31 |
Learning talk : a study of the interactional organisation of the L2 classroom from a CA institutional discourse perspectiveSeedhouse, Paul January 1996 (has links)
No description available.
|
32 |
Transfer of writing skills between languages : L1 versus L2 teaching of persuasive essay writing to intermediate-level Icelandic EFL studentsBerman, Robert January 1995 (has links)
No description available.
|
33 |
Change/innovation in formal education : building a knowledge-base for EFL research in Parana State, BrazilFrahm, Gertrud Friedrich January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
34 |
Teaching EFL reading in Japanese High Schools : an exploratory studyIto, Genji January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
35 |
The latent trait structure of L2 reading comprehension testsNegishi, Masashi January 1996 (has links)
No description available.
|
36 |
Discursive struggle in Chinese universities : English #linguistic imperialism', resistance and appropriationGrimshaw, Trevor Alexander January 2002 (has links)
No description available.
|
37 |
Schemata, metaphor and literary readings : a case study of Chinese EFL learners reading poemsZonglin, Chang January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
38 |
Teachers' conceptualisation and practice of planning in the Greek EFL contextPapadopoulou, Charis-Olga January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
39 |
Motivational orientations of American and Russian learners of French as a foreign languageVinogradova, Zoia 10 March 2017 (has links)
<p> This study seeks to examine and compare motivational orientations of French learners across different dimensions: cultural background (USA vs. Russia), educational modality and age (college students vs. private courses learners), gender, and time of studying foreign language. 613 American and Russian learners of French completed the questionnaire addressing 10 motivational factors to study French language. Despite differences in nationality, age, educational background and learning experience, all groups of participants produced nearly identical motivational rankings. The rankings are topped by the Travelling orientation, which seems to be universally appealing, followed by the orientations within the Idealistic motivational cluster (Aesthetic Factors, Culture, Knowledge, and Ideal Self). The Pragmatic motivational cluster (Instrumental orientation, which is sometimes coupled to Emigration and Friendship dimensions) is by far less important. This disposition is also confirmed by the qualitative data. With regard to specific orientations it has been found that US learners score consistently higher in Sociability motivation, whereas Russians score higher in the Peers’ Encouragement and Aesthetic categories. In regard to gender differences, this study shows that male students appear to be more personable, e.g. among American learners males consistently outscore females in the Friendship category. Referring to age differences, it was found that the overall level of motivation tends to decline with age.</p>
|
40 |
A Case Study into the Perception of World Language Study of All Stakeholders in a Suburban Midwest School DistrictCrowell, Michael L. 07 September 2016 (has links)
<p> The 21st century perception of students and stakeholders (parents, teachers, administrators, and support staff, etc.) within the realm of world language study in a Midwestern, suburban school district varied sometime subtly and sometimes greatly. No particular study had been done to indicate what inspired students to enroll in world language, other than conjecture from students and stakeholders. To discover the true perception of students and stakeholders within this particular school district, a case study was conducted. A survey was crafted utilizing a tool that focused on language perception with relation to motivation, learning process, relevance, progress, and relationships. Each population researched, both student stakeholder and other stakeholders, took this survey to discover their perception of world language study. From those who took the survey, individuals volunteered to participate in interviews from which the questions were constructed from the same categories that organized the survey: motivation, learning process, relevance, progress, and relationships. The surveys and interviews both narrowed the understanding of how the student stakeholder and other stakeholders perceive world language study, by comparing student responses to those of the stakeholders and seeing their positive and negative correlations. The two different populations agreed that learning a language was difficult and understood the effort it took to achieve proficiency, but valued the then-current system’s grading or credit versus actual skill achieved. Ultimately, one’s self-perceived ability to achieve within language determined the value attached to the process and the role language would play in their lives.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.041 seconds