本研究旨在了解國中校長正向領導與教師職場希望感的現況，教師人口變項、學校環境變項在校長正向領導以及教師職場希望感的差異情形及探討校長正向領導與教師職場希望感的關係。 本研究以問卷調查法為主。研究對象為新北市、台北市、桃園市國民中學教師，共發出835份問卷，回收率92.2%，有效樣本共770份。問卷回收後分別以信度分析、敘述統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關以及多元逐步迴歸等統計方法進行分析。根據研究結果與分析歸納之研究結論如下: 一、國中校長在整體正向領導與整體教師職場希望感方面表現為中上程度 二、國中教師人口變項中，不同性別、不同現任職務之教師知覺校長正向領導有差異。 三、國中在環境變項中，不同校長性別、不同學校規模之教師知覺校長正向領導沒有差異。 四、國中教師人口變項中，不同性別、、不同年齡、不同現任職務之教師知覺職場希望感有差異。 五、國中在環境變項中，不同校長性別之教師知覺職場希望感有差異。 六、國中校長正向領導與教師職場希望感為顯著正相關。 七、整體國中校長正向領導對於教師職場希望感有預測力。 最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、學校校長、教師以及未來研究之參考。

本研究利用生命故事中自傳式理解作為媒介，探討個體自我瞭解與心理適應的關係如何於生命故事中展現，由處理層面（認知努力、處理結果）、主題內容（救贖化歷程、汙染化歷程、生發主題、共群主題）切入，探索自傳式理解的不同面向與正/負向心理適應狀態間之關聯性；另一方面，追蹤參與者一年後的心理適應狀態，探討自傳式理解能否預測未來心理適應。本研究採用生命故事訪問法進行訪問，第一年收集48名大學生之生命故事與心理適應狀態量表（希望感/憂鬱）、第二年追蹤42名大學生之心理適應狀態，將訪問內容謄為逐字稿後，針對處理層面及主題內容進行內容分析的計分。研究結果顯示：（一）處理層面中之認知努力程度雖與第一年心理適應狀態無顯著相關或解釋力，但卻對第二年憂鬱程度有顯著解釋力，換言之當個體投入越多的心力在思考自我與過往事件的關聯，則其第二年憂鬱分數越低；處理結果與第一年心理適應有顯著相關，甚至對第一年希望感有顯著解釋力，但無法有效預測第二年希望感與憂鬱分數。（二）主題內容中救贖化/污染化歷程與第一年心理適應狀態皆有顯著相關，與過往研究結果相似，迴歸分析顯示污染化歷程對第一年憂鬱有顯著解釋力，但兩者亦無法顯著預測第二年心理適應狀態；生發、共群主題與第一年心理適應狀態無顯著相關，亦無法有效預測第二年心理適應分數。最後，針對研究結果進行討論並提出臨床上的運用、研究限制與未來研究方向之建議。 / In the present research, autobiographical reasoning (AR) was used to examine the relation between self-understanding and psychological adaptation. This research focused on the process aspect (cognitive effort, process outcome), and the content aspect (redemption/contamination sequences, agency, communal) of AR to explore the relation to psychological adaptation. Also, participants’ psychological adaptation (hope, depression) was followed a year later to test whether AR could predict future psychological adaptation. Life story interview was used to collect 48 college students’ stories in the first year (time 1), and 42 of them were followed in the second year (time 2). Results showed that (1) the relation between cognitive effort and T1 psychological adaptation wasn’t statistically significant. However, cognitive effort could predict T2 depression. The more effort participants put on thinking connections between past events and the inner self, the less depression level they are in the next year. Process outcome was significantly correlated with T1 psychological adaptation, but it could not predict T2 psychological adaptation. (2) Redemption/contamination sequences were significantly correlated with T1 psychological adaptation. Further, contamination sequences could predict T1 depression. But redemption and contamination sequences could not predict T2 psychological adaptation. On the other hand, agency and communal themes neither correlated with T1 psychological adaptation, nor predicted T2 psychological adaptation. Finally, implications and limitations of this study were discussed.

教師專業學習社群（簡稱「教師社群」）是一種協助現場教師突破孤立狀態、與同儕相互學習、以持續專業發展、進而提升創意之重要方式。 本研究透過量化模式的檢驗，探究教師社群互動、工作希望感受與創造性轉化之關係，以問卷調查法，針對台灣地區教師，進行取樣研究，有效問卷共計891份。研究工具包括「社群互動品質量表」、「工作希望感受量表」與「創造性轉化行為量表」。此外，並透過對典型個案之訪談，探究四個「創意教師行動研究」成功社群的經營策略。 量化研究主要發現：「教師社群互動、工作希望感受與創造性轉化」模式之驗證獲得支持。此模式的意義在於：良好的教師社群必須兼顧認知與情感層面的互動；如此，除了可直接促進教學上的創造性轉化之外，認知與情感互動尚可以透過工作希望感受之中介效果來影響教師的創造性轉化。至於教師工作希望感受的提升，則能直接影響創造性轉化的展現。其次，根據個案分析整理歸納出經營社群的重要策略，如：「感動策略」、「友誼策略」、「共同解決問題策略」、「榮耀共享策略」、「低調漸進緩慢策略」、「彰權益能策略」、「成就感策略」、「資源網絡拓展策略」、「雁行領導策略」以及「持續互動策略」。 最後，本研究根據上述發現並針對教育實務與未來研究層面，提出具體建議以供參考。 / Nowadays, the concept of a “teacher professional learning community” (Teacher Community, TC) is an important approach to cultivate, develop, and sustain teachers’ professional development and creativity. In Taiwan, from the perspective of TC, how to facilitate teachers’ creativity is also valued under the Creative Education policy. However, empirical evidence is rarely discussed. Thus, this study addresses two aspects: (1) the relationship of TC, work hope and creative transformation (Study I), (2) to explore the main strategies of managing teacher communities (Study II). In Study I, a SEM model is proposed using the linear structural relations (LISREL) to test the research hypotheses with the data from 891 valid questionnaires collected. Instruments used include Interactions of Communities Scales, Work Hope Scale, and Creative Transformation Scale. The estimated results of the proposed model are found to substantiate the requirements of the general LISREL model. The majority of the fit indices have indicated good fit of the model to the data. The main findings include (1) Cognitive interactions of communities have significantly direct and indirect effects through work hope on creative transformation; (2) Affective interactions of communities have significantly direct and indirect effects through work hope on creative transformation; (3) Work hope has a significantly direct effect on creative transformation. These results have suggested that teachers’ work hope, and their cognitive and affective interactions in communities have a significant, positive influence on creative transformation. In addition, work hope has played a role as a mediator between the interactions in communities and creative transformation. In Study II, teachers in communities of four typical cases funded for four years under the Project on the Enhancement of Creative Education are interviewed. Based on the data, there are several strategies for managing teacher communities: (1) witnessing strategy, (2) friendship strategy, (3) problem-solving strategy, (4) honor- sharing strategy, (5) low-profile strategy, (6) empowerment strategy, (7) sense of achievement strategy, (8) networking strategy, (9) flying geese strategy, and (10) sustaining strategy. Limitations of the current research and implications for the practice of teacher community were discussed.

本研究旨在探討高中身心障礙學生知覺的家庭功能、學校支持、希望感與人際適應之相關研究。以台北縣、市領有視覺障礙、聽覺障礙與肢體障礙身心障礙殘障手冊的高中身心障礙學生，共186人為研究對象，採用家庭功能量表、學校支持調查表、希望感量表、人際適應量表為研究工具，再以台北縣、市立公私立高中普通班學生，做為參照，以了解身心障礙學生知覺的家庭功能、希望感與人際適應的關係，和一般學生是否不同。統計方法以因素分析、信度分析、描述統計、t考驗、皮爾森積差相關、典型相關、多元迴歸分析等進行分析。結果發現： 一、高中身心障礙學生在知覺的家庭功能、學校支持、希望感與人際適應都有中上程度，其中，家庭功能與人際適應情形略低於高中一般學生，希望感則無明顯差異。 二、高中身心障礙學生知覺的家庭功能、學校支持、希望感與人際適應有三組顯著的典型相關存在。 三、高中身心障礙學生知覺的家庭功能、學校支持與希望感對人際適應有預測力，其中以學校支持的「同學支持的有助性」為最主要的預測向度。而高中身心障礙學生與一般學生知覺的家庭功能與希望感預測人際適應的情形有差異。 / This research is focused on the relationships between perceived family functioning, school support, hope and interpersonal adjustment about high school students with disabilities. Subjects are 186 high school students with visual disability, hearing impairment and physical disability coming from Taipei county and Taipei city in Taiwan. This study apply the Family Functioning Scale, School Support Investigation, Hope Scale and Interpersonal Adjustment Scale to obtain the necessary data. The collection of the data is interpreted with the use of factor analysis, cronbach alpha, t-test, pearson correlation, canonical correlation analysis and multiple regression. Findings are as such: 1. High school students with disabilities are all above average on percieved family functioning, school support, hope and intepersonal adjustment. However, they show less perceived family functioning and interpersonal adjustment than their general peer classmates; besides, there is no significant difference about hope whether the high school students have disabilities or not. 2. There are three significant canonical correlations between perceived family functioning, school support, hope and interpersonal adjustment about high school students with disability. 3. Interpersonal adjustment was able to be explained by percieved family functioning, school support and hope. Classmates’ support is the most important variabilities among high school students with disabilities.There are differences between high school students and their general peer classmates on predicting interpersonal adjustment.

