• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

以層級分析法 建構G2B計畫評估架構與指標-從價值鏈觀點出發 / A value-chain approach to build G2B program evaluation framework

楊禮榮, Yang, Li Jung Unknown Date (has links)
近年來,由於ICT的蓬勃發展,政府逐漸增加投資於電子化計畫的線上服務比例與種類,為了理解投資所能獲得的收益,杜絕資源浪費,並促使政府調整施政方向達到良善治理,針對電子化計畫進行評估是勢然必行的。目前許多評估機構逐漸從衡量政府投資電子化政府服務的客觀產出,轉而討論電子化服務使用者端的影響與成果。本研究,以計畫整體流程中所面臨的內部運作與外部感受、客觀產出與抽象成果的評估構面,提出G2B電子化計畫流程評估架構。 本研究結合Heeks (2006)的價值鏈模型與Millard & Shahin (2006)電子化計畫評估流程建立流程模型,透過文獻整理出評比國家型、網頁感知品質型、滿意模型與利害關係人模型指標,從企業途徑與政府內部途徑角度,探討G2B計畫流程評估架構,並使用層級分析法(analytic hierarchy process),由專家給予衡量G2B計畫推動時,前端到後端階段中重要構面的權重,並根據分析結果討論現今台灣計劃評估傾向上的差異。 本研究結果發現,在政府計畫生產過程中,應重視政府領導與支持,並發展衡量方式;專家不論在企業途徑與政府內部途徑上,都認為「服務產出評估是必需的過程,但影響與成果階段,才是價值衡量的終點」,因此,電子化計劃評估應從重視成本比的角度,朝向討論「透過政府對計畫服務的投入與投資,所能帶給企業實際或感知的價值與影響」,更能切中利害關係人關注的關鍵利益。 / This study aims at building an e-program evaluation chain model combining output evaluation with impact assessments, in order to assess the comprehensive G2B e-program from back-office process to the impact of online services. This study contributes a G2B evaluation framework with six processes integrated by e-government value chain model and e-program evaluation process. Given the concept of external and internal customer,「Business approach」and「Internal-Government approach」is developed in view of stakeholders. By evaluating subjective expert judgments via analytic hierarchy process method, this G2B evaluation framework is given weights and priorities in each hierarchy under both of approaches. The results indicate that impact and outcome assessments should be emphasized, no matter which approach is. Evaluation toward objective output is only a necessary process, but not the destination. As policy suggestions, this study addresses that government should focus on what kinds of value e-program can bring, and evaluate them.
2

政府採購入口網站功能架構與關鍵成功因素之研究 / A Study of the functional architecture and Key Success Factors for the Government Electronic Procurement Portal Website

陳冠竹 Unknown Date (has links)
政府入口網站含蓋了眾多提供公共服務的網站,讓民眾或企業進行相關業務的辦理、資訊的查詢以及進行交易等行為。全國或是全球需要使用到政府服務,例如政府採購等之使用者皆是政府入口網站之服務對象。因此政府網站在資料流量含量方面較之於一般商業網站更為可觀,亦包含了電子商務性質。在此狀況下,政府角色亦已逐漸從管制調適為服務。就政府體策略或執行計畫而言,實施知識管理除可使行政單位的工作效率提昇,行政流程時間縮短,更可避免重覆錯誤及誤判訊息之可能。   本研究主要以行政院公共工程委員會目前所推行之『政府採購電子化』計畫為研究對象,冀於對未來五年能達到政府採購作業全面電子化提出建議。本研究之目標係分析研擬「政府電子採購入口網站」之關鍵成功因素,從而由「政府採購電子化」計畫現行系統歸納出具綜效之整合型「政府電子採購入口網站」功能架構,其工作內容如下:   1. 歸納、分析現行各系統及政府採購法推動之問題。   2. 瞭解國內政府入口網站之推動情形,分析企業資訊入口網站解決方案現況。   3. 利用分析層級程序法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,簡稱AHP)歸納出三分類專家,包括工程會內部專家、公部門專家、產業界及學界專家所認為的「政府電子採購入口網站」之關鍵成功因素,同時也分析資訊職務與非資訊職務專家觀點之相異點。   4. 根據歸納出來之關鍵成功因素與內部需求,提出具建設性之「政府電子採購入口網站」功能架構雛形,建議工程會推動「政府採購入口網站」提供之功能依據。   本研究AHP法研究結果如下:   1. 本研究中之各類專家一般認為內在因素比外在環境因素之權重大。   2. 第三層關鍵成功因素包括知識管理機制之健全化、政策及法制配合度、使用者服務機制、資訊系統與營運。整體而言,工程會內部專家與產業界及學界專家兩類專家較重視政策及法制配合度構面因素,而公部門專家比較重視資訊系統與營運構面因素。資訊職務專家較重視政策及法制配合度構面因素,非資訊職務專家比較重視資訊系統與營運構面因素。   3. 整體最底層關鍵成功因素排名前七項分別為高階長官的參與和支持並訂定明確的目標、即時配合實際狀況,修正、鬆綁法規、充裕的資源配合、提昇法令約束力之效力、提供快速回應問題之機制、介面具親和力、操作流程循序簡單、提供高度的可靠性與穩定性。   本研究最後逐一對專家深入訪談、工程會需求訪談、企業資訊入口網站解決方案及關鍵成功因素AHP之分析等結果提出結論與建議。 / An e-Government Portal should integrates numerous websites that offer public service, and provides individuals or enterprises with a platform for trafficking, searching information, and conducting transactions. Thus, all the users, that need to access government service and government procurement information, are potential customers of the e-Government Portal website. Hence, the e-Government Portal website, with e-Commerce quality, has more enormous data flow and database contents in comparison with simple e-Commerce sites. Last but not least, the role of e-Government Portal website is turned gradually into a service provider from its simple transition role of inspection.   From government's strategic aspect, actions regarding knowledge management can not only improve the efficiency and streamline the administrative procedures, but also avoid the crisis of repeating failures and misleadings of messages.   The object of this research is the Electronic Procurement Plan, which was established and promoted by the Public Construction Commission (PCC) of The Executive Yuan, R.O.C. The goal of the Electronic Procurement Plan is to accomplish the electronic commerce of the government procurement entirely in five years. This study aims to find out the critical success factors (CSF) for the Government Electronic Procurement Portal Website, and to carry out a functional architecture for the synergic Government Electronic Procurement Portal Website via the following working packages :   1. to analyze and formulate the problems of promoting the electronic government procurement system and the government procurement law.   2. to discuss the ongoing domestic promotion programs of the e-Government Portal websites and analyze the status quo cases of the Enterprise Information Portal (EIP) solution.   3. to analyze and compare the critical success factors of the Government Electronic Procurement Portal Website of various expert viewpoints through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The experts come from the PCC internal public servants, public servants from other government agencies as well as industrialists and scholars. On the other hand, the different viewpoints between the IT background experts and non-IT background experts are also compared.   4. to summarize constitutive functional architecture for the Government Electronic Procurement Portal Website according to the resulted CSF and the PCC internal requirements.   The results of AHP analysis can be stated as following:   1. The internal factors outweigh external factors.   2. The third-level of factors of AHP architecture includes the solidity of knowledge management, the compatibility of policies and laws, the user service mechanism and the information systems and operations. Generally, the PCC internal public servants, industrialists and scholars pay more attention to the compatibility of policies and laws than the other public servants that put a lot of emphasis on the information systems and operations. The IT background experts value the compatibility of policies and laws, whereas the non-IT background experts emphasize the information systems and operations.   3. The top seven priority factors of the rock-bottom level factors include the involvements and endorsements of the top executives and establish the clear goals, the instantaneous emendation and relaxation of the laws, the compatibility of abundant resource, the effectiveness of promoting the law's constraint force, friendly interface and easily sequential operation flow and high reliability and stability.   At last, this research leads to the conclusions and suggestions in regard to in-depth experts interviews,PCC internal requirement investigations, EIP solutions and the AHP CSF analysis.

Page generated in 0.0227 seconds