本研究為研究者由實務工作所遭遇之問題出發，企圖了解社區發展協會之學理上社區功能與政策上社區功能為何？而該社區功能受哪些因素所影響（以社區類型、社區發展協會與里辦公處互動關係、社區發展協會與政府單位互動關係來檢視）？學理上社區功能與政策上社區功能有何落差？經由本研究之研究問題，擬訂出本研究假設： 研究假設一：學理上的社區功能與政策上的社區功能是有相關的。 研究假設二：不同的社區類型會影響學理上之社區功能。 研究假設三：不同的社區類型會影響政策上之社區功能。 研究假設四：社區發展協會與里辦公處之互動關係越好，其學理上社區功能發展越好。 研究假設五：社區發展協會與政府單位之互動關係越好，其學理上之社區功能發展越好。 研究假設六：社區發展協會與里辦公處之互動關係越好，其政策上之社區功能發展越好。 研究假設七：社區發展協會與政府單位之互動關係越好，其政策上之社區功能發展越好。 本研究採量化方式進行，針對臺北市331家社區發展協會（以98年11月統計數為母群體），利用臺北市政府社會局每年例行性辦理之補助說明會、臺北市社區發展工作評鑑輔導營及社區人才培訓活動發放問卷，本研究問卷共發放256份，其中回收187份，總計有效問卷161份，無效問卷26份，回收率為62％，惟本研究研究對象為社區發展協會，有效問卷中計有60份為重複填答，經剔除後本研究問卷共調查101家社區發展協會，其中理事長填答者共35份，總幹事填答者共38份，其他填答者28份（含理事、監事、會計、志工）。 經統計分析結果後發現未來在里辦公處與社區發展協會兩者組織發展情形，多數協會認為兩者仍應持續共存，且社區發展協會與里辦公處之互動關係良好的仍佔多數。而在與政府單位互動情形，整體而言，社區發展協會與政府單位之互動關係是良好的，另在整體滿意度與政府發展方向上，協會對於政府之施政、政策認為是滿意的、發展方向也與政府方向是一致的。本研究發現學理上社區功能與政策上社區功能兩者是無完全相關；而不同的社區類型是會影響社區發展協會學理上與政策上之社區功能；另外當協會與里辦公的互動關係越好時，其政策上社區功能會發展的越好。 / This thesis is started from the problem which the researcher met in practice work. The researcher would like to know what the community function in theory and policy is？And it is effected by what factors（Use the community type、the relationship in the community association and neighborhood office、the relationship in the community association and government to confer）？What is the difference between community function in theory and in policy？According to these questions，this thesis have seven assumptions： Assumption 1：The community function in theory is related to the community function in policy. Assumption 2：Different community type influence community function in theory. Assumption 3：Different community type influence community function in policy. Assumption 4：The better the relationship of the community association and neighborhood office is, the better the community function in theory is. Assumption 5：The better the relationship in the community association and the government is, the more is the community function in theory is. Assumption 6：The better the relationship in the community association and neighborhood office is, the better the community function in policy is. Assumption 7：The better the relationship in the community association and the government is, the better the community function in the policy is. This thesis is a quantification research, The population is 331 community associations（On a basis of September 2009）.The questionnaire survey delivered 256 pieces. There are 161 pieces is applicable，26pieces are not in 187 recycled questionnaires. A Recycled ratio is 62％. Anyhow, we survey 101 community associations，there are 35 pieces answered by the organization president ,38 pieces answered by the organization manager，the others answered 28 pieces. This survey find out the community association and neighborhood office will exit together in the future. And the relationship of the community association and the neighborhood office is good, and so is the community association and government. In conclusion，the community association is satisfied with the government policy，and the development direction is the same. This survey find that the community function in theory the community function in policy is not related. Different community type influence community function in theory and in policy. Besides the better the relationship of the community association and neighborhood office, the better the community function in theory.

