隨著國人生活習慣，理財觀念的改變，對於不動產之持有、使用理念，亦隨之改變，如大型購物中心的相繼出現；新穎科技化辦公華廈的興建，舒適健康豪華休閒育樂設施的開發；便捷安全公共工程的建設．．．等等，再再需要相關產業相互間的配合，而財務融資是根本課題。 　 巨額財務資金之籌集，來自投資大眾，因此，不動產物權之規格化、細小化、單位化，乃透過信託之證券化，以公開發行之受益憑證，直接由資本市場募集資金；我國不動產證券化條例第一條即謂：為發展國民經濟，藉由證券化提高不動產之流動，增加不動產籌資管道，以有效開發利用不動產，提升環境品質，活絡不動產市場，並保障投資；其重要性，可窺全貎。 　 本研究係就證券化定義之詮釋，來探討不動產證券化之特性，並列舉全球發行不動產券化國家之有關制度，市場概況及比較，加以簡述，尤其對美、日兩國推行REITs成效之良窳，予以論述，及我國不動產證券化立法前後，個案實例成敗及發展之研究，期能建立更臻完善之制度，健全不動產與證券市場管理，保障社會投資大眾，達成「資金大眾化，產權證券化，經營専業化」目標，職是故，於本研究後，有所結論與建議。

自由化、國際化和證券化乃當金國際金融之三大趨勢，而我國不動產市場遭逢長達近十年之不景氣，使得我國不動產業之經營相當困難。連帶使以不動產抵押貸款為主要業務的金融業之逾放比居高不下，幾乎又導致另一波之金融風暴。為了改善不動產業之經營環境，提昇不動產之流動性，「不動產證券化」乃為國人寄予厚望。 本文為探討不動產證券化之相關議題，其相關章節如下： 第一章：緒論；第二章：不動產及不動產市場；第三章：證券及證券化；第四章：資產證券化與不動產證券化；第五章：不動產證券化之動機分析；第六章：國外不動產證券化發展之概況；第七章：國內類似不動產證券化之案例討論與問題分析；第八章：我國「不動產證券化條例」草案之研討；第九章：結論；後記：不動產證券化條例三讀條文與原草案之重大差異比較 本文之研究分析發現： 一、 本條例之不動產證券化制度採信託制而分為「不動產投資信託」及「不動產資產信託」二種。但於信託法上對於信託財產獨立性之問題因為規定不清，導致信託財產委託人之債權人可能對信託財產強制執行，而使「不動產資產信託」罹於委託人破產風險之可能。 二、 本條例雖規定可由信託財產抵押權人出具信託期間不實行抵押權之同意，但因該項同意僅具債權效力，因而無法完全排除抵押權人就信託財產實行抵押權之可能。而使「不動產資產信託」可能具有權利瑕疵之問題。 三、 基於我國當今之不動產業現況，日制「不動產資產信託」較符合業界之需求。而就實證之結果，美制之「不動產投資信託」已具有相當之成功經驗且對投資人利益保障較佳。因而我國不動產證券化採「不動產資產信託」及「不動產資產信託」雙軌制，可茲贊同。 四、 而就受託人資格之問題，為顧及不動產經營之專業性及投資人信心之問題，修正後條文採信託業及特殊目的公司雙軌制亦符合社會需求。

不動產證券化可行性之研究 摘要 為解決傳統不動產投資困境，將不動產投資方式由固定的資產形式轉變為證券型態的概念，而有不動產證券化（Real Estate Securitization）的產生。國內主要的不動產證券化模式分為不動產投資信託（Real Estate Investment Trust）與不動產資產信託（Real Estate Asset Trust），這兩種模式未來市場供需面實際運作的可行性為何，將是不動產證券化制度成功與否的重要關鍵。 本研究先從需求面投資者的角度切入，透過問卷調查資料，運用Logit模型探討證券化可行性因素對於投資者購買不動產受益證券的影響。實證結果發現，一般投資者認為受益證券的市場流通性、分散風險的重要性愈高，以及預期報酬率愈高，其購買不動產受益證券的可能性愈高；在總體因素方面，對於未來證券市場情況愈樂觀，以及房地產市場情況愈樂觀，其購買受益證券的機率將愈高；法人投資者則認為分散風險的重要性愈高，以及該法人機構主要投資工具的種類愈多，其購買不動產受益證券的機率愈大。 以供給面不動產持有者財務上的可行性而言，其財務目標在追求自身的ROE極大化，因此不動產持有者將視各項風險來源對於投資報酬的影響，決定是否運用證券化投資方式。模擬分析結果發現，除了不動產持有者本身的財務結構限制與不動產經營能力之外，在個別考量委託成本風險與開發風險的情況下，其對於不動產持有者ROE的影響較小，但營運風險相較於其他風險來源，對於不動產持有者ROE的影響較大；綜合各項風險來源同時納入考量時，發現不動產持有者自有資金比例愈低，其運用證券化方式的ROE較高，但變動的幅度也較大。此一實證與模擬分析結果，對於未來國內不動產證券化實際運作，可提供政府、業者及一般投資大眾作為決策參考。 關鍵字：不動產證券化、不動產投資信託、不動產資產信託、Logit模型、蒙地卡羅模擬 / A Feasibility Study of Real Estate Securitization in Taiwai Abstract By transforming real assets into securities , real estate securitization is created to solve the liquidity problem of real estate investment. The real estate securitization system in Taiwan is divided into two types - Real Estate Investment Trust and Real Estate Asset Trust. Whether the real estate securitization system succeeds or not is based on the feasibility of the market operation in practice. On the demand side, this research uses Logit model to analyze the impact of the feasibility of the real estate securitization system on the investors’ behavior of buying beneficiary certificates by sampling from intuitional investors and individual investors. The empirical results show that the individual investors emphasize on liquidity, divergence, and expected return. In addition, the probability of buying real estate beneficiary certificates increases with the degree of their optimistic expectation on both the stock and the real estate markets. However, the institutional investors regard the divergence of portfolios and investment instruments as the main factors of their buying those certificates. On the supply side, given the financial objective of ROE maximum, the owners of the real estate will review all of impacts of risk on return of investment before their decision to take the way of securitization. In addition to the financial structure and the management ability of the owners, the results of Monte Carlo simulation on the effect of real estate securitization also reveal that: a. There is little influence on the ROE of the owners’ real assets while taking trust cost risk and land development cost risk into consideration. b. The influence of operation risk on ROE is more than that of other risks. c. Lower the proportion of capital, higher the ROE and bigger the variation of the ROE are. The results of empirical analysis can be a reference of decision making for Government, trust industry, and investors in the real estate security market operation. Keywords：Real Estate Securitization , Real Estate Investment Trust , Real Estate Asset Trust , Logit Model , Monte Carlo Simulation

