The CB1 cannabinoid receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor highly expressed throughout the central nervous system, that has been suggested as a target for the treatment of various disorders, including anxiety, pain and neurodegeneration. Despite the wide therapeutic potential of CB1, development of potential drug candidates has long been hindered by concerns about adverse effects, rapid tolerance development and abuse potential. Ligands that produce biased signaling have been proposed as a strategy to dissociate therapeutic and adverse effects for a variety of G-protein coupled receptors. Biased signaling involves selective activation of a signaling transducer in detriment of another, mainly involving selective activation of G-protein signaling or b-arrestin signaling. However, biased signaling at the CB1 receptor is poorly understood due to the lack of strongly biased agonists. The development of biased agonists would be aided by understanding the molecular mechanism that leads to biased signaling. Although the structure of CB1 has been resolved in the inactive state and in the canonical active state, which allows G-protein signaling, little is known about the alternative active state that allows b-arrestin biased signaling. Therefore, we set out to investigate molecular and pharmacological tools that could shed light on the mechanism of CB1 biased signaling and to characterize novel allosteric ligands with a biased signaling profile. Using molecular dynamics stimulation of CB1 bound to a ORG27569, an allosteric ligand that stimulates b-arrestin signaling and inhibits G-protein signaling, we proposed single amino acid mutations that were predicted to impact b-arrestin signaling, and expressed wild-type and mutated CB1 receptor in HEK293 cells to measure signaling through different signaling transducers. We found that N7.49 and Y7.53, two amino acids in the highly conserved NPXXY motif, were essential for b-arrestin recruitment and signaling, but mutating them to Ala and Phe, respectively, did not impact G-protein signaling. We also found that I2.43, a functionally conserved amino acid on transmembrane helix 2, negatively regulates a switch in the rotameric position of Y7.53, as mutating I2.43 to Ala reduced steric hindrance upon Y7.53 and enhanced b-arrestin1 recruitment and signaling, while mutating it to Thr, a polar residue that would further hinder Y7.53, partially inhibited b-arrestin recruitment. Therefore, we concluded that N7.49 and Y7.53 form a hydrogen bond network along with D2.50 that is essential for the alternative active state that stimulates b-arrestin biased signaling. N7.49 acts as a fulcrum on which transmembrane helix 7 can bend, and Y7.53 acts as a rotamer toggle switch, stabilizing conformational changes on the intracellular end of transmembrane helix 7. This is the first record of a molecular mechanism for CB1 b-arrestin biased signaling involving the NPXXY motif. Due to the highly conserved character of these residues, it is possible that this mechanism can also be applied to other class A G-protein coupled receptors. In addition, we characterized novel biased allosteric ligands that stimulate or inhibit b-arrestin1 signaling. Two ORG27569 analogs were found to enhance orthosteric agonist induced b-arrestin1 recruitment and extracellular-signal regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation (pERK), with no effect on G-protein signaling. Two pregnenolone analogs absent of the steroid scaffold were found to inhibit pERK signaling independent of Gprotein signaling, indicating that they hinder b-arrestin dependent signaling. Since these analogs are believed to mediate their effects via stimulation or inhibition of conformational changes on transmembrane helix 7, our findings support a role for this domain on the alternative active state of CB1. In contrast, a GAT211 analog, GAT1601, had no effect on recruitment of b-arrestin1, but stimulated G-protein signaling and slightly enhanced barrestin2 recruitment. This compound binds to an allosteric site, where it stimulates the canonical active state of CB1 by facilitating the outward movement of transmembrane helix 6. Altogether, the results presented in this dissertation suggest that CB1 b-arrestin biased signaling is regulated by the NPXXY motif, which stimulates conformational changes on the transmembrane helix 7/helix 8 elbow, and that stimulating or hindering these conformational changes can enhance or disrupt CB1 b-arrestin biased signaling. However, facilitating the movement of transmembrane helix 6 favors G-protein biased signaling. Our findings provide molecular and pharmacological tools that will be of great importance to structure guided drug design and to future studies on the functional consequences of biased signaling at the CB1 receptor.