全台第一座都會型纜車「貓空纜車」於2007年7月4日正式營運，並在一年三個月創下617萬搭乘人次，成果輝煌；然而在2008年9月，因遭逢辛樂克與薔蜜颱風接連肆虐下，發生纜車T16塔柱邊坡崩塌事件進而停駛。當各界重新檢討這座興建順利的纜車背後隱藏了多少問題之際，本研究運用政策網絡分析，檢視貓空纜車政策形成過程，分別就參與者性質、行動者策略、權力關係與網絡整合性四大面向，就問題形成、政策規劃、政策合法化三個階段，逐段建構政策網絡、確立利害關係人，並探討興建過程中產生的問題。 研究發現，貓空纜車成案的關鍵並非專業評估使然，乃是為了實現馬英九市府的競選承諾。貓空纜車因為規劃過程中受到動物園的影響，導致纜車路線變更，鄰近棲霞山莊，並衍生後續噪音污染等爭議。貓空纜車在木柵觀光茶園社區發展協會及指南宮等民間團體的支持下，削弱了反對聲音；而主要的政策反對者棲霞山莊，則在當時問題意識不明確、預算順利通過等因素下，錯失反對時機。 / The first urban-type cable car in Taiwan “Maokong Gondola” had been inaugurated since 4th of July in 2007. It has successfully achieved 6.17 million hits in one year and three months. However, during September 2008, typhoon Sinlaku and Jangmi struck one after another and incurred serious mudslide erosion underneath pillar T16. The disaster had crippled the whole cable car system and had urged the public to re-examine the whole construction. This study utilizes policy network analysis to evaluate policy formation process regarding the construction of Maokong gondola in terms of four major factors: character of participants, actions’ strategies, power relationship and network integration. Demarcating the policy network while identifying the policy stakeholders and exploring issues arising from the construction process has been carried out in all three stages of the event: problem formation, policy formulation and policy legitimation. This study shows that the key to the approval of Maokong gondola program was not due to professional evaluation, but instead, it was for the political motivation of Ma’s administration to attain victory in campaign. Being affected by the location of Taipei city zoo in the stage of program formulating, the cable car system has been rerouted closer to Chi-shia village, causing noise pollution and other harassment. By strong support from Muzha tea park community development association and Zhinan temple, the opponent’s opinions were gradually suppressed. Due to uncertainty of problem-knowing and easy approval of budget, the main opponent Chi-shia village had finally missed the opportunity in stopping the program.

台灣近十幾年來，社區凝聚意識高漲，各地區的非營利組織也紛紛在社區裡建立緊密的網絡以利互助交流。由於外在競爭者陸續的增加，使得社區型非營利組織必須具備更高的動員性，而為了募集更多的人力和資源，在申請和執行政府補助計畫的方面，也必須保持積極的態度。政府和社區型非營利組織要建構成功的夥伴關係，不僅與政府的政策規劃和執行有關，也與社區型非營利組織本身的特性和運作方式息息相關，故兩者間的協力關係呈現多樣化的面貌。 本研究以基隆市五個執行多元就業開發方案社會型計畫，但發展背景與執行成效有差異的社區發展協會為主要研究對象，探討這五個社區發展協會所發揮之功能與面臨的困境，以及參與多元就業開發方案中與政府的協力關係。 研究發現：（一）社區發展協會功能受限以及面對諸多問題；（二）社區發展協會參與多元就業開發方案帶來正面能量；（三） 社區發展協會參與多元就業開發方案與政府形成合作的模式；（四） 社區發展協會與政府所達成的協力互動關係因組織特質不同而有差異。 研究建議：（一）社區型非營利組織方面：社區發展協會應爭取多方資源，規劃學習型組織以及善用組織行銷（二）公私協力關係方面：社區發展協會應保持自主原則、社區發展協會領導人態度需正面積極、政府部門應以公平的態度對待每個單位、建立平等互惠的協力關係。（三）政策方面：透過社區附權來引導社區組織激發出更多想法與特色，並化為社區實際的能力。 / Over the past few decades, the consciousness of community has surged, the non-profit organizations also have built close network to enhance interaction in the community. Since the numbers of outside competitors have increased, the community non-profit organizations must have higher mobility. To gather more labor and resource, they must stay positive to apply for and execute the government grant programs. To establish a successful partnership between the government and the community non-profit organization, it is about not only the government’s policy and execution, but also the features of the community non-profit organization itself, and its operation way. Therefore, the cooperation of the two has appeared to be diverse. This study takes 5 community development associations which with same execution of multi-employment development social type plan, but different in developing background and executive efficiency as research subjects. Discuss the functions of the 5 communities and difficulties they have encountered, and the cooperation from government in the participation of multi-employment development plan. The research shows that: 1. The function of community development association is limited and also there are many problems they have encountered. 2. The community development association would bring positive energy by participating in multi-employment development plan. 3. The cooperation model between the government and community development associations that participate in multi-employment development plan. 4. There will be differences in the cooperative interaction due to the different organization features of the community development associations and the government. There are four suggestions: 1. For the community non-profit organization: The community development associations should strive for different resources, planning the learning organization and use the organization marketing well. 2. Public and private cooperation: The community development associations shall keep the principle of autonomy, the attitude of leader of the community development association has to be positive and aggressive, and the government shall treat every unit fair and establish the equality and mutual benefit of the cooperation. 3. Policy: By community empowerment lead and inspire the community organization with more thoughts and features, making it the practical power of the community.