本研究旨在探討大學生的希望感、建設性思考、情緒創造力及創造風格之關係。研究參與者來自台北縣市、桃園縣七所公私立大學的大學生，有效樣本計531人。本研究採用的研究工具包括「希望感量表」、「建設性思考量表」、「情緒創造力量表」及「創造風格量表」。資料分析所用的統計方法包括描述統計、單因子單變量和多變量變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及線性結構模式分析。本研究主要發現如下： 一、 大學生在希望感、建設性思考、情緒創造力的表現程度佳，且 偏向運用創造核心特質。 二、 不同性別的大學生在情緒創造力及創造風格上均有差異，就整 體和各指標而言，男生的創造核心特質優於女生，女生的情緒 創造力優於男生。 三、 創造力獎項得獎經驗對大學生的情緒創造力沒有效果，但對創 造風格中的非最終產品定位、技術使用及無意識過程信念有效 果，非最終產品定位及技術使用為無得獎者大於有得獎者，無 意識過程信念則為有得獎者大於無得獎者。 四、 所屬學院對情緒創造力中的新穎性來源及情緒準備度有效果， 且能對創造風格中的無意識過程信念、環境控制與行為自我調 節有效果。 五、 大學生的情緒創造力對創造風格有效果。 六、 希望感對大學生的情緒創造力有效果，且對創造風格中的非最 終產品定位、技術使用、無意識過程信念及借助他人有效果。 七、 建設性思考對大學生情緒創造力中的有效性及新穎性反應有效 果；且對創造風格中的迷信行為及環境控制與行為自我調節有 效果。 八、 就大學生創造風格之路徑模式而言，希望感與建設性思考產生 交互作用後，會分別對情緒創造力有直接效果並透過情緒創造 力對創造核心特質及創意輔助習性有間接效果，且情緒創造力 對創造核心特質與創意輔助習性有直接效果。 最後，本研究依據本研究主要發現提出意見，以提供相關單位與人員在教育以及學術研究上之參考。 / The main purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among hope belief, constructive thinking, emotional creativity, and creative style of undergraduate students. The participants included 531 undergraduate students sampled from seven national or private universities in Taipei City, Taipei County, and Taoyuan County. The employed instruments in this study were the Inventory of Hope, the Inventory of Constructive Thinking, the Inventory of Emotional Creativity, and the Questionnaire of Creative Style. The employed analysis methods included Descriptive Statistics, one-way ANOVA, one-way MANOVA and SEM. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1.The undergraduate students had high level of hope belief, constructive thinking, and emotional creativity; and they tended to use core traits of creativity. 2.There were significant gender differences on emotional creativity and creative style; the males outperformed the females in core traits of creativity, and the females outperformed the males in emotional creativity. 3.The experiences of winning creative awards had no effects on emotional creativity, but had effects on creative style, especially on “not final product orientation”, “use of techniques”, and “belief in unconscious processes”. Moreover, participants who had won creative awards outperformed their counterparts in “not final product orientation”, “use of techniques”; participants who had not won any creative awards outperformed their counterparts in “belief in unconscious processes”. 4.College of major had effects on emotional creativity, especially in “origin of novelty”, and “preparation”. Moreover, college of major had effects on creative style, especially in “belief in unconscious processes” and “environmental control and behavioral self- regulation”. 5.The participants’ emotional creativity had effects on their creative style. 6.The participants’ hope belief had effects on their emotional creativity and creative style, especially in “not final product orientation”, “use of techniques”, “belief in unconscious processes”, and “use of other people”. 7.The participants’ constructive thinking had effects on their emotional creativity, especially in “effectiveness”, “novel response”. Moreover, the participants’ constructive thinking had effects on their creative style, especially in “superstition” and “environmental control and behavioral self- regulation”. 8.As for the path model, hope belief and constructive thinking interactively and directly influenced their emotional creativity and then indirectly influenced their core traits of creativity and assisted habits of creativity via emotional creativity; meanwhile, emotional creativity had direct effects on their core traits of creativity and assisted habits of creativity. Finally, the researcher proposed some suggestions for educational instructions and academic research.