Šiame darbe nagrinėjami Europos Sąjungos ir Turkijos debatai žmogaus teisių tema. Pasitelkus „kalbinių žaidimų“ idėją, kai kalbos aktai prilyginami ėjimui šachmatų lentoje ar sprendimo priėmimui Žaidimų teorijose, analizuojama diskusija, kurioje išskiriamos dvi smulkesnės temos – žodžio laisvės problemos Turkijoje ir religinių mažumų teisės. Darbe nuosekliai išdėstoma, jog Turkijos identitetas yra dvilypis, jis padalintas į kemalistiškąjį bei islamistiškąjį. Tai lemia debatų pobūdį, nes Europos Sąjunga diskutuoja ne su vieninga Turkija, o su kemalistais arba islamistais. Remiantis „kalbinių žaidimų“ prieiga, nustatatoma, kokios taisyklės būdingos Europos Sąjungos ir Turkijojs debatams žodžio laisvės ir religinių mažumų teisių temomis, įvertinama Europos Sąjungos ir Turkijos „kalbinio žaidimo“ būklė, atsakoma į klausimą, ar žaidimas apskritai vyksta, ir jeigu taip, tai kas lemia debatų dalyvių pozicijas, kokius vaidmenis (draugo-priešo ir pan.) jie skiria vieni kitiems. / The paper is devoted to analyze European Union and Turkey debates on human rights. Here the debates are perceived as the scene where both sides put their arguments, positions, values, express intensions. This helps to find out the main reason, why discussion on human rights between European Union and Turkey isn‘t as fluent as it could be. Debates are analyzed in so called “language games” perspective, which means, that all argumentation here is equated to the move making in the game theory. Going along game theory lines, here we make a presumption, that states as international actors are rational, but their identity and interests are not static. Taking into account ideas of Alexander Wendt, identity and interests are presupposed to be a product of mutual states interaction. Interaction in the paper by itself is supposed to be a game, where the biggest stress is put on rules – knowing the rules of the game, it‘s possible to understand state intentions and identity elements. In the paper main theme of human rights is parted into two sections that deal with freedom of speech and religious minorities rights. It is supposed that the first topic is debated between European Union and Turkey‘s Kemalist establishment, and the second – between Union and proislamic movements in Turkey. Such move is made because of the ambivalent Turkish identity. After the First World War established Turkish state, soon it turned into a radical modernization and westernization. This led to the... [to full text]
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LABT_ETD/oai:elaba.lt:LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20140623_181832-24438 |
| Date | 23 June 2014 |
| Creators | Samoškaitė, Eglė |
| Contributors | Račius, Egdūnas, Vilnius University |
| Publisher | Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), Vilnius University |
| Source Sets | Lithuanian ETD submission system |
| Language | Lithuanian |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Master thesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20140623_181832-24438 |
| Rights | Unrestricted |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds