Contradictory views of nontraditional women provide a backdrop for differing perceptions of policewomen. After reading a vignette of a traffic stop by either a policewoman or a policeman who had either made a mistake or not a mistake in pulling participants over, 230 MTurk participants provided their anticipated affective, behavioral, and cognitive perceptions of the police officer that pulled them over and gave them a traffic ticket. Anticipated affective, behavioral, and cognitive perceptions for policewomen and policemen diverged for those high in hostile sexism and those high in benevolent sexism. Those high in hostile sexism perceive policewomen less warm than those who scored low in hostile sexism. Individuals high in benevolent sexism who read about interacting with a policewoman who made a mistake were more likely to produce positive behaviors compared to a policewoman who had not made a mistake. Additionally, those high in benevolent sexism who read about interacting with a policewoman were more likely to have a negative affective reaction about the situation compared to those who interact with a policeman. This study replicates the past research on ambivalent sexism, such that those high in hostile sexism revere traditional women and dislike nontraditional women while those high in benevolent sexism are overall more positive towards women but in a condescending manner. Additionally, this study extends ambivalent sexism theories into police research suggesting that citizens will react to a policewoman in line with their level of ambivalent sexism.

<p>Sverige kan ses som ett av världens mest jämställda länder. Människor kan dock inneha ambivalenta stereotyper om kvinnor, vilka kan vara sexistiska i sin karaktär. Syftet med föreliggande studie är att validera Glick och Fiskes (1996) Ambivalent Sexism skala översatt till svenska samt undersöka eventuella kopplingar mellan sexism, politisk inställning och system justification. Undersökningsdeltagarna tog i stor utsträckning avstånd från sexistiska attityder. Hostile sexism skattades högre än benevolent sexism, vilket skulle kunna kopplas till landets strävan efter jämställdhet. Männen skattade dock högre än kvinnorna på samtliga sexismskalor. Sambandet mellan system justification och politisk inställning var svagt. Det fanns dock en mindre skillnad mellan könen gällande uppfattningen om det svenska samhället, där män fann samhället aningen mer legitimt än kvinnorna, något som kan vara en antydan till en rådande samhällssituation där män fortfarande har högre social och ekonomisk status än kvinnor.</p>

Sverige kan ses som ett av världens mest jämställda länder. Människor kan dock inneha ambivalenta stereotyper om kvinnor, vilka kan vara sexistiska i sin karaktär. Syftet med föreliggande studie är att validera Glick och Fiskes (1996) Ambivalent Sexism skala översatt till svenska samt undersöka eventuella kopplingar mellan sexism, politisk inställning och system justification. Undersökningsdeltagarna tog i stor utsträckning avstånd från sexistiska attityder. Hostile sexism skattades högre än benevolent sexism, vilket skulle kunna kopplas till landets strävan efter jämställdhet. Männen skattade dock högre än kvinnorna på samtliga sexismskalor. Sambandet mellan system justification och politisk inställning var svagt. Det fanns dock en mindre skillnad mellan könen gällande uppfattningen om det svenska samhället, där män fann samhället aningen mer legitimt än kvinnorna, något som kan vara en antydan till en rådande samhällssituation där män fortfarande har högre social och ekonomisk status än kvinnor.

Although there is a reliably positive association between hostile (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS), lay perceptions of this association have not been directly tested. I predicted that people perceive an illusory negative association between men’s HS and BS attitudes because lay theories expect men to have univalent attitudes toward women. In Study 1, I manipulated the target’s gender and responses on a subscale of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (high HS, low HS, high BS, or low BS). The low BS male target (compared to high BS male target) was judged to be higher on HS, less supportive of female professionals, less good of father and husband, and more likely to perpetrate domestic violence. Ratings of the low BS male target were as equally negative as those of the high HS male target. In Study 2, low BS male targets were judged to be low in hostility towards women only if they explicitly stated that their low BS was motivated by egalitarian values, otherwise men’s low BS was assumed to indicate misogyny. Implications of the misconception of BS in men and future directions are discussed.

