No description available.

No description available.

Thesis advisor: David T. Takeuchi / Thesis advisor: Graciela Teruel-Belismelis / Poverty and violence within cities frequently concentrate in the same places and evidence suggests these exposures have deleterious consequences on health. The 2007 homicide increase in both rich and poor Mexican municipalities and the available biomarkers in a public panel study offer a unique opportunity to test each contextual effect in isolation on an innovative health outcome. Using an ecological framework, the main hypothesis of the dissertation is that, in urban environments, exposure to higher levels of contextual violence works as a stressor that wears down the body by increasing the levels of cardiovascular risk. This effect was hypothesized to be independent from poverty but with significant interactions and with heterogeneous effects among subpopulations. Multilevel cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted treating the data as a natural experiment using the homicide rate increase as treatment. The outcomes were two indices and single biomarkers that reflect cardiovascular risk in three waves of data corresponding to the years 2002, 2006, and 2012. Results showed that three complementary statistical approaches provided evidence indicating that exposure to cumulative violence at the municipality level yielded higher cardiovascular risk when controlling for individual covariates like victimization and household expenditure. The significant threshold for homicide rates was 35 and the differences between exposed and unexposed municipalities was between 1.5% & 8.3%, while the threshold for changes in the homicide rates between 2006 and 2012 was 10, with an effect size of 7%. Poverty and violence were not correlated in Mexico during the homicide rate spike, so the effects were independent. Unexpectedly, they did not show interaction effects: affluent and violent municipalities were the most stressful contexts. These effects were higher in women, in individuals in the two lowest socioeconomic quintiles and had significant impact in cohorts younger than 40 years old. The dissertation expands the ecosocial approach by exploring independent effects that shape multiple stressful contexts. It demonstrates that violence is a public health concern in Mexico that has indirect effects in the whole population, which not only worsens the obesity epidemic, but also demands a new perspective on assessing the burden of violence on everyday life. / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2017. / Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Social Work. / Discipline: Social Work.

Nationwide, housing authorities demolish public housing communities and relocate the existing residents in an attempt to create more favorable neighborhood environments and to promote safer and more efficacious social interactions for public housing residents. Yet, studies of public housing relocation do not find strong evidence of beneficial social interaction occurring between relocated residents and new neighbors. Despite increased safety and relative increase in neighborhood economic standing, studies find relocated residents socialize outside of their new neighborhoods or else limit existing neighborhood interactions as compared to living in public housing communities. This raises the question of why relocated residents either do or do not choose to interact with their new neighbors within their new residential settings. In an effort to answer this question, I have conducted a study focused on neighborhood social interactions using public housing residents relocated from six of Atlanta, Georgia’s public housing communities. As a backdrop to the study, I present relevant literature concerning both the study of neighborhoods and the study of prior relocation endeavors. I argue that neighborhoods do provide important social landscapes for attempting to benefit public housing residents, though more research and a different framework of analysis are needed in order to manifest theorized outcomes of relocation for all residents involved. I then employ the use of both quantitative survey data from 248 relocated residents and qualitative in-depth interview data from 40 relocated residents to provide further insight into social interaction patterns after relocation from Atlanta’s public housing. This research finds that prior to relocation residents in public housing communities differed in terms of their ideal zones of action and preferred levels of inclusion and engagement in the neighborhood setting and in terms of their surrounding community scene. By examining these different ideal-types of residents in detail, I argue that prior to moving the residents, a better fit between resident and neighborhood can be constructed by housing authorities such that more beneficial social interaction outcomes can be achieved overall in the relocation process.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

This paper will explore the social and economic impacts of public housing revitalization on households with minor children. The research traces the relocations of families from two public housing complexes to other public housing complexes or market housing, using Housing Choice formerly Section 8 vouchers. We contrast and compare the socioeconomic characteristics of the original neighborhoods to the relocation sites from the census tract level, exploring changes in resources available to families.

In 2008, Atlanta was the first city in the United States to completely eliminate its high-rise public housing projects. Georgia State University professors Drs. Ruel, Oakley, and Reid undertook a three-year study to determine the health, behavior, and attitudes of residents both before and after relocation. This study sought to determine whether residents' self-esteem and self-efficacy improved after relocation into areas that have lower levels of social disorder and poor housing conditions. Overall, results show that while housing conditions, social disorder, and fear of crime had little or no significant effect on changes in residents' self-esteem, an improvement in these indicators in residents' new neighborhoods had a significant effect on self-efficacy. The significance of decreased social disorder and poor housing conditions, as well as fear of crime on residents' self-efficacy (but not self-esteem) has important implications for future research regarding neighborhood and housing effects as well as public housing relocation.

xvi, 307 p. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number. / This research contributes to scholarly understanding of the labor market activity of women living in disadvantaged neighborhoods in large U.S. cities, the group most affected by 1996's welfare reform legislation. Welfare reform tightened eligibility for means-tested assistance programs, forcing many women to seek employment despite daunting personal obstacles. This research uncovers the extent to which this subset of women found steady employment in standard, living-wage jobs as well as the reasons why many have not. Unlike most work in this field, it incorporates measures of neighborhood disadvantage to further explore the spatial barriers to employment faced by this demographic group. I ask whether neighborhood context matters for employment outcomes, beyond individual characteristics and circumstances. Survey data, collected in 1998-1999 and 2001, come from the Project on Devolution and Urban Change, a longitudinal study of 3,916 women living in poor neighborhoods of four U.S. cities. I link these individual data to tract-level U.S. Census data, resulting in a longitudinal, multi-city, geographically-linked dataset, something that no previous published research uses, but an important tool for understanding how neighborhood context affects individual outcomes. The methodological approach involves a combination of regression techniques including pooled logistic regression, ordinary least squares regression, the use of change scores as predictors, the use of lagged endogenous variables, and the derivation of predicted probabilities using results from regression models. Results of this research indicate that neighborhood disadvantage is of only modest utility in explaining women's work trajectories. Although living in neighborhoods with more car ownership does improve employment outcomes, other neighborhood measures are less important. Some traditional markers of "disadvantage," such as the presence of female-headed (single parent) households, actually facilitate better employment outcomes, suggesting the need to reevaluate traditional notions of neighborhood advantage and disadvantage. Individual barriers to employment, particularly health, childcare and family responsibilities, and individual car ownership are consistently predictive of better employment outcomes. The results suggest the potential importance of spatially-targeted programs aimed at alleviating childcare, health and transportation barriers to employment. / Committee in charge: James Elliott, Chairperson, Sociology; Ellen Scott, Member, Sociology; Patricia A. Gwartney, Member, Sociology; Margaret Hallock, Outside Member, Labor Educ & Research Center