L'angiotensine II (Ang II) joue un rôle important dans la régulation du système cardiovasculaire par l’activation de plusieurs voies de signalisation. L’activation de ces voies passe par le récepteur de l'angiotensine II de type 1 (AT1R). Ce récepteur fait partie de la famille des récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (GPCRs). De plus, il est maintenant connu que certains ligands peuvent lier le récepteur et induire une conformation qui permet d'activer certaines voies de signalisation tout en n’étant pas favorable à l'activation d'autres voies. Il est alors question de sélectivité fonctionnelle, aussi appelée signalisation biaisée. Ainsi, avec cette approche, il est possible de cibler les voies qui produiront les effets thérapeutiques désirés sans toutefois activer les voies qui seraient responsables des effets indésirables. Nous avons émis l’hypothèse que de cycliser des ligands va restreindre les conformations possibles lors du couplage avec AT1R et induire un agonisme biaisé. Ainsi, des analogues cycliques de l’AngII substitués aux positions 3 et 5 par des cystéines et des homocystéines ont été synthétisés: [Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII, [Sar1Cys3Hcy5]AngII et [Sar1Cys3,5]AngII. D’abord, la capacité de ces analogues cycliques à activer la voie Gq a été évaluée par la mesure de la production des inositol phosphates. Puis, la capacité à activer les voies G12, le recrutement des β-arrestines (1 et 2) ainsi que l’activation de ERK1/2 a également été évaluée. Nos travaux ont montré que l’analogue cyclique [Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII a une puissance et une efficacité maximales sur toutes les voies testées à l'exception de la voie Gq. Des simulations de dynamique moléculaire ont été effectuées pour nous permettre de comprendre comment la conformation du ligand influence la structure d’AT1R et donc l’activation des différentes voies de signalisation. Les simulations en dynamique moléculaire ont montré que la barrière énergétique associée à l'insertion du résidu Phe8 de l’AngII dans le coeur hydrophobe d'AT1R est augmentée avec [Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII, pouvant expliquer que cet analogue active moins bien la voie Gq. D’autres analogues cyclisés aux positions 3 et 5 de l’AngII ont été synthétisés; [Sar1Hcy3Ile4Hcy5]AngII, [Sar1Hcy3,5Ile8]AngII et [Sar1Hcy3Cys5]AngII. Leur capacité à activer les voies Gq, ERK1/2 et le recrutement des β-arrestines (1 et 2) a été évaluée. L’analogue [Sar1Hcy3Cys5]AngII semblait bien activer la voie ERK1/2, mais pas les voies G12 et β-arrestines. Ces résultats suggèrent que le fait de contraindre les mouvements des déterminants moléculaires d’un ligand en introduisant des structures cycliques peut entraîner un biais dans la signalisation en stabilisant différentes structures du récepteur. / Abstract: Angiotensin II (Ang II) has an important role in the regulation of the cardiovascular system by its ability to activate several signaling pathways. The activation of these pathways occurs via the angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R). This receptor belongs to the family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Moreover, it is now known that certain ligands can bind to the receptor and induce a conformation that allow the activation of certain signaling pathways while not promoting the activation of other pathways. This concept is known as functional selectivity or biased signaling. With this approach, it is possible to target the signaling pathways that produce the desired therapeutic effects rather than activating the pathways responsible for adverse effects. We hypothesized that cyclizing ligands would restrict possible conformations when coupled with AT1R and induce biased agonism. Thus, cyclic AngII analogs substituted at positions 3 and 5 by cysteines and homocysteines were synthesized: [Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII, [Sar1Cys3Hcy5]AngII and [Sar1Cys3,5]AngII. First, the ability of these cyclic analogs to activate the Gq pathway was measured by the inositol phosphates production. Then, the G12 pathway activation, β-arrestin (1 and 2) recruitment and the ability of these analogs to activate the ERK1/2 pathway was evaluated. Our work has shown that [Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII has maximum potency and efficacy on all of the evaluated pathways, except for the Gq pathway. Molecular dynamic simulations were used to understand how a distinct ligand conformation influences the AT1R structure and the activation of signaling pathways. These studies have shown that the energy barrier associated with the insertion of the Phe8residue of AngII within the hydrophobic core of AT1R is increased with [Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII, possibly explaining why this analog is less potent in activating the Gq pathway. Other analogues cyclized at positions 3 and 5 of AngII were synthesized; [Sar1Hcy3Ile4Hcy5]AngII, [Sar1Hcy3,5Ile8]AngII and [Sar1Hcy3Cys5]AngII. Their ability to activate Gq, ERK1/2 and recruitment of β-arrestins (1 and 2) was evaluated. The analog [Sar1Hcy3Cys5]AngII appeared to activate the ERK1/2 pathway but not the G12 and β-arrestin pathways. These results suggest that constraining the movements of molecular determinants of a ligand by introducing cyclic structures can lead to a signaling bias by stabilizing different structures of the receptor.