Although there is a reliably positive association between hostile (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS), lay perceptions of this association have not been directly tested. I predicted that people perceive an illusory negative association between men’s HS and BS attitudes because lay theories expect men to have univalent attitudes toward women. In Study 1, I manipulated the target’s gender and responses on a subscale of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (high HS, low HS, high BS, or low BS). The low BS male target (compared to high BS male target) was judged to be higher on HS, less supportive of female professionals, less good of father and husband, and more likely to perpetrate domestic violence. Ratings of the low BS male target were as equally negative as those of the high HS male target. In Study 2, low BS male targets were judged to be low in hostility towards women only if they explicitly stated that their low BS was motivated by egalitarian values, otherwise men’s low BS was assumed to indicate misogyny. Implications of the misconception of BS in men and future directions are discussed.

The object of the present research was to examine the relationship between ambivalent sexism, adherence to traditional gender roles, gendered job types, performance evaluations and promotion decisions. There were 124 participants recruited from undergraduate psychology courses, randomly assigned to one of four scenarios. Participants took the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI), Ambivalence towards Men Inventory (AMI), and Sex Role Egalitarianism Scale (SRES), read a scenario, and then evaluated the leader in the scenario using the Leadership Effectiveness Appraisal of Performance (LEAP). A 2x2x2 MANOVA found significant main effects for participant gender on the ASI and SRES, but no main or interaction effects were found for the other measures. Steiger's Z-test for “correlated correlations” in a sample did not find a significant relationship between the correlations in the different scenarios.

A recent trend in the study of forgiveness is to look at forgiveness outside of traditional victim-perpetrator dyads. One way of going beyond these dyads is to look at third-party forgiveness. A recent advance in the study of relationship valence is to look at the amount of positivity and negativity in a relationship as on independent scales rather than on two ends of the same spectrum. This allows for categorization of relationships that are high in both positivity and negativity—ambivalent relationships. This study attempts to combine these two recent advances. I hypothesized that participants would have more difficulty forgiving offenders with whom they had ambivalent relationships, that participants would be more forgiving when they were personally offended compared to when they were a third-party to an offense committed against a friend, and that participants would be more forgiving of a perpetrator when an offense was committed against an ambivalent relation than when the same offense was committed against a positive relation. Strong support was obtained for the first hypothesis, but little support for the second and third hypotheses. The implications of these results are discussed and possible directions for future research are recommended.

La diversité biologique constitue l’un des piliers du fonctionnement des écosystèmes, etun potentiel pour l’adaptation et l’évolution de la vie dans le contexte du changement climatique. Les espèces constituant cette biodiversité sont étroitement connectées de différentes façons. Une diminution de cette biodiversité peut déclencher des effets de cascade et des conséquences largement imprévisibles, bien au delà de la seule réduction apparente du nombre ou de la distribution des espèces. La grande complexité de l’organisation écologique est très souvent un cauchemar pour la prise de décision. Les difficultés commencent avec le choix d’une mesure adéquate de la biodiversité. Une telle mesure est cependant une étape nécessaire si nous voulons prioriser nos actions de gestion de la biodiversité, afin de préserver le plus de diversité possible avec des ressources limitées. Bien que cette thèse ne prétende pas produire des réponses complètes à ces problèmes complexes, elle offre quelques points de réflexion pour la gestion de la biodiversité.Elle se compose de quatre chapitres. Le premier chapitre soulève la question de la gestion d’une biodiversité mélangée, au sein de laquelle des espèces invasives peuvent également s’inviter. Ce chapitre souligne les interconnections entre la sévérité des impacts des invasions biologiques et le contexte dans lequel cette invasion intervient. Considérant les impacts des invasions comme “ambivalents” — i.e. pouvant être positifs, négatifs, ou neutres pour le système dans lequel l’invasion s’installe — nous proposons une typologie afin d’évaluer l’ambivalence des impacts, sur la base de l’identification des sources potentielles de variabilité des impacts. Pour le second chapitre, nous nous concentrons sur la mesure de la biodiversité lorsque l’on tient compte des interactions entre espèces, de façon à produire une version de la métaphore de l’Arche de Noé (Weitzman, 1998) mieux adaptée aux problèmes de conservation in situ. Nous montrons tout d’abord que, lorsque l’on tient compte d’interactions écologiques, le problème défini par Weitzman demeure une solution extrême ; et deuxièmement, qu’un renversement de la hiérarchie des espèces préservées est possible et entièrement déterminée par la catégorie des interactions. Dans le troisième chapitre, nous utilisons le cadre de coût-bénéfice in-situ développé dans le chapitre 2 afin de comparer les résultats de priorisation de deux indices de biodiversité, Weitzman et Rao. Ces deux indices combinent différemment l’information sur les probabilités autonomes de survie des espèces, les interactions écologiques et la dissimilitude entre espèces afin de mesurer la biodiversité. Nous analysons des plans simples de protection de la biodiversité pour chaque indice, et démêlons le rôle joué par les différents éléments d’information nécessaires au calcul du ranking par l’indicateur,dans un écosystème à trois espèces. Nous montrons que chaque indice réalise un compromis qui lui est propre entre ces éléments d’information, et que l’introduction d’interactions écologiques entre plus de deux espèces mène à des conclusions plus complexes. Les interactions écologiques donnent ainsi une information additionnelle importante afin de déterminer les objectifs de conservation. Notre dernier chapitre est une adaptation du cadre d’optimisation défini précédemment. Il élabore une règle de décision myope afin de déterminer quelles invasions doivent être contrôlées en priorité, en tenant compte des coûts de gestion relatifs et les impacts trophiques en cascade. Nous discutons le gradient de la fonction d’objectif composé d’une fonction de diversité W et d’une fonction d’utilité U, afin de déterminer si nous devrions conserver plusieurs ou seulement quelques espèces sous une contrainte de budget. / Biological diversity constitutes one of the major pattern of ecosystem functioning, and a potential for adaptation and evolution of life in the context of climate change. As species are in many ways tightly interconnected, biodiversity loss can trigger large cascade effects and might lead to largely unpredictable consequences, reaching far beyond the visible reduction in the number or distribution of species. The high complexity of ecological organization is often a nightmare for decision-making, starting from accurately measuring biodiversity. This is however a necessary step to take if we want to prioritize action in biodiversity management, in order to preserve as much diversity as possible under limited resources. Though this thesis does not pretend to provide complete answers to those quite complex issues, it provides some reflection points for biodiversity management. It is composed of four chapters. The first chapter raises the issue of dealing with a mixed biodiversity, in which invasive species can be guests. It highlights the interconnections between the severity of the impacts of biological invasions and the contexts in which this invasion occurs. Considering invasion impacts as inherently ''ambivalent'' - i.e. good, bad or neutral for the system in which it arrives - we propose a typology to assess ambivalence in impact, based on the identification of potential sources of impact variability. For the second chapter, we focus on the measurement of biodiversity when accounting for species interactions, which we incorporates into the Noah's Arch problem developed by Weitzman (1998). We then derive a general model for ranking in situ conservation projects. We show firstly that, when accounting for ecological interactions, the problem defined by Weitzman is still an extreme solution, and secondly, that a ranking reversal is possible and completely defined by the interaction categories. In the third chapter, we use the in situ cost-benefit framework developed in Chapter 2 to compare the outcomes of two biodiversity indices, Weitzman's and Rao's. Those two indexes combine information about species survival probability, ecological interaction and distinctiveness in a different way to measure biodiversity; We analyze simple biodiversity protection plans for each index, and disentangle the role played by the different data requirement in the rankings, in a three species ecosystem. We show that such pieces of information will come as a trade-off when considered simultaneously in the measure, and that the introduction of ecological interactions among more than two species lead to more complex conclusions. Ecological interactions thus give important additional information to determine conservation objectives. Our last chapter is an adaptation of the previously defined optimization framework for the prioritization of invasive species management. It elaborates a myopic rule to determine which invasions must be controlled in priority, taking into account relative management costs and trophic cascades impacts. We discuss the gradient of the objective function composed of a diversity function W and a utility function U, to see whether we should retain several or only a few species for management under a budget constraint.

Forskning har visat att det finns ett samband mellan anknytningsmönster och konfliktbeteenden där personer med otrygg anknytning oftare använder sig av destruktiva konfliktbeteenden (Dijkstra, Barelds, Ronner, &amp; Nauta, 2017; Feeney &amp; Karantzas, 2017; Fowler &amp; Dillow, 2011). Studiens syfte var dels att undersöka om samma individ använde sig av samma konfliktbeteende i en konflikt med en nuvarande och tidigare partner, samt dels att undersöka sambandet mellan anknytningsmönster och konfliktbeteenden mot både tidigare och nuvarande partner. Deltagarna (N = 48) besvarade ett webbaserat frågeformulär som behandlade generella frågor om deltagaren, konfliktbeteende mot tidigare respektive nuvarande partner, skattning av tidigare respektive nuvarande partners konfliktbeteende samt anknytning till tidigare respektive nuvarande partner. Resultaten visade ett starkt stöd för att kritik som konfliktbeteende användes likvärdigt mot tidigare och nuvarande partner, medan stödet var svagare för konfliktbeteendena förakt, försvar och undandragande. Otrygg undvikande anknytning var en prediktor för undandragande konfliktbeteende mot nuvarande partner, medan även otrygg ambivalent anknytning var en prediktor mot tidigare partner. Mot nuvarande partner var otrygg ambivalent anknytning en prediktor för konfliktbeteendena kritik, förakt och försvar. Mot tidigare partner var även otrygg undvikande anknytning en prediktor för förakt och försvar. Studiens tillämpning och betydelse för framtida forskning diskuteras. / Research has shown that there is a connection between attachment patterns and conflict behaviors, where people with insecure attachment often use destructive conflict behaviors (Dijkstra, Barelds, Ronner, &amp; Nauta, 2017; Feeney &amp; Karantzas, 2017; Fowler &amp; Dillow, 2011). The purpose of the study was to investigate if the same person used the same conflict behaviors if the conflict was with a past or present partner, and to investigate whether there was a connection between attachment patterns and conflict behaviors towards both past and present partners. Participants (N = 48) answered a web-based questionnaire that addressed general questions about participants, conflict behavior towards past and present partners, estimation of past and present partners' conflict behavior, and attachment to past and present partners, respectively. The results showed strong support for criticism being equally used to past and present partners, but weaker support for contempt, defense and stonewalling. Avoidant attachment was a predictor of stonewalling towards both past and present partners, with ambivalent attachment as an additional predictor for past partners. Towards present partners, ambivalent attachment was a predictor of criticism, contempt and defense; towards past partner avoidant attachment was also a predictor of contempt and defense. The study’s application and significance for future research are discussed.

Romantic relationship satisfaction relates to better overall health, and identifying factors that affect relationship satisfaction could lead to better understanding of romantic relationships. This study examined the correlation between benevolent sexism, a subtle form of sexism resembling chivalry and relationship satisfaction; gender, age, ethnicity, religious beliefs, education, and length of time were also considered as moderators. The ambivalent sexism theory, which posits that sexism is ambivalent and ranges from hostile to benevolent sexism was the theoretical framework guiding this study. Previous research indicated benevolent sexism may predict relationship satisfaction. However, there remained an important gap in the literature; the demographic variables above had not been considered as moderators in those analyses. Thus, the purpose of this non-experimental study using data collected from a U.S. sample of adults who had been in romantic relationships for at least 1 year was to determine if such links existed. Correlation and regression analyses revealed that benevolent sexism, measured by the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory did not predict relationship satisfaction, measured by the Relationship Assessment Scale, and none of the demographic variables served as moderators. Results were trending toward significance though, suggesting that benevolent sexism might influence women's relationship satisfaction. Further research using longitudinal, mixed-method studies of dyads is recommended to gain a clearer understanding of this phenomenon. Findings would make important contributions to existing literature and enhance social change by providing professionals and individuals with awareness of how benevolent sexist attitudes may affect relationship satisfaction.