本研究依據批判思考主要特徵與教學理論，建構一套批判思考教學模式。根據文獻探討界定：一、批判思考主要內涵為批判思考能力、批判思考傾向與批判思考所需之必要知識；二、本研究所採之批判思考教學模式為前導活動、呈現主題、概念比較、分組活動、發表與澄清以及判斷與選擇。為探討批判思考教學在國小社會科實施效果，分別以兩所國小五年級中的兩班學生為研究對象，進行兩個月教學實驗，並編製批判思考測驗以比較兩組在批判思考學習效果的差異，此外，蒐集批判思考教學組學生在教學過程之相關資料進行質的分析。本研究工具為（一）批判思考測驗；（二）學習日記；（三）學習回饋問卷；（四）個案學習回饋問卷。 主要研究結果如下： 一、本研究之批判思考教學對批判思考能力有顯著教學效果。 二、本研究之批判思考教學對批判思考傾向有顯著教學效果。 三、本研究之批判思考教學對學生辯論之參與、聚焦與流暢性、意見陳述與反駁方面有明顯幫助。 四、接受批判思考教學的學生在信任理性、提出客觀且良好理由、多元思考等方面有顯著進步。 五、批判思考教學組學生對本研究之批判思考教學有相當正面的評價。 針對上述發現進行討論並提出建議： 1.本研究之批判思考教學模式值得國小社會課嘗試。2.應以學生個別差異實施批判思考教學。3.可採對話與辯證方式進行社會課教學。4.應營造安全溫暖且容忍犯錯的學習環境。5.宜容許社會課教學活動設計有彈性調整空間。6.應採多元評量的方式與內容。7.可設計學習單幫助學生有效蒐集資料。8.宜運用學習日記幫助學生進行反思。9.教師應重視批判思考教學並進行相關研究。 / This study constructs a model for teaching critical thinking based on the major characteristics and theories of critical thinking. To probe into the effects of teaching critical thinking in social studies, the researcher performs an experiment on a sample of 131 fifth-grade elementary school students for two months. The data-collection instruments include: (a) The Critical Thinking Test; (b) The Learning Diary; (c) The Learning Feedback Questionnaire; and (d) The Learning Feedback Questionnaire For Special Case. The following conclusions become evident. On the theoretical aspect: first, the main concepts of critical thinking include critical thinking ability, critical thinking disposition and the knowledge for critical thinking; second, the steps of the model for teaching critical thinking are guiding activities, displaying theme, comparing concepts, group discussion, sharing and clarifying, and finally, judgment and decision-making. On the experimental aspect: it was found that (a) Teaching critical thinking has significantly positive effects both on critical thinking ability and on critical thinking disposition. (b) Teaching critical thinking helps students have good performance in debates. (c) The students of experimental group make great progress on achieving confidence in reason and pluralistic thinking. (d) The students of experimental group give a vary positive evaluation on teaching critical thinking. Through these results, some guidelines are suggested as follows: (a) The model for teaching critical thinking is of great worth in social studies. (b) Critical thinking should be taught according to individual difference of students. (c) Dialogue and dialectic process is good for teaching social studies. (d) The atmosphere of classroom must be safe, warm and tolerating learning error. (e) Teachers should put emphasis on teaching critical thinking and on probing into critical thinking.

本研究的主要目的是探討「創意數位說故事課程」對故事創作的品質、創造力、和作文態度是否有幫助，並瞭解此類課程應用於國小高年級作文教學的可行性及侷限性。研究者採準實驗法之「不等組前後測設計」，以高雄市某國小五年級兩個班級的學童為樣本，安排一班為互動組，另一班為欣賞組，分別接受十二單元共60堂課的實驗課程，互動組接受「創意數位說故事」的課程，著重電子腦力激盪及故事分享等互動歷程；欣賞組接受「欣賞故事並將故事數位化」的課程，著重故事示範與欣賞。 本研究的研究工具為「新編創造力思考測驗」及研究者自編的「數位故事評量表」和「作文態度量表」，並蒐集質化資料（包括數位故事作品、學生課程反應的感想、趣味創作練習的資料等）。以獨立樣本單因子共變數統計以及相依樣本t考驗來進行分析，質化資料則是用來輔助量化結果的解釋。 研究結果顯示： (一)在數位說故事的製作上，互動組與欣賞組有顯著差異，且欣賞組優於 互動組。 (二)新編創造思考測驗的結果：在語文流暢力、語文變通力、語文獨創 力這些變項上，互動組與欣賞組有顯著差異，且互動組優於欣賞組。 但在圖形流暢力、圖形變通力、圖形獨創力和圖形精進力這些變項 上，互動組與欣賞組並無顯著差異。 (三)在作文態度改善的結果上，互動組與欣賞組無顯著差異。 (四)無論在數位說故事的製作上、新編創造思考測驗以及作文態度的結 果發現，互動組和欣賞組的後測皆高於前測。 (五)創意數位說故事作文教學在國小階段是值得推行的。 研究者根據上述的研究結果提出建議，以作為教育應用及未來研究的參 考。 / The main purpose of this research was to explore whether the 「creative digital story-telling course」 can help to improve story quality, creativity, and writing attitude, and understand the feasibilities and limitations of teaching similar courses to higher-grade students in primary schools. The researcher adopted 「nonequivalent pretest-posttest designs」 as a quasi-experimental study. Two classes of fifth grade students from a Kaohsiung school were selected as study samples; one class was assigned as an 「interactive group」, the other as an 「appreciation group」. Both respectively accepted twelve units in a total of 60 experimental courses. The interactive group took the lessons of 「creative digital storytelling」 that emphasized the interaction processes during electronic brain-storming, story sharing and so classes. The appreciation group took the courses of 「appreciating and digitalizing the stories」, which focused on story demonstration and appreciation. In this study, the research instruments comprised 「tests of creativity thinking in composition 」, the researcher’s self-created 「digital story rating scale」 and 「writing attitude rating scale」, and also the collections of qualitative data covering the digital story works, students』 reflections in response to the teaching courses, and the data of funny creation exercises. The analyses were conducted by one-way analysis of covariance for independent samples and dependent samples t-test. The qualitative data were used as supplementary explanations for the quantity results. The research resulted in the following findings: 1. In respect of the production of digital storytelling, there were significant differences between the interactive group and the appreciation group; obviously the appreciation group performed better than the interactive group. 2. In light of the results from the tests of creative thinking in composition, there were remarkable differences between the two groups in respect to linguistic fluency, flexibility and originality; the interactive group was better than the appreciation group in the results. Nevertheless, it showed no much difference between the two groups in graphic creativity in terms of fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration. 3. In respect of writing attitude improvement, there was no much difference between two groups. 4. The posttest scores were higher than pre-test scores for both interactive group and appreciation group in all experiments, including the production of digital storytelling, tests of creativity thinking in composition and writing attitude. 5. It is worthy to promote the creative digital storytelling in composition teaching for primary school educations. The researcher made suggestions in accordance with the above research findings, and served as a reference for educational applications and future studies.

本研究旨在探討「曼陀羅課程」與「創造思考力」之間的關係，設計一套適合我國國小學生學習的課程方案，最後依據研究結果提出建議。首先，針對「曼陀羅課程」與「創造思考力」進行文獻探討，俾作為研究立論基礎與分析之依據；其次，本研究採「準實驗研究法」，以國小甲校五年A班為實驗組進行共200分鐘的實驗課程，以國小甲校五年B班為對照組。研究工具包括研究者編製之「曼陀羅課程教材」、「曼陀羅課程學習成效評量」，以及「Torrance創造思考測驗圖形版」、「Torrance創造思考測驗語文版」；接著，以統計方法對實驗結果加以探討分析，包括描述性統計、t考驗、皮爾森積差相關以及逐步迴歸法；最後，依據結果形成結論與建議。茲將本研究之主要結論歸納如下： 壹、實驗組與對照組「Torrance創造思考測驗圖形版」後測分數有顯著差異。 一、實驗組在接受「曼陀羅課程」學習後，後測分數顯著高於對照組。後測分數包含標準分數平均數、創造力指數及創造潛能優異表現三個項目。 二、在本測驗包含的五項創造力特質中，實驗組在「獨創力」之後測分數顯著高於對照組；在「精密力」和「開放力」之後測分數與前測相比有提升。 貳、實驗組與對照組「Torrance創造思考測驗語文版」後測分數有顯著差異。 一、實驗組在接受「曼陀羅課程」學習後，後測總分顯著高於對照組。 二、在本測驗包含的三項創造力特質中，包含「流暢力」、「獨創力」、「變通力」，實驗組的後測分數皆顯著高於對照組。 參、實驗組學生多能充分理解「曼陀羅課程」，學習成效評量結果佳。 肆、「實-虛」課程對「語文創造力」具顯著相關及預測力。 最後，根據後續研究研究結果，提出相關建議，俾供對曼陀羅課程之內容設計、教學方式，以及對教育工作者與後續研究之參考。