No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

La tesis analiza el tratamiento que los principales medios gráficos italianos de la Argentina de fines del siglo XIX otorgan a un hecho histórico complejo como la Guerra hispano-cubano-norteamericana del año 1898, y debate su posicionamiento sobre la cuestión independentista de Cuba, el definitivo ocaso del imperio colonial español y la emergencia de Estados Unidos en el tablero geopolítico global, en calidad de potencia capaz de desafiar los intereses del Viejo Mundo, tanto en la vertiente Atlántica como en la Pacífica. Focalizar la atención en los diarios de mayor difusión de la comunidad italiana de Buenos Aires en la época seleccionada permitirá reconstruir también su proceso de constitución y formación, incluyendo el terreno político e institucional en el cual estos proyectos editoriales toman forma, el contexto social y cultural que los genera y en el cual los mismos se disputan lectores y visibilidad. / The thesis analyses how the main Italian graphic media in Argentina at the end of the 19th century deal with a complex historical event such as the Spanish-Cuban-American War of 1898, and debates its position on the question of Cuban independence, the definitive decline of the Spanish colonial empire and the emergence of the United States on the global geopolitical chessboard, as a power capable of challenging the interests of the Old World on both the Atlantic and the Pacific sides. Focusing the attention on the newspapers with the largest circulation in the Italian community of Buenos Aires at the selected time will also allow to reconstruct their constitution and formation process, including the political and institutional background in which these editorial projects take shape, the social and cultural context that generates them and in which they compete for readers and visibility. / TEXTO PARCIAL en período de teletrabajo

No description available.

Durante as décadas de 1890 e 1910, a sociologia adquiriu direito de cidadania na universidade francesa, passando a compor, em uma posição institucionalmente frágil e marginal, o leque das disciplinas ofertadas nas Faculdades de Letras. A presente tese se propõe a investigar os diálogos que os portadores desse saber novo travaram então com helenistas e latinistas, os quais representavam, por seu turno, disciplinas tradicionais e ainda hegemônicas no sistema de ensino daquele país. Para tanto, são aqui privilegiados os circuitos de ideias e de pessoas entre cinco revistas especializadas de perfil universitário: o Année Sociologique, o Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, os Mélanges dArchéologie et dHistoire, a Revue des Études Grecques e a Revue des Études Anciennes. A partir do exame dos sentidos de tal fluxo, procurase esclarecer quais condições epistemológicas e sociais tornaram possível uma interdisciplinaridade historicamente dada, problematizando tanto seus limites práticos quanto seu peso na definição de cada um dos saberes nela implicados. / During the 1890s and 1910s, sociology acquired citizenship rights within the French University system, and became part of the spectrum of disciplines offered at the various faculties of Letters all over the country, even though it kept holding an institutionally weak position. The purpose of this thesis is to examine the dialogues during this early period between the holders of this new knowledge and Hellenistic and Latin scholars, who, in turn, represented traditional disciplines which still dominated the French educational system. To that end, we focus upon the circuits of ideas and people represented in five specialized academic journals, i.e: Année Sociologique, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, Mélanges d\'Archéologie et d\'Histoire, Revue des Etudes Grecques, and Revue des Etudes Anciennes. By analyzing the meanings of such a flow, we attempt to elucidate the epistemological and social conditions that allowed a historically given interdisciplinarity, questioning both its practical limits and its influence on the definition of each knowledge area.

余志強. / 複本為複印本. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Fu ben wei fu yin ben. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 344-351). / Yu Zhiqiang. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue. / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1─35 / Chapter 第二章 --- 開始運用馬列主義觀點治史 --- p.36-53 / Chapter 第三章 --- 以古喻今的歷史著作 --- p.54-69 / Chapter 第四章 --- 歷史科學的任務 --- p.70-90 / Chapter 第五章 --- 史學大躍進──吳晗，翦伯贊之反響 --- p.91-139 / Chapter 第六章 --- 怎樣研習中國的歷史 --- p.140-175 / Chapter 第七章 --- 歷史主義與階級觀點 --- p.176-208 / Chapter 第八章 --- 歷史人物的評價問題 --- p.209-244 / Chapter 第九章 --- 農民戰爭問題 --- p.245-299 / Chapter 第十章 --- 怎樣處理歷史上的民族關係問題 --- p.300-334 / 吳晗，翦伯贊著作分類目錄 --- p.335-344 / 參考書目 --- p.344-351

郭詩詠. / "2000年8月" / 論文 (哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2000. / 參考文獻 (leaves 155-162) / 附中英文摘要. / "2000 nian 8 yue" / Guo Shiyong. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2000. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 155-162) / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / Chapter 第一章 --- 引言 --- p.1-6 / Chapter 第二章 --- 硏究目的及方法 --- p.7-25 / Chapter 第一節 --- 硏究背景 --- p.7-12 / Chapter 第二節 --- 硏究目的 --- p.12-14 / Chapter 第三節 --- 硏究方法 --- p.14 / Chapter 一、 --- 錢理群「典型現象」理論簡介 --- p.15-18 / Chapter 二、 --- 硏究方法的適用性 --- p.18-22 / Chapter 三、 --- 本文的硏究架構與分期方法 --- p.22-23 / Chapter 四、 --- 硏究方法的特點及限制 --- p.23-25 / Chapter 第三章 --- 1919-1928 ：從啓蒙者到尋路人 --- p.26-73 / Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.26-30 / Chapter 第二節 --- 早期作品中的五個單位意象 --- p.30 / Chapter 一、 --- 「踪跡」 --- p.31-36 / Chapter 二、 --- 「腳步」 --- p.36-40 / Chapter 三、 --- 「尋路人」 --- p.40-45 / Chapter 四、 --- 「自然」 --- p.45-50 / Chapter 五、 --- 「薔藏色的歷史」 --- p.50-55 / Chapter 第三節 --- 朱自淸早期作品中個人與時代的關係 --- p.55 / Chapter 一、 --- 〈槳聲燈影裡的秦淮河〉 --- p.56-61 / Chapter 二、 --- 〈毀滅〉 --- p.61-66 / Chapter 三、 --- 〈那裡走〉 --- p.66-71 / Chapter 第四節 --- 總結 --- p.71-73 / Chapter 第四章 --- 1928-1945 ：十字街頭外的象牙塔 --- p.74-110 / Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.74-78 / Chapter 第二節 --- 「無話可說」的「平凡人」 --- p.78 / Chapter 一、 --- 小引 --- p.78-79 / Chapter 二、 --- 人到「中年」的「無話可說」 --- p.80 / Chapter 1. --- 所謂「無話可說」的涵義 --- p.80-81 / Chapter 2. --- 〈論無話可說〉與朱自淸個人定位的關係 --- p.81-84 / Chapter 3. --- 在「無話可說」中寫作 --- p.85-89 / Chapter a. --- 「憶的路」 / Chapter b. --- 「我」的消失 / Chapter 三、 --- 朱自淸的「無話可說」與時代的關係 --- p.89-94 / Chapter 四、 --- 小結 --- p.95 / Chapter 第三節 --- 「求是」與「致用」的學術硏究 --- p.95 / Chapter 一、 --- 小引 --- p.95-96 / Chapter 二、 --- 「求是」、「致用」的學術硏究 --- p.96 / Chapter 1. --- 「求是」與「歷史的觀點」 --- p.97-99 / Chapter 2. --- 「致用」與「現實的觀點」 --- p.99-102 / Chapter 三、 --- 「求是」與「致用」的學術硏究之積極意義 --- p.102-108 / Chapter 四、 --- 小結 --- p.108 / Chapter 第四節 --- 總結 --- p.109-110 / Chapter 第五章 --- 1945-1948 ：民眾的步伐 --- p.111-151 / Chapter 第一節 --- 引言 --- p.111-115 / Chapter 第二節 --- 「動亂時代」的「標準與尺度」 --- p.116 / Chapter 一、 --- 小引 --- p.116-117 / Chapter 二、 --- 朱自淸筆下的「標準與尺度」 --- p.117 / Chapter 1. --- 「標準與尺度」的定義 --- p.118-119 / Chapter 2. --- 朱自淸討論「標準與尺度」的方法 --- p.119-127 / Chapter a. --- 客觀敘述的語調與「歷史化」的處理手法 / Chapter b. --- 以「動亂時代」與「平民的興起」解釋歷史的變化 / Chapter c. --- 以上兩點所呈現的不協調 / Chapter 三、 --- 「動亂時代」中的朱自淸 --- p.127-134 / Chapter 四、 --- 小結 --- p.134-135 / Chapter 第三節 --- 現代的立場：論雅俗共賞 --- p.135 / Chapter 一、 --- 小引 --- p.135-136 / Chapter 二、 --- 「現代」、「雅俗共賞」、「人民」 --- p.137-140 / Chapter 三、 --- 「近於人民的立場」與「自己的立場」 --- p.140 / Chapter 1. --- 常識的標準 --- p.142-144 / Chapter 2. --- 雜感 --- p.144-145 / Chapter 3. --- 百讀不厭 --- p.145-147 / Chapter 四、 --- 小結 --- p.147-148 / Chapter 第四節 --- 總結 --- p.148-151 / Chapter 第六章 --- 總結 --- p.152-154 / 參考書目 --- p.155-162 / 附錄一：朱自淸著譯繫年目錄 --- p.1-73 / 附錄二 ：朱自淸硏究知見書目 --- p.74-89

馮益繼. / "2005年8月". / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2005. / 參考文獻(leaves 197-207). / "2005 nian 8 yue". / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Feng Yiji. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 197-207). / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2005. / 論文提要 --- p.i / 致謝 --- p.iii / Chapter 第一章 --- 引言 / Chapter 1.1 --- 硏究主旨：近代中國知識分子對個體與群體關係的構想 --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- 潘光旦個案硏究的意義和硏究回顧 --- p.3 / Chapter 1.3 --- 硏究範圍、重點與進路 --- p.10 / Chapter 第二章 --- 童年與清華時代（1899-1922)：秩序重整與社會福音 / Chapter 2.1 --- 家世及童年 --- p.12 / Chapter 2.2 --- 清華學校時期 --- p.14 / Chapter 2.3 --- 五四運動 --- p.27 / Chapter 2.4 --- 小結 --- p.47 / Chapter 第三章 --- "留美時代（1922-1926)I ：身處異邦,心繫家國" / Chapter 3.1 --- 潘光旦與一戰後的美國 --- p.49 / Chapter 3.2 --- 放棄基督教 --- p.54 / Chapter 3.3 --- 民族意識的興起 --- p.62 / Chapter 3.4 --- 小結 --- p.72 / Chapter 第四章 --- "留美時代（1922-1926)II ：專研科學,崇奉優生" / Chapter 4.1 --- 優生學簡介 --- p.74 / Chapter 4.2 --- 潘光旦與美國優生運動 --- p.77 / Chapter 4.3 --- 潘光旦的優生學思想 --- p.80 / Chapter 4.4 --- 小結 --- p.109 / Chapter 第五章 --- 返國後至抗戰爆發（1926-1937)：内憂外患與優生學的再闡釋 / Chapter 5.1 --- 潘光旦在南京國民政府時期的中國 --- p.112 / Chapter 5.2 --- 民族觀：對民族生存危機的回應 --- p.115 / Chapter 5.3 --- 家庭與婦女觀：社會層面的民族復興方案 --- p.124 / Chapter 5.4 --- 黨治問題：政治層面的民族復興方案 --- p.135 / Chapter 5.5 --- 小結 --- p.143 / Chapter 第六章 --- 從抗戰到中共建國（1937-1949)：專制統治與自由思想 / Chapter 6.1 --- 走向對立：抗戰以後潘光旦與國民黨的關係 --- p.145 / Chapter 6.2 --- 極權主義與科學文明：對時局的憂思 --- p.151 / Chapter 6.3 --- 對個體自主的肯定 --- p.161 / Chapter 6.4 --- 自由的教育 --- p.168 / Chapter 6.5 --- 民主的政治 --- p.173 / Chapter 6.6 --- 小結 --- p.179 / Chapter 第七章 --- 結語 --- p.182 / 附錄：潘光旦年譜 --- p.189 / 參考書目 --- p.197

The history of Bertolt Brecht's play Leben des Galilei extends through the writing of its three versions during 1938 to 1955 -- a period of two decades that also encompassed the entirety of the Second World War. The period also covers the atom bomb from its development to America's use of the bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as the beginning of the Cold War, which included the sustained threat that nuclear weapons might be used any day. This thesis traces, and offers interpretations of, changes in Brecht's Leben des Galilei from its inception in 1938-1939 -- when the protagonist, a scientist, is portrayed in a positive light -- through the play's American version in 1947, where it bitterly accuses science and scientists of having betrayed society and humanity, and finally to its last version in 1955, where the protagonist struggles to prevent the normalization--the familiarization--of the threat of nuclear warfare. Next to the writing of the Leben des Galilei, the thesis also focuses on the main critical readings of the play. A large fraction of the critical readings, but not all of them, interpret the play either as a judgment of science or as an invitation to pass judgment on science. The thesis compares Leben des Galilei with three different groups of other texts. The first comparison is with two other plays that also address the problem of science in the age of nuclear weapons, and the second comparison is with other work of Brecht himself. The first comparison leads to the observation that the muted note of optimism in the final version of Leben des Galilei is exceptional, and the second comparison to the apparently unrelated observation that it was uncharacteristic of Brecht to make explicit a certain literary allusion in Leben des Galilei. The two observations converge to a possible common explanation from a comparison with a still third group of texts, a cycle of Native American myths which appear in the oral traditions of various Native American tribes spread throughout the New World. Finally, the thesis addresses the question of why a modern-day literary text, addressing the essentially modern problem of nuclear warfare, and addressing that problem using the essentially modern techniques of Brechtian theatre, might have structures parallel to the structures of primitive mythology.