問題意識： 1. 中國大陸對台政策法制化是否是必要性？中國大陸對台政策過去停留在人治的時代，透過各種政治性文件的宣示，顯然從台灣各項反應，並沒有達成中共預期的目標，因此對台政策法制化實有研究的必要性。 2. 反分裂國家法的原因、過程、內容及所產生的效果究竟為何？值得深入的探討。 3. 反分裂國家法在出台時引發軒然大波，但出台後就刻意低調與淡化處理，其間原因值得探究。 4. 探討反分裂國家出台後對於兩岸關係政策走向之探討。 研究價值： 1.從法制化的角度來探討反分裂國家法，有別於過去研究者單就反分裂國家法本身來探討。 2.從中國大陸對台政策法制化前後來探討中國大陸對台政策，以突顯對台政策法制化的重要性，不同於法制化前或法制化後單方面討論。 3.從法律層面與政治層面來探討反分裂國家法這部具有高度政治性的法律，而不是單純一方面來檢視反分裂國家法。 4. 本論文在資料收集上，作者透過親身至北京大學學習的經驗，得到第一手的書面資料，並透過兩岸學者專家之接觸與訪談，以釐清關於反分裂法之諸多爭議問題，不同於在兩岸任一方來看待反分裂國家法。 研究動機： 1. 作者自身個人的興趣與學科背景。 2. 適逢對台政策法制化的關鍵點。 3. 善盡研究者的學術及社會責任 。 4. 不負兩岸求學的機會。 研究目的： 1. 希望能夠瞭解中國大陸對台政策法制化的意義與必要性。 2. 藉由反分裂國家法制訂的動機、過程、內容探討，以瞭解較接近真相的反分裂國家法。 3. 使台灣民眾能真正瞭解中國大陸對於《反分裂國家法》之看法，使助於釐清一些流於政治認同之想當然爾之偏見，對於一些爭議性的條文與不確定的法律概念，能夠有更客觀之學術分析。 4. 透過《反分裂國家法》的研究，以觀察中國大陸對台政策之走向。 研究方法：文獻分析法(Document Analysis)、歷史研究法(Historical Research)、訪談法(Interview Research)。 研究途徑：法律研究途徑〈(Legal Approach)〉、系統理論〈System Theory〉 研究內容：本論文計分六章，約二十五萬餘字。 章節內容： 第一章部份前言，主要討論的問題包括問題緣起與研究價值、研究動機與目的、文獻檢討、研究方法、研究途徑與研究架構、研究設計這其中又包括研究假設、研究範圍與章節安排)、研究限制及概念界定，第一章是本文的核心重點部分。 第二章部分主要探討中國大陸對台政策法制化前之分析，首先在第一節中，探討反分裂國家法出台前中國大陸對台政策；在第二節中，探討反分裂國家法出台前中國大陸對台政策所存在的問題；在第三節中主要探討對台政策法制化的意義。 第三章部分主要探討法制化下中國大陸對台政策，第一節主要探討反分裂國家法的制訂原因與過程；第二節主要討論反分裂國家法的內容；第三節主要探討反分裂國家法的執行與相關問題探討。 第四章部分主要探討反分裂國家法與國際社會反應，在第一節中主要討論西方國家處理國家分裂問題之法制化實例；第二節主要討論國際社會對反分裂國家法出台後的態度；第三節主要討論台、美間的台灣關係法與台、中間的反分裂國家法。 第五章部分主要探討反分裂國家法出台後對台灣的影響分析，在第一節中，探討反分裂國家法的規範意義；第二節中探討反分裂國家法的主要爭點；在第三節主要是對反分裂國家法出台後對台政策走向探討 第六章部分是本文結論，包括研究發現與研究建議。 【關鍵詞】：反分裂國家法、法制化、法律研究途徑、系統理論、一個中國 / Problem Consciousness: 1 Is legislation of Taiwan policy a necessity? The policy towards Taiwan was formerly manipulated by persons in-charge; through enunciation of political vision, but producing less expected clout. It is, therefore, pushing for a more decisive legislation. 2.What is the reason, process, content and effect about 「Anti-Secession Law」? Try to find out the actual answers on causes, involved procedures, content and its repercussion. 3.「Anti-Secession Law」results in discussing and disagreement. But after drawing up, What is the reason why PRC deals with it silently. 4.What is the trending Analysis towards Taiwan of Mainland China? Research Value: 1.Focused the mainly on legislation, lest discussing 「Anti-Secession Law」itself. 2.Expanding both stages: 「Pre- Anti-Secession Law」 and 「Post- Anti-Secession Law」 3.Emplasizing the legal and public 「Anti-Secession Law」, lest the unilateral 「Anti-Secession Law」itself. 4 On Collecting data: By studying in Peking University and personal contacts with experts and scholars of cross-strait relationship. Research Motivation: 1.Presonal interest and academic background. 2. As if on one, it was time where legislation of the Anti-Secession Law and police took place. 3.Research responsibility in academic and social. 4.Opportunity available for the cross-strait study. Study Goal： 1. Understanding Mainland China’s Taiwan policy formulation under the impacts of the legislation ,institutionalization and its means and imperatives. 2. Understanding the actual stage of affairs under the Anti-Secession Law pertaining to its motivation, procedure, and content. 3. Assisting the Taiwan public to have a clearer understandings of the Anti-Secession Law, lest the political bias from its statutory articles. 4.To have a clearer understanding of its logic applied . Study Method：Literature analysis & study method、Historical study method、 Interview method. Study Approach ：Legal Approach、System Theory Content of Study : There are six chapters of the Thesis, in total of about 250000 characters. Key Words: Anti-Secession Law、Legislation、Legal Approach、System Theory、One China

2005年3月14日通過「反分裂國家法」，把廿多年來對台方針政策法律化，不僅上升為國家意志，且規範兩岸關係，使反分裂、維護國家主權領土完整有法可依。中共的「反獨」政策是配合國際戰略，為其「和平崛起」創造穩定的週邊環境，以「爭取談、準備打、不怕拖」作為「反獨」的最高原則。因此，我們可發現，中共制定「反分裂國家法」後，對台是以「底線清晰、彈性務實」與「軟硬兼施、分而治之」為指導方針，更特別強調如何與台灣推展交流合作。所以在對台交流作法上更趨靈活細緻，如釋放選擇性利益，拉攏我特定地域、黨派、階層、行業，以及擴大交流，深化兩岸經貿關係，更強調「主動出撃、區別對待、軟硬兼施、入島入心」，積極推動兩岸交流、給予我國民待遇以及廣邀我青年學子赴大陸交流等等。 本論文共分六章，茲將其內容分述如下： （一）第一章為緒論，主要說明本文的研究動機與目的，相關文獻回顧、研究途徑與研究方法、研究範圍與限制以及研究架構等。 （二）第二章探討中共對台交流策略的環境因素，先以中國大陸內部因素加以分析，再對國際因素以及台灣因素進行探討。 （三）第三章敘述胡錦濤主政下「反分裂國家法」制定之內容與意涵，首先分析胡錦濤主政下對台政策新思維，其次探討「反分裂國家法」之內容及意涵，最後分析「反分裂國家法」之意涵。 （四）第四章是探討中共制定「反分裂國家法」後對台交流策略與作法，首先探討「反分裂國家法」之目標，再討論中共制定「反分裂國家法」後對台交流策略。最後探討中共制定「反分裂國家法」後對台交流作法。 （五）第五章探討中共對台交流策略之評估，如中共在「反分裂國家法」後對台交流作法更趨務實，企圖打開兩岸僵局，並且以國民待遇化爭取民間，以及造成我政府壓力。 （六）第六章結論，探討中共對台交流策略之研究發現與建議，為使台海地區保持和平，應繼續爭取美國的支持以及加強兩岸交流合作。 / Ever since the “Anti-Secession Law” passed on March 14, 2005, it has legalized Taiwan policy in the last twenty years, which has not only elevated national volition but also confined the cross-Straits relations to gain a legal ground for “anti-secession” and to preserve national right and its territorial intact. The “anti-idependence”policy of Chinese Communists is tied in international strategy to create stable surroundings for its “peace initiatives,” and to observe the ultimate principle of “anti-independence” in the context of “negotiation first, ready for war and no fears of prolonging.” Therefore we found out that after Chinese Communists have set their“Anti-Secession Law,”with provided guidelines to treat Taiwan under“clear bottom line, flexible and practical” and “hard and soft play, splitting will rule” principles and a strong emphasis on promoting interexchange collaborations with Taiwan. Therefore the execution of interexchange collaborations with Taiwan are seen rather flexible and thorough in terms of optional interest concerns with an intention to release preferential to certain regions, parties, bureaucracy and industries and expanding interexchange scope, deepening cross-Straits economic relations. Furthermore stressed on the propaganda of “making initiatives, discrepancy treatments, hard and soft play, penetrating island to win hearts” with such aggressive interexchange activity promotions and an offer of national treatment and wide open policy for academics exchange in Mainland China to our youngsters. This thesis contains six chapters and the descriptions of each chapter as follows: A. Chapter One is a preface, which mainly describes research motive and objective of this article, and it includes the related literatures with research channels and methods, scope and limitation and the research restructure. B. Chapter Two is discovering the environmental factors of Taiwan interexchange strategy by the Chinese Communists, first part will analyze the internal factor of Mainland China and then global and Taiwan accordingly. C. Chapter Three describes the contents and meanings of “Anti-Secession Law” led by Hu Jintao, first will be the analysis of new aspirations toward Taiwan by Hu Jintao, second will discuss the contents and meanings of “Anti-Secession Law” and last will be the analysis of the meanings of “Anti-Secession Law.” D. Chapter Four is discussing the Taiwan interexchange strategy and execution of “Anti-Secession Law” set by the Chinese Communists. It will discuss the objective of “Anti-Secession Law” first and then Taiwan interexchange strategy after the setting of “Anti-Secession Law” by the Chinese Communists, finally, it will discuss the implementation of Taiwan interexchange of “Anti-Secession Law” set by the Chinese Communists. E. Cheaper Five is a discussion of Taiwan interexchange strategy assessment by the Chinese Communist such as pragmatic ways of dealing Tawain interexchange after setting “Anti-Secession Law” by the Chinese Communists in order to break the deadlock of the cross-Straits and treat our civil with national treatment to put pressures on our government. F. Chapter Six will be the conclusion of this thesis; the main emphasis will be on exploring the discovery and proposition of Taiwan interexchange strategy research by the Chinese Communist with an objective in maintaining peaceful state of Taiwan Strait and continuously rallying for the support form the United States and reinforce the collaborations of cross-Straits interexchange.