University, Diss., 2003--München.

Techn. Universiẗat, Diss., 2005--München.

Submitted by Paula Quirino (paula.quirino@ufpe.br) on 2015-03-05T17:57:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAÇÃO Tássia Sobreira Honório de Melo.pdf: 1078022 bytes, checksum: 008fab20849ca88c2de42ce43d0644ff (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-05T17:57:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAÇÃO Tássia Sobreira Honório de Melo.pdf: 1078022 bytes, checksum: 008fab20849ca88c2de42ce43d0644ff (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 / O presente trabalho tem como objetivo trazer à compreensão o sentido e função do conceito de Ereignis no pensamento do jovem Heidegger. O referido conceito será investigado a partir de sua primeira elaboração, desenvolvida no curso de pós-guerra intitulado “A ideia da Filosofia e o problema da visão de mundo”1, lecionado no semestre de inverno de 1919 na Universidade de Friburgo. Em seguida, outras obras do período da juventude do filósofo serão investigadas, visando uma determinação do sentido e função do conceito de Ereignis, com o objetivo de mostrar que existe um encadeamento entre este termo e outras ideias e definições relevantes para o desenvolvimento da pesquisa filosófica heideggeriana posterior. Acreditamos, portanto, que o conceito de Ereignis possui um papel germinal para a elaboração do pensamento do jovem Heidegger e que seu sentido foi desenvolvido em certos pontos elementares para a construção de uma investigação hermenêutico-fenomenológica adequada para atingir filosoficamente o ser da vida humana em seus elementos basilares. Seguimos e analisamos, o caminho de pensamento do jovem Heidegger, procurando investigar a maneira pela qual se dá a relação entre os principais termos trabalhados no período da juventude do filósofo e o conceito de Ereignis. Trabalhamos no mapeamento do sentido do conceito em questão, tendo em vista a sua função no escopo da estrutura da vida fática. Analisamos o nexo particular e relevante entre o conceito de Ereignis e a indicação formal enquanto modo de acesso apropriado à estrutura da vida humana, e investigamos a conexão fundamental entre o conceito de Ereignis e a temporalidade originária do Dasein.

[pt] À luz das considerações de Heidegger em seu texto Sobre a Madona Sistina, pretendo defender que a singularidade da Madona Sistina como um sui generis essenciar do Bild está relacionada a um transparecer apropriativo (Ereignis) que emerge nesta pintura. Vou argumentar que é possível rastrear este transparecer apropriativo através da investigação da especificação que Heidegger faz de seu uso do termo Bild como significando Antlitz (semblante) e de sua caracterização deste Bild como sendo um Altar-Bild. De acordo com o filósofo, o trazer à emergência traz à emergência (das Bild bildet) ambos: uma janela e um sítio (Ort). No primeiro capítulo, vou relacionar o sentido de Antlitz como um Entgegenblick (um olhar voltado a um encontro) enquanto chegada ao caráter de janela enquanto um olhar para fora (Ausblick) na direção daquilo que chega. O objetivo é sugerir que aquilo que singulariza este Bild é sua referência a um transparecer apropriativo do mútuo pertencimento de velar e desvelar. No segundo capítulo, vou relacionar o caráter de altar do Bild ao trazer à emergência de um sítio. Meu propósito é associar o pertencimento da Madona Sistina a um sítio a um mútuo pertencimento de sítios, a saber: um mútuo pertencimento do altar e da igreja. Supondo que ambos estão relacionados à memória do sagrado, eles poderiam ser relacionados ao pensamento enquanto a salvaguarda do sagrado. Segundo Heidegger, o pensamento é pensamento do Ser. Isso significa que ele pertence ao Ser e que ele ausculta o Ser. Ele é um transparecer apropriativo (Ereignis). / [en] In the light of Heidegger s remarks in his text On the Sistine Madonna, I intend to defend that the singularity of the Sistine Madonna as a sui generis Bild essencing (Bildwesen) is related to an enowning (Ereignis) that is brought forth in this painting. I will argue that it is possible to trace this enowning through the investigation of Heidegger s specification of his use of the term Bild as meaning Antlitz (countenance), and of his characterization of this Bild as being an Altar-Bild. According to the philosopher, the bringing into emergence brings into emergence (das Bild bildet) both: a window and a site (Ort). In the first chapter, I will relate the meaning of Antlitz as an Entgegenblick (encountering glance) as arrival to the window character as an outlook (Ausblick) of arrival. The aim is to suggest that what singularizes this Bild is its reference to a disclosure of appropriation (Ereignis) of the mutual belonging of concealment and unconcealment. In the second chapter, I will relate the altar character of the Bild to the bringing into emergence of a site. My purpose is to link the Sistine s belonging to a site to a mutual belonging of sites, that is: a belonging together of the altar and the church. Supposing that they are both related to the memory of the sacred, they could be related to thinking as the safeguard of the sacred. According to Heidegger, the thinking is the thinking of being. This means that it belongs to being and that it listens to being. It is an enowning (Ereignis).

