營建業為國內重要的民生工業，同時也是影響國家經濟發展與競爭力的重要指標之一。由於營建業易受外部政治和經濟環境等因素影響且高度依賴財務槓桿操作，經營風險較高使營建業公司治理機制成為提高營運績效及永續發展的關鍵因素。而台灣家族企業比例高，其中又以製造業及營建業比例高於其他產業。因此，本研究亦加入家族特性來討論公司治理結構對公司績效的影響。而過去國內營建業相關文獻多以傳統會計指標作為績效衡量標準，本文採用附加經濟價值(Economic Value Added , EVA)作為公司績效衡量指標，並以董事會結構、所有權結構以及經營團隊等三個面向作為公司治理機制變數之衡量。 本研究得到實證結果如下，第一，營建業存在董事規模小，獨立董事比例低以及控制股東持股比例高的特性，使得公司董事會過於封閉、經營團隊獨立性低且缺乏外部獨立性制衡。第二，營建業家族企業公司績效劣於非家族企業公司績效，顯示良好的公司治理機制對於家族企業的永續發展更加重要。第三、相對於非家族企業，家族企業會強化董事會規模、獨立董事比例及監察人比例與公司績效之間的正向關係。而無論是家族或是非家族企業，董事長兼任總經理皆對公司績效帶來負面影響。第四、營建業家族企業當家族成員涉入管理階層比例高，由於個人利益與家族利益關係密切，使家族成員涉入經營團隊時，透過凝聚力與相同目標可以增加決策效率，並以極大化公司價值為目標，有助於公司績效的提升。最後，營建業家族持股比例越高，家族利益與公司利益緊密性越高，對於公司績效有正向的影響，而家族董事控制席次增加，加深負面影響。 / Construction industry is not only an important major household industry but an indicator of economic development and competitiveness. The external political and economic environment and highly financial leverage affect the construction industry. The impact of corporate governance on performance becomes a key issue to improve the operational performance of construction industry. While the proportion of family business in manufacturing and construction industry is higher than other industries. Therefore, family characteristics are also added to discuss the impact of corporate governance on performance. In this paper, the economic value added (EVA) is used as the measure of corporate performance, and the board structure, ownership structure and management team is used as measures of corporate governance variables. The study shows following results. First, the construction industry has three characteristics, small board size, low proportion of independence directors and high ownership concentration. Second, in the construction industry, non-family business enjoy better performance than family firms do. Third, Family business will strengthen the positive impact of board size, the proportion of independent directors and supervisors on performance. Forth, in the construction industry, family shareholder in the management team is found to be beneficial to performance. And a positive relationship exists between ownership and performance. While increase the number of directors from the family members will increase the negative impact on corporate performance.

本研究從了解台達電公司的背景，整體環境，產品的前景與市場獲利，公司結構和近來動向，技術合作生產方面，重要轉投資活動，達電與上下游廠商之間的關係和在產業中的優劣勢分析出發，對公司的背景有了透澈的了解後，開始以既有的財務報表 (民國76~87年) 為基礎對達電預估民國88~92年的財務報表，並且以學術的評估公司價值理論套用進來，如資產評價模型 (CAPM)，競爭優勢期間 (Competitive advantage period)，股利折現模型 (Gordon model)，附加經濟價值模型 (EVA)，修正附加經濟價值模型 (REVA)，自由現金流量法 (Free cash flow)，指標盈餘法 (indexed earnings)，本益比 (P/E)、市價淨值比 (P/B) 和市價銷售比法 (P/S) 等，以了解這些模型對達電的適用性，並對上述的模型提出其是否適用的原因，作為日後評價類似台灣科技產業的參考。 此實例研究重點仍在如何將公司預估的財務報表作一系性地連結，並且建立在對其基本面的理解，完成此紮實的基礎再套用不同的評價理論，結論是以自由現金流量和相對價值模型: 本益比 (P/E)、市價淨值比 (P/B) 和市價銷售比法 (P/S)，這些模型較能和市場價值近似。解釋原因: 自由現金流量和科技產業的特性有關，能對其大量的折舊稅值現金流入和儘量發放股票股利代替現金分配的因素加以考量，本益比 (P/E)、市價淨值比 (P/B) 和市價銷售比法 (P/S) 則因台灣有不少性質近似的同業和本身的歷史報表作為比較基礎，故使用起來亦方便且有效。 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的 第二節 研究範圍與限制 第三節 研究架構 第二章 文獻探討 第三章 研究達電公司 第一節 達電簡介 第二節 整體環境 第三節 產品的前景與市場獲利 第四節 公司結構和近來動向 第五節 技術合作生產方面 第六節 重要轉投資活動 第七節 達電與上下游廠商之間的關係 第八節 達電經營團隊的領導作風與政府和勞資的關係 第九節 達電在產業中的優劣勢分析 第四章 研究設計 第一節 研究假說 第二節 資料描述 第五章 實證結果 利用競爭優勢期間求算達電股價 以對權益的自由現金流量法 利用現金股利折現模型 以投資機會方法 (investment opportunities approach) 運用q (盈餘保留率) 的價格 指標盈餘 (indexed earnings) 方法 以EVA和REVA法求算達電經營績效 以本益比、市價淨值比和市價銷售比法 敏感性分析 第六章 結論與建議 參考文獻： 附錄 / There are many valuation models, such as CAPM, competitive advantage period model, Gordon dividend discount model, economic value added model, revised economic value added model, free cash flow model, and relative pricing models such as P/E, P/B and P/S, etc… But what is the fittest model for the high-tech stocks in Taiwan? In my thesis I picked Delta electronic company for my case study because it is one of the fastest growing corporations that is representative of the industry on this island. I started with understanding the fundamentals, strategy, strength, weakness, opportunity and the threat of Delta by analyzing its industry, structure, products and its affiliates domestically and abroad. On the basis of the existing financial statements of the past 12 years (1987~1998), I built the next 5-year ones (1999~2003). Then I applied the valuation models to find out the intrinsic value of Delta based on the information from my analysis, magazines, the internet, the library and other resources. To sum up, this study pointed that the free cash flow model and the relative pricing models including P/E, P/B and P/S could fit the market well. Others are a little away from the quotes of the market. After all, the conclusion is not decisive that other models will never capture the value of the high-tech company like Delta electronic. However the main contribution of this research is the consistence of Delta's projected financial statements. They all connect all together. And all is based on the fundamentals of the company and the industry. Their relationship is what this case study accounts. With this maneuver in the company's accounting numbers step by step, the market participants can apply to other similar companies in Taiwan high-tech industry as well. Or this can contribute to the academics for the scholars to study further on similar issues down the road.