Thesis (Th. M.)--Dallas Theological Seminary, 1991. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 56-66).

The main thesis of this dissertation is that Jezebel is a primary character in 1 Kgs 16 – 2 Kgs 10. This may be observed both in the so-called Elijah and Elisha cycles. One of the main purposes, if not the purpose, of the stories contained within the Elijah cycle is to enhance the polemic against Jezebel and against the Baal cult which had been introduced by her, and not merely to convey events from Elijah‘s ministry. The choice of the characters and details revealed about their background indicate that the Elijah cycle is only partially concerned with the prophet, while it is directed importantly also against the queen and Baal. Elisha‘s ministry follows that of Elijah. His cycle prepares the reader for the punishment of Jezebel by revealing different details of the final moments of the queen‘s life and the events surrounding her death. Even though the reader will find only two direct references to the queen in 2 Kgs 2-8, the text sheds some light on the queen, her character and her death. The narrative also introduces new characters whose role is to be a foil or a contrast to the queen. The thesis, then, argues that Jezebel is a primary character in the narrative of the middle part of the Books of Kings. It must be said, however, that many elements of the argument against Jezebel operate on the narrator‘s, and not on characters‘, level. Besides a few direct references to Jezebel and to her activities, she herself quite often remains absent from the stage. It is only when one raises one‘s sights from the characters‘ to the narrator‘s perspective that he or she may notice abundance of allusions, prefigurations, comparisons, use of foils, and other devices that enhance the argument against the queen and make her a primary character in 1 Kgs 16:29 – 2 Kgs 10.

This study of the elements of the Byronic hero in Herman Melville's Captain Ahab includes a look at the Byronic hero and Byron himself, the Byronic hero and the Gothic tradition, the Byronic hero and his "humanities," and the Byronic hero and Prometheus-Lucifer.

In conceptualizing Moby-Dick; or, the whale, Herman Melville was both drawn and opposed to the ideas of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Through an analysis of the main characters in MobyDick and Emerson’s writing, it becomes evident that Transcendentalism is embodied in the characterization of the novel’s main characters. I argue that the eventual fates of characters in the novel reveal Melville’s criticism of Emerson’s ideas. Moreover, the depiction of ocean and land as a symbol of the soul in Moby-Dick mirrors Emerson’s idealized relationship between man and nature. However, the ambiguous and horrific nature Melville produces shows that the romantic ideal of Emerson’s is lacking. / I skrivandet av Moby Dick eller valen så kom Herman Melville att både inspireras av och motsätta sig Ralph Waldo Emersons idéer. Genom en analys av huvudkaraktärerna i Moby Dick samt Emersons texter så är det tydligt att transcendentalism finns förkroppsligad i karaktäriseringen av romanens huvudkaraktärer. Jag argumenterar för att karaktärernas slutgiltiga öden i romanen uttrycker Melvilles kritik av Emersons idéer. Vidare så är skildringen av hav och land som en symbol för själen i Moby Dick en spegling av Emersons idealiserade förhållande mellan människa och natur. Emellertid den tvetydiga och fruktansvärda natur Melville skapar visar på bristfälligheten i Emersons romantiska ideal.

Zugl.: Apeldoorn, Theologische Univ., Diss., 2008

Although Ishmael does not appear to be a main character in Moby Dick, his narration is integral to the text. Only through telling the story is Ishmael able to give himself a concrete identity, which is reflected not only through himself, but through the thoughts, speeches, and actions of the other characters, specifically Ahab and the shipmates. Ishmael represents the fragmented Romantic of nineteenth century American society. He is bound by a traditional patriarchal world where he must break away from the father to establish his own identity. He has lost his connection to nature, the primal source of his beginningsùthe womb of the mother. Through his hermetic voyage into nature and back to the unconscious, he is able to reconnect to his origins. No longer is he the alienated wanderer, but recreated as the artist, able to create his own myth and identity.

Text in Afrikaans / "Teksbetekenis" staan sedert die opkoms van strukturalisme in die middelpunt van die diskussie in literere Kringe. Die ontwikkeling van lesersgeorienteerde teoriee en die opkoms van die konsep van "intertekstualiteit" het veral bygedra tot die bevraagtekening van die opvatting dat tekste 'n "eintlike" betekenis "het". In konserwatiewe kerklike kringe word daar egter nog baie gemaak van die Skrif as 'n regulatiewe dokument met een sensurerende eintlike of korrekte betekenis. Die opvatting is ook dat prediking Skrifprediking moet wees waarin slegs die Skrifwoord 'n plek het. Die opvatting strook nie met literere insigte nie. In hierdie studie word sekere aspekte van die literere gestalte van die Masoretiese 1 Konings 21 ontleed en die resultaat hiervan vergelyk met soortgelyke analises van die weergawe van die verhaal in vertalings (LXX, Vulgaat, Wycliffe, Purvey, en die Geneva Bible), oorvertellings (deur Josefus en Lukas), kommentare (in die kantlyne van Purvey-en Geneefse vertalings), preke en in 'n akademiese artikel. Die bevinding is dat elke weergawe, ongeag die genre daarvan, die verhaal op een of ander manier verander het en dat interpretasies wissel van mindere uitbouings tot die skep van nuwe verhale. Die situasie van die interpreteer- der het telkens die interteks gevorm wat 'n nuwe vertelling laat ontstaan het. Hoewel tekste betekenis mag he (wat dit moontlik maak om hulle met mekaar te vergelyk) is elke interpretasie 'n kontekstualisering wat onvermydelik 'n nuwe teks produseer. Die bevinding bring konserwatief-teologiese definisies van Skrifbeskoulike konsepte soos kanon, kanoniese betekenis, Skrifgesag en Skrifprediking ernstig in gedrang en noodsaak dringende herbesinning op daardie terreine / Since the rise of structuralism "textual meaning" has been at the centre of the literary debate. The formation of reader orientated theories and a concept like "intertextuality" contributed a great deal to the questioning of the idea that texts "have" a "real" meaning. However, in conservative church circles much is still being made of scripture as a regulative document with one censuring "real" or correct meaning. The conviction is, further, that preaching should be "scriptural", that is, sermons should only repeat what Scripture says. This view does not tally with insights gained from current literary theory. In this study certain aspects of the literary shape of the Massoretic version of 1 Kings 21 are analysed and the results compared with similar analyses of accounts of this narrative in translations (LXX, Vulgate, Wycliffe, Purvey and the Geneva Bible), re-tellings (by Josephus and Luke), comnentaries (Purvey and Geneva Bible margins), sermons and an academic article. It was found that each account, irrespective of its genre, in some or other way changed the narrative and that the interpretations vary from lesser extentions to the creation of completely new narratives. The situation of the interpreter constantly functioned as the intertext generating a new narrative. Even though texts may "possess" meaning (enabling one to compare them with one another) every interpretation is a contextualisation inevitably producing a new text. This conclusion seriously questions conservative theological definitions of concepts such as canon, canonical meaning, scriptural authority and scriptural preaching and necessitates urgent rethinking in these areas / Biblical and Ancient Studies / D. Th. (Ou Testament)