Investigamos os possíveis efeitos das experiências de atravessamento das identificações e representações do ser, implicados no conceito de gozo feminino de Jacques Lacan, e também no estudo da superação da metafísica no ser-o-aí (Dasein) de Martin Heidegger, ocasião de desvelamento em que o ser irrompe com uma singular estranheza (das Ereignis). Nosso objetivo foi o de esclarecer quais seriam possíveis finalidades clínicas e efeitos transformativos, face ao patológico, que o tratamento psicanalítico poderia conferir às experiências de transbordamento do ser para mais além das significações fálicas. Para tanto, a metodologia escolhida foi o estudo da obra de dois dos principais expoentes do século XX nos campos da filosofia e da psicanálise, legitimadores cada qual a seu modo da formalização e da escuta de um paradoxo: o ser é ao mesmo tempo íntimo e estrangeiro, radicalmente inacessível ao pensamento, e neste sentido se provaria êxtimo. Num primeiro momento, esclarecemos os sentidos da extimidade ou ek-sistência do ser nas obras de Heidegger, em textos de 1927 a 1966, e de Lacan, sobretudo no recorte de seu seminário 20 (1972-73), paradigmas com os quais pudemos trabalhar, em nosso último capítulo, certos desafios que a lacuna do ser traz à situação clínica. Como resultado, sustentamos a leitura de que o ser para a psicanálise lacaniana se apreende pelo conceito de gozo, em suas duas modalidades: ser da significância, correlata ao gozo fálico típico da fantasia neurótica, e Outra irrepresentável, denominada de gozo feminino. Como efeitos deste gozo desconhecido, desarticulador da representação objetal, dar-se-iam os temporários atravessamentos das identificações do sujeito, bem como das amarrações simbólicas do sintoma; experiências que podem transcorrer em efeitos de indeterminação produtiva. Concluímos que, sobretudo em virtude da vazão indizível do ser, podemos romper com uma leitura a nosso ver reducionista da psicanálise em que a perspectiva monoculturalista e falocêntrica perpetuasse, clinicamente, efeitos de sujeito em relação exclusivamente fálica-objetal com o ser. Defendemos finalmente a importância de uma 9 escuta psicanalítica capaz de diferenciar o ser do objeto, caso se atente também à insólita abertura de um ser para mais além do Falo / This research investigates the possible effects of certain experiences that cross over the identifications and representations of Being, implied on Jacques Lacans concept of feminine enjoyment and also regarding the overcoming of metaphysics in Martin Heideggers concept of Being-there (Dasein), which refers to an unconcealment experience in which Being bursts out with a singular strangeness (das Ereignis). We aim to clarify the clinical purposes and transformative effects on the pathological treatments which psychoanalysis may convey on the overflow experiences of Being beyond phallic signification. Therefore, the adopted methodology was to study the work of two of the twentieth centurys leading exponents in the fields of philosophy and psychoanalysis who legitimize, each in their own way, the formalization and the understanding of the following idea: that the inner being of man is out of his imaginary or representative reach, and by being inner and outer at the same time, Being is extimity. At first, we clarified how a strange possibility of enjoyment of extimacy or of the ek-sistence of Being is formulated in the works of Heidegger between 1927 and 1966, as well as in Lacans theory, especially within the clipping of his seminar 20 (1972-73). Thus, supported by those two paradigms, in our last chapter we could reflect about certain challenges that the unspeakable Being brings to the clinical situation. As the outcome of our research, we argue that the concept of Being in lacanian psychoanalysis is held by the concept of enjoyment in its two forms: firstly, as the Being of significance related to the phallic enjoyment of neurotic fantasy and, secondly, as the unrepresentable Other, related to the experience of extimacy within feminine enjoyment. As effects of this unknown enjoyment, devoid of object representation, the subjects identifications, as well as the symbolic symptoms bindings, would helplessly flow through; which characterizes them as experiences that could elapse productive indeterminacy effects. Finally, after studying the problems of Being and of the Unspeakable in clinical practice, we conclude that due to the unspeakable outflow of 11 Being through the perspective of certain experiences of indetermination, it is possible to break, as we understand it, the reductionist interpretation of psychoanalysis in which the monoculturalistic and phallocentric perspective could clinically perpetuate the effects of the subject in exclusively phallic-objectal relations with its Being. We finally stand for the importance of a psychoanalytical listening also capable of differentiating Being and object, as long as psychoanalysts look out for an opening of Being beyond the Phallus

Investigamos os possíveis efeitos das experiências de atravessamento das identificações e representações do ser, implicados no conceito de gozo feminino de Jacques Lacan, e também no estudo da superação da metafísica no ser-o-aí (Dasein) de Martin Heidegger, ocasião de desvelamento em que o ser irrompe com uma singular estranheza (das Ereignis). Nosso objetivo foi o de esclarecer quais seriam possíveis finalidades clínicas e efeitos transformativos, face ao patológico, que o tratamento psicanalítico poderia conferir às experiências de transbordamento do ser para mais além das significações fálicas. Para tanto, a metodologia escolhida foi o estudo da obra de dois dos principais expoentes do século XX nos campos da filosofia e da psicanálise, legitimadores cada qual a seu modo da formalização e da escuta de um paradoxo: o ser é ao mesmo tempo íntimo e estrangeiro, radicalmente inacessível ao pensamento, e neste sentido se provaria êxtimo. Num primeiro momento, esclarecemos os sentidos da extimidade ou ek-sistência do ser nas obras de Heidegger, em textos de 1927 a 1966, e de Lacan, sobretudo no recorte de seu seminário 20 (1972-73), paradigmas com os quais pudemos trabalhar, em nosso último capítulo, certos desafios que a lacuna do ser traz à situação clínica. Como resultado, sustentamos a leitura de que o ser para a psicanálise lacaniana se apreende pelo conceito de gozo, em suas duas modalidades: ser da significância, correlata ao gozo fálico típico da fantasia neurótica, e Outra irrepresentável, denominada de gozo feminino. Como efeitos deste gozo desconhecido, desarticulador da representação objetal, dar-se-iam os temporários atravessamentos das identificações do sujeito, bem como das amarrações simbólicas do sintoma; experiências que podem transcorrer em efeitos de indeterminação produtiva. Concluímos que, sobretudo em virtude da vazão indizível do ser, podemos romper com uma leitura a nosso ver reducionista da psicanálise em que a perspectiva monoculturalista e falocêntrica perpetuasse, clinicamente, efeitos de sujeito em relação exclusivamente fálica-objetal com o ser. Defendemos finalmente a importância de uma 9 escuta psicanalítica capaz de diferenciar o ser do objeto, caso se atente também à insólita abertura de um ser para mais além do Falo / This research investigates the possible effects of certain experiences that cross over the identifications and representations of Being, implied on Jacques Lacans concept of feminine enjoyment and also regarding the overcoming of metaphysics in Martin Heideggers concept of Being-there (Dasein), which refers to an unconcealment experience in which Being bursts out with a singular strangeness (das Ereignis). We aim to clarify the clinical purposes and transformative effects on the pathological treatments which psychoanalysis may convey on the overflow experiences of Being beyond phallic signification. Therefore, the adopted methodology was to study the work of two of the twentieth centurys leading exponents in the fields of philosophy and psychoanalysis who legitimize, each in their own way, the formalization and the understanding of the following idea: that the inner being of man is out of his imaginary or representative reach, and by being inner and outer at the same time, Being is extimity. At first, we clarified how a strange possibility of enjoyment of extimacy or of the ek-sistence of Being is formulated in the works of Heidegger between 1927 and 1966, as well as in Lacans theory, especially within the clipping of his seminar 20 (1972-73). Thus, supported by those two paradigms, in our last chapter we could reflect about certain challenges that the unspeakable Being brings to the clinical situation. As the outcome of our research, we argue that the concept of Being in lacanian psychoanalysis is held by the concept of enjoyment in its two forms: firstly, as the Being of significance related to the phallic enjoyment of neurotic fantasy and, secondly, as the unrepresentable Other, related to the experience of extimacy within feminine enjoyment. As effects of this unknown enjoyment, devoid of object representation, the subjects identifications, as well as the symbolic symptoms bindings, would helplessly flow through; which characterizes them as experiences that could elapse productive indeterminacy effects. Finally, after studying the problems of Being and of the Unspeakable in clinical practice, we conclude that due to the unspeakable outflow of 11 Being through the perspective of certain experiences of indetermination, it is possible to break, as we understand it, the reductionist interpretation of psychoanalysis in which the monoculturalistic and phallocentric perspective could clinically perpetuate the effects of the subject in exclusively phallic-objectal relations with its Being. We finally stand for the importance of a psychoanalytical listening also capable of differentiating Being and object, as long as psychoanalysts look out for an opening of Being beyond the Phallus

La présente recherche traite le problème de la langue et de la traduction avec Martin Heidegger à partir de la notion grecque de logos, telle qu’elle apparaît chez Héraclite. Ce que le logos dévoile, c’est que la parole de l’homme est anticipée par une « parole » des choses, dans laquelle consiste leur être. Logos devient ainsi un nom pour le rapport entre l’être et l’homme. Compte tenu du fait que l’homme déploie ce rapport d’une manière inaccomplie, la question qui se pose est celle d’une authenticité possible, à atteindre à travers un saut vers le retrait de l’être, que Heidegger pense en tant qu’Ereignis. Analysant la portée de celui-ci à l’égard de l’histoire de l’être selon la lecture de Reiner Schürmann, on découvre le silence qui se tient en deçà de la manière grecque de concevoir le Logos et qui permet d’aborder la question de la langue sur une nouvelle base. Le but est de montrer que le déploiement de la langue figure un type particulier de rapport, qui s’avère être la manière la plus originaire dont le rapport, comme tel, devrait être conçu : à savoir, comme traduction. Ce dernier mot, loin de reprendre d’emblée les traits qu’on lui prête généralement, acquiert sa signification à partir de la langue, qui se laisse saisir comme traduction du silence en langue parlée par l’homme. Sur la base de cette description, les questions concernant la place de la langue à l’égard des choses et à l’égard de l’homme trouvent leur réponse, de même que des conséquences majeures pour la traduction entre les langues peuvent être tirées. Comme le rapport implique essentiellement une altérité, l’interrogation revient à chaque fois à une perspective éthique menant de la figure de l’être comme altérité originaire à celle d’autrui sous le sceau de la traduction conçue comme hospitalité, faisant la pensée de Heidegger entrer en dialogue avec celle de Jacques Derrida. / The present work treats the problem of language and translation along with Martin Heidegger, grounding itself in the Heraclitean notion of logos. The latter allows us to discover the fact that our speech is anticipated by a more originary one, namely the being of beings. Logos becomes thus a name for the relation between being and man. Yet considering the fact that man holds himself inauthentically in this relation, the most important question is how to attain a possible authenticity, which can only take place as a leap towards the concealment of being itself, and what Heidegger associates with the term Ereignis. By interpreting this notion in its connection with the history of being, following the reading of Reiner Schürmann, we discover the realm of silence which the Greeks and their thinking of logos could not unveil, and which sets a new ground for the problem of language. The aim is to show that the abode, i.e. the unfolding (Wesen) of language figures a special kind of relation ; moreover, it represents the most originary way in which the relation as such should be conceived, namely as translation. Far from possessing the general meaning we usually ascribe to it, the word translation acquires thus its sense from the unfolding of language itself, which is to be thought as a passage from the silence of being to the sonority of human language, indeed as translation of silence into sound, which proves to be a harmonic and tearing relation at the same time. On the basis of this description it becomes possible to reinterpret the “logical” relation between man and being through language and to draw a great number of consequences for the general praxis of translation between languages. Given that the idea of relation essentially implies an otherness, the research is constantly oriented towards an ethical approach of language and translation, bringing at the end Heidegger’s thinking in dialogue with Jacques Derrida on the field of hospitality

