Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-06-06T22:34:21Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
JosairCustodioDeMesquita_DISSERT.pdf: 839966 bytes, checksum: 98a80295ce6fc97958f43c5fd9329871 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-06-09T20:43:09Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
JosairCustodioDeMesquita_DISSERT.pdf: 839966 bytes, checksum: 98a80295ce6fc97958f43c5fd9329871 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-09T20:43:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
JosairCustodioDeMesquita_DISSERT.pdf: 839966 bytes, checksum: 98a80295ce6fc97958f43c5fd9329871 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-11-06 / OBJETIVO: Avaliar a percep??o dos estudantes dos cursos de Medicina e Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), sobre a assist?ncia ao trabalho de parto e ao parto normal, no contexto do atendimento oferecido pela Maternidade Escola Janu?rio Cicco (MEJC), e contribuir para o planejamento de modifica??es curriculares no ensino da obstetr?cia de acordo com os princ?pios da humaniza??o. METODOLOGIA: Foi realizado um estudo de abordagem transversal e de car?ter descritivo quali-quantitativo, com graduandos em Medicina e Enfermagem da UFRN, que estavam cursando ou j? haviam cursado as disciplinas de obstetr?cia, na medicina e sa?de da mulher, na enfermagem. Os dados foram coletados atrav?s de um question?rio com quest?es objetivas e subjetivas, e armazenados em um banco de dados, em planilha do software Excel/Office 2010 com todas as vari?veis. RESULTADOS: Foram entrevistados 169 estudantes, 118 do curso de medicina e 51 do curso de enfermagem, dos quais 46,75% eram do sexo masculino e 53,25% do sexo feminino. O maior n?mero de entrevistados de medicina estava no 11? per?odo (40,67%), e de enfermagem, no 10?, (43,15%). Esses alunos presenciaram 1.073 partos, dos quais 61,8% via vaginal. Os m?dicos obstetras foram os que mais realizaram partos vaginais (40%). Os enfermeiros realizaram apenas (8,13%). A assist?ncia prestada ?s mulheres, durante o processo do trabalho de parto e parto, configurou-se como adequada para 87,58% dos entrevistados e estes vislumbraram condutas humanizadas. Dos estudantes que realizaram partos, 76,27% eram de medicina e 11,76% eram de enfermagem. Todos receberam orienta??o durante essa atividade. Um total de 19,50% estudantes de medicina relatou existir preconceito contra o parto normal, principalmente quanto ao parto humanizado, ao contr?rio de todos os estudantes de enfermagem (100%) que relataram n?o existir este preconceito. A maioria das estudantes (73%) apresentava prefer?ncia pelo parto vaginal, sobretudo as estudantes de enfermagem. Sobre o conhecimento de mitos em rela??o ao parto normal, 60,35% responderam conhecer algum. CONCLUS?O: O estudo se apresenta como de grande relev?ncia, uma vez que os resultados encontrados podem contribuir para modifica??o e atualiza??o curriculares do ensino da obstetr?cia, como tamb?m servir como subs?dio para a an?lise das pr?ticas de humaniza??o que devem ser desenvolvidas nas institui??es de ensino e que s?o preconizadas pelo Minist?rio da Sa?de. / OBJETIVE: To evaluate the perception of Medical and Nursing students of Medicine and Nursing graduation courses at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), on obstetrics teaching and labor assistance in the context of the maternal care provided by the Maternity Hospital Janu?rio Cicco (MEJC) and contribute to curricular updating planning of teaching obstetrics, in accordance with the principles of humanization. METHODS: It was conducted a study of cross-cutting approach and qualitative and quantitative descriptive method, with students in medicine and nursing of UFRN, who were attending or had been attended the midwifery disciplines medicine; and women's health in nursing. The data were collected through a questionnaire with objective and subjective questions, and stored in a database, spreadsheet software Excel / Office 2010 with all the variables. RESULTS: We interviewed 169 students, 118 of medical school and 51 from the nursing program, of which 46.75% were male and 53.25% female. The largest number of medical respondents is the 11th period (40.67%), and nursing, on 10, (43.15%). These students witnessed 1,073 births, and (61.8%) vaginal deliveries. The obstetricians were the most performed vaginal deliveries (40%). Nurses performed only (8.13%). The assistance provided to women during the process of labor and delivery, was configured as suitable for 87.58% of respondents and these glimpsed humane conduct. Students who performed deliveries, 76.27% were medical and 11.76% were nursing. All had guidance while doing them. A total of 19.50% medical students reported that there is a prejudice against vaginal delivery, particularly for the humanized birth, unlike all nursing students (100%) who reported that there is this prejudice. Most students (73%) showed preference for vaginal delivery, especially nursing students. On the knowledge of myths in relation to vaginal delivery, 60.35% answered that they know some. CONCLUSION: This study presents itself as a highly relevant, since the results may contribute to curricular changing and updating related to obstetrics teaching, but also serve as a resource for analysis of humanization practices that should be developed in educational institutions and which are recommended by the Ministry of Health.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/20663 |
| Date | 06 November 2015 |
| Creators | Mesquita, Josair Cust?dio de |
| Contributors | 13049127449, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7869140767244263, Souza J?nior, Jos? Edvan de, 83874011453, http://lattes.cnpq.br/8649739086762968, Medeiros, Robinson Dias de, 24262153487, http://lattes.cnpq.br/5790887167696618, Robinson Dias de, Maranh?o, T?cia Maria de Oliveira |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ENSINO NA SA?DE, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds