立高級中學校長為對象寄發問卷，有效樣本123位，並以因素分析法計算後設評鑑指標權重。據此，本研究建構完成之「我國高級中學後設評鑑指標之權重體系」，其結果顯示：
一、「我國高級中學後設評鑑指標之權重體系」中，一級指標包括「評鑑規劃階段」，權重值.204、「評鑑設計階段」，權重值.226、「評鑑實施階段」，權重值.233、「評鑑結果階段」，權重值.220、「結果利用與檢討階段」，權重值.228。
二、一級指標中之「評鑑規劃階段」，下轄「評鑑目的」、「評鑑計畫」、「規劃人員」等三個二級指標，其權重值依序為.391、.402、.379，二級指標下共有11個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。
三、一級指標中之「評鑑設計階段」，下轄「評鑑方式」、「評鑑表與評鑑標準」、「評鑑組織及人員」等三個二級指標，其權重值依序為.373、.378、.371，二級指標下共有12個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。
四、一級指標中之「評鑑實施階段」，下轄「溝通與協調」、「評鑑資料蒐集方法」、「學校自評過程」、「訪視評鑑過程」等四個二級指標，其權重值依序為.286、.298、.280、.296，二級指標下共有17個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。
五、一級指標中之「評鑑結果階段」，下轄「評鑑資料分析」、「評鑑報告」、「評鑑結果公佈」等三個二級指標，其權重值依序為.358、.362、.359，二級指標下共有13個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。
六、一級指標中之「結果利用與檢討階段」，下轄「評鑑結果的利用」、「評鑑結果的檢討」等二個二級指標，其權重值皆為.523，二級指標下共有10個三級後設評鑑指標，亦各有其權重。
此外，本研究也針對得懷術及因素分析方法的運用進行分析與檢討，最後並針對實務應用及未來後續研究方向等提出具體的建議。 / The purpose of this study is to establish the meta-evaluation indicators and the weight system of senior-high school in Taiwan.First,we used document analysis to establish the primary scales of meta-evaluation indicators of senior-high school in Taiwan(M.E.I.S.T.).Then,we used the delphi technique to improve the primary scales.Finally, 123 principles of senior-high school in Taiwan were investigated, and we used factor analysis to calculate the weights of M.E.I.S.T.. The main conclusion of this study are as follows:
(1)The first-order indicators of M.E.I.S.T. include “the stage of evaluation formulation”,” the stage of evaluation design”, “the stage of evaluation implementation”, “the stage of evaluation results”,“the stage of use and discussion of results”. The weights for each indicator is .204,.226,.233,.220,and.228.
(2)There are 3 second-order indicators under“The stage of evaluation formulation”.They are “The evaluation purpose”, “The evaluation plan”, “The staff of planning”. The weights for each indicator is .391, .402, .379.There are 11 third-order indicators under them.
(3) There are 3 second-order indicators under“The stage of evaluation design ”.They are “The evaluation ways”, “The evaluation scales and criterias ”, “The organizations and staff”. The weights for each indicator is .373, .378, .371. There are 12 third-order indicators under them.
(4) There are 4 second-order indicators under“The stage of evaluation implementation”.They are “The communication and negotiation”,“The data collection”,“The self-evaluation process”, “ The external evaluation process”.The weights for each indicator is .286, . 298, .280, .296. There are 17 third-order indicators under them.
(5) There are 3 second-order indicators under“The stage of evaluation results”.They are “The data analysis”, “The evaluation report ”,“The disclosure of results”. The weights for each indicator is .358, .362, .359. There are 13 third-order indicators under them.
(6) There are 2 second-order indicators under“The stage of use and discussion of results.”.They are “The use of results ”, “The discussion of results ”. Both of the weights are .523. There are 10 third-order indicators under them.
Besides,this study also discusses the implementation of delphi technique and factor analysis. At the end of the study also proposes some concrete suggestions for practical and further study.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/A2002000244 |
| Creators | 林劭仁, Lin,Shaw-Ren |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds