This quasi-experiment investigates the impact of Letter Bingo (a modified Bingo game encompassing phonics instruction) on the spelling performance and perceived motivation in learning English of 27 Hong Kong Primary 3 students. Three volunteer groups (Experimental Group, n=8; Placebo Group, n=9; Control Group, n=10) participated over one school term. Quantitative data for measuring spelling performance were drawn from 5 sets of dictation scores and qualitative data for measuring motivation were drawn from 3 interviews with students, parents and teachers. Unexpectedly, all groups experienced a decline in spelling performance over the duration of the study. For the Experimental Group, findings drawn from the quantitative data show no positive impact of Letter Bingo on spelling performance and findings drawn from the qualitative data reveal that some students perceived a positive impact of Letter Bingo on their spelling performance and motivation (however, this finding is not supported by parent and teacher perceptions, and more importantly, is not supported by the quantitative data). Noting that in this quasi-experiment, the quantitative data are the main data and the qualitative data are interpreted in the context of the quantitative data, the qualitative data alone might suggest that limited positive impact is rendered unreliable by the power of the quantitative data. Caution is needed when interpreting findings of this study because of the methodological concerns including the small sample size, the lack of randomization and breadth of interview questions as well as data relating to the perceived motivation of the Control Group. It is firmly concluded that the efficacy of Letter Bingo has not been robustly demonstrated in this study. Acknowledging that generalizations of the findings to the wider population are limited and are not the objective of this study, this quasi-experiment demonstrates some methodological insights into the investigation of using games in educational settings thus providing groundwork for further research on the impact of learning games particularly with language learning.

The English writing system is notoriously irregular in its orthography at the phonemic level. It was therefore proposed that focusing beginner-spellings’ attention on sound-letter relations at the sub-syllabic level might improve spelling performance. This hypothesis was tested in Experiments 1 and 2 using a ‘clue word’ paradigm to investigate the effect of analogy teaching intervention / non-intervention on the spelling performance of an experimental group and controls. The results overall showed the intervention to be effective in improving spelling, and this effect to be enduring. Experiment 3 demonstrated a greater application of analogy in spelling, when clue words, which participants used in analogy to spell test words, remained in view during testing. A series of regression analyses, with spelling entered as the criterion variable and age, analogy and phonological plausibility (PP) as predictors, showed both analogy and PP to be highly predictive of spelling. Experiment 4 showed that children could use analogy to improve their spelling, even without intervention, by comparing their performance in spelling words presented in analogous categories or in random lists. Consideration of children’s patterns of analogy use at different points of development showed three age groups to use similar patterns of analogy, but contrasting analogy patterns for spelling different words. This challenges stage theories of analogy use in literacy. Overall the most salient units used in analogy were the rime and, to a slightly lesser degree, the onset-vowel and vowel. Finally, Experiment 5 showed analogy and phonology to be fairly equally influential in spelling, but analogy to be more influential than phonology in reading. Five separate experiments therefore found analogy to be highly influential in spelling. Experiment 5 also considered the role of memory and attention in literacy attainment. The important implications of this research are that analogy, rather than purely phonics-based strategy, is instrumental in correct spelling in English.

This thesis is formed of two papers. The first paper is concerned with the construction and design of the Spelling Self-Efficacy Measure (SSEM), based upon the constructs that children have about learning to spell and findings from a literature search. The second paper further develops the SSEM, carrying out a large test administration and validation, and then exploring relationships between perceived efficacy beliefs and spelling ability. The rationale to create a measure of spelling self-efficacy originally stemmed from conversations with teachers during my placement experiences as a trainee educational psychologist. It was often the case that children in schools were not making progress in literacy, despite ongoing and high quality intervention and support. I carried out a literature review and found that the majority of spelling support packages were focused on building children’s mastery of skills rather than any focus on the emotional aspects of learning. I had many conversations with teachers about ways in which they could support children’s beliefs in their capabilities to learn, and had positive reviews with lots of school staff about how this had helped them make interventions more personalised to the child. The two papers in this thesis outline the steps taken to develop and construct the Spelling Self-Efficacy Measure. There were originally five domains underpinning the Spelling Self-Efficacy Measure: Belief in Own Ability to Learn to Spell; Belief in Learner Characteristics; Belief in the Need for Help from Others; Belief in Phonological Awareness; and Belief in Technical Understanding of Spelling. These five areas were condensed through analysis in both Paper 1 and Paper 2 to propose a revised Spelling Self-Efficacy Measure underpinned by three domains: Phonological Awareness, Learner Independence and Optimism in Abilities; Learner Confidence and Resilience. The Spelling Self-Efficacy Measure has been found to be a reliable and valid scale to explore children’s perceived efficacy beliefs about learning to spell. Consistent with existing research, significant correlations have been found between a child’s spelling ability and their level of spelling self-efficacy, as measured by the SSEM.

This thesis sought to conceptualise children’s spelling and reading representations in a novel way based upon the implicit-explicit framework proposed by the Representational-Redescription (RR) model (Karmiloff-Smith, 1992). The children studied were aged 4-7 years. Existing models of spelling and reading (e.g. Frith, 1985, Ehri, 1998, 1999, 2002) describe the developmental process as a series of stages/phases. An alternative approach adopted here is derived from the author’s previous research (Critten et al. 2007). It employs a coding scheme that analyses children’s explanations of and performance on, recognition tasks that reveal varying levels of explicitness in understanding of spelling. In this thesis the levels are empirically validated for both spelling and reading. It begins with an attempt to show that young children represent spelling knowledge implicitly. A longitudinal study then elucidates the developmental trajectory of both spelling and reading over the course of a year demonstrating that changes occur in the explicitness of children’s underlying representations. By comparing the co-development of spelling and reading it was possible to demonstrate that phonological information is often explicitly used first in spelling before reading, lending support to Frith’s (1985) “pace maker” notions. The final study examined how context, previously known to facilitate children’s reading ability can also facilitate their spelling development. This effect occurs not just for reading and spelling performance but for explicit understanding, building on the Lexical Quality Hypothesis (Perfetti & Hart, 2002) that proposes a role for semantic information in successful spelling and reading. These findings are integrated into a proposal for a new model of development: the Spelling and Reading Explicitation Model (SREM). This model postulates that children develop beyond implicit recognition to form “active” explicit representations, accounting for generalisation errors and characterised as being consciously accessible and verbalisable. It proposes that the development of reading and spelling skill is based upon processes of abstraction, interpretation and application of phonological and morphological knowledge.

Στόχος της παρούσας μελέτης ήταν η σύγκριση των ορθογραφικών επιδόσεων μαθητών της Δ΄ τάξης, της Ε΄ τάξης και της Στ΄ τάξης του δημοτικού σχολείου με μαθησιακές δυσκολίες με μαθητές χωρίς μαθησιακές δυσκολίες, των ίδιων τάξεων, στην ορθογραφική απόδοση λεξικών μορφημάτων λέξεων της ελληνικής γλώσσας. Στην έρευνα έλαβαν μέρος 927 παιδιά. Από αυτά 776 ήταν παιδιά χωρίς μαθησιακές δυσκολίες ενώ 151 ήταν παιδιά με μαθησιακές δυσκολίες. Τα αποτελέσματα της έρευνας, απόλυτα συμβατά με ευρήματα άλλων ερευνών, έδειξαν ότι οι επιδόσεις των παιδιών με μαθησιακές δυσκολίες ήταν, με στατιστικά σημαντική διαφορά, χαμηλότερες από τις επιδόσεις των παιδιών χωρίς δυσκολίες της ίδιας ηλικίας ενώ έδειξαν επίσης ότι η διαφορά παραμένει ακόμα και όταν συγκριθούν οι επιδόσεις των παιδιών με μαθησιακές δυσκολίες της Στ’ δημοτικού με αυτές των παιδιών χωρίς μαθησιακές δυσκολίες της Δ΄ τάξης. Παρόλα αυτά. τα αποτελέσματα έδειξαν επίσης ότι, παρά τις διαφορές τους, παιδιά με και χωρίς μαθησιακές δυσκολίες χρησιμοποιούν κοινές ορθογραφικές στρατηγικές ενώ αυτό που φαίνεται να προσδιορίζει το προφίλ των παιδιών με μαθησιακές δυσκολίες είναι η διατήρηση, παρά την ανάπτυξη της ορθογραφικής τους ικανότητας με την ηλικία, λαθών που αλλοιώνουν τη φωνολογική ταυτότητα των λέξεων που αποδίδουν ορθογραφικά. / The aim of this study was to compare the spelling performance of students of class 4th, class 5th and 6th class of primary school with learning difficulties with students of the same classes without learning difficulties, to yield orthographic lexical morphemes of Greek words. The survey took place 927 children. Of these 776 were children without learning disabilities and 151 were children with learning difficulties. The survey results, fully consistent with findings of other surveys, showed that the performance of children with learning difficulties was a statistically significant difference, lower than the children without difficulties of the same age and also showed that the difference remains even when comparing performance of children with learning difficulties of 6th class with those of children without learning difficulties of 4th class. Nevertheless, results also showed that despite their differences, children with and without learning disabilities using common spelling strategies and what seems to determine the profile of children with learning difficulties is to maintain, despite the development of spelling ability with age, errors that alter the identity of phonological give spelling words.

Σκοπός της παρούσας εργασίας ήταν να μελετήσει την ορθογραφική απόδοση κλιτικών μορφημάτων ουσιαστικών, ρημάτων και επιθέτων της ελληνικής γλώσσας από μαθητές ηλικίας 9 έως 11 ετών. Στη μελέτη συμμετείχαν τρεις ομάδες μαθητών: 21 μαθητές Στ΄ δημοτικού με αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δυσκολίες, 21 μαθητές ίδιας χρονολογικής ηλικίας και 24 μαθητές παρόμοιου αναγνωστικού και ορθογραφικού επιπέδου νεότερης ηλικίας. Αρχικά, χορηγήθηκε στους μαθητές όλων των ομάδων ένα σύνολο δοκιμασιών, οι οποίες αξιολογούσαν τη μη λεκτική τους νοημοσύνη, τη βραχύχρονη μνήμη τους, τις αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές τους δεξιότητες. Η πειραματική ορθογραφική δοκιμασία συνίστατο στην ορθογραφική απόδοση ουσιαστικών, επιθέτων και ρημάτων ενσωματωμένων σε κατάλληλα προτασιακά πλαίσια. Σύμφωνα με τα αποτελέσματα, οι μαθητές με αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δυσκολίες ήταν λιγότερο ακριβείς και συνεπείς στην ορθογραφική απόδοση των κλιτικών μορφημάτων των λέξεων συγκριτικά με τους μαθητές τυπικής ανάπτυξης της Στ΄ τάξης δημοτικού. Οι μαθητές με αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δυσκολίες είχαν παρόμοια επίδοση με αυτή των νεαρότερων μαθητών παρόμοιου αναγνωστικού και ορθογραφικού επιπέδου ως προς την ορθογραφική ακρίβεια και την ορθογραφική συνέπεια στην απόδοση των κλιτικών μορφημάτων. Υπήρξαν βέβαια και κάποιες περιπτώσεις, όπου δεν υπήρξαν διαφοροποιήσεις μεταξύ των ομάδων. Επιπλέον, oι μαθητές και των τριών ομάδων είχαν καλύτερη επίδοση στην ορθογραφική απόδοση των κλιτικών μορφημάτων των ουσιαστικών και των ρημάτων σε σχέση με αυτήν στα κλιτικά μορφήματα των επιθέτων. / The purpose of this study was to examine the spelling of noun's, verb's and adjectives' inflectional morphemes in the Greek language by 9–11-year old children. Three groups participated in this study. Particularly, 21 sixth graders with reading and spelling difficulties, 21 chronological age-matched children and 24 younger reading and spelling-level-matched children. At first, students were assessed on a range of tests of non verbal ability, short-memory abilities, as well as reading and spelling abilities. In the experimental spelling task they were asked to spell nouns, verbs and adjectives in dictated sentences. Children with reading and spelling difficulties were less accurate and less consistent than chronological age-matched children in spelling inflectional morphemes. Moreover, children with reading and spelling difficulties performed similarly to younger reading and spelling-level-matched children as far as spelling accuracy and spelling consistency of inflections are concerned. In some cases of inflectional morphemes the three groups did not differ. Finally, children spelled noun and verb inflections more accurately than adjective inflections.

Στην εργασία αυτή εστιάζουμε την προσοχή μας στα ορθογραφικά λάθη που εντοπίσαμε σε εκθέσεις αλλοδαπών μαθητών που φοιτούν στις τρεις τελευταίες τάξεις του ελληνικού δημοτικού σχολείου. Στόχος μας είναι η διερεύνηση των εξωγλωσσικών παραγόντων της καταγωγής των αλλοδαπών μαθητών, της περιοχής όπου διαβιούν, του φύλου και της ηλικίας τους στην ανάπτυξη της ορθογραφικής τους ικανότητας στην ελληνική γλώσσα. / In this paper we focus our attention on spelling errors we found in writings of immigrant pupils who study at the three last classes of primary greek school. Our aim is to research the impact of exoglossic parametres, such as the pupil's origin, the region of their living, the puppil's gender and their age, on the development of their spelling capacity in greek language.

This research is concerned with an investigation into the development of a formal diagnostic assessment tool for spelling in the foundation phase. A literature study and information acquired from educators provided information to compile a suitable spelling list that could be used as a diagnostic tool in the foundation phase. A self-designed questionnaire was administered to fifty educators Who provided their expert opinion regard the spelling list. This was followed up by second questionnaire that was based on the analysis and interpretation of the first. The Delphi-technique was applied to this investigation. The study was complete when consensus was reached among the educators with regard to which words should be included in the final spelling list. / Psychology of Education / M. Ed. (Psychology of Education)

Η παρούσα έρευνα επικεντρώθηκε στη μελέτη ζητημάτων που αφορούν στη μορφολογική πλευρά της ορθογραφίας, γιατί σε αυτήν φαίνεται να είναι μεγαλύτερες οι δυσκολίες που συναντούν οι μαθητές με και χωρίς δυσκολίες στο γραπτό λόγο. Ειδικότερα, η έρευνα αυτή επιχείρησε να εξετάσει την ορθογραφική απόδοση των βασικών λέξεων και των μορφολογικά πολύπλοκων παράγωγών τους, από ελληνόφωνους μαθητές τυπικής ανάπτυξης και μαθητές με αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δυσκολίες, που φοιτούν στο δημοτικό σχολείο. Πιο συγκεκριμένα, δείγμα της έρευνας αποτέλεσαν 66 μαθητές που φοιτούσαν στις Δ΄ και Στ΄ τάξεις του δημοτικού σχολείου. Αρχικά, οι μαθητές εξετάστηκαν σε ορισμένες προδοκιμασίες, οι οποίες αξιολογούσαν τη μη λεκτική νοημοσύνη, τη βραχύχρονη μνήμη και τις αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δεξιότητές τους. Τα αποτελέσματα από τις δοκιμασίες αυτές, οδήγησαν στην επιλογή των μαθητών που θα συγκροτούσαν την κάθε ομάδα αλλά και στις εξισώσεις των ομάδων μεταξύ τους. Οι ερευνητικές ομάδες ήταν τρεις: η πειραματική ομάδα και οι δύο ομάδες ελέγχου. Η πειραματική ομάδα περιείχε 21 μαθητές της Στ΄ τάξης με αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δυσκολίες, η ομάδα ελέγχου Ι περιείχε 21 μαθητές τυπικής ανάπτυξης της Στ΄ τάξης και η ομάδα ελέγχου ΙΙ απαρτιζόταν από 24 μαθητές τυπικής ανάπτυξης της Δ΄ τάξης. Η πειραματική ομάδα εξισώθηκε ως προς τη χρονολογική ηλικία και το νοητικό επίπεδο με την ομάδα ελέγχου Ι και με την ομάδα ελέγχου ΙΙ ως προς το αναγνωστικό, ορθογραφικό και νοητικό επίπεδο. Έπειτα, οι μαθητές εξετάστηκαν στην πειραματική ορθογραφική δοκιμασία με στόχο την εξέταση της ορθογραφικής ακρίβειας, της ορθογραφικής συνέπειας και του συνυπολογισμού της ορθογραφικής ακρίβειας και συνέπειάς τους, σε σχέση με την απόδοση λεξικών μορφημάτων και παραγωγικών επιθημάτων λέξεων της ελληνικής γλώσσας. Οι λέξεις που συμπεριλήφθηκαν στη δοκιμασία αυτή έλαβαν τη μορφή ‘Βάση – Παράγωγη’ λ.χ. διαφημίζω-διαφημίσεις. Για τον υπολογισμό της ορθογραφικής ακρίβειας, τα λεξικά μορφήματα και τα παραγωγικά επιθήματα των λέξεων χωρίστηκαν σε 140 λεξικά τμήματα-στόχοι. Για τον υπολογισμό της ορθογραφικής συνέπειας, ομαδοποιήθηκαν τα λεξικά τμήματα που θα συγκρίνονταν μεταξύ τους σε 52 ομάδες λεξικών τμημάτων. Τα κυριότερα αποτελέσματα ήταν τα εξής: όσον αφορά στις συσχετίσεις, προέκυψαν στατιστικώς σημαντικοί δείκτες μεταξύ όλων των τιμών των ανεξάρτητων μεταβλητών μεταξύ τους, καθώς και μεταξύ των τελευταίων και των εξαρτημένων μεταβλητών «ποσοστό ορθογραφικής ακρίβειας», «ποσοστό ορθογραφικής συνέπειας» και «ποσοστό ορθογραφικής ακρίβειας και συνέπειας» της πειραματικής ορθογραφικής δοκιμασίας, με εξαίρεση τη μη λεκτική νοημοσύνη, η οποία φάνηκε να συσχετίζεται σημαντικά μόνο με τις δύο τελευταίες. Επιπλέον, σε όλες τις μετρήσεις της πειραματικής ορθογραφικής δοκιμασίας, οι μαθητές της Στ΄ τάξης με αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δυσκολίες σημείωσαν χαμηλότερη επίδοση στην ορθογραφική απόδοση των λεξικών μορφημάτων και παραγωγικών επιθημάτων των λέξεων-στόχων συγκριτικά με τους τυπικούς συνομηλίκους τους. Παράλληλα, είχαν παρόμοια επίδοση σε σχέση με τους νεαρότερους τυπικούς μαθητές της Δ΄ τάξης. Ακόμα, οι τρεις ομάδες είχαν καλύτερη επίδοση στην ορθογραφική απόδοση των λεξικών μορφημάτων και παραγωγικών επιθημάτων των ουσιαστικών και των επιθέτων συγκριτικά με αυτήν των ρημάτων. Τα ευρήματα αυτά, επιβεβαιώνουν το προφίλ των μαθητών με δυσκολίες στο γραπτό λόγο που έχει φανεί σε προγενέστερες έρευνες, δηλαδή ότι υπάρχει μία καθυστέρηση στις ορθογραφικές δεξιότητες των μαθητών με αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δυσκολίες σε σχέση με την ηλικία που διανύουν. Επιπρόσθετα, τα υψηλά ποσοστά των τριών ομάδων στην ορθογραφική συνέπεια μάς επιτρέπουν τον ισχυρισμό πως οι μαθητές χρησιμοποιούν μορφολογικές στρατηγικές κατά την παραγωγή ορθογραφημένης γραφής. Ωστόσο, οι τυπικοί μαθητές της Στ΄ φαίνεται να χρησιμοποιούν πιο εκτεταμένα τις μορφολογικές στρατηγικές, αφού παρήγαγαν περισσότερες συνεπείς και σωστές ορθογραφικές αποδόσεις των κοινών λεξικών τμημάτων σε σύγκριση με τους συνομήλικους μαθητές με αναγνωστικές και ορθογραφικές δυσκολίες και τους τυπικούς μαθητές της Δ΄ τάξης. Αν και τα αποτελέσματα της ορθογραφικής συνέπειας ενισχύουν τη χρήση μορφολογικών στρατηγικών, δεν αποκλείουν τη χρήση άλλων στρατηγικών στις οποίες εμπλέκεται ο παράγοντας της μνήμης (λ.χ. απομνημονευτικές στρατηγικές. Τέλος, αν και οι τυπικοί μαθητές της Στ΄ τάξης είχαν σημείωσαν υψηλότερο συνολικό ποσοστό ορθογραφικής ακρίβειας σε σύγκριση με τις άλλες δύο ομάδες, υπήρξαν περιπτώσεις λεξικών τμημάτων, κατά την ορθογραφική απόδοση των οποίων, οι μαθητές και των τριών ερευνητικών ομάδων σημείωσαν είτε υψηλό είτε χαμηλό ποσοστό ορθογραφικής ακρίβειας. Η απουσία στατιστικώς σημαντικής διαφοράς στις περιπτώσεις αυτές, αποτελεί πηγή προβληματισμού και αναδεικνύει το ζήτημα του ρόλου της ορθογραφικής επεξεργασίας εκάστης λέξης. / The present study focused on the examination of matters related to the morphological aspect of spelling. This seems to pose great difficulties to students with or without reading and spelling difficulties. Particularly, this study attempts to examine the spelling of the base and the derived words by Greek-speaking typical achievement students and students with reading and spelling difficulties, all which attended primary school. The participants of this study were 66 fourth and sixth graders. Initially, as part of the testing, students completed a battery of pretests which evaluated their nonverbal intelligence, short-term memory and reading and spelling skills. The results of these tests led to the selection of the students that would form each group and the matching of the groups. Three research groups of participants took part in this study: an experimental group and two control groups. The experimental group consisted of 21 typical achievement sixth graders, control group I consisted of 21 sixth graders with reading and spelling difficulties and control group II comprised 24 typical achievement sixth graders. A reading/spelling level match design was employed. The experimental group was matched in terms of chronological age and intellectual level (chronological age-matched group) with control group I whereas with control group II in terms of reading, spelling and intellectual level (reading/spelling level-matched group). In addition, students were assessed on a spelling task that was designed to examine their spelling accuracy, their spelling consistency and their spelling accuracy-consistency in spelling lexical morphemes and derivational suffixes of Greek words. The experimental items in the spelling task were morphologically related word-pairs (base and derivation). To test the spelling accuracy, lexical morphemes and derivational suffixes of words were divided into 140 lexical parts. To test the spelling consistency, these lexical parts were grouped in 52 groups. The main results are as follows: as far as the correlations are concerned, apart from non-verbal intelligence, there is statistically significant indicators among all independent variables and between the independent and the dependent variables “percentage of spelling accuracy”, “percentage of spelling consistency” and “percentage of spelling accuracy and consistency” of the spelling task. Moreover, in the measurements of the spelling task, students with reading and spelling difficulties performed poorly in spelling lexical morphemes and derivational suffixes compared to their typical achievement peers. At the same time, their performance was similar to the performance of typical achievement fourth graders. In addition, the three groups had a better performance in spelling the lexical morphemes and derivational suffixes of nouns and of adjectives than of verbs. These findings confirm the profile of students with reading and spelling difficulties that has been shown in previous studies. In particular, it seems that there is a delay in the spelling skills of students with reading and spelling difficulties. This is consistent with a spelling delay hypothesis, rather than a spelling deviance hypothesis. Furthermore, the groups’ high percentages in spelling consistency allow us to claim that students use morphological strategies when they spell morphologically related words. However, typical achievement sixth graders seem to make greater use of morphological strategies, since they produce more consistent and correct spellings of the lexical morphemes and derivational suffixes compared to their peers with reading and spelling difficulties and typical achievement fourth graders. Our results suggest the use of morphological strategies, yet they do not exclude the use of other strategies which rely on memory such us memory strategies. Finally, typical achievement sixth graders scored a higher percentage in spelling accuracy compared to the other two groups. However, there were certain parts in which the students’ spellings didn’t differ. Our data show that in these parts students of the three groups scored high or low percentages of spelling accuracy. The absence of statistically significant differences between the three groups in these cases is an area of concern and highlights the role of the orthographic processing of each word.

This research is concerned with an investigation into the development of a formal diagnostic assessment tool for spelling in the foundation phase. A literature study and information acquired from educators provided information to compile a suitable spelling list that could be used as a diagnostic tool in the foundation phase. A self-designed questionnaire was administered to fifty educators Who provided their expert opinion regard the spelling list. This was followed up by second questionnaire that was based on the analysis and interpretation of the first. The Delphi-technique was applied to this investigation. The study was complete when consensus was reached among the educators with regard to which words should be included in the final spelling list. / Psychology of Education / M. Ed. (Psychology of Education)