Nowadays, event processing is becoming the backbone of many applications. Therefore, it is necessary to provide suitable abstractions to properly modularize the concerns that appear in event-driven applications. We identify four categories of languages that support event-driven programming, and identify their shortcomings in achieving modularity in the implementation of applications. We propose gummy modules and their implementation in the GummyJ language as a solution. Gummy modules have well-defined event-based interfaces, and can have a primitive or a composite structure. Composite gummy modules are means to group a set of correlated event processing concerns and restrict the visibility of events among them. We provide an example usage of gummy modules, and discuss their event processing semantics.

Much neglected is Heidegger's latter work in favor of the fundamental ontology of Being and Time. Consequentially, conceptions of Heidegger's question of Being are oftentimes misconceived. Currently three main models have been proposed: (1) existential phenomenology, exemplified by Joseph Langan in the 1950s; (2) the popular thought of Being model in the 1960s as developed by William Richardson; (3) and in counter distinction to these unified models Joseph Kockelmans offers in the 1970s the many ways model, touting the end of systems. These misconstruals have spawned much Heideggerian dialogue, and in recent years, has had its effect upon Western continental scholarship from structuralism to post-structuralism. <br>Rather than usual conceptual models, this dissertation proposes a new model of Heideggerian scholarship seen through the lens of "Being as Saying." Neither mystical nor incomprehensible Heidegger's; unique linguistic turn negotiates the inadequacies of modern conceptions of the subject, object and cognition. Through a careful reading of Heidegger's work from 1949-1976, I trace Heidegger's utter reliance upon language as the way-making of Being, "Sprache als Be-wëgen." More originary than ordinary language, Heidegger's Being as Saying arises from Nietzsche's insights on nihilism. For Heidegger Being is no-thing, and as such reveals itself as unconcealment. We hear it as a deep, unsettling silence. From Being's two-fold character of concealing and revealing and humanity's subsequent discomfit, we derive all forms of communication, including thought and logic, even our world as a response to, and evasion from this pervasive silence. <br>Most notably Heidegger unseats the preeminent stature of thought and subject, only to reincorporate them within language. To achieve this he develops notions of Ereignis and Geviert, at once simple and complex, by which Being manifests itself, no longer through Dasein as prime discloser, but through a crossing of four regions. What emerges is a dynamic gathering-as-separated dialogue, a far richer, relational understanding of the world and the person. Heidegger's new way can best be described as a phenomenology of the inapparent, wherein Being and humanity are in a relational dialogue of unconcealing and revealing. With this insight we can reengage the Western philosophical tradition meditatively. / McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts / Philosophy / PhD / Dissertation

Stuttgart, Univ., Diss., 2007.