Text in Afrikaans / "Teksbetekenis" staan sedert die opkoms van strukturalisme in die middelpunt van die diskussie in literere Kringe. Die ontwikkeling van lesersgeorienteerde teoriee en die opkoms van die konsep van "intertekstualiteit" het veral bygedra tot die bevraagtekening van die opvatting dat tekste 'n "eintlike" betekenis "het". In konserwatiewe kerklike kringe word daar egter nog baie gemaak van die Skrif as 'n regulatiewe dokument met een sensurerende eintlike of korrekte betekenis. Die opvatting is ook dat prediking Skrifprediking moet wees waarin slegs die Skrifwoord 'n plek het. Die opvatting strook nie met literere insigte nie. In hierdie studie word sekere aspekte van die literere gestalte van die Masoretiese 1 Konings 21 ontleed en die resultaat hiervan vergelyk met soortgelyke analises van die weergawe van die verhaal in vertalings (LXX, Vulgaat, Wycliffe, Purvey, en die Geneva Bible), oorvertellings (deur Josefus en Lukas), kommentare (in die kantlyne van Purvey-en Geneefse vertalings), preke en in 'n akademiese artikel. Die bevinding is dat elke weergawe, ongeag die genre daarvan, die verhaal op een of ander manier verander het en dat interpretasies wissel van mindere uitbouings tot die skep van nuwe verhale. Die situasie van die interpreteer- der het telkens die interteks gevorm wat 'n nuwe vertelling laat ontstaan het. Hoewel tekste betekenis mag he (wat dit moontlik maak om hulle met mekaar te vergelyk) is elke interpretasie 'n kontekstualisering wat onvermydelik 'n nuwe teks produseer. Die bevinding bring konserwatief-teologiese definisies van Skrifbeskoulike konsepte soos kanon, kanoniese betekenis, Skrifgesag en Skrifprediking ernstig in gedrang en noodsaak dringende herbesinning op daardie terreine / Since the rise of structuralism "textual meaning" has been at the centre of the literary debate. The formation of reader orientated theories and a concept like "intertextuality" contributed a great deal to the questioning of the idea that texts "have" a "real" meaning. However, in conservative church circles much is still being made of scripture as a regulative document with one censuring "real" or correct meaning. The conviction is, further, that preaching should be "scriptural", that is, sermons should only repeat what Scripture says. This view does not tally with insights gained from current literary theory. In this study certain aspects of the literary shape of the Massoretic version of 1 Kings 21 are analysed and the results compared with similar analyses of accounts of this narrative in translations (LXX, Vulgate, Wycliffe, Purvey and the Geneva Bible), re-tellings (by Josephus and Luke), comnentaries (Purvey and Geneva Bible margins), sermons and an academic article. It was found that each account, irrespective of its genre, in some or other way changed the narrative and that the interpretations vary from lesser extentions to the creation of completely new narratives. The situation of the interpreter constantly functioned as the intertext generating a new narrative. Even though texts may "possess" meaning (enabling one to compare them with one another) every interpretation is a contextualisation inevitably producing a new text. This conclusion seriously questions conservative theological definitions of concepts such as canon, canonical meaning, scriptural authority and scriptural preaching and necessitates urgent rethinking in these areas / Biblical and Ancient Studies / D. Th. (Ou Testament)

This paper investigates Herman Melville’s quest for spiritual stability and certainty in his novel Moby-Dick. The analysis establishes a philosophical tradition of doubt towards the Bible, outlining the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes, Benedict de Spinoza, David Hume, Thomas Paine and John Henry Newman. This historical survey of spiritual uncertainty establishes the issue of uncertainty that Melville writes about in the nineteenth century. Having assessed the issue of doubt, I then analyze Melville’s use of metaphorical charts, which his characters use to resolve this issue. Finally, I present Melville’s philosophical findings as he expresses them through the metaphor of whaling. Here, I also scrutinize Melville’s depiction of nature, as well as his presentation of the dichotomy between contemplative and active questing, as represented by the characters Ishmael and Ahab.