Résumé : La signalisation biaisée représente la capacité des récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPG) d'engager des voies de signalisation distinctes avec des efficacités variables selon le ligand utilisé ou la mutation dans le récepteur. Un meilleur contrôle des voies activées ou inhibées par des médicaments pourrait permettre de réduire leurs effets indésirables. Malheureusement, les mécanismes structuraux impliqués dans la transmission du signal à travers la membrane plasmique par l'entremise des RCPG sont peu connus, ce qui limite le développement rationnel de nouvelles molécules ciblant des voies de signalisation particulières. Le récepteur de type 1 à l'angiotensine II (AT[indice inférieur 1]), un RCPG de classe A prototypique, peut activer différents effecteurs suite à sa stimulation par le ligand endogène angiotensine II (AngII), incluant la protéine G[indice inférieur q/11] et les β-arrestines. Il est suggéré que l'activation de ces deux voies de signalisation peut être associée à des conformations différentes du récepteur AT[indice inférieur 1]. Pour vérifier cette hypothèse, nous avons utilisé des simulations de dynamique moléculaire afin d'explorer les interactions et les mouvements qui définissent le paysage conformationnel du récepteur AT[indice inférieur 1]. De plus, nous avons vérifié comment était modifié le paysage conformationnel par des mutations (N111G, N111W et D74N) et des ligands (AngII et [Sar[indice supérieur 1], Ile[indice supérieur 8]]AngII) ayant des profils signalétiques différents pour la voie de la protéine G[indice inférieur q/11] et la voie des β-arrestines. Les résultats obtenus nous éclairent sur le rôle d'un réseau de ponts hydrogène entre des résidus polaires conservés au coeur du récepteur dont font partie les résidus N111[indice supérieur 3.35] et D74[indice supérieur 2.50]. Les résultats révèlent la présence d'un groupe de résidus hydrophobes juste au-dessus du réseau de ponts hydrogène et adjacent à la pochette de liaison du récepteur qui semble important pour la stabilisation de l'état inactif du récepteur ainsi que pour son activation par un ligand. Dans l'ensemble, les résultats suggèrent que l'activation de la voie de la protéine G[indice inférieur q/11] est associée avec une transition conformationnelle spécifique stabilisée par l'agoniste alors que l'activation de la voie des β-arrestines est associée à une stabilisation de l'état de repos du récepteur. / Abstract: Biased signaling represents the ability of G protein-coupled receptors to engage distinct pathways with various efficacies depending on the ligand used or on mutations in the receptor. Having better control over the signaling pathways activated or inhibited by drugs could lead to fewer undesirable effects. Unfortunately, the structural mechanisms involved in the transmission of signal across the cell membrane through the receptors are poorly understood, which limits the rational development of new molecules targetting specific signaling pathways. The angiotensin-II type 1 (AT[subscript 1]) receptor, a prototypical class A G protein-coupled receptor, can activate various effectors upon stimulation with the endogenous ligand angiotensin-II (AngII), including the G[subscript q/11] protein and β-arrestins. It is believed that the activation of those two pathways can be associated with distinct conformations of the AT[subscript 1] receptor. To verify this hypothesis, microseconds of molecular dynamics simulations were computed to explore interactions and movements that define the conformational landscape of the AT[subscript 1] receptor. We have also verified how this conformational landscape is modified by mutations (N111G, N111W, D74N) and ligands (AngII, [Sar[superscript 1]Ile[superscript 8]]AngII) that have different signaling properties on the G[subscript q/11] pathway and the β-arrestin pathway. The results provide a better understanding of the role of a hydrogen bond network formed of conserved polar residues in the receptor core which include residues N111[superscript 3.35] and D74[superscript 2.50]. The results also reveal the existence of a cluster of hydrophobic residues located right above the hydrogen bonds network and adjacent to the binding pocket that appears important for the stabilization of the ground state of the receptor as well as its ligand-induced activation. As a whole, the results suggest that activation of the G[supbscript q/11] pathway is associated with a specific conformational transition stabilized by the agonist, whereas the activation of the β-arrestin pathway is linked to the stabilization of the ground state of the receptor.

Le récepteur de chimiokine CXCR3 est un récepteur couplé à la protéine G (RCPG) exprimé, entre autre, sur les cellules T activées lors d’une réponse immune. CXCR3 est activé par trois ligands inductibles par l’interféron-γ (CXCL9, 10, 11) et, plus récemment, il a été découvert que CXCL4 liait CXCR3. Nous savons que CXCR3 joue un rôle dans la chimiotaxie des leucocytes, mais peu d’attention a été portée sur la signalisation biaisée induite par ces quatre ligands. Alors que l’homodimérisation entre récepteurs de chimiokine est un concept grandement observé, l’hétéromérisation entre deux récepteurs reste un domaine de recherche active. La signalisation biaisée et l’hétéromérisation ont été testées grâce à la technique de bioluminescene resonance energy transfer (BRET) dans des cellules HEK293E. Nous présentons une caractérisation pharmacologique des quatre ligands de CXCR3 et démontrons l’hétéromérisation de CXCR3 avec CXCR4 et avec CXCR7. Nos résultats suggèrent que les ligands de CXCR3 n’agissent pas de manière redondante. / The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) rapidly induced on naïve T cells upon activation. CXCR3 is activated by three interferon-γ inducible ligands (CXCL9, 10, 11) and, more recently, CXCL4 has been discovered as a functional ligand for CXCR3. It is known that CXCR3 acts as a chemotactic receptor, but limited attention has been directed to the biased signaling induced by all four ligands. Chemokine receptor homodimerization is now a widely accepted concept, but the extent to which heterodimerization is prevalent remain matter of active research. In this work, biased signalling and heterodimerization were assessed with bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) in HEK293E cells. We present pharmacological characterization of all four ligands of CXCR3 and heterodimerization of CXCR3 with CXCR4 or CXCR7. Our results suggest that CXCR3 ligands are not redundant and that CXCR3 heterodimerizes with CXCR4 and with CXCR7.

No description available.

Src family kinases (SFKs) are key regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The expression of these non-receptor tyrosine kinases is strongly correlated with cancer development and tumor progression. Thus, this family of proteins serves as an attractive drug target. The activation of SFKs can occur via multiple signaling pathways, yet many of them are poorly understood. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)- mediated regulation of SFKs, which is of considerable interest because GPCRs are among the most widely used pharmaceutical targets. This type of activation can occur through a direct interaction between the two proteins or be allosterically regulated by arrestins and G proteins. We postulate that a rearrangement of binding motifs within the active conformation of arrestin-3 mediates Src regulation by comparison of available crystal structures. Therefore, we hypothesize a potentially different activation mechanism compared to arrestin-2. Furthermore, we discuss the probable direct regulation of SFK by GPCRs and investigate the intracellular domains of exemplary GPCRs with conserved polyproline binding motifs that might serve as scaffolding domains to allow such a direct interaction. Large intracellular domains in GPCRs are often understudied and, in general, not much is known of their contribution to different signaling pathways. The suggested direct interaction between a GPCR and a SFK could allow for a potential immediate allosteric regulation of SFKs by GPCRs and thereby unravel a novel mechanism of SFK signaling. This overview will help to identify new GPCR–SFK interactions, which could serve to explain biological functions or be used to modulate downstream effectors.