不動產證券化條例於2003年7月23日公佈實施以來，不動產投資信託受益證券(REITs)和不動產資產信託受益證券(REATs)均已發行多檔，信託財產種類含括辦公室、百貨公司、旅館、商務住宅等；不動產產權型態包含所有權與設定地上權二類。然而「設定地上權的不動產」其資產價值會隨著時間而遞減的特性，對於以封閉型態上市的REITs基金而言，將產生淨資產價值(NAV)不斷下跌的問題，為避免前項問題影響基金的市價(Market Price)表現，本研究將透過「中崙大樓」出售予「富邦二號不動產投資信託基金」的實施經驗、相關財務理論的佐證及專家學者的深度訪談，來研究提撥「投資本金攤提準備金」(Reserve Fund)機制的優缺點及替代方案。 本研究結果發現，在不動產市場穩定發展的情況下，Reserve Fund除了可對投資人產生節稅效果之外；對基金而言：可避免基金之淨資產價值(NAV)隨時間不斷遞減的問題、可供地上權到期時還本之用、得以分散投資風險並發揮良好的財務槓桿的效果。然而相對的，除非基金的年營收維持每年固定上漲，否則投資人的名目收益率可能會逐年下降，並產生資金運用的無效率狀況。 至於是否ㄧ定要提撥Reserve Fund，從本研究中發現，若從投資人偏好來看，所有淨收益每年均全部發放或設計為PO、IO二個群組，或發行有期限的Finite Life REITs都是可以替代的方案。從開發商的角度，則可以將應收租金債權設計為金融資產證券而不做REITs。 此外，本研究亦發現目前台灣REITs的投資人幾乎將REITs視為固定收益證券，致使其市價波動及成交量均極小，建議政府應放寬法令限制，致力於活絡交易市場，才能達到初衷。而受託機構應扮演更積極的角度並將其與管理機構間的責任與分工進一步釐清，以避免發生管理機構的代理問題，以期更健全市場的發展。 不動產證券化就是將金融商品的彈性注入不動產的開發，本研究為設定地上權的不動產找出參與REIT的配套機制，期許能對政府及產業有所貢獻。 / The Real Estate Investment Trust (REITs) and Real Estate Asset Trust (REATs) securities had been issued since the “Real Estate backed securities Act” published on July 23rd, 2003. The properties being entrusted, for instance, office buildings, department stores, hotels, business suite, etc.. The right of property can be divided into two parts: the ownership and the superficies on land；However, the value of the properties with superficies right will be decreased when time passes by. The close-end fund will continually decline of Fund’s net asset value (NAV), and indirectly affect its market price. To solve such problems, the purpose of this research paper is to discuss the solution of the Reserve Fund design when the Chung-Lung building, offered by “ Fubon REITs no.2” , has its financial theories implication, also tried to interviews of scholars and professionals for the suggestions. From the result of this research paper, when the real estate market is at its steady growing stage, the Reserve Fund design can not only accurately solve to the problem of decreasing Fund’s NAV with time, but also it can bring such benefits as tax-saving and principle-paying at the expiration date. Moreover, the growing amount of Reserve Fund can positively benefit the fund itself by diversification and higher leverage capability. On the contrary, unless the revenue of the fund keeps constant growing, the investors’ nominal yield of return might decrease year by year, which will result in inefficiency in the usage of investment capital. For the Reserve Funds design, from the view of investors’ preference points, we find that the revenue allotment or issued Finite Life REITs could be substituted. On the other hand, from the view of developers’ points, they may regard it as a CMBS rather than REITs. If the government can abstemiously open financing limits of REITs, we can refer as company、SPC or SPT types of USA or Japan to substitute for the Reserve Funds design. The stock market of the real estate is the financial commodities will be more flexible to input the development of the real estate. The study of research paper is to form a complete set of REITs mechanism for the superficies on land of property which can be contributed for the government and industry of the real estate.

開發型不動產證券化制度，定義上係以未開發完成之不動產之權利，透過特殊目的機構，在破產隔離之法律關係下，加以小口化、規格化，並發行有價證券表彰該權利且對外募集或私募有價證券之行為。在我國法規範之下，制度上則可包括「不動產投資信託基金投資於開發型不動產」以及「不動產資產信託以開發型不動產作為信託財產私募有價證券」二種型態。證券化對於不動產之開發而言，係一相當有利之融資管道，且同時亦提供了小額投資人投資大型不動產開發案共享獲利之機會。一般均認為開發型不動產係對於證券化需求最大之標的，然而，因開發性不動產本質上具有較已開發不動產更高之風險，故學說、實務及立法上之討論亦有眾多見解主張對於開發型不動產之證券化應予禁止或限制。 我國不動產證券化條例於民國92年公布施行時，對於開發型不動產納入規範係採所謂「分階段立法」之模式，而在民國98年1月6日始由立法院三讀通過不動產證券化條例之修正案，正式將開發型不動產納入我國不動產證券化之法制，惟現行法基於道德危險之防止、風險控管與投資人保護等考量，對於開發型不動產之證券化仍設有多數禁止或限制規範。然而，本文認為風險控管與投資人保護之並非不動產證券化制度唯一或絕對之考量；並且，制度上之限制或禁止應屬投資人保護之最後手段，若尚可透過主管機關之有效監理降低投資風險並保障投資人時，仍應儘量朝「興利同時防弊」之方向運作，不應過度限制該制度之適用範圍，否則反而將使制度之立法目的無法達成。 綜上所述，本文嘗試從開發型不動產證券化之本質、特性與優缺點出發，參酌國外相關立法例，並考量我國民情與資本市場之特色後，分析提出我國開發型不動產證券化制度之走向，主張應修法開放募集之不動產投 資信託基金得投資於一般開發型不動產。另外，針對都市更新及BOT等開發案適用不動產證券化條例之議題，本研究採取否定見解，認為應於各該法律另行立法規範此種特別法上之開發型不動產證券化，而不應以不動產證券化條例規範之。故本研究尚針對現行不動產證券化條例、都市更新條例、促進民間參與公共建設法等法律規範提出修正建議。期能提供開發型不動產證券化制度將來修法及運作上之參考。 / The “development-oriented real estate securitization” could be defined as an arrangement that subdivides and standardizes the right of real estate which is undeveloped or under development, into separate shares through a special purpose vehicle and the bankruptcy-remoteness structure, and the public offering or private placement of the real estate securities representing ownership of such shares. Under the Real Estate Securitization Act of Taiwan, R.O.C. (the “Act”), so called development-oriented real estate securitization could also be construed as either 1) fund investment of REIT into real estate(s) under development, or 2) entrusting real estate(s) under development or to be developed to a REAT. Securitization is a favorable way to finance the development project, also it provides opportunities for investors with limited fund to invest in and profit from the same. Generally, development projects have the strongest needs for securitization financing. However, due to the risks accompanied with development, there are opinions from researchers and legislators for the restriction of their securitization. Upon the Act’s promulgation in 2003, the Legislative Yuan also resolved the guidelines for future amendment that the real estate under development or to be developed shall be included upon the maturity of real estate securitization operation. However, due to legislators’ concerns on moral hazard, risk control and investor protection, the amendment promulgated in 2009 formally adapting the development-oriented real estate securitization was still quite restricted. It is held by this thesis that risk control and investor protection are not the only or supreme purposes of the Act. Meanwhile, the restriction shall be deemed the last resort of investor protection, it is to say, if the monitoring and supervision of competent authority is operable, we shall use them to protect investors instead of legislative restriction. Or some objectives of the Act would be therefore hindered. Based on the analysis of the nature, advantages, disadvantages, comparative law study of development-oriented real estate securitization, and also referring to the customs and capital market structure of Taiwan, this thesis has provided some thoughts and suggestions for other researchers and legislators’ reference. Firstly, it is held that the restriction on publicly offered REIT’s investment in development project shall be removed. Also, the urban renewal and BOT project shall not be applicable under the Act as which shall be exceptional types respectively legislated in Urban Renewal Act and the Law for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects. It is expected that the issues, thoughts and opinions raised or provided by this thesis could encourage further discussions toward the subject to ensure the sound and stable development of real estate securitization in Taiwan.